Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Current practicies in the recognition of qualifications awarded by joint programmes Hanna Reczulska Graz, 11 June 2010.
Advertisements

JOINT DEGREES The Experience of the ENIC and NARIC Networks Dr. E. Stephen Hunt Manager, USNEI and President, ENIC Network ECA Team II Conference Joint.
Recognition, ECTS and Grade Conversion Andy Gibbs Erasmus Coordinators Workshop June 2012.
Work on the Council of Europe/UNESCO Recommendation on the recognition of joint degrees Bologna follow-up Workshop Joint degrees – further development,
BFUG Work Program on QA Agenda Gayane Harutyunyan Basel,
Ministry of Science, Innovation and Higher Education Emne og dato Sted Navn ENIC/NARIC networks: role and activities ENIC/NARIC networks: networks cooperating.
The Project, the Work of the UK NARIC, and the EU Networks Dr Cloud Bai-Yun 8 th May 2006, Sofia.
For education and learning JOINT DEGREES AND THE LISBON RECOGNITION CONVENTION (LRC) Dr. Carita Blomqvist, Head of Unit Recognition and International Comparability.
Corruption prevention in respect of judges and prosecutors - GRECO in the midst of its fourth evaluation round Christian Manquet, Vice-President of GRECO.
Changes in the educational system- Implementation of Bologna Oslo October 2009.
For learning and competence Practical aspects of the Lisbon Recognition Convention UNICA Admission and Credential Evaluation University of Lausanne April.
Bregenz, Austria 7 June 2015 Shaping our future: higher education helping create the society we want Gayane Harutyunyan.
1 Education in Europe: Quality Enhancement and Setting Standards Dr Marie Donaghy Head of School of Health Sciences.
Delegations ICM Cluj-Napoca, 20th April The European Law Students’ Association Albania ˙ Austria ˙ Azerbaijan ˙ Belgium ˙ Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Delegations III KAM, Bratislava 4th to 8th September 2013.
The role of European standards and guidelines for the development of the national system of independent assessment of the quality of higher education Seidakhmetova.
Institutional Visits IV KAM Prague, 3 rd to 7th September.
Delegations IV KAM Prague 3rd to 7th September 2014.
Institutional Visits III KAM, Bratislava 4th to 8th September 2013.
Universities UK How will the Bologna Process and EU initiatives affect higher education worldwide? Diana Warwick 1.
IS Studies Accreditation: Problems and Challenges Janice C. Sipior, Ph.D. Professor of MIS Department of Accountancy & IS Villanova School of Business.
Development and Evaluation of Joint Study Programmes Almantas Šerpatauskas Center for Quality Assessment in Higher Education.
European Quality Assurance Register for Higher Education Quality Assurance in the Bologna Process Colin Tück St Paul’s Bay, 22 June 2015 Peer Expert Training.
BFUG Work Program on QA Agenda Gayane Harutyunyan Astana, Kazakhstan Ensuring quality higher education is one of the most important.
Higher Education and Research Council of Europe September 2006.
Recognition: the national centre and the ENIC Network Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian.
Recognition: General Overview and Latest Developments Gunnar Vaht Estonian ENIC/NARIC (Archimedes Foundation)
Improving the recognition system Prof. Andrejs Rauhvargers President, Lisbon Convention Committee.
Bologna Process after Bucharest: Challenges and expectations BFUG Work Plan Gayane Harutyunyan Bologna Secretariat Split, Croatia June 17-18,
1, avenue Léon-Journault Sèvres - France Centre international d’études pédagogiques.
Erasmus+ Work together with European higher education institutions Erasmus+
ELSA Summer Law Schools IV KAM Prague, 3rd to 7th September 2014.
Erasmus+ Work together with European higher education institutions Erasmus+
The Project, the Work of the UK NARIC and the EU Networks [add Name] [add Date]
LISBON RECOGNITION CONVENTION (LRC) POST 2010 Dr. Carita Blomqvist, Head of Unit Recognition and International Comparability of Qualifications Finnish.
Recognition 2010: the recognition agenda for the EHEA Bologna seminar Riga, 3-4 December 2004 Gunnar Vaht President of the ENIC Network
STRENGTHENING OF INTERNATIONALISATION IN B&H HIGHER EDUCATION / STINT FMON’s competencies, organization, role in the project, expectations from the project.
Recognition issue in the Bologna Process: from London to Leuven/Louvain-la-Neuve Kevin Guillaume NARIC-French Community of Belgium DG non compulsory education.
 The purpose of the Bologna Process (or Bologna Accords) is to create the European Higher Education Area by making academic degree standards and quality.
Academic and professional recognition in Europe International legal framework Workshop: Boosting quality: International Credential Evaluation and Higher.
Strengthening of Internationalization in B&H Higher Education Banja Luka, Recognition of Qualifications within European Higher Education.
Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Qualification Recognition Policy Merima Baraković University of Tuzla Banja Luka/March, 8th.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
1 Presentation 2 Dr Declan Kennedy, Department of Education, University College Cork, Ireland. Ireland.
Assessment and recognition of foreign qualifications in Estonia Gunnar Vaht Estonian ENIC/NARIC 2016.
Transparency Tools Questionnaire
Recognition of Distance Learning Programmes
CES Road Map on statistics for SDGs
The Lisbon Recognition Convention: Outlining the Idea and its Implementation in 50 Countries Allan Bruun Pedersen – Danish Agency for Higher Education.
International credit mobility with partner countries
Work on the Council of Europe/UNESCO Recommendation on the recognition of joint degrees Bologna follow-up Workshop Joint degrees – further development,
TOWARDS THE YEREVAN 2015 MINISTERIAL CONFERENCE: A NEW AGENDA FOR THE EHEA Hayk Sargsyan 11 March 2015 Moscow, Russian Federation.
Erasmus+ Work together with European higher education institutions
Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian ENIC/NARI Baku, 2017
Gunnar Vaht 2016 Lisbon Recognition Convention and its Implementation in the Ratifying Countries Gunnar Vaht
Erasmus+ Work together with European higher education institutions
Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education
Senior project leader at CIEP Former President of ENQA
The Malta Qualifications Framework (MQF)
Introduction to the training
the European Qualifications Framework (EQF)
Quality assurance of higher education in the European Higher Education Area - developments and ways forward Paula Ranne, Deputy Director European Association.
Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education
Working Group on Recognition of Academic Qualifications
Recognition of Qualifications as a stepping stone for further integration Brussels, 26 June 2018.
Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Armenia
International Legal Instruments
Thinking and acting globally The role of recognition, quality assurance and qualifications frameworks for student and talent mobility: challenges and opportunities.
Thinking and acting globally The role of recognition, quality assurance and qualifications frameworks for student and talent mobility: challenges and opportunities.
National Correspondents for Qualifications Frameworks (QF-EHEA)
Presentation transcript:

Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Recognition of Foreign Qualifications Concerning Further Education – The European Approach and Methodology of Creation of the Manual for HEIs Dženan Omanović Centre for Information and Recognition of Qualifications in Higher Education Bihac/6 September 2016 Project number: 561874-EPP-1-2015-1-BE-EPPKA2-CBHE-SP   "This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein"

Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education ENIC/NARIC Networks Two networks for the same objective  fair recognition! NARIC network Established in 1984: National Academic Recognition Information Centres in the European Union created by the European Commission ENIC network Established in 1997: European Network of National Information Centres on academic recognition and mobility created by the Council of Europe and UNESCO to implement the Lisbon Recognition Convention and to develop policy and practice for the recognition of qualifications Networks supported by Three Secretariats  European Commission, Council of Europe and UNESCO ENIC Bureau and NARIC Advisory Board  to reinforce the role of the Networks (re-elected every 2 years, members are elected at the anual Joint Meeting of the ENIC/NARIC Networks)

Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education ENIC/NARIC Networks Centres NARIC Auatria Belgium Bulgaria Croatia Czech Republic Cyprus Denmark Estonia Finland France Germania Greece Hungary Ireland Island Italy Latvia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Romania Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain Sweden United Kingdom Centres ENIC Albania Andorra Armenia Australia Azerbaijan Belarus Bosnia and Herzegovina Canada Georgia Holy See Israel Kazakhstan Moldova Monaco Montenegro New Zealand Russian Federation San Marino Serbia Switzerland The Former Yugoslavia Republic Macedonia Turkey Ukranie USA

Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Purposes of Networks The two networks work together to enhance mobility and improve academic recognition of diplomas by : Sharing information on the educational systems of the member countries Sharing information on foreign educational systems, diplomas and degrees issued in countries of other regions Sharing and disseminating good recognition practice in line with the principles of the Lisbon Recognition Convention (LRC) But, the scope of work of the centers may be different from one country to another

Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Purposes of Networks Very efficient and performing networks: Annual networks meetings Cooperation/participation in common projects Funding by European Commission, the Council of Europe and UNESCO Trust as basis for the networks! AND common information and communication tools!

Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Purposes of Networks ENICs and NARICs = main provider of authoritative information User-oriented, including individuals, HEIs, QAAs, public authorities, etc. Might be the recognition competent authority Contribute to policy developments Have the appropriate resources (staff, ICTs, documentation, etc.) But still great diversity in terms of competences (information vs. recognition), outcomes (advice vs. decision), structures (agency-like vs. ministerial dpt.), scope (technical vs. policy) and resources

Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Purposes of Networks Starting point = share information and increase cooperation 1999: development of a common website and ListServers, under the coordination of the ELCORE Group ELCORE Group oversees the operations of the ENIC-NARIC Website and the ListServers and develop proposals 2012-2014: decision to review completely the website With EU funded-project led by Italian NARIC, CIMEA With the monitoring/decision of the ELCORE Group Objectives: to develop a content management tool; to modernise the visual identity; to design and manage a new structure and content; to answer the needs of all stakeholders Official launch in June 2014: www.enic-naric.net

Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Purposes of Networks web pages of the interest www.enic-naric.net www.conventions.coe.int www.ec.europa.eu/education/tools/naric_en.htm www.eacea.ec.europa.eu/llp/project_reports/project_reports_naric_en.php www.ehea.org www.eurorecognition.eu

Recognition and Bologna Process Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Recognition and Bologna Process Recognition has been at the heart of the Bologna Process (BP) since its inception Lisbon Recognition Convention (LRC) as only binding text of the BP Strategic objective to make ‘full’ mobility as a reality Diversification of HE systems, institutions and programmes Thus, recognition as main outcome of the structural reforms and main instrument for an ‘open’ EHEA Thus, need to re-think recognition at systemic level, not individual level (no more equivalence, nostrification, etc.)

Recognition and Bologna Process Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Recognition and Bologna Process Unfortunately, recognition is still at the heart of the Bologna Process Main obstacles for mobility Common agreement but different interpretation on the main principles for recognition, despite the LRC Diversity in recognition approaches/practices Some ‘protectionist’ attitudes Recognition is seen as technical issue, not policy-related Thus, (automatic?) recognition should remain a main objective of the Bologna Process Thus, again in 2015, through the Yerevan Communiqué, the European ministers committed themselves to recognition

Recognition and Bologna Process Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Recognition and Bologna Process Yerevan Communiqué Documents adopted The revised Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG) The European Approach for Quality Assurance of Joint Programmes The revised ECTS Users’ Guide, as an official EHEA document

Recognition and Bologna Process Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Recognition and Bologna Process Yerevan Communiqué Documents adopted Revised ESG 1.4 Student admission, progression, recognition and certification Standard: Institutions should consistently apply pre-defined and published regulations covering all phases of the student “life cycle”, e.g. student admission, progression, recognition and certification. Guidelines (part of 1.4): Fair recognition of higher education qualifications, periods of study and prior learning, including the recognition of non-formal and informal learning, are essential components for ensuring the students’ progress in their studies, while promoting mobility. Appropriate recognition procedures rely on: - institutional practice for recognition being in line with the principles of the Lisbon Recognition Convention; - cooperation with other institutions, quality assurance agencies and the national ENIC/NARIC centre with a view to ensuring coherent recognition across the country.

Recognition and Bologna Process Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Recognition and Bologna Process Yerevan Communiqué Commitments (provisions concerning recognition) to review national legislations with a view to fully complying with the Lisbon Recognition Convention, reporting to the Bologna Secretariat by the end of 2016, and asking the Convention Committee, in cooperation with the ENIC and NARIC Networks, to prepare an analysis of the reports by the end of 2017, taking due account of the monitoring of the Convention carried out by the Convention Committee to remove obstacles to the recognition of prior learning for the purposes of providing access to higher education programmes and facilitating the award of qualifications on the basis of prior learning, as well as encouraging higher education institutions to improve their capacity to recognize prior learning

Lisbon Recognition Convention Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Lisbon Recognition Convention The Lisbon Recognition Convention (LRC) was adopted and opened for signatures in Lisbon on April 11th 1997. In the years following the adoption of the LRC, subsidiary texts were added, in order to give more detailed recommendations and to serve as guidance for institutions and credential evaluators. The LRC has a central position in policy and political initiatives regarding recognition in the European region. The LRC forms the basis of and sets standards for recognition procedures in the European region. The LRC lays down the fundamental principles of the fair recognition of qualifications and periods of study.

Lisbon Recognition Convention Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Lisbon Recognition Convention The main recognition documents The Convention on the Recognition of Qualifications concerning Higher Education in the European Region (Lisbon Recognition Convention) (1997) Recommendation on Criteria and Procedures for the Assessment of Foreign Qualifications and Explanatory Memorandum (2001, revised in 2010) Joint ENIC/NARIC Charter of Activities and Services  (2004) Recommendation on the Use of Qualifications Frameworks in the Recognition of Foreign Qualifications (2013) All documents, unofficial translated, can be found at the web page of the Centre: http://www.cip.gov.ba/index.php/en/lisbon-convention

Lisbon Recognition Convention Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Lisbon Recognition Convention Spirit and main principles of the LRC: Reinforcing education as a human right Promoting academic mobility Respecting institutional autonomy Fair assessment of foreign qualifications No discrimination Recognition of qualifications and periods of study in a flexible way (only substantial differences should lead to partial recognition) Existence of a national information centre Possibility to appeal

Academic Recognition Procedures in Practice Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Academic Recognition Procedures in Practice The most students apply directly to the higher education institution of their choice and thus enter the institutional admissions process. Academic recognition may take place at various levels within a higher education institution. In countries with an active national recognition information centre, it may be possible for admissions officers to ask such a centre for information on a particular foreign qualification, or even for a written evaluation. Such services are also provided by commercial organizations operating on an international basis. Admissions officers may do their own research into the foreign qualification, by using the information tools available on the Internet or in printed form, and by using the expertise already available at their institution.

European Recognition Manual for HEI Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education European Recognition Manual for HEI This manual is the result of the European Area of Recognition – A Manual for the Higher Education Institutions (EAR HEI) project. The ‘EAR HEI’ manual is based on the European Area of Recognition (EAR) manual published in 2012 recommended by the ministers of Higher Education of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) in the Bologna Bucharest Communiqué (April 2012). Manual aimed to assist credential evaluators and admissions officers in higher education institutions in practicing fair recognition. It is the only European recognition manual for credential evaluators and admissions officers that presents commonly agreed – upon best practice based on the Lisbon Recognition Convention.

Content of European Recognition Manual for HEI Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Content of European Recognition Manual for HEI Manual consists of six parts + an overview of the main sources and references used per chapter and an index, each part building further on the other parts. Every part has got flowchart + recommendations + practical examples The firts part (Intoduction to Recognition) provides better understanding of recognition by discussing the legal framework, recognition structures and diversity in recognition procedures and education systems. The second part (The Evaluation Process) discusses the aspects to be taken into account in the evaluation process: - the accreditation and quality assurance of the institution that awarded the qualification; - verifying the authenticity of the qualification; - determining the purpose of recognition; - establishing the learning outcomes of the degree programme; - considering the credits and grades obtained; - recognizing the qualification unless there is a substantial difference and lastly; - if applicable, granting partial recognition and providing the right of the applicant to appeal against the decision.

Content of European Recognition Manual for HEI Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Content of European Recognition Manual for HEI The third part (Institutional Recognition Practices) focuses on what is needed for the recognition process to run smoothly and to be fair. The fourth part (Information Instruments), provides the sources to be used in the evaluation process. Part five (Specific Types of Qualifications) presents specific types of qualifications that may be encountered in the recognition process, such as joint degrees and qualifications that involve flexible learning paths or transnational education. Part six is reserved for recommendations regarding periods of study abroad. Unlike the previous chapters dealing with diploma mobility, this part considers credit mobility.

Conclusion to the EAR HEI Manual Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Conclusion to the EAR HEI Manual Trust, trust and trust! Recognition is not only a technical issue but should be at the centre of HE policies as well as HEI policies Link recognition developments with other policy areas, mainly qualifications frameworks, quality assurance and especially mobility Make use of the cooperation with other regions and countries

GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS based on EAR HEI Manual Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS based on EAR HEI Manual It is urgent for all authorities to harmonize their regulations with LRC; Term "nostrification" should be phased out because it is directly opposite to the LRC; Recognition procedures should be transparent, simplified with clear steps, documents, criteria, responsibilities and rights; Recognition rules and procedures should be available to applicants (most preferable on the web page of the recognition bodies; Foreign qualifications shall be recognized unless there is a substantial difference; Recognition fees shouldn't be higher than the real costs for carrying out recognition procedures The right to appeal against the decision shoud be guaranteed for all applicants.

Work package 2 Recognition mechanisms Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Work package 2 Recognition mechanisms Description This WP aims to develop a B&H recognition model for Higher Education institutions for practising fair recognition according to the principles of the Lisbon Recognition Convention, its subsidiary documents, latest EAR HEI Manual and the UNESCO Recommendation on the Recognition of Studies and Qualifications in Higher Education. Tasks - Education of B&H partners for recognition model, - Development of B&H recognition model, - Comparative analysis between BH partners of all documents developed within this WP Leading Organization Centre for Information and Recognition of Qualifications in Higher Education

What has been already done (concerning recognition model) Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Work package 2 Strategic internationalization and recognition mechanisms What has been already done (concerning recognition model) Glossary of the most used recognition terms was done and published at the official web page of the Project (http://stint-project.net/pages/publications-project) ; Questionnaire Recognition of Qualifications at Public Higher Education Institutions in BiH was done (in English), translated (by Higher Education Accreditation Agency of Republika Srpska) and sent to higher education institutions;

What should be done (Proposed by Centre) Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education Work package 2 Strategic internationalization and recognition mechanisms What should be done (Proposed by Centre) Analysing of the fulfilled Questionnaire "Recognition of Qualifications at Public Higher Education Institutions„ by the representatives of the Centre, Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Srpska and the University of Sarajevo (...); Creating of the comprehensive SWOT analysis; Development of the Recognition Model; Discussing the proposed Recognition Model by all partners.

MAIN OBSTACLE (S) TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF RECOGNITION MODEL Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education MAIN OBSTACLE (S) TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF RECOGNITION MODEL Harmonization of legislation will not be done during a "Project life; ??

Strengthening of Internationalisation in B&H Higher Education ...and finally.... END THANK YOU 