Evaluation of Indiana's Pilot Public Pre-Kindergarten Program: First Year Results James Elicker, Katrina Schmerold, David Purpura, Sara Schmitt, Amy Napoli,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Highlights of Preschool for Californias Children: Promising Benefits, Unequal Access (PACE Policy Brief, September 2004)
Advertisements

Eight Week Intervention Program for Preschool Children Prior to Kindergarten Entry Board of Early Education and Care December 8, 2009.
Presented by: Mary LindseyDabaram Rampersad Marsha BlackDonna Kmetz Brenda Brinson HIPPY Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters.
Judith J. Carta, Ph.D. Juniper Gardens Children’s Project University of Kansas with help from Elaine Carlson, WESTAT.
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
Massachusetts Early Care and Education and School Readiness Study
Kindergarten Readiness:
And the children in the apple tree Further poetic findings from the Union County Longitudinal Study
Child Care Quality and Children’s Development in Indiana Low Income Working Families James Elicker, Carolyn Clawson, & Soo-Young Hong Purdue University.
Associations between Child Care Quality & Developmental Outcomes of Children in Low Income Working Families in Four Communities James Elicker, Soo-Young.
Supporting PreK Teachers During Act 3 Implementation.
This research was supported by: U.S. Department of Education (U411B110098) and private-sector matched funds from 20 funders and foundations The Human Capital.
GEORGIA’S PRE-K PROGRAM Bright from the Start: Georgia Department of Early Care and Learning Marsha H. Moore, Commissioner.
LOOKING AT QUALITY PROGRAMS AND CHILDREN KATHY R. THORNBURG ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER EARLY AND EXTENDED LEARNING Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary.
EEC Board Policy and Research Committee Meeting April 7, 2014 Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge Grant (RTT-ELC)
Welcome! Provider Network Meeting August 19, 2009.
Early Childhood Education The Research Evidence Deborah Lowe Vandell December 11, 2003.
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
What is Title 1? O It is a federal formula grant. O It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
Council for Exceptional Children/Division of Early Childhood Conference October 2010 Kim Carlson, Asst. Director/619 Coordinator Ohio Department of Education.
+ Third Party Evaluation – Interim Report Presentation for Early Childhood Advisory Council December 19, 2013.
Does Reading First Work? Feng-Yi Hung, Ph.D. Director of Assessment and Program Evaluation Clover Park School District.
V v References 1. Ladd, G. W., Birch, H. S., & Buhs, E. S. (1999). Children's Social and Scholastic Lives in Kindergarten: Related Spheres of Influence?
Closing the Gap in the School Readiness of Low-Income Children Jean I. Layzer Carolyn J. Layzer February 11, 2009.
Early Childhood Profiles: Joe Roberts & Elizabeth Whitehouse Governor’s Office of Early Childhood.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Massachusetts Universal Pre- Kindergarten Program Evaluation of the First Two Years of the Pilot Initiative Alyssa Rulf Fountain Barbara Goodson September.
Jefferson County Public Schools Kindergarten Readiness Camps Kentucky Joint House/Senate Education Committee November 9, 2015.
PRESCHOOL PROMISE EARLY LEARNING UPDATE April 14, 2016 David Mandell, Early Learning Division.
Early Childhood Feasibility Study Presented by Early Childhood Feasibility Committee Members Eileen F. Swan, parent Amy Lupoli, parent Alisa Ruggiero,
Diapers to Diplomas Preschool Study Group April 10, 2014.
The Effects of High Quality Early Childhood Education.
ACHIEVING COMPREHENSIVE EARLY CARE & EDUCATION IN ALEXANDRIA: VPI’S ROLE / MIXED DELIVERY APPROACH Early Childhood Innovation Symposium June 6, 2016 –
Summer Learning Program
Anne Arundel County March 2013 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Indiana Paths to QUALITY™ Child Care Quality Rating and Improvement System: Outcomes for Children and Child Care Providers James Elicker, Zachary Gold,
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant.
Equity Implementation Committee June 21, 2016
PPCD Service Location Code
REACHING FOR THE STARS Robyn Gibson, M.Ed.
FY15 Universal Pre-Kindergarten (UPK) Grant Proposal
Chapter 14 Early Childhood Special Education
Appleton Area School District
2011 Partnership priorities strategies
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant.
Professional Development BOOT CAMP
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant.
Title I Information.
Dorchester County March 2013 Children Entering School Ready to Learn
Muncie public library Brings early literacy into the home
State Perspective Kevin Bain.
Worlds Best Workforce Annual Report
Welcome Parents! Parent Advisory.
“What will my Child Learn in 4K?”
Title I Information.
Types of Early Childhood Programs
Linden Elementary Title I Parent Night
Community Input Discussions:
Title I Information.
2015 International Development and Early Learning Assessment (IDELA)Baseline Results: ELM project Afar and South Omo, Ethiopia.
Preschool Snapshot New Jersey Department of Education
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night
Title I Information.
Inequality Starts Before Kindergarten
Family Engagement Policy
Onslow County Schools Head Start
Binghamton City School District
UNDERSTANDING THE CLASS
Snowshoe Elementary School $109,762
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of Indiana's Pilot Public Pre-Kindergarten Program: First Year Results James Elicker, Katrina Schmerold, David Purpura, Sara Schmitt, Amy Napoli, Adassa Budrevich, Lindsey Bryant, & Christine McCall, Human Development & Family Studies Abstract The Indiana state legislature funded a pilot public pre-kindergarten program in five counties in 2014. This 5-year evaluation project is designed to answer the legislature’s mandated questions about the effectiveness of the Pre-K Pilot Program in improving: 1) children’s school readiness, 2) children’s early school performance, and 3) parents’ school engagement. The Purdue evaluation team will inform stakeholders about the quality of instruction in the Pre-K classrooms and the growth of children’s skills in Pre-K and kindergarten in math, literacy, language, executive function, and overall school readiness. Finally, the evaluation team will examine the impact of part-day vs. full-day and part-year vs. full-year programming on children’s learning outcomes. First year results include Pre-K children's academic gains from fall to spring, observed quality of the Pre-K classrooms, and description family engagement reported by parents. Evaluation Sample On My Way Pre-K Children (N=282) 282 four year olds, randomly selected in 5 counties 57 OMW Pre-K classrooms Comparison Children (N=99) 90 low income children (using CCDF vouchers) randomly selected in 5 counties These children attended a child care center rated at PTQ Level 1 or not rated (also not Head Start; not nationally accredited) 22 Comparison classrooms Child Development Measures: Fall & Spring Overall School Readiness– Bracken Scales Literacy & Language– Get Ready to Read; PPVT; Woodcock-Johnson Letter-Word Subscale Early Math Skills– PENS-B; Math Language (Purpura) Executive Functioning– Head,Toes,Knees,Shoulders (HTKS); Day-Night Stroop Social Skills-- Social Skills Improvement System Rating Scales (SSIS; teacher report) Policy Implications The OMW Pre-K program has been successful reaching children with the greatest educational needs. Parents report benefits in family self-sufficiency at a result of their child’s participation in OMW Pre-K. Some family engagement efforts were reaching parents on a regular basis, at least monthly. However other effective family engagement activities were rarely or not reported at all by parents. The least frequent forms of communication from providers to parents (less than once per month) were: text messages, emails, web sites, social media. The OMW program should consider emphasizing in training/technical assistance/coaching with providers using a wider range of communication strategies and media, providing regular information about the children’s learning progress, and information about community services. Efforts are needed to increase the instructional quality in OMW Pre-K classrooms. Higher standards and professional development in this area are needed. Use of an evidence-based curricula should be required. Future Research The 2015-2016 OMW Pre-K students will be followed and assessed to Grade 3. An additional 2016-2017 cohort of 100 OMW Pre-K and 100 Comparison students will be added to the sample. Future analyses will statistically match the OMW and Comparison groups, controlling for pre-existing differences. Results: Family Engagement in OMW Pre-K Results: Four-Yr.-Olds’ Fall to Spring Gains & Classroom Quality Indiana On My Way Pre-K Pilot program and evaluation funded by the Indiana Legislature in 2014 Launched in 5 pilot counties in 2015 (Allen, Lake, Marion, Jackson, Vanderburgh) Targeted program for 4 yr. olds from low-income households (under 127% of federal poverty level) Pre-K providers must: be rated Level 3 or Level 4 in the Paths to QUALITY quality rating system have a family engagement program Use the ISTAR-KR for child assessment Research Questions Do low income children who participate in OMW Pre-K show increase school readiness or early school performance, compared with similar children who did not attend the program? What is the observed quality of the OMW Pre-K classrooms, as assessed using the CLASS measure? What do OMW Pre-K classrooms do to engage families? For comparison, means for all Head Start programs in 2015: Emotional Support: 6.03 Classroom Organization: 5.80 Instructional Support: 2.88 Means for Boston Public Pre-K, 2013: Emotional Support: 5.63 Classroom Organization: 5.10 Instructional Support: 4.30 Other Benefits to Families - One-third to one-half of the Pre-K parents reported that having their child in the program enabled them to get a job, work more hours, or start school or job training. - 57% of children attending OMW Pre-K had not attended any child care or preschool program the prior year. - More than 25% said if they had not gotten their child into OMW, they did not know if the child would have attended any early childhood program this year. Funding for the OMW Pre-K evaluation provided by the Indiana Family & Social Service Administration, Office of Early Childhood and Out of School Learning