Reference Simulation Settings

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Changes in U.S. Regional-Scale Air.
Advertisements

Evaluation of Satellite NO 2 Columns over U. S. Power Plants using a Regional Atmospheric Chemistry Model Si-Wan Kim ESRL, NOAA and CIRES, U. of Colorado.
Richard T. McNider Atmospheric Sciences Department University of Alabama in Huntsville The Role of the Physical Atmosphere in Air.
The impact of mesoscale PBL parameterizations on the evolution of mixed-layer processes important for fire weather Joseph J. Charney USDA Forest Service,
Working together for clean air Puget Sound Area Ozone Modeling NW AIRQUEST December 4, 2006 Washington State University Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Washington.
Impact of Mexico City on Regional Air Quality Louisa Emmons Jean-François Lamarque NCAR/ACD.
Henry Fuelberg Nick Heath Sean Freeman FSU WRF-Chem During SEAC 4 RS.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Washington July 2013.
Beta Testing of the SCICHEM-2012 Reactive Plume Model James T. Kelly and Kirk R. Baker Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards US Environmental Protection.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review New Jersey May 2013.
Jerold Herwehe 1, Kiran Alapaty 1, Chris Nolte 1, Russ Bullock 1, Tanya Otte 1, Megan Mallard 1, Jimy Dudhia 2, and Jack Kain 3 1 Atmospheric Modeling.
Prediction of Future North American Air Quality Gabriele Pfister, Stacy Walters, Mary Barth, Jean-Francois Lamarque, John Wong Atmospheric Chemistry Division,
Modeling Studies of Air Quality in the Four Corners Region National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in.
Jonathan Pleim 1, Robert Gilliam 1, and Aijun Xiu 2 1 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division, NOAA, Research Triangle Park, NC (In partnership with the.
Georgia Environmental Protection Division Uncertainty Analysis of Ozone Formation and Emission Control Responses using High-order Sensitivities Di Tian,
On the Model’s Ability to Capture Key Measures Relevant to Air Quality Policies through Analysis of Multi-Year O 3 Observations and CMAQ Simulations Daiwen.
Earth-Sun System Division National Aeronautics and Space Administration SPoRT SAC Nov 21-22, 2005 Regional Modeling using MODIS SST composites Prepared.
Preliminary Study: Direct and Emission-Induced Effects of Global Climate Change on Regional Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter K. Manomaiphiboon 1 *, A.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Connecticut July 2013.
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation 2 T. W. Tesche Dennis.
Seasonal Modeling (NOAA) Jian-Wen Bao Sara Michelson Jim Wilczak Curtis Fleming Emily Piencziak.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Alabama May 2013.
ARCTAS-CA June 2008 Air Quality Simulations. July 1, 2009 ARCTAS-CA Data Analysis Workshop 2 Collaborators Ajith Kaduwela, Chenxia Cai, Dazhong Yin, Jin.
Comparison of CMAQ Lightning NOx Schemes and Their Impacts Youhua Tang 1,2, Li Pan 1,2, Pius Lee 1, Jeffery T. McQueen 4, Jianping Huang 4,5, Daniel Tong.
Impact of lightning-NO and radiatively- interactive ozone on air quality over CONUS, and their relative importance in WRF-Chem M a t u s M a r t i n i.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Maryland May 2013.
WRF Version 2: Physics Update Jimy Dudhia NCAR/MMM.
U.S. EPA and WIST Rob Gilliam *NOAA/**U.S. EPA
1 Impact on Ozone Prediction at a Fine Grid Resolution: An Examination of Nudging Analysis and PBL Schemes in Meteorological Model Yunhee Kim, Joshua S.
1. How is model predicted O3 sensitive to day type emission variability and morning Planetary Boundary Layer rise? Hypothesis 2.
May 22, UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRECURSOR REDUCTIONS IN LOWERING 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS Steve Reynolds Charles Blanchard Envair 12.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review North Dakota July 2013.
Assessment of aerosol direct effects on surface radiation in the northern hemisphere using two-way WRF-CMAQ model Jia Xing, Jonathan Pleim, Rohit Mathur,
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
June 29, 2011NASA/ARB Data Analyses Discussion1 What can We Learn from ARCTAS-CARB Data? Modeling and Meteorology Branch Planning and Technical Support.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review New Hampshire July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Idaho July 2013.
Emission reductions needed to meet proposed ozone standard and their effect on particulate matter Daniel Cohan and Beata Czader Department of Civil and.
MRPO Technical Approach “Nearer” Term Overview For: Emissions Modeling Meteorological Modeling Photochemical Modeling & Domain Model Performance Evaluation.
Impacts of Meteorological Conditions Modified by Urban Expansion on Surface Ozone over Yangtz River Delta and Pearl River Delta region, China Xuemei Wang,
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Iowa May 2013.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development.
Ozone Sensitivity to Nitric Oxide Emissions in WRF-Chem
Off-line Air Quality Modeling Paradigms:
Serena Falasca (1,2) and Gabriele Curci (1,2)
Mid-Atlantic Air Quality Model: Initial Results from WRF-Chem
SAPRC07T Implementation within the CMAQ model.
SEMAP 2017 Ozone Projections and Sensitivities / Contributions Prepared by: Talat Odman - Georgia Tech Yongtao Hu - Georgia Tech Jim Boylan - Georgia.
Evaluation of Emissions of Nitrogen Oxides in Houston, Texas Using Three- Dimensional Aircraft Observations during the DISCOVER-AQ 2013 Mission Ou Nopmongcol2,
The 96th AMS Annual Meeting
A Performance Evaluation of Lightning-NO Algorithms in CMAQ
ASM Project Update: Atmospheric Modeling
Charles University in Prague
C. Nolte, T. Spero, P. Dolwick, B. Henderson, R. Pinder
IMPROVING HURRICANE INTENSITY FORECASTS IN A MESOSCALE MODEL VIA MICROPHYSICAL PARAMETERIZATION METHODS By Cerese Albers & Dr. TN Krishnamurti- FSU Dept.
Dr. Randhir Singh Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (IIRS)
Lily Li, Qing Lu, Jingyu An, Cheng Huang
Dr. Randhir Singh Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (IIRS)
Development of a 2007-Based Air Quality Modeling Platform
Impact on Recent North American Air Quality Forecasts of Replacing a Retrospective U.S. Emissions Inventory with a Projected Inventory Michael Moran1,
Michigan Air Emissions
Chris Misenis*, Xiaoming Hu, and Yang Zhang
The relationship between summertime ozone peak hour and NOx and VOC emissions Jianfeng Li April 21, 2016.
Deborah Luecken and Golam Sarwar U.S. EPA, ORD/NERL
Some thoughts on future air quality models from a WRF-Chem modeler
Uto Patrick – Cross River Partnership
The Value of Nudging in the Meteorology Model for Retrospective CMAQ Simulations Tanya L. Otte NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, RTP, NC (In partnership with.
WRAP Modeling Forum, San Diego
Diagnostic and Operational Evaluation of 2002 and 2005 Estimated 8-hr Ozone to Support Model Attainment Demonstrations Kirk Baker Donna Kenski Lake Michigan.
Presentation transcript:

 Practical Predictabilities of Ozone: Sensitivity to Emissions Inventory and Planetary Boundary Layer

Reference Simulation Settings Shortwave Radiation- Dudhia Longwave Radiation- RRTM Boundary Layer- YSU Microphysics- WSM6 Cumulus-Grell-Devenyi Boundary/Initial Conditions- GFS Chemistry-RACM Biogenic Emissions-MEGAN Anthropogenic Emissions-NEI-11 Photolysis-Madronich

Boundary Layer predictabilities MYJ-PBL Scheme GFS initial conditions Predictability group Reference Boundary Layer predictabilities MYJ-PBL Scheme GFS initial conditions NEI-11 Emissions YSU-PBL Scheme ACM2-PBL scheme Emissions inventory Predictabilities NEI-05 Emissions NEI-Update (NEI-U) Initial Conditions Predictabilities (To be completed) ERA-Interim GFS initial Conditions

Updated Emissions Inventory Original emissions inventory- NEI-11 All pollutants are the same, with the exception of NOx Designed to replicate the NOx emissions from June 2014 Other emissions (such as VOCs were held the same as the NEI-11) Point emissions were updated by the use of Clean Air Market Data supplied by the Environmental Protection Agency. Area emissions were updated by statewide ratios provided by NOAA.

Updated Emissions Inventory: Area Emissions

Updated Emissions Inventory: Area Emissions

Updated Emissions Inventory: Point Emissions

Updated Emissions Inventory: Point Emissions

Standard Deviation of Hourly O3 Emissions Predictabilities 25th Percentile 75th Percentile Median Minimum Maximum

Standard Deviation of Hourly O3 PBL Predictabilities 25th Percentile 75th Percentile Median Minimum Maximum

Emissions and hourly O3 Sensitivity from PBL Maximum Hourly sensitivity from PBL predictability NEI-11 Emissions Inventory at 18 UTC

Sensitivity of Hourly o3 predictabilities It is clear from the hourly o3 sensitivity analysis that hourly O3 is more sensitive to PBL scheme

Sensitivity of peak 8-hour o3 predictabilities However, the sensitivity of the peak 8-hour O3 is unclear. Why? Could the spikes of hourly O3 from PBL predictabilities be occurring at night? Could the smoothing effect of the 8-hour average dilute sensitivity?

Comparison of average Peak 8-Hour sensitivities

Hour of Maximum Hourly O3 sensitivity PBL Predictabilities Emissions Predictabilities

Sensitivity of the Vertical Distribution of O3 Sensitivity to Emissions inventory Sensitivity to PBL scheme

Sensitivity of the Vertical Distribution of O3 Sensitivity to Emissions inventory Sensitivity to PBL scheme

Sensitivity of the Vertical Distribution of O3 Sensitivity to Emissions inventory Sensitivity to PBL scheme

Summary: A new emissions inventory, depicting June 2014 was created and implemented. Area NOx emissions, the category highest impacted by the change, was altered by factors supplied by NOAA. Point source NOx emissions were altered by the implementation of Clean Air Market data. Hourly O3 sensitivity to the PBL scheme is larger than the hourly O3 sensitivity to emissions inventory. Hourly O3 sensitivity of both emissions inventories and PBL scheme is increased by the emission rate of NOx. For the peak 8 hour O3, the sensitivity due to emissions inventory and PBL scheme is relatively similar.