Educator Plans Overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BRISTOL WARREN REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Implementation of RI Educator Evaluation System
Advertisements

Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
1 Triangulated Standards-based Evaluation Framework Kathleen J. Skinner, Ed.D. Director, MTA Center for Education Policy & Practice Kansas Evaluation Committee.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
The New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Natick Public Schools.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality.
The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation: An Orientation for Teachers and Staff October 2014 (updated) Facilitator Note: This presentation was.
The New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation System Natick Public Schools.
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
The New Massachusetts Principal Evaluation
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Creating & Implementing Your Plan October 2012.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT: PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
My Learning Plan Observation and Appraisal SYStem
Expanded ADEPT Guidance Presentation Office of Educator Effectiveness May 9, 2016.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS March 13, 2014 Wifi: EnglishWLan PW:BostonEnglish1821 Leveraging Evaluation to Support School Priorities & Increase.
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS Monday, October 28 Leveraging Evaluation to Support School Priorities & Increase Effectiveness.
Oconee Keys Training September, Oconee Keys is designed to: Evaluate classroom teachers using qualitative rubrics to assess instructional practices.
Candidate Assessment of Performance (CAP): an Overview CAP Practicum Workshop for AIC Teacher Candidates Practicum Workshop Pt.2.
Monomoy Educator Evaluation System Training
The District Management Council 70 Franklin Street Boston, MA Tel: 877.DMC Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
New Teacher Induction.
Evaluation 4.0 Or at least a 3.75.
What it means for New Teachers
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
INSTRUCTIONAL EVALUATION SYSTEM
Teacher Evaluation Timeline
Lynne Griffith-Jones Superintendent of Human Resources
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Dissemination Training
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Teacher Evaluation Performance Categories
Teacher Evaluation Process
CLASS KeysSM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation Training
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Five Required Elements
Objectives for today If we have done our job today, you will:
Documenting Your Work Through Artifacts November 2012
Sam Houston State University
State Board of Education Progress Update
Improving student achievement through teacher observation and feedback
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Georgia Department of Education
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Evaluation Information
HEYWORTH COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS
Sam Houston State University
Pike County Schools Certified Evaluation Annual Training
Assessment Day Strategy
Evaluation Cycle At-A-Glance
Career Skills 2 Overview
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May
Bradley County Schools Robert Brittingham Department of Instruction Evaluations & Licensure
Presentation transcript:

Educator Plans Overview Lowell Public Schools Office of Personnel & Recruitment

Educator PLANS Educator Plan: The growth or improvement actions identified as part of each educator’s evaluation. The type of plan is determined by the Educator’s career stage, overall performance rating, and impact on student learning, growth, and achievement. 1. Self-Directed Growth Plan- A plan developed by the educator for one or two school years for educators with PTS who are rated proficient. 2. Developing Educator Plan- A plan developed by the educator and evaluator for one school year or less for an educator without PTS; or at the discretion of an evaluator for an educator in a new assignment. 3. Directed Growth Plan- A plan developed by the educator and evaluator of one school year or less for educator with PTS who are rated needs improvement. 4. Improvement Plan- A plan developed by the evaluator of at least 45 school days, and no more than one school year for educators with PTS who are rated unsatisfactory with goals specific to improving the unsatisfactory performance. Lowell Public Schools Office of Personnel & Recruitment 7.27.2015

Two Year Self-Directed Growth Plan Cycle By 10/31, educator submits Self-Assessment Self Assessment By 10/31, educator proposes a student learning and a professional practice goal in TeachPoint Goals Educator and evaluator collect evidence through artifacts and observations Observation Requirements: At least 2 unannounced (educator may request an announced observation) Plan Implementation Formative Evaluation Summative Evaluation By 4/15 of the 1st year, the evaluator prepares a Formative Evaluation in TeachPoint and provides ratings Rating determines next steps: Proficient or Exemplary Plan continues Needs Improvement Move to a Directed Growth Plan Unsatisfactory Move to an Improvement Plan By 4/15 of the 2nd year, the evaluator prepares a Summative Evaluation and provides ratings in TeachPoint Rating determines next steps: Proficient or Exemplary Begin new Self-Directed plan cycle Needs Improvement Move to a Directed Growth Plan Unsatisfactory Move to an Improvement Plan Lowell Public Schools Office of Personnel & Recruitment 7.27.2015

Directed growth plan Cycle Up to 1year Educator and evaluator meet to discuss evaluation and new plan Evaluator directs educator to submit Self Assessment by a determined deadline Self Assessment Educator and evaluator may co-create goals, or the evaluator sets goals based on previous feedback by a determined deadline Goals Educator implements goals and action plan Educator and evaluator collect evidence through artifacts and observations Observation Requirements: At least 2 unannounced (educator may request an announced observation) Plan Implementation Formative Assessment Summative Evaluation Midway through the cycle, evaluator prepares a Formative Assessment and provides ratings. Evaluator and educator meet to discuss the assessment. The plan continues. Modifications to goals/action plan may be suggested based on Formative Assessment rating and feedback. At the end of the cycle, evaluator prepares the Summative Evaluation and provides ratings Rating determines next steps: Proficient or Exemplary Move to a Self-Directed Growth plan Needs Improvement Move to an Improvement Plan Unsatisfactory Move to an Improvement Plan Lowell Public Schools Office of Personnel & Recruitment 7.27.2015

Improvement Plan cycle 45 School days-1 year Educator and evaluator meet within 10 days of assigning the new plan Evaluator directs educator to submit Self Assessment by a determined deadline Self Assessment Educator and evaluator may co-create goals, or the evaluator sets goals based on previous feedback Goals Educator implements goals and action plan Educator and evaluator collect evidence through artifacts and observations Observation Requirements: At least 2 unannounced (educator may request an announced observation) See Observation Chart* Plan Implementation Formative Assessment Summative Evaluation Midway through the cycle, evaluator prepares a Formative Assessment and provides ratings. Evaluator and educator meet to discuss the assessment. The plan continues. Modifications to goals/action plan may be suggested based on Formative Assessment rating and feedback. At the end of the cycle, the evaluator prepares a Summative Evaluation and provides ratings. Ratings determine next steps: Proficient or Exemplary Move to a Self-Directed Growth plan Needs Improvement May recommend dismissal Unsatisfactory Lowell Public Schools Office of Personnel & Recruitment 7.27.2015

Developing educator plan cycle 1st-3rd year (NON-PTS OR New role) By 10/31, educator submits Self-Assessment Self Assessment By 10/31, evaluator meets with 1st year educators to assist with Self-Assessment and Goal Setting By 10/31, educator proposes a student learning and a professional practice goal in TeachPoint – approve by evaluator Goals Educator and evaluator collect evidence through artifacts and observations Evaluator completes at least 1 announced and 4 unannounced observation in the 1st year, and 3 unannounced in the 2nd/3rd year. By 11/15, evaluator must complete first observation Plan Implementation Formative Assessment Summative Evaluation By 1/15, evaluator prepares a Formative Assessment and decides rating By 4/15, evaluator prepares Summative Evaluation and decides rating. Ratings may necessitate goal/action plan modifications. Educators in 3rd year must receive a proficient rating on each standard on the Summative in order to obtain Professional Teaching Status Lowell Public Schools Office of Personnel & Recruitment 7.27.2015

Observation chart 1 2 0* 0* 1 1 4 5 0* 3 3 Type of Educator Plan First observation by 11/15 Type of Educator Plan Self Directed Growth Plan Directed Growth Plan < 1 School year Announced Observations Unannounced Observations 1 2 Minimum Observations 0* 0* 3 to 5 depending on length of plan Improvement Plan 45 school days to 1 year 1 2 if plan < 6 mos. 4 if plan is btwn. 6mos. and 1 yr. Developing Educator Plan 1st year 1 4 5 Developing Educator Plan 2nd & 3rd years 0* 3 3 Lowell Public Schools Office of Personnel & Recruitment 7.27.2015 *Teachers can request an announced observation