TGC L1 Trigger On-Line Monitoring Tel Aviv University:

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

RPC & LVL1 Mu Barrel Online Monitoring during LS1 M. Della Pietra.

Advertisements

GNAM and OHP: Monitoring Tools for the ATLAS Experiment at LHC GNAM and OHP: Monitoring Tools for the ATLAS Experiment at LHC M. Della Pietra, P. Adragna,

CSC Online and Offline DQA Status Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei (U. Arizona)

CSC DQA and Commissioning Summary  We are responsible for the online and offline DQA for the CSC system, a US ATLAS responsibility  We are ready for.

CSC DQA for Last Week Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei University of Arizona.

CSC Online and Offline DQA Status Ken Johns, Venkat Kaushik, Xiaowen Lei (U. Arizona)

First year experience with the ATLAS online monitoring framework Alina Corso-Radu University of California Irvine on behalf of ATLAS TDAQ Collaboration.

1 Raw Event : ByteStream implementation Muon Workshop, April 2002 A. Nisati, for the Muon Trigger group.

O FFLINE T RIGGER M ONITORING TDAQ Training 30 July 2010 On behalf of the Trigger Offline Monitoring Experts team.

Data Quality Monitoring of the CMS Tracker

SSD Status P. Christakoglou (NIKHEF-UU) for the SSD collaboration Thanks to: Marco vL, Enrico, Mino, Marek and Massimo.

ATLAS ONLINE MONITORING. FINISHED! Now what? How to check quality of the data?!! DATA FLOWS!

Web Based Monitoring DT online shifter tutorial Jesús Puerta-Pelayo CIEMAT Muon_Barrel_Workshop_07/July/10.

DC12 Commissioning Status GOALS: establish operating conditions, determine initial calibration parameters and measure operating characteristics for the.

CAF shifts and procedures Marcello, Raffaello, Alberto, Pigi, Sungeun, David, Silvia, Anna & all the 2009 shifters.

Report on the Commissioning Task Force activity Global and sub-detector views on ECS Histogram handling : – histogram handling and PVSS – the ALEPH and.

Gnam Monitoring Overview M. Della Pietra, D. della Volpe (Napoli), A. Di Girolamo (Roma1), R. Ferrari, G. Gaudio, W. Vandelli (Pavia) D. Salvatore, P.

Tracker data quality monitoring based on event display M.S. Mennea – G. Zito University & INFN Bari - Italy.

Software installation for commissioning tests Olivier Deschamps Calorimeter commissioning meeting – 05 april 2007.

OFFLINE TRIGGER MONITORING TDAQ Training 5 th November 2010 Ricardo Gonçalo On behalf of the Trigger Offline Monitoring Experts team.

TAU entered in various places. Manpower – Yan Benhammou++ (N. Guttman, N. Hod, E. Reinherz, A. Kreizel). Working on online Monitoring of TGC. Looking at.

RPC DQA but also Monitoring for the DCS group: status and prospective for Marcello Bindi RPC L1MU Barrel DQM - 08/05/2013.

CMS pixel data quality monitoring Petra Merkel, Purdue University For the CMS Pixel DQM Group Vertex 2008, Sweden.

Multistep Runs with ROD Crate DAQ Murrough Landon, QMUL Outline: Overview Implementation Comparison with existing setup Readout Status ModuleServices API.

6th Feb 2003SCT DAQ analysis development 1 SCT analysis framework Work by:Alan Barr, Matt Palmer, Dave Robinson Almost all slides originally produced by.

4 th Workshop on ALICE Installation and Commissioning January 16 th & 17 th, CERN Muon Tracking (MUON_TRK, MCH, MTRK) Conclusion of the first ALICE COSMIC.

September 2007CHEP 07 Conference 1 A software framework for Data Quality Monitoring in ATLAS S.Kolos, A.Corso-Radu University of California, Irvine, M.Hauschild.

RPC DQM status Cimmino, M. Maggi, P. Noli, D. Lomidze, P. Paolucci, G. Roselli, C. Carillo.

N. Hod, Y. Benhammou, O. Ben-Ami, Y. Silver, L. Levinson D. Lellouch O. Silbert TGC ONLINE Monitoring.

Online (GNAM) and offline (Express Stream and Tier0) monitoring produced results during cosmic/collision runs (Oct-Dec 2009) Shifter and expert level monitoring.

Pixel DQM Status R.Casagrande, P.Merkel, J.Zablocki (Purdue University) D.Duggan, D.Hidas, K.Rose (Rutgers University) L.Wehrli (ETH Zuerich) A.York (University.

DQM for the RPC subdetector M. Maggi and P. Paolucci.

The ATLAS DAQ System Online Configurations Database Service Challenge J. Almeida, M. Dobson, A. Kazarov, G. Lehmann-Miotto, J.E. Sloper, I. Soloviev and.

Michele Bianco ICATPP 091 Performance of the Resistive Plate Chambers as LVL1 ATLAS muon trigger Michele Bianco INFN Lecce & Physics Department,

Straw VME Data Monitoring M. Koval Straw WG meeting

14 th IEEE-NPSS Real Time Stockholm - June 9 th 2005 P. F. Zema The GNAM monitoring system and the OHP histogram presenter for ATLAS 14 th IEEE-NPSS Real.

ID Week 13 th of October 2014 Per Johansson Sheffield University.

TGC On-Line Monitoring Status for 1 beam Before LHC Startup on TomBox: A single machine (pc-tgc-mon-rod-01) receives all TGC events.

The NA62RunControl: Status update Nicolas Lurkin School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Birmingham NA62 TDAQ Meeting – CERN, 10/06/2015.

DAQ and Trigger for HPS run Sergey Boyarinov JLAB July 11, Requirements and available test results 2. DAQ status 3. Trigger system status and upgrades.

Real data in the Muon Spectrometer Bernardo RESENDE and a lot of other people not named here NIKHEF Jamboree, December 2008.

L1Calo Databases ● Overview ● Trigger Configuration DB ● L1Calo OKS Database ● L1Calo COOL Database ● ACE Murrough Landon 16 June 2008.

L1Calo DBs: Status and Plans ● Overview of L1Calo databases ● Present status ● Plans Murrough Landon 20 November 2006.

DB and Information Flow Issues ● Selecting types of run ● L1Calo databases ● Archiving run parameters ● Tools Murrough Landon 28 April 2009.

Online Software Status ● Overview ● Recent Changes ● Required Changes ● Desirable Changes ● Upgrade ● Summary Murrough Landon 1 July 2009.

L1Calo Databases ● Overview ● Recent Activitity ● To Do List ● Run types Murrough Landon 4 June 2007.

Online Database Developments ● Overview ● OKS database status and plans ● COOL database developments ● Validating calibrations ● Tools ● Summary Murrough.

TGC online DQ GNAM + RODSampler status 11/09/2009 GNAMs + ROD sampler: 6/6 GNAM segments running. 1 RODSampler application running. 1/6 GNAM segment (efficiencies.

ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Data Quality Assessment and Performance

RPC DQA 2012 Status and prospective

CMS ROC Report Patricia McBride May 26, 2005.

Online Database Work Overview Work needed for OKS database

CLAS12 DAQ/Trigger/Online Status

Risultati del run di integrazione M4

Online Database Status

Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems

Pixel DQM Status & Plans

Online Software Status

Online SW, DB & Calibration

Online Software Status

Remaining Online SW Tasks

Level 1 (Calo) Databases

ProtoDUNE SP DAQ assumptions, interfaces & constraints

Experience between AMORE/Offline and sub-systems

HLT Jet and MET DQA Summary

CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring

The Online Detector Control at the BaBar experiment at SLAC

DQM for the RPC subdetector

CMS Pixel Data Quality Monitoring

Status of the Calibration

Presentation transcript:

TGC L1 Trigger On-Line Monitoring Tel Aviv University: E. Etzion, Y. Benhammou, N. Hod, O. Ben-Ami, Y. Silver Weizmann Institute: L. Levinson D. Lellouch, O. Silbert September 30, 2017

Status, May 2009 Unified with TGC DAQ software and configurations. Working modules are: -- 4 GNAM segments (OverView, HitProfile, pTthreshold, TriggerProfile). -- 3 DQMF segments (GlobalChamber, Timing, SubsectorOccupancies). DQMF algorithms are not yet fine-tuned. DQA↔DB interaction is in preparation, see next slides. Histograms: ~2000 for SHIFT, ~200 for EXPERT, see next slides. These numbers are not static. Documentation for the shifter / expert is in preparation. September 30, 2017

Another GNAM segment for TGC-Efficiency is in preparation. Code and xml(s) are installed and checked under tdaq-02-00-01 in: -- /det/muon/standalone/sw/tdaq-02-00-01/detectors/muons/installed/ -- /det/muon/standalone/databases/tdaq-02-00-01/muons/segments/TGC/ (GNAM/,DQMF/,OHP/) All tested in TGC-Standalone and ready to be copied in the combined area together with all TGC DAQ software and xml(s). Another GNAM segment for TGC-Efficiency is in preparation. Using Jumbo-packets (for large events) – not yet fully tested. will be ready before the coming cosmic run. New “13 sectors” structure require many modifications in decode and in QDA tests. In process… Several new dqm algorithms for DQMF segments. Some are relative algo’s - where we don’t have good references yet. New tombox (soon…) September 30, 2017

DQA ↔ DB interactions Java Viewer IS TGC DB GNAM Histo’s DQMF COOL DQMD Data from DQMF will not go directly to the TGC ORACLE DB / COOL. Instead, it will be stored in IS (as arrays, in a global numbering scheme). Then it will be pooled from there by a special (TGC-DAQ) tool to be translated (to the chamber level) and registered in the ORACLE DB. From the ORACLE DB it will be sent to COOL along with other TGC info. The information to register to the IS, and then to the DB is (for now): -- chamber status (“on” / “off”), -- number of dead / hot channels in the chamber (#dead, #hot), -- chamber timing performance (#prevBC, #centBC, #nextBC). September 30, 2017

Histograms (HitProfile, ohpNexus) September 30, 2017

Histograms (HitProfile, ohpNexus) September 30, 2017

Histograms (HitProfile, DQMD) September 30, 2017

Histograms (GlobalChamber, DQMD) September 30, 2017

Histograms (GlobalChamber, DQMD) September 30, 2017

Histograms (Timing, DQMD) September 30, 2017

Histograms (HitProfile, ohpNexus & DQMD) September 30, 2017

Histograms (HitProfile, ohpNexus & DQMD) September 30, 2017

Histograms (some EXPERT histos, ohpNexus) September 30, 2017