Diagnostic studies Adrian Boyle.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Clinical Effectiveness: Interpreting test results Nick Price 17 th October 2006.
Advertisements

TEACHING ABOUT DIAGNOSIS
Diagnostic Test Studies Tran The Trung Nguyen Quang Vinh.
Lecture 3 Validity of screening and diagnostic tests
Step 3: Critically Appraising the Evidence: Statistics for Diagnosis.
TESTING A TEST Ian McDowell Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine November, 2004.
1 Case-Control Study Design Two groups are selected, one of people with the disease (cases), and the other of people with the same general characteristics.
Dr Ali Tompkins,ST6 East and North Herts Hospitals Sensitivity of Computed Tomography Performed Within Six Hours of Onset of Headache for Diagnosis of.
Critical Appraisal Quiz! P(There will be prizes)
Interpreting Basic Statistics
Interpreting Diagnostic Tests
Diagnosis Concepts and Glossary. Cross-sectional study The observation of a defined population at a single point in time or time interval. Exposure and.
Statistics in Screening/Diagnosis
DEB BYNUM, MD AUGUST 2010 Evidence Based Medicine: Review of the basics.
Diagnostic Testing Ethan Cowan, MD, MS Department of Emergency Medicine Jacobi Medical Center Department of Epidemiology and Population Health Albert Einstein.
EBMRC How to Use an Article About a Diagnostic Test Akbar Soltani. MD, Endocrinologist Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) Endocrine and Metabolism.
Risk Concepts and Glossary. Cross-sectional study The observation of a defined population at a single point in time or time interval. Exposure and outcome.
Statistics for nMRCGP Jo Kirkcaldy. Curriculum Condensed Knowledge Incidence and prevalence Specificity and sensitivity Positive and negative predictive.
Vanderbilt Sports Medicine How to practice and teach EBM Chapter 3 May 3, 2006.
1 Interpreting Diagnostic Tests Ian McDowell Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine January 2012 Note to readers: you may find the additional.
Evidence Based Medicine Workshop Diagnosis March 18, 2010.
Evidence Based Practice in Psychology – Lecture 3 May 31, 2007.
Screening and Diagnostic Testing Sue Lindsay, Ph.D., MSW, MPH Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Institute for Public Health San Diego State University.
EBCP. Random vs Systemic error Random error: errors in measurement that lead to measured values being inconsistent when repeated measures are taken. Ie:
Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests
EVIDENCE ABOUT DIAGNOSTIC TESTS Min H. Huang, PT, PhD, NCS.
Evaluating Diagnostic Tests Payam Kabiri, MD. PhD. Clinical Epidemiologist Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Appraising A Diagnostic Test
Likelihood 2005/5/22. Likelihood  probability I am likelihood I am probability.
Stats Facts Mark Halloran. Diagnostic Stats Disease present Disease absent TOTALS Test positive aba+b Test negative cdc+d TOTALSa+cb+da+b+c+d.
1. Statistics Objectives: 1.Try to differentiate between the P value and alpha value 2.When to perform a test 3.Limitations of different tests and how.
TESTING A TEST Ian McDowell Department of Epidemiology & Community Medicine January 2008.
Prediction statistics Prediction generally True and false, positives and negatives Quality of a prediction Usefulness of a prediction Prediction goes Bayesian.
Screening and its Useful Tools Thomas Songer, PhD Basic Epidemiology South Asian Cardiovascular Research Methodology Workshop.
HSS4303B – Intro to Epidemiology Feb 8, Agreement.
Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value
Diagnostic Tests Studies 87/3/2 “How to read a paper” workshop Kamran Yazdani, MD MPH.
Diagnostic Test Characteristics: What does this result mean
Evidence based medicine Diagnostic tests Ross Lawrenson.
1 Medical Epidemiology Interpreting Medical Tests and Other Evidence.
EVALUATING u After retrieving the literature, you have to evaluate or critically appraise the evidence for its validity and applicability to your patient.
Diagnosis Examination(MMSE) in detecting dementia among elderly patients living in the community. Excel.
PTP 560 Research Methods Week 12 Thomas Ruediger, PT.
Diagnostic Likelihood Ratio Presented by Juan Wang.
Diagnosis:Testing the Test Verma Walker Kathy Davies.
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Receiver- Operator Characteristic Curves 10/10/2013.
Sensitivity:DISEASE Specificity:PRESENTABSENT TEST RESULTS POSITIVEAbA+b NEGATIVECdC+d a+cb+da+b+c+d Lets recall the 2x2 contingency table Probability.
Critical Appraisal Course for Emergency Medicine Trainees Module 5 Evaluation of a Diagnostic Test.
“Reading and commenting papers” (Scientific English) Alexis Descatha INSERM, UMS UVSQ- Unité de pathologie professionnelle, Garches.
DR.FATIMA ALKHALEDY M.B.Ch.B;F.I.C.M.S/C.M
Diagnostic Test Studies
Cardiac Testing for Coronary Artery Disease in Potential Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review of Test Accuracy Studies  Louis W. Wang, MM(ClinEpi)(Hons),
Introduction to Diagnostic Test Accuracy Prima Conferinta a Societatii Nationale de Metodologie si Statistica Medicala Professor Ario Santini MD,BDS,DDS,PhD,FDS,FFGDP,DGDP(UK),DipFMed,FADM.
Evidence-Based Medicine
An Idiots Guide to Statistics Curriculum 3.6
Question 1 A new ‘Super test’ claims to have a superb capability to diagnose disease X. Its sensitivity is 99% and specificity is 90%. Which of the following.
Class session 7 Screening, validity, reliability
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Clinical Epidemiology
Public Health Phase 3A Abigail Aitken
Screening, Sensitivity, Specificity, and ROC curves
Refining Probability Test Informations Vahid Ashoorion MD. ,MSc,
Dr. Hannah Jordan Lecturer in Public Health ScHARR
کارگاه تکميلی کشوری تربيت مربی آموزش طب مبتنی بر شواهد
Figure 1. Table for calculating the accuracy of a diagnostic test.
Diagnostic Studies Specimen Appraisal
Positive predictive value of screening tests
Evidence Based Diagnosis
Clinical Effectiveness: sensitivity, specificity and PPV
Basic statistics.
Presentation transcript:

Diagnostic studies Adrian Boyle

Diagnostic studies: objectives Sensitivity Specificity Positive and negative predictive values Accuracy Likelihood ratios Receiver Operator Curves

Diagnostic studies: design Cross sectional comparison to a gold standard Cohort study RCT That’s the way we’ve always done it

Basics Gold standard +ve Gold standard -ve Test +ve A B A+B -ve C D A+C B+D

Basics Sensitivity A/A+C True positive SNNOUT How good is this test at picking up disease? SNNOUT A SeNsitive test which is Negative effectively rules OUT a diagnosis

Specificity D/B+D True negative SpPin How good is this test at excluding the well? SpPin A SPecific test which is Positive rules a case IN

Basics PPV A/A+B Post +ve test prob If a patient has a +ve test what is the probablity that they have the disease

Basics NPV D/C+D Post test prob of –ve test If a patient has a negative test, the probablity that they do not have the condition

Advanced Accuracy A+D/A+B+C+D What proportion of all tests have given the correct result?

Exercise: D-dimer in pleuritic chest pain and SOB with active cancer CTPA +ve CTPA -ve D-dimer > 500 198 502 700 D-dimer < 500 2 298 300 200 800 1000

Example Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV 99% 38% 28%

Example: D-dimer in patients with a cough CTPA +ve CTPA -ve D-dimer > 500 9 691 700 D-dimer < 500 1 299 300 10 990 1000

Example Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV 90% 38% 1.2% 99%

Advanced Receiver (Relative) Operator Curves for continuous data Plot the Sensitivity (y axis) against the false positive rate, 1-Specificity (x-axis) A good test has the greatest area under the curve These curves are used to decide where to make the cut-off

ROC curves

Advanced Likelihood ratio of a positive test (LR+ve) Sensitivity / 1-Specificity How much more likely is a positive result to be found in a patient with, as opposed to without, the condition? 1 to an infinitely big number

Advanced Likelihood ratio of a negative test 1-Sensitivity/ Specificity How much more likely is a negative test in a patient with, as opposed to without, the target disorder 1 to an infinitely small number

Example (Fictitious) A 55 year old man presents with headache. You are concerned about temporal arteritis You know that the prevalence of TA in this age group with headache is 5%. (PRETEST PROBALITY) The LR+ve of an ESR >60 is 6.9 for diagnosing TA

Specific things to look for 95% Confidence intervals especially lower limit Sensitivity 94% (95% CI 65-100%) Sensitivity 92% (95% CI 89-95%)

Example 2 0.05 x 6.9 = 0.345 If this man has a raised ESR then his chances of having temporal arteritis are 34%

Example 3 The LR-ve of an ESR in this condition is 0.6 If this man has a normal ESR, then his chances of having TA are 3%

Use of LR A positive LR test > 5.0 is pretty useful at diagnosing something A negative LR <0.02 s pretty good at ruling something out

Particular biases : spectrum BNP story Is there any selection in this group who might have systematic differences to my patients? Case Control Design leads to Spectrum Bias

Particular biases : work-up bias (Verification bias) Patients with suspected coronary artery disease and positive exercise tests were more likely to undergo coronary angiography (the reference standard) than those with negative exercise tests.

Other biases Incorporation bias Test is also part of the gold standard

STARD STAndards for the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy studies

Biases to be aware of Spectrum bias is the study population exaggerated into yes / no groups Partial verification bias Gold standard applied inconsistently to confirm negative results Incorporation bias Test is also part of the gold standard

Quick list for appraising a paper Identify aims Identify study design Identify population, exposure and outcome Consider the gold standard Consider the measurement What biases (work up, expectation) are there? What is the result and what does it mean

Useful resources BMJ debate paper about test characteristics http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/329/7459/209?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=snnout&andorexactfulltext=and&searchid=1115988869897_7738&stored_search=&FIRSTINDEX=0&sortspec=relevance&resourcetype=1

Any questions?