Eliminating one constraint for the scheduling committee Jay Benesch

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.
Advertisements

EMMA Magnet Design Ben Shepherd Magnetics and Radiation Sources Group ASTeC STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
R. Miyamoto, Beam Physics Design of MEBT, ESS AD Retreat 1 Beam Physics Design of MEBT Ryoichi Miyamoto (ESS) November 29th, 2012 ESS AD Retreat On behalf.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnet Design Workshop: Magnet Design and Analysis Charles Spataro, NSLS-II Project NSLS-II is a new 3Gev synchrotron.
The present CEBAF Wien Spin Manipulator: Designed for 100kV beam and max rotation +/- 110 degrees Adaptation of SLAC design (how different?) X turn coil.
MEBT & RT CH Section Thomas Page Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee May 10 th – 12 th, 2006.
Poster reference: FR5PFP025 Extending the Energy Range of 50Hz Proton FFAGs S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Magnetic.
Optics and magnetic field calculation for the Hall D Tagger Guangliang Yang Glasgow University.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 23 rd Annual HUGS Program June 2-20, 2008 CEBAF Overview HUGS08 June 3 CEBAF Overview HUGS08 June.
Aug 9, 2008S. Kahn -- HCC Magnet Plans1 HCC Magnet Future Plans Steve Kahn Aug 9, 2008 NFMCC Friday Meeting.
SOLIDWORKS: Lesson II – Revolutions, Fillets, & Chamfers UCF Engineering.
12 GeV CEBAF INJECTOR Reza Kazimi Users Group Annual Meeting June 4, 2012.
S. Kahn 5 June 2003NuFact03 Tetra Cooling RingPage 1 Tetra Cooling Ring Steve Kahn For V. Balbekov, R. Fernow, S. Kahn, R. Raja, Z. Usubov.
Low Energy RHIC e - Cooling Meeting Minutes – 11/19/14 1. Cooling Section Magnets and Power Supplies –Most of power supplies will be from ERL (R. Lambiase).
Magnet Design & Construction for EMMA
GlueX Two Magnet Tagger G. Yang University of Glasgow Part 1, 3 D Tosca analysis. Part 2, Preliminary Drawings. Part 3, Proposed Assembly Procedures (i)
Low Energy RHIC e - Cooling Meeting Minutes – 11/5/14 1.J. Tuozzolo will schedule a visit to NSLS next week to evaluate available magnets, power supplies,
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Status of ATF Fast Kicker Experiment
2 July 2002Realistic Fields for a Ring Cooler Magnet System -- S.Kahn Page 1 Realistic Fields for a Ring Cooler Steve Kahn 2 July 2002 NuFact’02 Meeting.
Plan for Beam Extraction using strip-line kicker with pulse bump orbit Present extraction kicker system Strip-line kicker system for ILC Beam extraction.
Cornell ERL-FFAG Lattice Using Dejan’s doublet arc cell September 2014Stephen Brooks, FFAG’141.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.
Update: Puck and Gun Magnet March 1, Magnetized Gun 2 K 2 CsSb Preparation Chamber HV Chamber.
LCLS-II Injector layout design and study Feng Zhou 8/19/2015.
Telecommunications JBCardenas © 1982 Com3 4Q1516 Antenna Design JBC © 198 v A2,2 Key design requirements 1.Undertake the theoretical computations of shapes.
PS-ESS and LEBT State of the art Lorenzo Neri Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Laboratori Nazionali del Sud.
DDBA magnets Chris Bailey Low emittance rings Sept Frascati.
Computer Graphics Lecture 06 Circle Drawing Techniques Taqdees A. Siddiqi
Preservation of Magnetized Beam Quality in a Non-Isochronous Bend
Prism Pairs for Elliptical Beams
Re-design of extraction line for single stage BC
Learning Aid: Technical Terms for Describing Drawings
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Geometric Optics Figure Mirrors with convex and concave spherical surfaces. Note that θr = θi for each ray.
Discussion of modification to DID field for detectors with TPC
Bunching system for SPES project
Hall C Readiness Review – Small Angle SHMS Operation
Warm magnets for LHeC / Test Facility arcs
Preliminary results for electron lens with beam current of 20 A
CLAS12 Torus Magnetic Field Mapping
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Design of the MANX experiment
Main magnets for PERLE Test Facility
Yingshun Zhu Accelerator Center, Magnet Group
Junji Urakawa (KEK) for ATF International Collaboration
Electron Beam Setup for Bubble Chamber
HRS at small angles for e+/ e- pair for APEX
Compensation of Detector Solenoid with Large Crossing Angle
Fast Kicker R&D at ATF T.Naito(KEK) TILC09 18/April/ /11/27.
I Alexander Nass for the JEDI collaboration
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
200 kV gun CST microwave studio simulations Shield modifications
200 kV gun CST microwave studio simulations Shield modifications
November 14, 2008 The meeting on RIKEN AVF Cyclotron Upgrade Progress report on activity plan Sergey Vorozhtsov.
Hall C Users Meeting 31 January 2009
A. Freyberg Aug 2016 ECT’16 =>
November 7, 2008 The meeting on RIKEN AVF Cyclotron Upgrade Progress report on activity plan Sergey Vorozhtsov.
Test of Booster at UITF Reza Kazimi (12/12/18)
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
IR Lattice with Detector Solenoid
3D Modelling Workshop By Keith Phelan!.
M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
Chapter 28 Sources of Magnetic Field
Electron Collider Ring Magnets Preliminary Summary
IR Beam Transport Status
Andrew Hutton Concept suggested independently by Haipeng Wang
Presentation transcript:

Eliminating one constraint for the scheduling committee Jay Benesch A Wien for each beam Eliminating one constraint for the scheduling committee Jay Benesch

Idea The injector group within Accelerator Operations is working on a new front end with 200 keV gun and a new cryo-unit incorporating the capture. Reza Kazimi and I were chatting about it, discussing the problems caused by the pre-buncher between the two Wiens. Reza asked if one could build a minature Wien and install three in the chopper region. I decided to investigate. Current density required appeared too high, ~2500 A/cm2, for conventional conductor – until the YR burnt up. That runs at 3700 A/cm2 at 6 GeV, so it’s possible.

Present Wien Steel box with 5.375” inside width, 3.125” inside height. Nickel disk at each end to reduce field Z extent.

Field fall-off at end of Wien

Field integral comments B is determined by precession desired. E is determined by need for straight orbit on axis. Calculated E value is 1.1% high for that required for x=0 at output. 5.5 mm square array shown below.

Chopping system Symmetric pair of transverse 499 MHz cavities and solenoids put the three bunches at 120o intervals on a 30 mm diameter circle. Moving slits may then independently reduce the current for each hall. Master slit has 24o apertures. 24o of 30mm circle is 6.3mm = width of beam between the slits and the de-chopping half of the system. Anything within the chopping system must have at least this aperture and have unity transfer matrix. -1 OK?

Basics of new Wiens Three osculating 26mm circles have their centers on a 30mm circle. There’s a stock metric steel tube size 26mm OD, 0.5mm wall – perfect for shielding one Wien from the next. E-field limit suggested 4 MV/m 200 keV beam, 110 degree precession capability needed For those values and sharp edged fields 30 cm long, BdL=5190 G-cm and EdL=108 (MV/m)*cm (3.6 MV/m). Since E field and B field don’t fall off the same way in Z, the electrode length has to be adjusted to minimize steering. For existing Wiens, the electrodes were chamfered to approximate the measured magnet fall-off.

End fields Electrode length was adjusted to match magnetic field fall-off. Magnetic shield length was varied in a failed attempt to adjust the B field end profile. Final electrode 14.8 cm half-length. Final steel tube 15cm half-length. x axis cm from center y axis V/cm or 208*G

Electrode curvature Flat electrodes provided less than a fourth the good field region needed for beam. I explored electrodes as arcs of circles, keeping 1cm spacing on mid-plane. 3cm chosen

Time delay as a function of precession It was suggested this might be a problem. It isn’t.

single Wien model

conductor choice Some gap between the OD of the conductor and the steel desired to reduce field distortion. I chose 1mm initially. At least a 6.3mm square of good field region is needed for the chopped beam. The smaller the angle subtended by the dipole conductor, the better the field. I tried 15o, 12o and 10o . For this round of modeling, I used a square “helical end” coil built into Tosca, 3mm square, 15cm half-length. Hollow conductor may be fabricated in 10o wedge, 7.445 mm2 , or 1/8” diameter refrigeration tubing used, 5.776mm2 of copper. 2040 and 2630 A/cm2 in copper respectively, so start (end?) with tubing.

field quality from these choices Dipole field +/- 0.6% over 6mm diameter circle Electric field +/- 1% over 6mm circle Beam propagation showed E field 0.2% high, but TOSCA lets one adjust this in the post-processor. Best E-field multiplier for central ray .9985; for 5.25mm square .9972. Plots will use .998*E for single and triple Wiens. Power supplies must be stable to better than 0.05% to avoid beam steering.

5.24 mm square array through Wien Why 5.24 mm? A and C slit widths.

view showing horizontal focusing

A full length quad doesn’t help A full length quad was added to the model in an attempt to counteract the horizontal focusing. Vertical focusing was so great as to preclude its use. Since it complicated the assembly and was no use, delete. Next two slides show the beam divergence in the XZ and YZ planes 10cm beyond the steel tube. Conclusion: either a quad doublet or quadruplet is needed after the Wien to make the unity transfer device needed inside the chopper for successful de-chopping. BTW, this design works nicely outside the chopper.

YZ projection 10cm downstream

XZ projection 10cm downstream

Is the magnetic shield adequate? Model was copied twice with offsets to create a larger model with three Wiens on 30mm diameter chopping circle. E and B fields are identical in the three Wiens Stray field effects are seen and are small – the 5.24mm square arrays still get through all Wiens. Flipping the field in the bottom Wien (hall B) doesn’t change the result. Conclusion: shield is good enough for this first order model.

Three Wien filters on 30mm circle

Three Wiens Z+ end view 16 rays on 5.24mm square in each bore

E field map superimposed on orbits

Next steps Obtain endorsement from Division management so I can get formal help from CASA and EGG. Or stop. Further explore parameter space in attempt to increase good transmission region: electrode curvature in mm increments, dipole coil inner radius in 100 mm increments Add quadruplet (quads and correctors) after Wien to allow full transfer matrix to be set to unity, or at least no more than swapping head and tail of bunch. Model chopping system with included Wien system. Use round conductors with leads in dipole to learn how this affects transmission. If all goes well, engineering design/fab of prototype. EGG test in injector stand.