Darrel Huish Vice Chancellor Minnesota State Colleges and Universities

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Shared Technical Infrastructure Bill Willis Deputy State CIO ITAB Meeting 12/2/2005.
Advertisements

1. 2 August Recommendation 9.1 of the Strategic Information Technology Advisory Committee (SITAC) report initiated the effort to create an Administrative.
The Changing Face of Higher Ed and the Role of IT as a Strategic Enabler Dave Wallace Chief Information Officer University of Waterloo December 4, 2012.
IT Governance: Prioritizing Projects through Inclusivity, Communications and Transparency Stephen A. Vieira CIO and Executive Director of IT The Community.
National overview: Workforce Planning Elinor Mitchell.
Service Lifecycle Cradle 2 Grave Romy Bolton – University of Iowa Bernard Gulachek – University of Minnesota.
Charting the Course for Technology at ASU Strategic Direction Based on Data and Governance Cathy Bates, CIO Information Technology Services.
SEM Planning Model.
Utilization-Focused Assessment: Principles and Practices Paula Carlson Vice President & Liaison to the Board of Regents St. Olaf College CHEA Annual Conference.
From the IT Assessment to the IT Roadmap ( )
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Lynette Olson, Assessment & Effectiveness Director & Gary Langer, Associate Vice Chancellor, Office of the Chancellor, Minnesota State Colleges and Universities.
State of Information Technology Presentation for Faculty Council November 14, 2013 Mike Carlin Vice Chancellor for IT and CIO.
Enterprise IT Decision Making
QAD's Customer Engagement Dan Blake Consultancy Development Director, QAD QAD Explore 2012.
HARVARD | BUSINESS | SCHOOL
Information Technology Master Plan
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Information Technology Alignment, Strategy & Governance, and Efficiency CSG Winter 2011.
Red Means Go Office of Information Technology Future Directions for OIT OIT Staff Meeting Monday, March 9, 2009 Marc Hoit, Ph.D. Vice Chancellor for IT.
From a galaxy far, far away... The Compact Process A View from 40,000 feet Laura Coffin Koch Associate Vice Provost University of Minnesota.
WRITING LEARNING OUTCOMES AND MAPPING CURRICULUM UK Office of Assessment.
New Frameworks for Strategic Enrollment Management Planning
Nevada State Innovation Model (SIM) Delivery System and Payment Alignment May 6,
Our Journey to a Virtual Shared Service Desk. Christy Long Director, ITS Services and Solutions Mark Staub Manager for Service Delivery, ITS Services.
President’s Fall Retreat Tuesday, August 13, 2013 Charting the Future of Minnesota State Colleges and Universities.
Office of Major Project Development (OMPD) Overview November 2015.
Student success is the highest priority of every community college in Texas and our legislative priorities reflect this core principle. The member colleges.
Vision to Reality: How Knowledge Sharing Promotes Efficiencies Through Process Improvement  History of the Knowledge Collaboration Centre (KCC)  The.
Integrated Planning Initiatives Dr. Ryan Cornner Associate Vice President, Strategic Planning and Innovation November 17, 2014.
Joint CIO Council and HR Deans & Directors Meeting
IT Governance and Management Structure
Making Cross-campus, Inter-institutional Collaborations Work
Collaborative Innovation Communities: Bringing the Best Together
PMO Awareness and Support Presentation
Effectively engaging everyone in it governance
ACE II Communication Strategy
Updating the Value Proposition:
The assessment process For Administrative units
FY17 End of Year Goals Summary FY17: Top 40 Goals Assessment
University Career Services Committee
Making the CHANGE Christine Wyatt VP Sales, Moodlerooms Louise Finn
Maine is IT! at SMCC Grant Playbook for
Improving Mission Effectiveness By Exploiting the Command’s Implementation Of the DoD Enterprise Services Management Framework - DESMF in the [name the.
EDUCAUSE Southwest 2009 "Copyright Mario Berry and Shah Ardalan This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission is granted for.
Harvard CRM Service Strategy
Towards a New ERP: Status Update
Research Program Strategic Plan
Agenda Workforce Development Coaching Mentoring
Southern Obesity Summit Senior Program Officer
Somalia NGO Consortium
Information Technology Policy Institutional Data Policy
Support for the AASHTO Committee on Planning (COP) and its Subcommittees in Responding to the AASHTO Strategic Plan Prepared for NCHRP 8-36, TASK 138.
Integrating Student Success Initiatives Across Your Campus
Capex to Opex: Are You Ready?
Analytics for Student Success
Assistant Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Suffolk County Community College
Finance & Planning Committee of the San Francisco Health Commission
Long Term Financial Sustainability Strategy Roadmap Review
Employee engagement Delivery guide
DEVELOPING A HIGH PERFORMING FEDERAL WORKFORCE THROUGH INTERAGENCY COLLABORATION Randy Bergquist Chair, Interagency Chief Learning Officer Council.
Strategic Planning in Dynamic Times
Guided Pathways & SEM: Everything you ever wanted to know and more!
DREMC Balanced Scorecard Training / Planning Workshop
Local Goal Setting & SEA Plan Introduction & Overview
to Sustainably Develop Nurse Leaders in Targeted Areas of Excellence
College of Social Sciences
Presentation transcript:

Multi-Campus Service Delivery Strategy: Creating Clarity In The Delivery of Information Technology

Darrel Huish Vice Chancellor Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Multi-Campus Service Delivery Strategy: Creating Clarity In The Delivery of Information Technology Darrel Huish Vice Chancellor Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Kenneth Janz Chief Information Officer Winona State University Chris McCoy Chief Information Officer Metropolitan State University Ken Ries Chief Information Officer Pine Technical College Andrea Kodner-Wenzel System Director of Enterprise Systems Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Thursday, November 8, 2012, 8:00am, Meeting Room 404 EDUCAUSE 2012– Denver Colorado

Overview of Presentation Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Issues Facing the System Office and Campuses Service Delivery Strategy Supporting Steps Initial Projects Benefits and Outcomes Discussion

Locations The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System has: 31 Institutions 54 Campuses 47 Communities

Students Serve 430,000 students in credit and noncredit courses. Produce 34,700 graduates each year. Educate 63 percent of the state’s undergraduates.

Faculty and Staff Employ more than 19,300 full-time and part-time faculty and staff

Issues Facing the System Office and Campus CIOs

Struggling to Find Balance Campus Autonomy System Office Efficiency

No Trust Campus CIOs System Office

No Service Inventory Inventory of Services

No Consistency $ $ $

No Roadmap

Service Delivery Strategy

Creation of a Workgroup

Application Inventory Survey “As – Is” Model

Near-Term Service Collaboration Projects Shared Vision - Future State Near-Term Service Collaboration Projects “To – Be” Model SDS Strategy & Roadmap

Principles, Assumptions, and Constraints Projects and Charters * How to Create A Shared Vision? Vision Principles, Assumptions, and Constraints Vision Statements Goals Supporting Steps * Projects and Charters *

Develop Supporting Steps Ex: Life cycle management Develop common service catalog Clarify governance model Expand data gathering Roadmaps Delete “Ex: Life cycle management” Move beyond a shared vision of a future state to a roadmap for turning that vision into reality

Supporting Step – Common Service Catalog … pertinent data on enterprise services, services shared between institutions and individual campus services. Inventory of services becomes a common service catalog which promotes shared services Increase transparency Catalyst for new conversations Example: Identify areas for future collaboration

Supporting Step – Clarify Governance Model Leverage existing structures (e.g. governance model) Clarify where the service delivery strategy fits into existing governance model Temporary or permanent?

Supporting Step – Expand Data Gathering Initial on-line survey 3rd party-led deep dives CIO quarterly discussions Bi-weekly conference call Workgroups Document sharing Delete first bullet point (Initial on-line survey) Build trust through collaboration and shared experiences

Supporting Step - Roadmaps Why Roadmaps? Help us understand: New services Campus ↔ enterprise services Discontinuing services

Development of SDS Roadmap

Step 6: Select Projects Efficiency / Cost Reduction Improved Service Alignment with the System’s Strategic Framework Time to implement Feasibility Cost

Projects and Charters Near-Term Opportunistic Lingering work Easy to identify Quick to implement High impact Close to home Opportunistic Lingering work Long-term impact Longer lead time Partners Visionary Deeper thought Greater impact Higher risk Increased coordination

Phase I : Near-Term Projects Enterprise Active Directory Enterprise SharePoint Event Management System

Phase II : Next Iteration of Projects Enterprise Identity and Access Management Acceleration ERP Integration Acceleration Analytics Initiative Shared Computing – Data Center Services Consolidation

An environment that encourages … Benefits An environment that encourages … EVERYONE to participate in seeking new IT services or policies to support current and emerging business strategies.

Benefits Enterprise-wide services mapped to the business processes or strategies they support

a documented and well-understood roadmap … Benefits Everyone operating from … of experimental, emerging, established, and obsolete information technologies. a documented and well-understood roadmap …

because IT services are planned, focused, aligned and cost effective. Benefits Stakeholders will receive value … because IT services are planned, focused, aligned and cost effective.

Discussion