Computer Science Standards Review

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CSTA K-12 Computer Science Standards (rev 2011)
Advertisements

Jefferson Township Public Schools Spring 2009 Testing Analysis Presented to: Jefferson Township Board of Education Presented by: Mary K. Thornton, Ph.D.
WEBINAR – FEBRUARY 25, 2015 OSPI-Developed Assessments in Social Studies, The Arts, Health, Fitness & Educational Technology
NETS Meets Common Core Teresa Knapp Gordon, NBCT
Washington Educational Technology Assessments Educational Technology.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Educator Effectiveness Academy Day 1, Session 2. Participants will: review STEM Standards of Practice student proficiencies. analyze the STEM Standards.
Seeing the Destination So We Can Direct Others to It
Curriculum Transformation Moving towards the Reality.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Next Generation Science Standards Update Cheryl Kleckner Education Specialist.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Common Core Implementation Update SEPTEMBER 4, 2014 CAMBRIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP 1 Start recording—title slide—1 of 3 Introducing the Next Generation Science Standards Originally presented by:
Building 21 st Century Skills with ICTs What does it mean? GEORGE SCHARFFENBERGER 6 September 2006.
The Next Generation Science Standards From Awareness to Transition
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
1 PD3 P rofessional D evelopment D ecisions Using D ata.
CFN 204 · Diane Foley · Network Leader CMP3 Professional Development Presented by: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach CFN204 1.
Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics Webinar Series – Part One Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Randy I. Dorn, State Superintendent.
Tuning Indiana: Education. Originally focused on: Elementary education Math education Special education.
Summary of Assessments By the Big Island Team: (Sherry, Alan, John, Bess) CCSS SBAC PARCC AP CCSSO.
You Can’t Afford to be Late!
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
What do you think should be the goal of technology in education?
Defining 21st Century Skills: A Frameworks for Norfolk Public Schools NORFOLK BOARD OF EDUCATION Fall 2009.
Coding Connections at the Interface of Algebra I and Physical World Concepts Improving Teacher Quality Grant Program Summer 2016.
Measuring the Power of Learning.™ 2015–16 CAASPP March, 2016 Laurie Carlson California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP)
Digital Citizenship 7 th Grade. Goal 2: Engage learners through the use of technological tools to access, create and share content as well as collaborate.
Teaching and Learning with Technology
You Can’t Afford to be Late!
What about the Assessment System?
Assessment and Report Cards
Best Practices in Implementing the 2010 ELA Standards
NATIONAL PROCESS FOR DEVELOPMENT
Using PBL and Engineering Design to Engage Students in
ISBE Mathematics Foundational Services Training
Ed Reform in Washington State 4.5, 4.6
Revised Curriculum.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Making meaningful connections
Education Transform Resources
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
Little Coders Computational Thinking in K-2 Classrooms
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
A Digital Age Skill for All
STEM, Science and engineering practices are designed to strengthen and develop students understanding of the nature of science and engineering. 1. Asking.
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Welcome to GATE Advisory Engaging Families to Support Success
Digital Citizenship Background & Definitions
The BVSD Curriculum Essentials Document
STEM, Science and engineering practices are designed to strengthen and develop students understanding of the nature of science and engineering. 1. Asking.
STEM, Science and engineering practices are designed to strengthen and develop students understanding of the nature of science and engineering. 1. Asking.
Electricity & Magnetism 1. Question & Research Task
Using PBL and Engineering Design to Engage Students in
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
The Public Schools of Dover and Sherborn
Introducing Digital Technologies
Designing Programs for Learners: Curriculum and Instruction
The Intersection of Literacy and Digital Literacy in the classroom:
2018 Virginia Science Standards of Learning
Moving Literacy Forward with 2017 English Standards of Learning
Presentation transcript:

Computer Science Standards Review Fall 2016

Goals Reviewing and vetting the draft standards Conducting side by side evaluation of current state learning standards Identifying gaps, questions and concerns OSPI Update & Computer Science Standards Review September 2016 Except where otherwise noted, this work by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.

A Working Definition Computer science is the study of computers and algorithmic processes, including their principles, design, implementation, and impact on society (adapted from ACM, 2003). OSPI Update & Computer Science Standards Review September 2016 Except where otherwise noted, this work by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.

Overview: Standards Comparison Focus of Analysis: Where overlaps and differences existed between the two standard sets; To identify new content or processes that existed; and To form the basis for developing a implementation plan. Methodology: Due to structural differences between the two sets of standards, it was not possible to do a direct quantitative alignment. Therefore, we elected to do a side by side alignment. OSPI Update & Computer Science Standards Review September 2016 It was a challenging task because the structures of the two standards sets are very different Develop a 4-year CS implementation plan that districts and other state and local education leaders can use to drive and support decisions and actions. Except where otherwise noted, this work by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.

Educational Technology In the 2014–2015 school year, school districts provided data on classroom-level use of educational technology assessments. Districts must self-report only if teachers used the OSPI-developed assessments. There is no requirement to enter data related to specific assessments or other assessment strategies. These are the results: 42% of Washington school districts reported using an OSPI-developed assessment for educational technology (up from 38% in 2013–2014).   The most-used assessments were those that included standards for social studies: “You Decide” and “Constitutional Issues.” Standards for Educational Technology 184 school districts have technology standards for students (mandatory in 91 districts). 130 districts have technology standards for teachers (mandatory in 52 districts). 106 districts have technology standards for administrators (mandatory in 33 districts). OSPI Update & Computer Science Standards Review September 2016 Educational technology assessments developed by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) are voluntarily administered in the elementary, middle, and high school grades. Teachers use the assessments to determine if students meet Washington’s standards for educational technology. The assessments integrate standards from science, math, health, English language arts, social studies, and the arts. The educational technology assessments adapt well to instructional planning. The assessments helped students apply new knowledge across other subject areas. In some districts, students used the assessments to produce standardized samples of successful work for graduation portfolios. Districts want training for teachers that focuses on instructional technology and assessment strategies. Except where otherwise noted, this work by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.

Reading Ed-Tech Standards OSPI Update & Computer Science Standards Review September 2016 Except where otherwise noted, this work by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.

Unique Numbering System for the 2016 CSTA K–12 CS Standards To help organize and track each individual standard, we have developed a unique identifier for each standard. An example appears below: Grades Identifier Interim CSTA K–12 CS Standard Framework Concept Framework Practice 9–10 3A-A-2-1 Design and develop a software artifact working in a team. Algorithms and Programming Collaborating OSPI Update & Computer Science Standards Review September 2016 As students revisit key ideas across the grade bands, they develop increasingly sophisticated understandings of core concepts and practices. For example, students in high school will use and build on ideas learned in Kindergarten through 8th grade. The progressions have been set up such that concepts in earlier grade bands are not required as prerequisites for later grade bands, but instead provide a background for richer understanding of later concepts. Note that the practices explained in the K-12 Frameworks are not by grade bands how students should be exhibiting the practice with increasing sophistication from Kindergarten to Grade 12. The other three practices are essential and complementary to CT. Except where otherwise noted, this work by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.

[Interim] K-12 CS Standard The identifier code corresponds to: Level – Concept – Practice – Key Identifier Code Key Levels 1A Grades K–2 1B Grades 3–5 2 Grades 6–8 3A Grades 9–12 3B Grades 11–12 Concepts A Algorithms and Programming D Data and Analysis N Networks and the Internet C Computing Systems Practices 1 Fostering an Inclusive Computing Culture Collaborating 3 Recognizing and Defining Computational Problems 4 Developing and Using Abstractions 5 Creating Computational Artifacts 6 Testing and Refining 7 Communicating about Computing OSPI Update & Computer Science Standards Review September 2016 Use the legend to interpret the unique identifier for each Except where otherwise noted, this work by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License. Data and Analysis

Examples INTERM CS (CSTA) EdTech Standards 1A-N-7-17 Use passwords to protect private information and discuss the effects of password misuse   Practice Safety 2.1.1 2.1.2 Practice personal safety. Practice ethical and respectful behavior. 1A-I-7-15 Compare and contrast examples of how computing technology has changed and improved the way people live, work, and interact.   Investigate & Think Critically 1.3.1 Identify and define authentic problems and significant questions for investigation and plan strategies to guide inquiry. OSPI Update & Computer Science Standards Review September 2016 1A-A-6-8 Analyze and debug (fix) an algorithm that includes sequencing and simple loops, with or without a computing device.   Except where otherwise noted, this work by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.

Standards Comparison Tools OSPI Update & Computer Science Standards Review September 2016 The first step in comparing the two standards sets was to create a structure by which the standards sets could be compared. Except where otherwise noted, this work by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.

Resources Education Technology Standards can be accessed via: Online Grade Level Resources This interactive resource provides GLE Reports (grade level, grade spans, K-12 GLEs) CSTA Computer Science Standards CSTeachers.org Framework for K-12 Computer Science Education Concept View Link Link OSPI Update & Computer Science Standards Review September 2016 Link Except where otherwise noted, this work by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.

Resources Common Core Standards Google Play Apps (also iTunes) Mathematics English Language Arts Google Play Apps (also iTunes) OSPI Update & Computer Science Standards Review September 2016 Except where otherwise noted, this work by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.

SurveyGizmo Links K-2 (All) 3-5 (1-7, 8-14, 15-21) 6-8 (1-12, 13-25) Using Math… 9-10 (Quantities, Equations, Functions) 11-12 (Quantities, Equations, Functions) SurveyGizmo allows for electronic tracking of responses and comments. The standards have been broken into smaller sections to help. OSPI Update & Computer Science Standards Review September 2016 Except where otherwise noted, this work by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.

Thank you for your time today For more information, please contact: Shannon.Thissen@k12.wa.us