GMOs and Campbell’s Ethical Assessment Framework

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCIENCE,SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE E.U.
Advertisements

Chapter 20 REGULATIONS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY. Regulations Are intended to allow us to safely use the benefits of biotech. Help in developing and using biotech.
Chapter 19 Issues and Ethics Identifying an Issue Issue: a subject or problem that has more than one point of view Somatic Cells: cells that compose.
What is Morality?.
ETHICS ETHICS. ETHICS SEEKS TO DETERMINE WHAT A PERSON SHOULD DO, OR THE BEST COURSE OF ACTION, AND PROVIDES REASONS WHY. IT ALSO HELPS PEOPLE DECIDE.
Food Inc.. Warm up Discuss at your table: Have you eaten any GMO (genetically modified organisms) food today?
Bioethics What’s in a question?. What is “ethics”? Ethics: “the rules of conduct recognized in respect to a particular class of human actions of a particular.
Ethics and Genetic Engineering. What Is Genetic Engineering? “Genetic Engineering” = Creating organisms with novel genetic sequences.“Genetic Engineering”
Gene Cloning -Techniques -Ethics -Uses -Consequences.
Ethical Decision Making
GENETIC ENGINEERING by Adil & Andrè. Definition of GE The technology entailing all processes of altering the genetic material of a cell to make it capable.
Social and Ethical Considerations of Agro-biotechnology
Business, Ethics and Profit: Economic Approaches Marc Le Menestrel
Back to Table of Contents pp Chapter 4 Business Ethics and Social Responsibility.
Issues and Ethics in Biotechnology. ETHICS Set of moral principles governing an individual’s action Reflects morality (perception of what is right) Essential.
4 Chapter Business Ethics and Social Responsibility pp
Back to Table of Contents pp Chapter 4 Business Ethics and Social Responsibility.
A Biotechnology Case Study A fictional case study based upon a real problem Should Rutgers University be able to collaborate with Campbell Soup Company.
Have you ever eaten genetically engineered foods? Does it taste good? What is the difference? Scientists want to transfer desirable qualities from one.
Ethical Theory and Business Chapter Two
© Mcgraw-Hill Companies, 2008 Farm Management Chapter 1 Farm Management in the Twenty-First Century.
Marketing Ethics and Social Responsibility
The New Science of Food: Facing Up to Our Biotechnology Choices Prepared by Mark Edelman, Iowa State University David Patton, Ohio State University A Farm.
CODE TO WORD: ETHICS IN THE WORKPLACE Florida Gulf Coast University Hudson Rogers Fall 2003.
Unit 1: Introduction to Agriculture. Objectives 1.1 Define terminology 1.2 Determine the impact of agriculture on Arkansas' economy. (rice, soybeans,
The Ethics of Agricultural Biotech: Lessons for Nanotech? Jeffrey Burkhardt Ethics & Policy Program Institute of Food & Agricultural Sciences University.
The Relu Programme and Animal and Plant Disease Management.
Issues and Ethics in Biotechnology
Biotechnology. D Biotechnology2 Definition Techniques used to modify deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) or the genetic material of a microorganism, plant,
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Business Ethics Chapter # 3 Ethical Principles, Quick Tests, and Decision-Making Guidelines  The best kind of relationship in the world is the one in.
Business ethics and social responsibility
Engineering Ethics ELEC 422, Spring 2006 (kudos to Drs. Peeples and Jerse for portions of this presentation)
Understanding Animal Welfare Issues. Next Generation Science/Common Core Standards Addressed! RST.9 ‐ 10.8 Assess the extent to which the reasoning and.
Value pluralism and decision making A comment. Setting value based priorities in a world of value pluralism Different values must be respected and must.
1 DEAT PERSPECTIVE ON GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS 31 JULY 2007.
Unit B Animal Science and The Industry. Problem Area 6 Meeting Environmental Requirements of Animals.
2  ETHICS IN MARKETING MEANS DELIBERATELY APPLYING STANDARDS OF FAIRNESS OR MORAL RIGHTS AND WRONGS TO MARKETING DECISION MAKING,BEHAVIOUR AND PRACTICE.
ETHICS: THE BASIC QUESTION n Is an action right or wrong? n How do you decide?
Concepts of Engineering and Technology BIOTECHNOLOGY Science, Technology, and Ethics Copyright © Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.
Unit 2 Lesson 7 Biotechnology
Ethics and Moral reasoning
Facilitating moral reasoning: Ethical accounting
Ethics & Social Responsibility
School of Economics Shanghai University
Chapter 3: Ethics and Business Decision Making
Issues and Ethics in Biotechnology
Engineers as Responsible Experimenters
4 Social Responsibility of Business and Government
4 Social Responsibility of Business and Government
Environmental policies in Europe
ETHICAL & SOCIAL IMPACT OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Sustainability, Fisheries and Aquaculture
ISSUES SURROUNDING GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS (GMOs):
Ethical Decision Making
Social and Ethical Considerations of Agro-biotechnology
ELEC4011 Ethics & Electrical Engineering Practice Hugh Outhred
4 Social Responsibility of Business and Government
Animal, Plant & Soil Science
Moral Decision-Making
How An Organization Influences Ethical Decision-Making
4 Chapter Business Ethics and Social Responsibility pp
Ethics & Social Responsibility
Ethics.
Ethics and Genetic Engineering
Social and Ethical Responsibility of Management
Steps for Ethical Analysis
To change the images at the bottom of the slide:
Presentation transcript:

GMOs and Campbell’s Ethical Assessment Framework Purdue University is an equal access/equal opportunity/affirmative action university. If you have trouble accessing this document because of a disability, please contact PVM Web Communications at vetwebteam@purdue.edu.

What this lecture will do Apply Campbell’s Ethics Assessment Process to understand the challenges and implications of sustainability issues in aquaculture Use Campbell’s Assessment to discuss GMOs and highlight intrinsic and extrinsic ethical arguments concerning Aquabounty’s “sustainable salmon” Place holder

Facilitating moral reasoning: Ethical accounting and GMO fish: Should the sale of Aquabounty salmon be banned in Alaska?

Campbell’s Ethics Assessment Process Problem-seeing: What are the ethical issues? Who/what is impacted? Ethical detective work/fact–finding: are we using complete, current science (facts)? Moral imagination: what means/alternatives can achieve our goals? Ethics Jam: what values are embedded? Which have priority? Moral Justification: which options are ethically acceptable? Moral Testing: which moral tests are passed?

Applying the ethics assessment process to a policy case

Should GMO salmon be sold in Alaska?

Problem seeing What are the ethical issues? What must be decided? Is it wrong to sell GMOs fish in Alaska? Do we have special obligations to naturally occurring local species? How will this product impact the market, animals, fisheries industry, fish stocks, the environment, folkways? Will it promote sustainability (people, planet, profit) Who are the stakeholders? What are their interests? Experimental fish, other fish Alaska Native folkways and Alaska cultural icons Threat to diversity and natural resources on the coast of Alaska Environmental impacts Fish farmers and farm staff; Biotech companies and agribusinesses

Central Concerns Unintended consequences and risks for agriculture and the environment Food safety and food policy Ethics of consent and unwanted social consequences Animal welfare and health Concerns about novel biotechnology in food (e.g., cloning) (Intellectual) property issues Religious concerns Trust, education and risk communication

Evaluating Ethical Concerns Intrinsic ethical arguments: these are arguments about the morality of genetic engineering itself Extrinsic ethical arguments: these are arguments about the morality of applications of genetic engineering or its consequences The Philosophy of Food David M. Kaplan (Editor) (2012)   Chapter 7. Ethics and Genetically Modified Food  Gary Comstock: pp. 125-127 http://www.ucpress.edu/book.php?isbn=9780520269347 Chapter 7 is Comstock's chapter (Philosophy of Food by David Kaplan)

Comstock’s 4 main categories (2012, p. 127-130) To engage in agricultural biotechnology is to: Play God Engage in world-altering interventions/technologies Illegitimately cross species boundaries Appropriateness of inserting plant genes into fish Commodify life

Intrinsic arguments: Unnatural argument, violates species integrity, playing God, tampering with evolution Added

Extrinsic arguments: Certain applications of GE are permissible or impermissible according to duty-based constraints or considerations (e.g., legal or moral rights) Issues of rights (we may have obligations to increase the food supply) Property rights are violated Does a particular application relegate people to the status of mere means?

Extrinsic Arguments b. Genetic engineering is good or bad because of its likely consequences. Ways to evaluate consequences: Avoid bad consequences Maximize good consequences Is there fair distribution of good and bad consequences (benefits and burdens) among all affected parties?

Ethical detective work/fact–finding What do we need to know? How are the fish created, bred? What are the welfare impacts on fish? What is the evidence? What is the impact on the environment? What is the difference between GMO fish and non-GMO ones?? What are good sources of information?

What is genetic engineering? The manipulation of the DNA content of an organism to alter that characteristics of that organism (Ruse and Castle, Genetically Modified Foods, 2002) Animal Biotechnology and GMOs Use of modern molecular biological techniques to produce animals to provide vital benefits for human beings These technologies raises important ethical and public policy question.

Moral imagination: What are the options? What are the objectives of decision-makers? - If ban market access (e.g., limit consumer choice healthy alternative) - If allow market access (e.g., competition with wild fisheries) What means/alternatives can achieve their goals? Conduct referendum (include consumers and representatives from fishing industry)

Ethics jam What values are embedded? Which have moral priority? Fairness (F) Compassion (C) Protecting others from harm (PH) Promoting others’ welfare (PW) Respect for others’ choices (RC)

Moral justification Values Alternatives Fairness (F) Compassion (C) Protecting others from harm (PH) Promoting others’ welfare (PW) Respect for others’ choices (RC) Which options are ethically acceptable? Ban market access Allow market access Could tie this to both intrinsic and extrinsic arguments and info on “problem seeing” slide

Which is ethically preferable? Does one respect a broader range of values? Are benefits and harms equally distributed? Which options are ethically acceptable?

Moral testing Harm Practicality Publicity Collegiality *Reversibility Does this alternative do the least harm? Practicality Can the decision be implemented? Publicity Would I want the decision published? Collegiality Can I defend the decision to peers? *Reversibility Would I accept the decision if I were the recipient? Theoretical Is there an ethical theory that supports the decision?

Moral testing Moral tests Choices Allow Ban Harm, Practicality, Publicity, Collegiality, *Reversibility, Theoretical How does it hurt the industry, consumers, fish themselves

Instructor notes On the ethics jam slide, challenge students to think about other values that may apply. Ask students to respond to moral justification the by teasing out both intrinsic and extrinsic concerns. Also discuss Importance of labeling (if concern is couched in terms of choice)