Scoring Guidelines for Speaking and Writing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IDEA® English Language Proficiency Tests (IPT)
Advertisements

SUCCESS BY YOUR STANDARDS ® Administering Idaho’s English Language Assessment (Condensed Training Version) Spring 2015.
1 Test Administrator Training Grades 4, 8, & 10 Science SBA Spring 2015.
STAAR Alternate 2 Preparing for the STAAR Alternate 2 Assessment 2015.
1 Arizona Grade 8 Science Online Field Test Test Administrator Training March 23 – April 2, 2007.
Welcome to PARCC Field Test Training! Presented by the PARCC Field Test Team.
1 ELPA Initial Screening Policies and Procedures ELPA Initial Screening Policies and Procedures Fall 2009 Michigan Department of Education.
Field Testing Performing Fine Arts Assessment Project.
2016 TELPAS Online Testing. TELPAS Assessment Management System Accessed at
ELPA21 Data Entry Interface (DEI) Overview Training Webinar Copyright © 2014 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved.
TELPAS Online Testing & Data Collection December 2010 Texas Assessment Conference TEA’s Student Assessment Division, TELPAS team Cristina Vázquez, Manager.
TEXAS ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (TELPAS) February 2013 by: Michael Marín.
2012 TELPAS Online Testing & Data Collection. Disclaimer  These slides have been prepared by the Student Assessment Division of the Texas Education Agency.
TEA Student Assessment Division 2  These slides have been prepared by the Student Assessment Division of the Texas Education Agency.  If any slide is.
2016 TELPAS Online Testing & Data Collection. Disclaimer  These slides have been prepared by the Student Assessment Division of the Texas Education Agency.
Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System (TELPAS) TELPAS in the Texas Assessment Management System.
Alaska Measures of Progress Paper-Based AMP Webinar December 8, 2015 Gail Tiemann Deputy Project Director AAI Elizabeth Shamla Program Manager Questar.
LEAP 2025 Practice Test Webinar for Teachers
(Required for DTCs, Recommended for STCs)
CBT Update NYSAA NYS 3 – 8 Assessments
What about the Assessment System?
Responsible District and School Codes
Writing and Submitting Student Learning Objectives
Writing Objectives Understand the ways in which the writing assessment differs from other assessments Administer the Writing Performance Assessment.
QUICK START GUIDE TO ONLINE TESTING
Test Security: Never a Dull Moment
ELPA21 Data Entry Interface (DEI) Overview
Welcome to the Nevada Test Administration Training and Q&A Session
ELPA21 Data Entry Interface (DEI) Overview
Assessment, Accountability and Continuous Improvement
Test Security and Ethics
Spring 2016 TELPAS Holistic Rating Training System
Introduction to DSC ClassView
West Virginia ELPA21 Q & A January 8, 2018
Online Testing System Assessment Viewing Application (AVA)
Teacher Hand Scoring System
ELPA21 Screener Paper Administration Using the Data Entry Interface (DEI) Training Module Welcome. In this training module, we will discuss how to use.
ELPA21 Data Entry Interface (DEI) Overview
Teacher Hand Scoring System for Interim Assessments
Teacher Hand Scoring System
Teacher Hand Scoring System (THSS) for Interim Assessments
Orders & Shipment Tracking
Data Entry Interface (DEI) Overview
Teacher Hand Scoring System
Screener Administration
Ohio English Language Proficiency Assessment (OELPA)
Teacher Hand Scoring System for Interim Assessments
Standard for Success Teacher Training.
Teacher Hand Scoring System
English Language Proficiency Assessment for the 21st Century
(Required for DTCs, Recommended for STCs)
Teacher Hand Scoring System
Interim Assessment Training NEISD Testing Services
Data Entry Interface (DEI) Overview
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP)
Teacher Hand Scoring System
E L P A Last updated: 08/31/09.
Participation Reports
Participation Reports
CoAlt: ELA and Math (DLM) DAC Activities 2019
Evaluation Information
Standard for Success Teacher Training.
Iowa Statewide Assessment of Student Progress
English Language Proficiency Assessment for the 21st Century (ELPA21)
Data Entry Interface (DEI) Overview
Test Security and Ethics
Presentation Template for Building Training David Rand, Director DERA
Presentation transcript:

Scoring Guidelines for Speaking and Writing 2017 K – ELPA Scoring Guidelines for Speaking and Writing

Training Overview Part 1: K – ELPA Scoring Overview Part 2: Speaking Part 3: Writing Part 4: Educator Portal Scoring Overview

Materials Needed for Scoring Located on the www.ksassessments.org website you will need to download: K – ELPA Examiner’s Manual KITE® K – ELPA Scoring Manual

Materials Needed for Scoring Located in the Educator Portal you will need to download: 2017 K – ELPA Test Administration and Scoring Directions for Speaking 2017 K – ELPA Test Administration and Scoring Directions for Writing

Test Administration and Scoring Directions These are grade band specific documents. Each document includes: Scripts for test administration Scoring information, question specific scoring rubrics, scoring codes Student writing test for Grade K and Grade 1 (questions that are human scored) These are test secure documents. Documents must be kept secure throughout testing and shredded after completion of testing/scoring.

Part 1: K-ELPA Overview

Educator Portal Account Any educator who is responsible for scoring must have an active account in the Educator Portal. This account must be tied to K – ELPA (not just KAP). Please work with your District Test Coordinator to obtain accounts and/or refer to KITE documentation manuals www.ksassessments.org

K – ELPA Scoring Overview All Reading and Listening questions are Machine Scored Writing questions: some questions are machine scored and some require human scoring All Speaking questions are human scored

Number of Questions that Require Human Scoring Number of Questions to Score Grade Speaking Writing* K 25 5 1 18 4 2-3 16 4-5 11 6 6-8 9-12 7

Test Administration Considerations Scoring Window – Feb. 1–March 30 To allow time for human scoring we recommend that you administer the writing and speaking assessments early in the testing window to allow time for completion of scoring. All scoring must be completed by March 30.

K – ELPA Holistic Scoring All questions that require human scoring on the K – ELPA assessment are scored using Holistic Rubrics Holistic Rubrics: allow you to evaluate strengths and weaknesses of the response as a whole allow you the ability to assign a single rating or one overall score for the entire response are ideal for summative performance tasks

Holistic Rubrics Rubrics are specific to the grade bands: K, 1, 2-3, 4-5, 6-8, 9-12 Rubrics are specific to the domain being assessed (speaking and writing) Rubrics are specific to the task (question)

Holistic Rubrics Rubrics are attached to each question in the KITE Educator Portal scoring system and provided in the Test Administration and Scoring Directions documents. It is important that you print the rubrics and become familiar with scoring criteria.

Determining Scoring Processes Each district has the flexibility to determine who will score the assessment items. It must be a certified educator. Questions may be scored individually, in pairs or in small groups. Questions may be read/heard by more than one reader/scorer, but only one score is entered into the Educator Portal system in KITE®.

Individual Scoring Process Individual scoring allows the scorer to: listen/read written responses use the rubric to determine the rating they would give the response based on the student response determine final rating and enter the response

Paired Scoring Processes Paired scoring allows for calibration of ratings. Paired scoring could be done in the initial phase of scoring allowing scorers the opportunity to: listen/read written responses discuss the rating they would give the response based on the rubric determine final rating

Part 2: K – ELPA Speaking

K – ELPA Speaking Scoring Options Scoring can be performed in one of two ways: by deferred scoring, in which each question is scored individually after the student has completed the assessment, OR by simultaneous scoring, in which the questions are scored while the student is testing and the scores are then entered by using the upload process into Educator Portal.

Deferred Scoring This method of scoring requires the scorer to: have an Educator Portal account login to the Educator Portal go to the scoring tab listen to each response on the computer and make scoring decisions using the appropriate scoring rubric enter each score for the assigned question in the Educator Portal

Simultaneous Scoring This method of scoring requires the scorer to: sit beside the student during the speaking assessment listen to the question and the student response score the response using the appropriate rubric record the score on a spreadsheet that was downloaded in the Educator Portal upload scores in the Educator Portal

K – ELPA Speaking Each district test coordinator is responsible for determining which scoring process will be used by their district for speaking Deferred Scoring Simultaneous scoring A combination or deferred and simultaneous scoring It does not need to be a one size fits all approach, but it does need to be matched to your needs, your district and communicated as such to staff.

Downloading and Uploading Scores The DTC/BTC is responsible for the process of downloading and uploading the spreadsheet.

Nonscore Codes Any question that does not meet the demands of the task are typically given a score of 0, as outlined in the rubric.   Some questions may be difficult to score and will require the use of a nonscore code.

Nonscore Codes In some cases you will need to provide both a score of 0 and a nonscore code. Questions that meet a specific nonscore code criteria as outlined in the rubric should be coded as such when determining the score earned. This helps to further validate the reason for the awarded score of 0. 

Nonscore Codes In some instances you will provide only a nonscore code for the response if the rubric does not allow for both the score code of 0 and the nonscore code.

Nonscore Codes BL = Blank – student response is blank IS = Insufficient or inaudible response OT = Off Task RNE = Response Not in English HSO = Harm to Self or Others

Rubric Example The response does not address the communicative demands of the task.   Responses at the 0 level are typically characterized by: Only in a language other than English Refusal Off Task/Topic Unintelligible BL = Blank – student response is blank  IS = Insufficient or inaudible response OT = Off Task RNE = Response Not in English HSO = Harm to Self or Others

Scoring Considerations Ask yourself: “How consistently and effectively does the response demonstrate command of the speaking skills outlined in the grade-band rubric?”

Part 3: K – ELPA Writing

Grade K and Grade 1 Writing For some questions students respond directly on the computer while others are written in a student test booklet Questions are machine scored and human scored like all other grade bands. The Test Administration and Scoring Directions document provides further guidance and the student test booklet.

Grade K and Grade 1 Writing Scores may be entered directly into the computer or may be uploaded as an entire school or district.  Scores may be uploaded only by the District Test Coordinator (DTC) and/or the Building Test Coordinator (BTC). The DTC determines whether the BTC will upload scores.   

Writing Grades 2–12 Students must write their responses directly in the KITE system. All writing questions must be scored by working directly in the Educator Portal. The use of an upload feature is not available for writing in grades 2–12. Student writing responses in grades 2–12 cannot be printed for scoring.

Writing Grade 2–12 This method of scoring requires the scorer to: have an Educator Portal account login to the Educator Portal go to the scoring tab read each response on the computer and make scoring decisions using the appropriate scoring rubric enter each score for the assigned question in the Educator Portal

Nonscore Codes Any question that does not meet the demands of the task are typically given a score of 0, as outlined in the rubric.   Some questions may be difficult to score and will require the use of a nonscore code.

Nonscore Codes In some cases you will need to provide both a score of 0 and a nonscore code. Questions that meet a specific nonscore code criteria as outlined in the rubric should be coded as such when determining the score earned. This helps to further validate the reason for the awarded score of 0. 

Nonscore Codes In some instances you will provide only a nonscore code for the response if the rubric does not allow for both the score code of 0 and the nonscore code.

Nonscore Codes BL = Blank – student response is blank IS = Insufficient or inaudible response OT = Off Task RNE = Response Not in English HSO = Harm to Self or Others

Rubric Example The response does not address the written demands of the task.   Responses at the 0 level are typically characterized by: Only in a language other than English Refusal Off Task/Topic Unintelligible BL = Blank – student response is blank  IS = Insufficient or inaudible response OT = Off Task RNE = Response Not in English HSO = Harm to Self or Others

Scoring Considerations Ask yourself: “How consistently and effectively does the response demonstrate command of the writing skills outlined in the grade-band rubric?”

Part 4: Educator Portal Scoring Overview

KITE® K – ELPA Scoring Manual Located on the www.ksassessments.org KITE® K – ELPA Scoring Manual Please read and review the document carefully before scoring.

KITE® K – ELPA Scoring Manual Assigning Scorers* Monitoring Scoring Completion* Scoring Responses (page 6) Uploading Scoring Results* Items marked with an asterisk * are specific to the DTC and BTC role tasks

Assigning Scorers Proctor and Scorer terms: When submitting your TEST send you were asked to provide the name of the “proctor” – for purposes of this test a proctor is the same as a scorer.

Scoring Responses Please read and refer to pages 6–9 when scoring responses.

Questions For questions specifically related to the scoring tools please contact the KITE Service Desk: 785-864-3537 kite-support@ku.edu