LEGO Robotics Authentic, Engaging, Problem Solving.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OAME Leadership Conference Creating Communities of Assessment Inquiry and Practice: A Vision for Leadership in Mathematics Pre-Adobe Connect Virtual.
Advertisements

Developing Mathematical Thinking in Addition and Subtraction.
Directions As you view the photos from this teacher-built standards- based classroom, read the accompanying explanation regarding how each depicted artifact.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Common Core Grades 6 – 8 Math Stacy Wozny February 18 th, 2013.
Elementary School Standards-Based Classroom.
High School Standards-Based Classroom.
Implementing the New Mathematics Integrated Resource Package (IRP) British Columbia Ministry of Education Webcast - April 5, 2007.
NCTM’s Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making.
Assessing Students’ Skills in Science & Technology Hong Kong University – May 19 th 2006 Graham Orpwood York/Seneca Institute for Mathematics, Science.
Teacher Judgements – A Functional Data Base ….a monitoring tool for Western Australian Curriculum Maths and English…. designed by teachers for teachers.

Presented by Christina Goldner and Carla Wilson
Guided Math Presented by Heidi Priestley. Principles of Guided Math All scholars can learn. A numeracy-rich environment promotes mathematical learning.
Principles of Assessment
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
IES e-PATT Grant e-PATT: Parents and Teachers Together.
Differentiated Supervision
School Improvement Improving what’s happening in the classroom for students with disabilities: instruction & its impact on student learning Systems that.
Task 4 Mathematics Boot Camp Fall, 2015.
+ Assessment. + Assessment For, As, Of Learning (Complete Chart below) Assessment Mode: Written, Oral, Performance (Write, Say, Do) Assessment Strategy.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Introduction to Working Portfolios Educator Effectiveness System Training.
MATH 90 CURRICULUM RENEWAL & MATH MAKES SENSE 9 WORKSHOP June 25th, 2010.
Provoking Action to Make Gains Student achievment Equity Public confidence.
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
Connecting the Dots PLC AfL DI Higher Order Thinking TLCP Multi- Literacies Arts Technology Inquiry BIP SEF SIP.
Social Studies Classroom Based Assessments (CBAs ) Tacoma Public School K – 5 Implementation Plan
Learning Today, Leading Tomorrow Cut and discard this bottom portion. The mission of Colleton County Middle School is to provide meaningful learning experiences.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
+ The continuum Summative assessment Next steps. Gallery Walk – the Bigger Picture Take one post it of each of the 3 colours. Walk around a look at the.
SW1 FOS Networking Session Dec. 16, 2011 David Hornell Junior School.
Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.
21 st Century Learning Environments at All Saints. Initial steps towards Personalised Learning in the Grade 5/6 Level.
EPCI Early Primary Collaborative Inquiry Maple Leaf Public School Teston Village Public School Sixteenth Ave Public School Bond Lake Public School R.L.
Curriculum Framework for Mathematics 1 Curriculum Framework for Mathematics Hawaii State Dept. of Education OCISS, Instructional Services Branch.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
What is Writing Matters? Writing program for upper elementary and middle school. Comprehensive curriculum resources and professional development. Features.
Mathematics and the Common Core Principals’ Conference November 18, 2011.
Mentoring Moments: Powerful Designs for Mentoring Teaching Policy and Standards Branch Issue 12 / Nov 2012.
Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.
 “I have to teach the same information skills each year because students do not learn them.”  “I don’t have time to give tests so I do not assess student.
Effective mathematics instruction:  foster positive mathematical attitudes;  focus on conceptual understanding ;  includes students as active participants.
Teacher Leader Endorsement Programme Modeling Exemplary Mathematics Teaching Session 6 – Differentiating Instruction Facilitator: Rebeka Matthews Sousa.
+ Washington State Mathematics Fellows Andrew Hickman NCESD Math Fellows.
Performance Assessment: The Core of Competency Based Learning Rose ColbyIowa ASCDJune, 2014.
Numeracy and Maths Parent Workshop September 2015.
Developed by the Southern Alberta Professional Development Consortium (SAPDC) as a result of a grant from Alberta Education to support implementation of.
Maths No Problem; A Mastery Approach.
21st Century Pilot for System Learning
Common Core State Standards Mathematics
Competency Based Learning and Project Based Learning
Improving Teaching Practices through the Use of Video-Case Analysis
Inquiry-based learning and the discipline-based inquiry
Mathematics at Tiger Academy Eureka Math
School Library Services 21
Back to School Night for Mathematics in Context®
Instructional Rounds Peninsula School District
Effective Learning Environment Video
Inquiry in Science.
Fulton County Schools Personalized Learning Instructional Model: Ocee Elementary January 2016.
Professional Learning for the e-Learning Context
Welcome to Day Three.
Big Ideas and Problem Solving
What is a Performance Task
Maths No Problem; A Mastery Approach.
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
A Model for Building and Using Professional Learning Communities
Presentation transcript:

LEGO Robotics Authentic, Engaging, Problem Solving

Unit by M. Curtis & J. McLaren Presentation by M. Curtis

The Toronto District School Board classroom robotics pilot asked teachers to bring LEGO robotics into the classroom, and link them meaningfully to the Ministry of Education Curriculum.

Getting Started

Our goal was to guide and facilitate the development and application of mathematical processes through student-lead inquiry and problem solving

Ontario Ministry of Education. (2005) Ontario Ministry of Education. (2005). The Ontario curriculum grades 1-8: Mathematics. Retrieved from www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/elementary/math18curr.pdf

Pairs of students programmed their robot to complete assigned tasks. Each task was designed such that success would involve making use of specific strand expectations; groups would investigate math curriculum as they sought solutions to the problems they faced.

Patterning 1.2: make predictions about linear growing patterns, through investigation

Measurement 2.2: solve problems that require conversion between metric units of measure

Number Sense 2.4: solve multi-step problems arising from real-life contexts and involving whole numbers and decimals

Students carefully plotted various straight-line and turning motions to determine relationships that would allow them to plan and calculate their programs without the need for 'guess and check'

Relationship between ‘track’ and ‘turning radius’

Students periodically submitted reflections and examples to demonstrate their learning progress; these were used as assessments for, as and of learning.

Matt Curtis. (2016, April 17th). Conference 1[Video file] Matt Curtis. (2016, April 17th). Conference 1[Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPzzyTvT_-4&feature=youtu.be

Matt Curtis. (2016, April 17th). Conference 2[Video file] Matt Curtis. (2016, April 17th). Conference 2[Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrKa0sO4VGk&feature=youtu.be

A culminating task was created which allowed students to select between three rich scenarios. Success criteria and rubrics based upon the achievement chart helped to guide student product.

Work product was differentiated, allowing each student to select the manner in which they displayed their learning. Each student produced an independent report, and each pair developed a presentation using a format of their choice.

Guidelines were summarized: “Using examples and explanations of your choice, demonstrate that you have mastered each of the curriculum expectations covered in the robotics unit.”

Thrilled to be visited by Antonio Santos; Central Coordinating Principal STEM K-12!

During the pilot program, many of our colleagues observed our students’ engagement, and expressed interest in our unit.

With support from administration, we are in the process of reconfiguring decommissioned shop space to support robotics programs school wide. Additionally, we have hosted learning workshops with the entire teaching staff at Charles Gordon Sr. P.S. These professional development sessions had the goal of providing teachers with the opportunity to gain the skills necessary to integrate robotics into their classrooms as well.