New Assessments of the California Next Generation Science Standards: What to Expect This Spring and Beyond California Science Education Conference October.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Guide to Implementation
Advertisements

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Presentation to California Teachers Association State Council.
1 Alignment of Alternate Assessments to Grade-level Content Standards Brian Gong National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment Claudia.
New Hampshire Enhanced Assessment Initiative: Technical Documentation for Alternate Assessments Alignment Inclusive Assessment Seminar Brian Gong Claudia.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Principles of Assessment
Science & Technology Grades Spring 2007
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 9, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction National Center and State Collaborative California Activities Kristen Brown, Ph.D. Common Core.
Committee on the Assessment of K-12 Science Proficiency Board on Testing and Assessment and Board on Science Education National Academy of Sciences.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction CISC General Membership Meeting March Keric Ashley,
Tool 5: Using Evidence of Learning Specifications to Develop a Performance Task and Rubric Five Tools & Processes for NGSS.
ELA Grade 11/12 Cohort Common Core Transition Training SY March 7, 2014 Professional Development Center (PDC) Judy Henderson, Emily Jimenez, Elizabeth.
Measuring the Power of Learning.™ 2015–16 CAASPP March, 2016 Laurie Carlson California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP)
Paulding County School District Hutchens Elementary Parent Presentation Powerpoint information has been adapted from resources available at
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Science Assessment Development and Status
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP)
Secondary Assessment & Grade Reporting
NATIONAL PROCESS FOR DEVELOPMENT
Instructional Services Division of Educational Services
INTRODUCTION TO THE ELPAC
All Standards All Students
California Science Test (CAST)
The California Alternate Assessments What’s New in 2017–18?
Quarterly Meeting Focus
So, What is Teacher Leadership?
Using the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Rubric Proactively
Significant Events in Science Updates
NGSS Assessments in the Classroom: Update on the Development of the California Science Test (CAST) and California Alternate Assessment (CAA) for Science.
California Teaching Performance Assessment
Analyzing Performance Tasks: Turning Results Into Action
Literacy Across Disciplines (LAD)
Next Generation Science Standards
The California Next Generation Science Standards
Improving the Accessibility of Locally Developed Assessments CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment 2016 Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction,
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING
The California Alternate Assessments What’s New in 2017–18?
Classroom test and Assessment
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Assessment Updates California Special Education Local Plan
Developmental Reading Assessment
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Update
12/11/2015.
Building Understanding of the North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards How to READ the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Rubric Using language and.
Standard Setting for NGSS
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
Interim Assessment Training NEISD Testing Services
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress and the California Alternate Assessments Special Education Local Plan Area Directors May 5,
NGSS Tool and Process 1 . Advancing Tools and Processes for Next Generation Science Planning for Classroom Assessment Tool 5: Using Evidence of Learning.
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Michael Heinz, Science Coordinator NJDOE Science Homepage
California Science Test (CAST)
Science Assessment Development and Status
Instructional Services Division of Educational Services
Instructional Services Division of Educational Services
Instructional Services Division of Educational Services
Wendi Anderson, Senior Advisor for ELA/Literacy, PARCC, Inc.
NGSS Tool and Process 1 . Five Tools and Processes for Translating the NGSS into Instruction and Classroom Assessment Tool 2: Using Performance Expectations.
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP)
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module One: Introduction SBIEP Module one: Introduction - The standards-based reform movement has.
Instructional Services Division of Educational Services
NGSS Tool and Process 1 . Five Tools and Processes for Translating the NGSS into Instruction and Classroom Assessment Tool 5: Using Evidence of Learning.
National Literacy and Numeracy Learning Progressions: Overview
Presentation transcript:

New Assessments of the California Next Generation Science Standards: What to Expect This Spring and Beyond California Science Education Conference October 22, 2016 Palm Springs, CA

Presenters Jessica Barr, Education Administrator II, Assessment Development and Administration Division, California Department of Education Scott Maderer, Assessment Specialist IV, Educational Testing Service Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

Federal and State Science Requirements for Science Assessments Upcoming Opportunities and Milestones Role of Stakeholders in the Test Design Process Overview of CAST Operational Design and 2017 Pilot CAST Questions CAA for Science Operational Concept Model and 2017 Pilot CAA for Science Questions Further Information Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

Federal and State Requirements for Science Assessments Assessments are administered once annually at each grade span: grades three–five; grades six–nine; and grades ten– twelve. Once the system is operational, aggregate scores will be publicly released. Student participation rates must be collected and reported for accountability purposes. Alternate achievement standards will be used for students with significant cognitive disabilities provided that: The standards are aligned with academic achievement standards. The participating students have an individualized education program (IEP). Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

Upcoming Opportunities and Milestones November 8–10, 2016 CAST 2018 Field Test Item Writing Workshop November 14–16, 2016 CAA for Science 2017 Pilot Embedded Performance Task and Prioritization Scheme Review Meeting January 2017 Training Tests for CAST and Training Samples for CAA for Science become available March 20, 2017 Piloting of CAST and CAA for Science Begins 2018 CAST Field Test CAA for Science Pilot Year 2 2020 CAA for Science Operational Administration 2019 CAST Operational Administration CAA for Science Field Test Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

Role of Stakeholders in the Test Design Process CAST and CAA for Science designs were informed by feedback from: California science teachers, including representatives of the California Science Teachers Association (CSTA) Higher education officials, including representatives of Stanford University’s Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) Assessment Program (SNAP) STEM reform experts, including representatives from the National Research Council (NRC), which developed A Framework for K–12 Science Education Representatives from various other advocacy groups Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

Stakeholder Priorities for Assessments of the California NGSS (CA NGSS) Focus on providing information to support the improvement of teaching and learning. Promote a dramatic shift in science instruction across all grades. Reflect fidelity to the CA NGSS. Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

CAST Operational Design and 2017 Pilot Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

CAST Design Goals Emphasize the importance of group-level results to promote improvements to teaching and learning. Provide models of high quality, CA NGSS–aligned assessment items and performance tasks (PTs). Create incentives for schools to provide science instruction in every grade, not just in tested grades. Measure the range and depth of CA NGSS performance expectations (PEs) by leveraging the state’s distinctly large student population. Minimize testing time and costs. Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

CAST Operational Design Features: Part 1 Assessment design measures the range and depth of the CA NGSS PEs over a three year cycle Includes the three dimensions: Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCIs), Science and Engineering Practices (SEPs), and Crosscutting Concepts (CCCs) Includes the four science domains: Life Sciences; Physical Sciences; Earth and Space Sciences; and Engineering, Technology, and Applications of Science Assessment design makes use of a diverse range of item types Both discrete items as well as PTs are used. Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

Integrating Aspects of the CA NGSS into Item Development CCCs SEPs DCIs PEs Items are being developed to assess the PE and incorporate at least two of the three intertwined dimensions of knowledge. PTs may integrate two of the four science domains. Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

CAST Operational Design Features: Part 2 The operational administration will Be a two-stage adaptive assessment. Use partial matrix sampling of content. This approach provides group-level feedback while ensuring individual student performance is measured fairly and comparably. The operational assessment is designed to be administered in two hours or less. The operational assessment is administered at grades five and eight, and at either grade ten, eleven, or twelve for high school. The design requires that all students in the tested grades participate in three segments (A, B, and C) of the test. Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

Operational Segment A Segment A is a two-stage adaptive segment. Segment A combines machine-scorable short answer and selected response items that cover a very broad range of the CA NGSS PEs. Segment A contributes to student and group scores. Stage 2: Second Set of Items Stage 1: First Set of Items Mix of Difficulty Levels Easy Difficulty Level Medium Difficulty Level Hard Difficulty Level Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

Transition from Segment A to Segment B Performance in Segment A guides the selection of science domains presented in Segment B. The assignment of the science domains in Segment B will be random unless performance on a particular science domain in Segment A is weak. Segment B: Selected Science Domains via Performance Tasks Earth and Space Sciences Physical Sciences Engineering, Technology, and Applications of Science Life Sciences Screener Segment A: All Science Domains via Discrete Items  Transition Example   Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

Operational Segment B Segment B includes PTs that require students to solve a series of complex problems set in domain-specific contexts, which deeply measure a student’s command of selected CA NGSS PEs. Contributes to student and group scores Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

Operational Segment C Segment C includes a range of items that, collectively, broadly and deeply measure the CA NGSS PEs associated with the tested grade span. All CA NGSS PEs (minus those identified as not suitable for summative assessments) will be collectively assessed at the group level only. Encourages the teaching of science at all grade levels Contributes to group-level scores Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

2017 CAST Full Census Pilot Participation required for all students in grades five and eight High school sampling: All high schools Each high school assigned a single grade All students enrolled in that grade are required to participate Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

2017 CAST Pilot Components Purpose: Collect participation status of students; try out newly developed item types and test system functionality Items Training tests Student survey Accessibility supports Teacher survey Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

Training Tests Purpose: Provide students with an opportunity to engage with CA NGSS–aligned items Educators and students are encouraged to access the training test/sample for each grade span to see a variety of science content and item types. Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

Overview of Accessibility Features Purpose: Evaluate functionality of some accessibility features American Sign Language Text-to-speech Braille (refreshable and embosser) Print on demand Student eligibility will be determined by the accommodations identified as required in the student’s IEP and/or Section 504 plan. Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

Teacher Survey Purpose: Collect feedback on the pilot test administration One survey per science teacher Approximately 10–12 questions No more than 15 minutes to complete Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

CAST Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

CAA for Science Operational Concept Model and 2017 Pilot Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

Guiding Principles of the CAA for Science Provide meaningful information to both students and educators Support and promote educators’ implementation of the CA NGSS Embed assessment into instructional practice Offer a developmentally appropriate opportunity for students with significant cognitive disabilities to be assessed Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

Assessment Models Considered: CAA for Science Linear on-demand assessment Fixed set of questions presented in order of difficulty with starting and stopping points that may be used to eliminate questions that may be too easy or too difficult Multistage adaptive, on-demand assessment Adapts the difficulty level of the succeeding set of items to the student’s ability level based on the student’s cumulative performance on the first set of items presented Collection of embedded performance tasks (EPTs) Used to summatively evaluate student performance and are integrated with, or embedded in, classroom work Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

Evaluation of the Design Options Assessment Models Guiding Principles Stakeholder Feedback Design Options Guiding Principles 1 2 3 4 Linear on-demand assessment Multistage adaptive, on-demand assessment Collection of embedded performance tasks Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

Design: Collection of EPTs Development of EPTs may be done at the: Local level (state-approved), State level, or A combination of these two approaches. The student’s test examiner will administer EPTs: At state-specified intervals. With student responses recorded and scored according to state-defined criteria and protocols. Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

Connectors for the CAA for Science Connector Term Description Performance Expectation (PE)* Specifies what students should know, understand, and be able to do; integrates SEPs, CCCs, and DCIs; illustrates how students engage in SEPs to develop a better understanding of essential knowledge; supports targeted instruction and assessment by providing tasks that are measurable and observable Core Content Connector (Connector) Builds a bridge to the content of the PE Focal Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities (FKSA) Describe what students should know and be able to do in terms of the original PE and associated Connector Essential Understanding (EU) Defines a basic, foundational key idea or concept Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

Collection of EPTs: Benefits Shows student progress over time when collecting student work samples throughout the school year Provides an opportunity for students to demonstrate performance “in real time” Conforms to the principles of universal design Offers the least restrictive environment for teacher/students to select/produce evidence Supports the improvement of teaching and learning Provides a minimally stressful and burdensome process for students Promotes the delivery of challenging, yet developmentally appropriate, academic content to students Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

Collection of EPTs: Challenges Some educators may see the use of the EPTs as distinct from the instructional process. Scoring and professional development activities can be costly. Extra vigilance is required to ensure technical integrity. Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

CAA for Science Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

For Further Information Assessment Development and Administration Division Office 916-319-0803 California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Office caaspp@cde.ca.gov 916-445-8765 Educational Testing Service California Technical Assistance Center http://www.caaspp.org/contact/ caltac@ets.org 800-955-2954 Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science

How to Get Involved in the Development of CAST and the CAA for Science Opportunities for California educator involvement may include: Item writing Item review Form review Scoring Data review Rangefinding To get involved, complete the content reviewer application at http://caaspp.org/reviewers.html. Overview of the CAST and the CAA for Science