Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Governors Grants Office Presents: Smart Issues for Effective Grants Management Governors Grants Office Higher Education Conference May 22, 2012 Martin.
Advertisements

Contract Staff Training Contract Management 2007.
Office of Management & Budget
OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Audit Requirements for Nonprofits.
OMB Circular A-133 Audits of States, Local Governments and Non-Profit Organizations CReATE May 2013 Cathi Bass, Grants Compliance Manager Sponsored Research.
LOCAL REVOLVING LOAN FUND (RLF). Page 2 Local Revolving Loan Funds Indications that HUD and GAO will heavily monitor and audit the RLF activities HUD.
4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?
Subrecipient Monitoring CCIA Spring Conference Sheena Tran, Rancho Santiago CCD Tania Walden, Los Rios CCD Tracy Young, Coast CCD May 2013.
Subrecipient Monitoring Webcast Presenters Pat O'Rourke, Irene St. Croix, Bridget Ware Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services.
State Auditor’s Office April 22, 2010 Brad White, CPA Single Audit Coordinator.
Subcontracts Subcontractor or Vendor How do you know?
1 Subgrants vs. Subcontracts TAA-CCCT Grants November 16, 2011.
Subawards and Subrecipient Monitoring
Dionysios Karamalikis November 9,  Award Identification—At the time of the award, identifying to the sub-recipient the federal award information.
State Auditor’s Office March 10, 2010 Brad White, CPA Single Audit Coordinator.
“The mission of the Sub-recipient Monitoring Section is to monitor, assess, and assist Sub-recipients to successfully implement and complete Grant Program.
MODULE 8 MONITORING INDIANA HPRP Training 1. Role of Independent Financial Monitors 2 IHCDA is retaining an independent accounting firm to monitor its.
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
Introduction to Intellectual Property using the Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR) To talk about intellectual property in government contracting, we.
Subrecipient Monitoring Under the New Uniform Guidance Steven A. Spillan, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2015.
Prior Approval? Is That A Fact? Attention! Uniformed Guidance Audit Anyone? $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100.
Audits of Federal Awards AGA-Olympia October 20, Brad White, SAO.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
1 F EDERAL F UNDING A CCOUNTABILITY AND T RANSPARENCY A CT R EPORTING R EQUIREMENTS U.S. Department of Education Risk Management Service Guidance for Grantees.
Financial Management Stacey Jones, Resolution Specialist OGCM- Division of Policy, Review and Resolution Young Offender Grants New Grantee Orientation.
Erica Cummings Grant Coordinator 1.  The New Mexico Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) is responsible for:  Monitoring.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
Omni Circular Key Area #7: New Responsibilities of the Pass- Through Agency By Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.
Presented by Raaj Kurapati and Charlene Hart. Introduction  The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 was enacted to streamline and improve the effectiveness.
UT-Arlington Accounting CPE Day August 13, 2014 SEFA Preparation and Subrecipient Monitoring.
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
BTOP OVERSIGHT WASHINGTON D.C. MAY 2012 U.S. DOC Inspector General Recovery Act Oversight Task Force 1.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
Audit and Audit Resolution Presented by Wendy Spivey ADECA Audit Manager.
Preston Alderman MSDE, Director of Audit.  As recipients of federal and state funds we are charged with ensuring that the funds are adequately accounted.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP P RESENTED B Y : M ARCY F RIEDLE C OLLABORATIONS : S UBRECIPIENT V. C ONTRACTOR.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program Small City and County Grant Kick-Off Meeting California.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Agency Roundtable Discussion: Subrecipient Monitoring.
Sponsored Project Administration Fall 2012 CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Sponsored Project Lifecycle Introduction Overview Creating a Project Budget Compliance.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Accounting for Grant Funds, including Documentation for Expenditures.
Jaimie Lewis Omnitrans San Bernardino, California SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING.
Prior Approval? Is That A Fact? Attention! Uniformed Guidance Audit Anyone? $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100.
SD DOE Federal Education Programs Monitoring Office of Grants Management Rob Huffman, Administrator Tacy Kennison, Program Specialist Danna Sanders, Program.
What’s your friend up to? Subrecipient Monitoring Issues Tom Egan, MIT OSP Jeannette Gordon, Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight OPERA, OER, NIH.
Division of Adult Education and Literacy U.S. Department of Education Washington, DC.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Other Key Uniform Administrative Grant Requirements.
Juanita Syljuberget Alabama Cooperative Extension System May 23, 2012.
Implementing TAACCCT Round 2 Consortium Grants Management September 27, 2013.
Grant Management and Compliance
Subrecipient Monitoring
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
Presented by Urmila Bajaj January 26, 2017
NCJA’s National Forum on Financial Management Training
NCJA’s National Forum Financial Management Training
Other Key Uniform Administrative Grant Requirements
Office of Grants Fiscal
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
Subrecipient vs. Contractor Determinations
Subrecipient Monitoring
Grants Management 101 Part A
Sponsored Programs at Penn
Managing Federal grants
Uniform Guidance and Grants Accounting
Presentation transcript:

Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination

Sub-recipient or Contractor? A non-federal entity may concurrently receive Federal funds as a recipient, sub-recipient, and a contractor. Therefore, the pass-through entity must determine whether each agreement cast the party receiving the funds in the role of sub-recipient or a contractor. The Federal awarding agency may supply and require recipients to comply with additional guidance to support determination.

Sub-recipient or Contractor? Definitions: Sub-recipient – means a non-Federal entity that expends Federal awards received from a pass-through entity to carry out a Federal program, but does not include an individual that is a beneficiary of such a program. Contractor – means a dealer, distributor, merchant, or other seller providing goods or services that are required for the conduct of a Federal program. These goods or services may be for an organization’s own use or for the beneficiaries of the Federal program, but creates a procurement relationship with the contractor.

Sub-recipient or Contractor? Characteristics: Sub-recipient Determines who is eligible to receive Federal assistance; Has its performance measured as to whether program objectives were met; Has responsibility for programmatic decision making; Responsible for following program requirements specified in the award; and Uses the funds to carry out a program for a public purpose specified in the authorizing statue.

Sub-recipient or Contractor? Characteristics: Contractor Provides the goods and services within normal business operations; Provides similar goods and services to many different purchasers; Normally operates in a competitive environment; Provides goods and services that are ancillary to the operation of the Federal program; and Is not subject to compliance requirements of the Federal program.

Monitoring Responsibilities Pass-through entity: Must provide reasonable assurance that sub-recipients are incompliance with Federal program guidelines and requirements. Inform each sub-recipient of CFDA title and number, award name and number, and award year. Advise sub-recipient of requirements imposed on them by Federal laws, regulations, and provisions of contracts or grant agreement. Advise of any supplemental requirements imposed by the pass-through entity.

Monitoring Responsibilities Pass-through entity: (cont’) Monitor the activities of sub-recipients to ensure funds are used for authorized purposes and performance goals are achieved. Ensure that sub-recipients that expend $750,000 or more in their fiscal year follow the audit requirements in OMB Uniform Requirements (2 CFR Part 200.500). Issue a management decision on audit findings within 6 months after receipt of the sub-recipient’s audit report. Ensure that the sub-recipient takes appropriate and timely corrective action.

Monitoring Responsibilities Pass-through entity: (cont’) Require each sub-recipient to permit the pass-through entity and auditors to have access to the records and financial statements as necessary.

What Your Sub-recipient Should Know Seek prior approval for certain costs and extensions to grant closing date. Method in which they will be paid and any documentation that should accompany the claim. Documenting the allowable sources of matching funds. Prohibition of using the federal award to supplant existing resources. Maintain property records for equipment and perform physical inventory of equipment. Accounting for and using program income.

Factors to Consider When Monitoring Sub-recipients Dollar amount of awards provided to sub-recipients. Number of sub-recipient can effect how often you monitor them. Complexity of program requirements. Sub-recipient’s control environment (i.e., staffing levels, computer system, etc.). Results of prior audits. Sub-recipient with frequent requests for budget modifications, extensions, or exceptions to the rules.

When Monitoring Your Sub-recipients Perform an on-site visit to review financial and programmatic records and observe operations. Reconcile the sub-recipient’s budgeted expenditures to actual. Offer sub-recipients technical assistance where needed. Perform desk reviews to ensure allowable use of grant funds. Have a second party within your organization periodically review the sub-recipient monitoring plan and reports.

Document Your Efforts Maintain a file or record of the desk reviews that you perform and the results. Develop a schedule of dates to perform on-site visits. Document the work performed and the results of on-site visits. Document corrective action taken by sub-recipient and follow-up work performed by you. Retain a copy of the management decisions you issued in response to sub-recipient audit findings.

System for Award Management (SAM) The first-tier sub-recipient are required to register in the System for Award Management (SAM) registration, including obtaining a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number.

Penalties & Sanctions Withholding of disbursements or future awards; Disallowance of cost; Suspension/Termination of award; Suspension/Debarment of Association; Civil lawsuit; or Criminal prosecution.

Questions & Answers (Q&A)