N. Blaskovic, T. Bromwich, R. Ramjiawan

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATF2: Status Update Glenn Christian (on behalf of FONT group) 10 th ATF Project Meeting.
Advertisements

P.N. Burrows ATF2 Project Meeting, KEK, 14/12/091 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales Philip Burrows Glenn Christian Hamid Dabiri Khah Javier Resta Lopez.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 Preliminary resolution study results N. Blaskovic.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 November 2013 week 2 FONT shift summary N. Blaskovic.
Beam position monitors LCABD Plenary meeting Bristol, 24th March 2009 A. Aryshev, S. T. Boogert, G. Boorman, S. Molloy, N. Joshi JAI at Royal Holloway.
-brief report of October runs and some inputs for the Nov/Dec planning – Nobuhiro Terunuma, KEK, ATF ATF session on LCWS13, Tokyo Univ., Nov. 13, 2013.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
Progress towards nanometre-level beam stabilisation at ATF2 N. Blaskovic, D. R. Bett, P. N. Burrows, G. B. Christian, C. Perry John Adams Institute, University.
ATF2 Q-BPM System 19 Dec Fifth ATF2 Project Meeting J. May, D. McCormick, T. Smith (SLAC) S. Boogert (RH) B. Meller (Cornell) Y. Honda (KEK)
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF February-March 2014 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry.
High Resolution Cavity BPM for ILC final focal system (IP-BPM) ILC2007/LCWS 2007 BDS, 2007/6/1 The University of Tokyo, KEK, Tohoku Gakuin University,
Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales (FONT) - Review of Feedback Prototype Tests at ATF(KEK) Glenn Christian John Adams Institute, Oxford for FONT collaboration.
1 FONT Results 2010 Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Glenn Christian Michael Davis, Colin Perry, Javier Resta Lopez John Adams Institute Oxford.
FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF21 FONT digitisation studies of IP BPMs D. Bett, N. Blaskovic, P. Burrows, G. Christian, M. Davis, Y. I. Kim, C. Perry John.
IP-BPM status Siwon Jang KNU. Contents The electronics repair status –Repair work status –Electronics RF test (by using Oscilloscope) –Electronics shipment.
Development of a Low-latency, High-precision, Intra-train Beam Feedback System Based on Cavity Beam Position Monitors N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, D. R. Bett,
Future FONT BPM Processors C.Perry 25 June Types of Processor Two types of processor: a) present mixer type b) baseband type Both will be made because:
IP BPM Shift Report FONT Meeting: 22 December 2014 Talitha Bromwich.
1 FONT R&D status Philip Burrows Douglas Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
ATF2 Software tasks: - EXT Bunch-Bunch FB/FF - IP Bunch-Bunch FB - FB Integration Status Javier Resta-Lopez JAI, Oxford University FONT meeting 1th August.
FONT Hardware Processing electronics and current beam tests Stephen Molloy Queen Mary, University of London.
FONT Meeting1 Charge normalisation and IP LO power scan N. Blaskovic.
Philip Burrows ATF2 project meeting 14/1/111 Plans for ATF2 IP Feedback Philip Burrows, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
Production and Installation Policy of IP-BPM ATF2 Project Meeting, 2006/12/18 Y. Honda, Y. Inoue, T. Hino, T. Nakamura.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF October 2014 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry.
Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT) Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett*, Talitha Bromwich, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis**, Colin Perry.
IPBPM issues (Limitation of resolution) Siwon Jang (KNU)
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John.
IP instrumentation configuration for Autumn 2010 ATF2 runs Toshiyuki OKUGI, KEK 2010 / 7/ 1 10 th ATF2 project meeting.
CALIBRATIONS IPBPM FILTER TESTS Siwon Jang Hoyeong Jeong Glenn Christian Talitha Bromwich Friday, 1 May Talitha Bromwich, FONT Group Meeting.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF November 2013 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
Philip Burrows ATF2 project meeting 1/07/101 Plans for ATF2 IP Feedback Philip Burrows, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
NumberMikey Davis02 November 2012 Roundup of ATF Trip.
FONT GROUP MEETING ATF JUNE SUMMARY Neven & Talitha Talitha Bromwich - Friday, 26 June 2015.
1 Feedback On Nanosecond Timescales (FONT): Philip Burrows Neven Blaskovic, Douglas Bett, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John.
1 IP FB tests at ATF2 Philip Burrows Douglas Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Young Im Kim, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford.
IoP HEPP/APP annual meeting 2010 Feedback on Nanosecond Timescales: maintaining luminosity at future linear colliders Ben Constance John Adams Institute,
Overview of progress at FONT Neven Blaskovic TMD technologies CASE student John Adams Institute Oxford University.
FONT4 Status Report Glenn Christian John Adams Institute, Oxford for FONT collaboration.
1/33Mikey Davis24 January 2013 Review of 23 rd of January Shift.
1 FONT IP FB Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Neven Blaskovic, Glenn Christian, Michael Davis, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
FONT Oxford FONT REPORT NOVEMBER Neven Blaskovic Kraljevic and Talitha Bromwich Friday, 27 November
Superfast BPM Processor Scheme Stephen Molloy, QMUL Nano-Project Mini-Workshop at ATF.
D. BettATF Operations Meeting - 15 June IP C. Perry G. Christian Y. Kim D. Bett N. Blaskovic Kraljevic.
FONT5 digital feedback boards
Roundup of Week at ATF Mikey Davis 19 April /26.
Siwon Jang Hoyeong Jeong Glenn Christian Talitha Bromwich
Glen White, SLAC Jan th ATF2 Project Meeting, KEK
Further Tracking Studies and March Trip Plan
Resolution Study T. Bromwich FONT 8 September 2017.
N. Blaskovic, T. Bromwich, P. Burrows, G. Christian, C. Perry, R
Feedforward runs N. Blaskovic N. Blaskovic FONT Meeting.
Monitoring glitches in the frequency divider
Firmware Update 29/03/2017 Rebecca Ramjiawan.
N. Blaskovic, T. Bromwich & G. Christian
ATF Shift Plans Rebecca, Talitha 08/09/2017 Friday, 08 September 2017
Summary Friday h38: Ramp down and pre-cycle.
March Trip Plan Mikey Davis 01 March /7.
Revised ATF Shift Plans
Progress towards nanometre beam stabilisation at ATF2
Progress towards nanometre level beam stabilisation
Phase Feedforward in 2015 & Plans for 2016
NanoBPM Status and Multibunch Mark Slater, Cambridge University
Status of Phase Feedforward Tests
TLK10xxx High Speed SerDes Overview
FONT stripline BPM resolution
N. Terunuma (KEK) ILC2010, Beijing, March 29th, /2/28.
Report on ATF2 Third Project Meeting ATF2 Magnet Movers ATF2 Q-BPM Electronics Is SLAC ILC Instrumentation Group a good name?
Presentation transcript:

N. Blaskovic, T. Bromwich, R. Ramjiawan ATF February Shifts N. Blaskovic, T. Bromwich, R. Ramjiawan FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Outline Hardware set-up IP Box issues IP Kicker issues IPA noise Other issues Sample jump issues Week 1 Shift 1 – Minimum jitter at IPC & noise floor measurements Shift 2 – 3-BPM resolution study Week 2 Shift 3 – Upstream feedback propagating to the IP Shift 4 – Upstream feedback + 2BPM IP feedback Equipment brought back to Oxford FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Hardware set-up Upstream FONT5A #5 Instrument P2, P3 and MFB1FF Synchronisation signal sent from FONT5A #5 AUX Out C to the FONT5A #4 at the IP via the feed-forward cable. Firmware: IPFB_FW_160217ab_1843kBaud (Upstream coupled-loop feedback, without PLL) IP FONT5A #4 Instrument IPA, IPB and IPC Y information + Y Reference. Receiving synchronisation signal from FONT5A #5 upstream. Sending synchronisation signal sent from FONT5A #4 Aux Out B (using special firmware provided by Glenn) to the FONT5 #1 Firmware: PROM_IPFB_FW_2BPM_100217 (2BPM IP feedback with synchronisation signal from Aux Out B) FONT5 #1 Instrument IPA, IPB and IPC X information + X Reference Receiving synchronisation signal from FONT5A #4. Firmware: PROM_IPFB_FW_121016aa (loaded for this trip - firmware version previously loaded on the upstream board) FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

IP box issues Pre-beam both upstream and downstream IP boxes were not responding to remote communication. The IP boxes were removed from the tunnel and everything was temporarily plugged into wall sockets. Tsukada-san fixed the issue by setting enable DHCP on the IP box settings. (It is not clear why they were working before this trip, but not now, or whether this setting was enabled previously and lost due to some hard re-set?) Access was taken before shifts to reinstall the IP boxes. Whenever sample jumping returned it could be removed by power cycling the FONT board remotely via IP box. In the second shift of week 1 the IP power box stopped responding again. During an access we tried removing things sequentially, and found it could cope with the FONT5A, FONT5 and SIS, but once the kicker amplifier was added it stopped responding. Consequently, we left the kicker amplifier plugged into the wall. FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Kicker issues Following first week IP power box issues, the kicker amplifier was left plugged into the wall. In the second shift of the first week we were unable to kick the beam. On Monday week 2 prior to beam we checked the DAC output to the kicker from the FONT 5A board, and it was fine. However, whilst in the tunnel we also noticed that the kicker amplifier (TMD3) was sporadically triggering (we could hear it clicking), despite no trigger output being sent from the FONT 5A board. Consequently we left the kicker unplugged. Took an access at the beginning of the final shift to switch the IP kicker amplifier with one of the upstream amplifiers (TMD1, the one from K1), under advisement from Oxford. This was subsequently used successfully on shift in IP feedback. We have now brought the former IP kicker amplifier (TMD3) back to Oxford. FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

ADC1 noise Throughout the February shifts we continue to observe high-level ADC noise on several triggers on ADC1 of both FONT boards. The temporal occurrence seems random. FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Other issues FONT5A #4 requires AUX Out C to be patched to the front panel. It currently has a special version of 2BPM IP feedback firmware with the synchronisation signal temporarily patched out via AUX Out B. FONT5 #1 - when we power cycle it remotely via the IP box we could not recover it - adjusting the power input connection cable/port (which is very unstable) by hand during an access caused it to recover - the problem with power cycling repeated during the same shift: no time for a second access - JTAG connection is very temperamental - trigger connection also failed on one occasion even though it was powered – again fixed by adjusting the connection (may have nudged something else?) Stripline phase shifter not responding - one of them failed to respond to the LabView DAQ. Fortunately it was already reasonably well set up, so we managed without changing the phase shifter setting at any future point. There was no time to troubleshoot this. FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Sample jump issues Large permanent sample jumps - they occur on all FONT boards, but not by the same numbers of samples - on average it occurs once every few hours. Some shifts not observed at all - when running feedback this requires we repeat all the set-up Single sample permanent sample jumps - they occur on all FONT boards, by the same single sample - we observed this twice in all data from February Rapid sample jumping back and forth between two locations - not observed on all banks e.g. frequent sample jumps on banks 1 and 3, but stable on bank 2 - usually occurs about once a shift - fixed by power-cyling the board, which again requires we repeat all the set-up Single trigger sample jumps - the average 400-trigger jitter run contains around 2 of these - they occur on all banks - they are removed in analysis so we ignore them FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Example of large permanent sample jumps Temporal plot of peak location from maximum of the fit to the peak (i.e. interpolating between sample numbers) For example, here occurring on both FONT boards, but not by the same amount. FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Example of rapid sample jumping back and forth Temporal plot of peak location on the upstream FONT board for the data from P1 (bank 1), P2 (bank2) and P3 (bank 3) For example, here the rapid sample juping is occurring on banks 1 and 3, but not on bank 2. FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Week 1 Shift 1 - Minimum jitter at IPC & noise floor study Minimum jitter measurements with the beam on waist at the IPBPMs. On shift there was only time to perform this study at one BPM: we worked at IPC. Measure jitter as a function of attenuation. Random jitter source scan to measure real jitter (at 10dB). Take new measurements of the noise floor using 70dB attenuation on the dipole. FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Checking the trigger and 357 MHz signals inside the tunnel Beginning of shift we took an access to reinstall the fixed IP box. Checked integrity of triggers used for FONT5A and FONT5 boards (see right). Checked 357 MHz levels. Added 17dB amplifier and attenuators (6dBm on #1, 8dBm on #2) in the S-band hut to bring into required range. New levels: FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Measure the jitter on waist at IPC at different attenuations Performed a waist scan at IPC with 10dB and then 0dB attenuation and moved to minimum jitter location. Performed minimum jitter measurements at different attenuations: Att (dB) Jitter (um) 0 0.19 ± 0.01 10 0.27 ± 0.02 20 0.38 ± 0.03 30 1.08 ± 0.08 40 3.6 ± 0.3 50 12.5 ± 0.9 60 36 ± 3 70 113 ± 8 FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

IPC jitter at 10dB with random jitter source scan upstream Turned on the random jitter source upstream and took IPC jitter measurements at different levels. Random Jitter (um) Jitter Source Strength (AU) 0 0.19 ± 0.01 0.5 0.16 ± 0.01 1.0 0.17 ± 0.01 1.5 0.27 ± 0.02 2.0 0.29 ± 0.02 2.5 0.31 ± 0.02 3 0.47 ± 0.03 3.5 0.46 ± 0.03 4 0.43 ± 0.03 4.5 0.56 ± 0.04 5 0.47 ± 0.04 FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Noise floor measurements with 70dB attenuation on dipole Use calibrations taken at different attenuations to convert the jitter of this file into IPC position jitter i.e. an estimate of the noise floor at different attenuations at IPC. FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Noise floor measurements with 70dB attenuation on dipole Overlay plots of I signal Q signal Referennce / 5 Scale factor (calculated using 0dB calibration) to compare the timing and amplitude of the different waveshapes. Note: Reference monitor signal is delayed by ~ 42 ns (15 samples) relative to the reference signal going into the second stage mixer using delay cables to account for the delay introduced on the dipoles because of the BPFs. FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Noise floor in ADCs in the I and Q signals Plot shows the jitter of the 70 dB data set in ADCs as a function of sample number along the pulse. I Signal Q Signal √( I2+Q2 ) FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Week 1 Shift 2 – 3-BPM Resolution Study High-beta optics, two bunches. Centre the beam in X and Y in all three BPMs using the IP mover system. Jitter run + calibrate all three BPMs at (in X and Y) at various attenuations and different charges to calculate the resolution of the IP system. FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Summary of shift This shift started halfway through the Owl shift, so Okugi-san gave us detailed instructions for changing to high-beta optics. Unfortunately this process is very complex and it took us several hours to resolve issues. Resolved when Okugi-san arrived. Accesses required for previously mentioned IP box issues. Alignment of all three BPMs took ~ 1 hour, but we now have a system in place for doing this. - Place all BPMs at the centre of their mover range. - Find the minimum AQD0FF in I/Q in IPA and IPB. - Adjust the angle of AB block to minimise difference in minimum signal size AQD0FF current between all four channels. - Move the AB block, maintaining the same angle, until it is possible to minimise the signals in IPC simultaneously. - Fine tune the angle of the AB block and AQD0FF mover setting to account for new beam trajectory. - Use IPC movers to minimise the signal at IPC. - Repeat for X and Y. Significant beam drift observed on this shift that required frequent re-centering of the beam. (ATF feedback not running?) Completed two charge scans and one attenuation scan. Attempted to set up the 2-BPM feedback study, but found we could not kick the beam and ran out of time. FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Week 2 Shift 1 (& Shift 2a) – Upstream feedback propagation to the IP Nominal optics, two bunches, high charge. Set-up upstream feedback. Measure the feedback jitter correction upstream, and the correction propagated downstream with the IP BPMs. FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Summary of shift Moved the waist to IPC for IP measurements. Frequent trigger (i.e. odd to even trigger) jumps made it difficult to use the LabView automatic scan system to calculate gains. Therefore we had to calculate the gains offline, but they did agree with the online calculations when we eventually managed to obtain an automatic scan without trigger jumps. No correction observed at P2 or MFB1FF using coupled loop feedback. Ran in single look feedback, and observed good correction with K2P3, but could observe no correction from K1P2. After the shift we determined, with Doug’s help, that this was due to not having K1 bunch strobe select turned on in the DAQ. Decided to use the first half of the final shift to continue this study. Feedback correction observed in P2, P3, MFB1FF and at the IP. Permanent sample jumps requiring a board power cycle and re-setup and gain calculation meant there was not time to turn on the random jitter source. FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Week 2 Shift 2b – 2BPM IP feedback High-beta optics, two bunches. Move the waist near to IPB. Centre the beam in X and Y in all three BPMs using the IP mover system. Measure the bunch-to-bunch correlation as a function of sample number. Set-up 2 BPM IP feedback using IPA and IPC to correct at IPB using optimal sampling. FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Waist location and jitter at IPA, IPB and IPC FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Bunch-to-bunch correlation as a function of sample number Highest correlation at samples 25 / 25 / 30. Select these for feedback. (Note: IPC is 5 samples later than IPA and IPB) FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Best result, integrating 34:36 83 nm Geometric resolution: 74 +/- 4 nm. ipfbRun7_10dB_Board1_240217, Integrating samples 34:36, Reference sample 31 FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Best result, single sample 35 89 nm Geometric resolution: 74 +/- 4 nm. ipfbRun7_10dB_Board1_240217, samples 35, Reference sample 31 FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Predicted feedback performance using IPA and IPC Using single sample, predicts correction to 86 nm. FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Equipment brought back to Oxford FONT5 #1 - the power connection is very fragile FONT5A #4 - to reconfigure for Aux Out C IP Kicker amplifier - sporadic clicking observed with no trigger input USB serial server - at Glenn’s request FONT Wednesday, 1 March 2017