OSIRIS Mars flyby : 3D reconstruction of Phobos and Deimos

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Exploration of bump, parallax, relief and displacement mapping
Advertisements

T.A.Rector, I.P.Dell'Antonio /NOAO /AURA/NSF.
PARALLAX Definition: “the apparent shift or movement of a nearby object against a distant background, when viewed from two different positions”
ATEC Procedural Animation Introduction to Procedural Methods in 3D Computer Animation Dr. Midori Kitagawa.
December 5, 2013Computer Vision Lecture 20: Hidden Markov Models/Depth 1 Stereo Vision Due to the limited resolution of images, increasing the baseline.
MEPAG National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Presentation to MEPAG.
Minor bodies observation from Earth and space: asteroid (2867)Steins A. Coradini, M.T. Capria, F. Capaccioni, and the VIRTIS International Team.
1 Determination of 3D CME Trajectories using Stereoscopy Paulett Liewer, Jeff Hall, Eric DeJong, JPL Vahab Pournaghsband, UCB Arnaud Thernisien and Russ.
RHESSI observations of LDE flares – extremely long persisting HXR sources Mrozek, T., Kołomański, S., Bąk-Stęślicka, U. Astronomical Institute University.
Dynamical modeling of the DI dust ejecta cloud Tanyu Bonev (Institute of Astronomy and National Astronomical Observatory, Bulgaria) and the ESO DI observing.
Mars By: Nathan Brown. Overview of Mars -It is the fourth planet from the Sun. -From orbit, it looks red, which gives it the nickname, “Red Planet”. -You.
Stargazing on Mars Stargazing on Mars Cover Page Environment Constellations Polar Axis Observing Moons Observing Mars Moon to Moon Solar Eclipses Earth.
Comets and the Solar System Practical Astronomy: 16 September 2014 Tonight's Topics Planets over the next few months Three good comets are visible NOW!
Direct Illumination with Lazy Visibility Evaluation David Hart Philip Dutré Donald P. Greenberg Cornell University SIGGRAPH 99.
Mark Beckman - Flight DynamicsMB-1 Lunar Flight Dynamics Mark Beckman July 12, 2012.
Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility NIF SPICE Geometry Finder (GF) Subsystem Searching for times when specified geometric conditions occur November.
Physical parameters of Asteroids from GAIA Photometry V. Zappalà, M. Delbò, A. Cellino INAF-Astronomical Observatory of Torino GAIA SSWG Besancon, 6-7.
CS447/ Realistic Rendering -- Radiosity Methods-- Introduction to 2D and 3D Computer Graphics.
The Wavelet Packets Equalization Technique: Applications on LASCO Images M.Mierla, R. Schwenn, G. Stenborg.
Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility NIF Event Finding Subsystem Preview Capabilities, Current Status and Plans January 2009.
A Flexible New Technique for Camera Calibration Zhengyou Zhang Sung Huh CSPS 643 Individual Presentation 1 February 25,
R-Alice Lutetia PDS/PSA Data Review Kurt Retherford.
Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility NIF SPICE Event Finding Subsystem October 2007.
Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility NIF SPICE Geometry Finder (GF) Subsystem Searching for times when specified geometric events occur September.
Comparison of MC and data Abelardo Moralejo Padova.
Plate_renderer (optional) N. Hirata 1. plate_renderer Tool for simulating Hayabusa's observations developed by N. Hirata – Implementing a light scattering.
21 Lutetia: Overview of Results
H. U. Keller, M. Küppers, L. Jorda, P. Gutierrez, S. Hviid, C
Rosetta Science Working Team Meeting #26 Working Group #1
OSIRIS Solar System Simulator
Lutetia surface 3D reconstruction and uncertainty modelling
SOLIS-VSM Magnetic Synoptic Maps
The OSIRIS Solar System Simulator (OSSS) and its application to ACK and MFB phases Bertini Ivano.
Motions of the Moon, Phases and Eclipses (Ch 3)
Processing visual information for Computer Vision
Rosetta Status Mike A’Hearn.
OSIRIS operation summary
Rosetta’s first view of CG
OSIRIS operation summary
Determination of photometric properties of Steins
OSIRIS Observations of Comet 2004/Q2 Machholz
Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung
Update of a presentation at ESLAB meeting in May 2009
Jets and sources of activity on 67P observed by OSIRIS
Shape Model Subsystem Preview (DSK)
Asteroid 4 Vesta observed from OSIRIS-ROSETTA
Lutetia Flyby Rosetta Radio Science Investigations RSI
A TARGET OF THE ROSETTA MISSION
Observing the parallax effect due to gravitational lensing with OSIRIS
Deeper insight in the Steins flyby geometry:
Post-Operation Status: Archiving, Calibration & Science
Recent developments on micro-triangulation
Geometric information for VIRTIS-M data
Investigation of different flyby geometries for asteroid Steins - Surface area, stereo and phase angle coverage Sofie Spjuth Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung.
Lutetia geometry and timeline
Summary of the science planned per mission phase
OSIRIS operation summary
Mars Swingby (MSB) information
Stubbe Hviid1, C. Barbieri2, A. M. Barucci3, I. Bertini2, L
Photometry of dust grains of comet 67P and connection with nucleus regions G.Cremonese, E.Simioni, R.Ragazzoni, I.Bertini, F.La Forgia, M.Pajola, S.Fornasier,
José Manuel Iñesta José Martínez Sotoca Mateo Buendía
Khallefi Leïla © esa Supervisors: J. L. Vazquez M. Küppers
Philae status 21st Rosetta Science Team meeting
Common Classification Tasks
CS5500 Computer Graphics May 29, 2006
Traceability of the GIRO to the ROLO: Definition of a benchmark
LHCb Alignment Strategy
MEASURING ASTRONOMICAL DISTANCES
Putting Some Reality into the Glare and Visibility Debate
Presentation transcript:

OSIRIS Mars flyby : 3D reconstruction of Phobos and Deimos O. Groussin (UMD) P. Lamy (LAM) L. Jorda (LAM) M. A’Hearn (UMD) G. Bonello (LAM) OSIRIS flyby working group meeting January 30-31, 2006 Padova, Italy

Introduction We intend to perform a 3D reconstruction of Phobos and Deimos during the Mars flyby. This is our only opportunity to develop and test 3D reconstruction algorithms before the asteroids flyby and more important, the 67P approach phase.  We must not miss that opportunity!

Geometry of the flyby (1/4) (from SPICE) From Agay documents (Hviid, Koschny and Thomas)

Geometry of the flyby (2/4) Distance (from SPICE) Phobos Deimos Phobos hidden by Mars Deimos hidden by Mars Phobos in Mars’s shadow Rosetta in Mars’s shadow

Geometry of the flyby (3/4) Phase (from SPICE) Phobos Deimos Phobos hidden by Mars Deimos hidden by Mars Phobos in Mars’s shadow Rosetta in Mars’s shadow

Geometry of the flyby (4/4) Elongation (from SPICE) Phobos hidden by Mars Deimos hidden by Mars Phobos in Mars’s shadow Rosetta in Mars’s shadow 60 degrees constraint Phobos Deimos

Windows (W) for Phobos and Deimos (1/2) Deimos W1 Deimos W2 Phobos W1 Phobos W2 Phobos hidden by Mars Deimos hidden by Mars Phobos in Mars’s shadow Rosetta in Mars’s shadow

Windows for Phobos and Deimos (2/2) Pro and Cons Deimos W1 : best at the end of the window Phase angle, Distance, Scattered light from Mars, no look back Deimos W2 : only the first 20 min of the window (elongation) Phobos W1 : best at the end of the window Phobos W2 : not possible because of elongation < 60 deg

Some numbers Closest approach from Mars surface : 257 km on 25 Feb 2005, 01:55 UT Closest approach from Phobos CM : 4346 km on 25 Feb 2005, 02:06 UT Closest approach from Deimos CM : 23298 km on 25 Feb 2005, 02:20 UT Window 1 for Deimos (15x12x11km) : Before 25 Feb 2005, 01:49 UT Best distance = 27232 km (~29 NAC pixels for 15km) Window 2 for Deimos : After 25 Feb 2005, 01:58 UT & Before 25 Feb 2005, 02:20 UT Best distance = 23298 km (~34 NAC pixels for 15km) Window 1 for Phobos (27x21x19km) : Before 25 Feb 2005, 00:42 UT Best distance = 48730 km (~29 NAC pixels for 27km) 1 NAC pixel = 3.881 arcsec = 18.82 microrad

Conclusions on a possible flyby strategy Images during approach for Phobos and Deimos, as long as we can, i.e., until they are hidden by Mars (~29 NAC pixels). Ignore the scattered light, since we do not want to do photometry but just get the limb. Images after approach for Deimos, as soon as Deimos becomes visible again (~34 NAC pixels), and until elongation becomes a problem (~20min window). Can we observe while Rosetta is in the Mars’s shadow? Image of Phobos after approach is not possible, because of the constraint on the elongation.

How to perform the 3D reconstruction ? Step #1 is to get images with different phase angles. Step #2 is to use the limb and the geometry of the flyby. We will start with a spherical shape and modify it as long as necessary to match all the images in all the different geometry. The solution may not be unique in that case. We are developing IDL routines to do this. Step #3 is to compare the results with the real shape of Phobos and Deimos and see how we can improve our algorithms. Comments : with our resolution of only 20-30 NAC pixels, we cannot expect to use an accurate method with control points like P. Thomas (Cornell) did for example, on 19P/Borrelly (DS1) and 9P/Tempel 1 (DI). However, we will learn how to proceed that way for future asteroids and 67P observations.

Real shape of Phobos and Deimos We have obtained the shapes of Phobos and Deimos on the PDS. We have IDL routines to read them and play with them. Phobos : 27x21x19km Deimos : 15x12x11km

Conclusions Observations of Phobos and Deimos offer a unique opportunity to prepare the 67P approach phase and the 3D reconstruction of the nucleus shape. Those observations are possible and must be performed, in good coordination with Mars observations. We already have a few tools to perform 3D reconstruction. We will learn and develop new tools in the next months, in order to be ready for the Mars flyby.