Introducing Antimicrobial Fruit & Vegetable Treatment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Iowa FFA Association Food Science CDE.
Advertisements

It’s Not Just A Sheller Problem!  All nuts are not created equal  Growing /Handling Differences  Processing Differences  What can you do to insure.
Food Safety for Cottage Food Operations Brought to you by The Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Division of Food Safety.
California Department of Public Health Food and Drug Branch San Joaquin County All Hazards Workshop August 2008.
Food Safety National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases.
100% Natural – 100% Effective Fresh Wash – Seafood TM.
Food Safety Concepts Concept Team: Janet Johnson, M.S., Tom Miller, M.D. and Jean Weese, Ph.D.
Protecting Food Safety From naturally occurring sources –Cholesterol From intentional contamination –Food terrorism 25 Chapters 10 and 11 Knutson, Penn.
Robert B. Gravani, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Cornell University.
General Food Safety.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Role of Economics in Pathogen Control Regulations Daniel Engeljohn, Ph.D. Office.
© National Pasteurized Eggs, Inc. v3659 SafeEggs.com/foodservice FOOD SAFETY — The fork stops here !
Natural Resource Concerns. In 2007 there were a number of food borne illness attributed to fresh produce People became sick Business’s lost market share.
Who’s Minding the Store - The Current State of Food Safety and How It Can Be Improved Devon Zagory, Ph.D. Senior Vice President Food Safety & Quality Programs.
Introducing Antimicrobial Fruit & Vegetable Treatment.
Firefly owner John Simmons poses at his restaurant at 3824 Paradise Road in Las Vegas on Monday Nov. 18, (Bill Hughes/Las Vegas Review-Journal) SAFE.
Providing Safe Food. Foodborne Illness Illness carried or transmitted to people by food Foodborne-Illness Outbreak Incident in which two or more people.
E. COLI 0157:H7. E.Coli 0157:H7  It is one of the hundreds of strains of the bacterium Escherichia coli  This strain produces a powerful toxin and can.
Providing Safe Food Chapter 1.
1 Keeping Food Safe Chapter Number 1. Learning Objectives After this presentation, you should be able to complete the following Learning Outcomes 1.0.
Pizza and Pathogens Down the Production Line Brought to you by the Auburn University Center for Detection and Food Safety. Lesson No. 3.
NC Food Safety and Defense Task Force Food Protection Evolution Adapting to Changing Times Terry Levee, RS, REHS Director of Food Safety Programs Food.
Pure and Wholesome: Is Food a Risky Business? Pure and Wholesome: Is Food a Risky Business? A Lawyer’s perspective William D. Marler, Esq.
Contaminates in our Food Supply
Rocky Mountain Food Safety Conference May 22, 2013.
FOOD SAFETY Updated December 2010 GORDON FOOD SERVICE Training Foodborne Illness Let’s learn about them and prevent them!
FDA Regulatory Counseling Lake Bluff, Illinois, USA (847) Regulatory Update Richard O. Wood 2014 Mid-Year Meeting.
United States Department of Agriculture Office of Food Safety Protecting Public Health through Food Safety Brian Ronholm Deputy Under Secretary for Food.
Food Safety …From Farm to Table By: Allison Weis
Guilt by Association: The Impact of Secondary Recalls Erin Woodom Food Compliance Officer Rapid Response Team Microbiologist Food and Drug Protection Division.
Food and Drug Administration & Outbreaks
Adjunct FacultyNORTHEASTERNUNIVERSITY Senior Food Policy Coordinator America’s regulation of food policy from victim and consumer advocate perspectives.
Overview of Post-Harvest Food Safety in ARS
Introducing Antimicrobial Fruit & Vegetable Treatment.
2 2 3 Lettuce and Spinach 8 outbreaks traced back to produce from Salinas, California 8 outbreaks traced back to produce from Salinas, California 21.
Compliance and Investigations Division (CID). Proposed Rules  Official establishments, and retail stores that grind raw beef products, will keep records.
1 FOOD SAFETY MANAGING RISKS TO REDUCE LEGAL LIABLITY ELIZABETH HAWS CONNALLY,ESQ. Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing.
Food Safety and Produce AEC 317 November 13, 2013 Unit Two.
Foodborne Illnesses People become sick because food is not handled, prepared, cooked or stored correctly Challenges of Food Safety Time Language Literacy.
21 st Century Food Safety Trends Adam Johnson Sr. Driector– Food Safety.
Food Safety Challenges and Benefits of New Technology Randall Huffman, Ph.D. Vice President, Scientific Affairs American Meat Institute Foundation USDA-
Keeping Our Kitchen Safe
Populations at High-Risk for Foodborne Illness
The culture of Clean May 4, 2017 Tracy Graham
Let’s watch a DVD… DVD Instructor Notes
Understanding Basic Food Safety
AFVT vs. Competitors AFVT Fit Suma Eden
Contaminates in our Food Supply
Food Safety Regulations and Standards
FOODBORNE DISEASES WEEKS XII
Employment Food Safety Training Program
Foodborne Illnesses People become sick because food is not handled, prepared, cooked or stored correctly Challenges of Food Safety Time Language Literacy.
Populations at High-Risk for Foodborne Illness
Food Safety Procedures Martha C. Espiritu Walden University.
Populations at High-Risk for Foodborne Illness
ServeSafe Review Review for Test.
E. Coli & Fresh Produce: Some Lessons Learned
Food Safety Be Food Safe.
Food Safety and Food Borne Illnesses
Challenges to Food Safety
Populations at High-Risk for Foodborne Illness
Fight Back! Sanitation and Safety.
The How’s and Why’s of using a food thermometer when cooking burgers, chicken breasts, pork chops and sausage patties.
Welcome.
Populations at High-Risk for Foodborne Illness
Populations at High-Risk for Foodborne Illness
Challenges to Food Safety
Foodborne Illness and its Impact
Food Safety & Sanitation
Florida Association for Food Protection
Presentation transcript:

Introducing Antimicrobial Fruit & Vegetable Treatment Photo size is:

Produce Food Safety Issues Lettuce and other leafy vegetables were associated with more food-borne illnesses that any other commodity (CDC, 2013) Incidents are increasingly visible Supplier control difficult 2012 Spinach, Mixed Greens Ground Beef, Raw Tuna, Mangoes, Cantaloupe, Peanut Butter Ricotta Cheese 2010 Peppers, HVP, Shell Eggs, Sprouts (2), Chicken Casserole, Raw Milk 1999 Unpast. Juice Eggs, Chicken, Beef, Pork 2002 Ground Beef (2) RTE Turkey & Chicken 2006 Bagged Spinach, Restaurant Lettuce 2008 Peppers, Tomatoes, Cereal Milk, Pork Lunch Meat 1994 Ice Cream 1997 Ground Beef 1993 –E. coli O157:H7 in undercooked hamburgers at a west coast hamburger chain resulted in more than 500 confirmed illnesses and 4 deaths. Record settlements of over $50 million. The company established a world class food safety program, requiring suppliers to test for E. coli O157:H7, which required implementation of antimicrobial interventions to reduce prevalence of E. coli O157:H7 BEFORE regulations went into effect. Note, ground beef outbreaks and recalls continue, with major events in 1997, 2002, and 2007 Fresh produce outbreak continue and have had significant impact on customers and consumer confidence. For example, 2006 –Bagged spinach associated with E. coli O157:H7 caused 198 illnesses and 3 deaths in 25 states, Canada, Iceland, Taiwan. Cost to industry more than $100 million because spinach trade was halted until the source of the outbreak was identified Drove development of Good Agricultural Practices metrics for on farm testing, which were implemented in the California marketing agreement Demonstrates need for antimicrobial solutions to prevent the spread of contamination during processing Foods once thought to be perfectly safe like peanut butter and dry cereal demonstrate that low level contamination can be found to cause illness and have a significant impact on the supply chain and consumer confidence: 2007 – Salmonella in consumer peanut butter caused illness in 628 people in 47 states. The estimated cost to the manufacturer was $50-60 million Environmental hygiene and maintenance issues were identified as root causes of the outbreak 2009 – The current commercial peanut butter outbreak demonstrates to breadth of issues that can be created in the supply chain with over 600 people ill and 8 deaths in 44 states as of February 12, 2009. Potentially contaminated products were sent to over 1000 firms Over 2000 products have been recalled Sale of non-impacted consumer peanut butter products is down 25% These outbreaks provide examples of the continued need for basic cleaning and sanitation, enhanced technologies that can treat produce and meat products, and knowledge based food safety management programs, audits and training to enhance the safety of food, protect brands, and improve consumer confidence. International outbreaks 1996 – variant Creuzfeld Jakob Syndrome related to BSE in cows 1999 – Dioxin in Belgian eggs, chicken, beef, and pork 2008 – dioxin in Irish pork, Melamine in Chinese milk, Listeria in Canadian lunch meat 1998 Cereal 2003 Green Onions 2007 Ground Beef (2) Pot Pies, Peanut Butter Chili Sauce 2009 Cookie Dough Milk Powder, Peanut Butter, Pistachios 2011 Sprouts- Ground Turkey, Cantaloupe Cantaloupe 1993 QSR Burgers 1996 Unpast. Juice Mad Cow 2000 Steak House 2005 Bagged Lettuce Salmonella Listeria E. coli O157:H7 Hepatitis A Botulism Chemical 2

Cost of Food-borne Illnesses Direct Costs of an Outbreak ~$75K* per establishment in Legal fees Medical claims Lost wages Sanitizing costs Business Risk Potential tens of $ millions in lost sales across a chain Word of mouth and social media Traditional media coverage Regulatory action Public Health Risk Estimates: 48 million cases** of foodborne illness in the US annually 120,000 hospitalizations 3000 deaths *NRA estimate **http://www.cdc.gov/foodborneburden/

Risks of Current Water Washing Practices Recent studies have demonstrated washing [with water] to fall short of the complete removal of organisms The Food Code requires all fresh produce, except commercially washed, pre-cut, and bagged produce, to be thoroughly washed under running, potable water or with chemicals (or both) If produce is soaked in water alone, pathogens can be transferred to non-contaminated produce Therefore, it is important to follow practices that minimize pathogens in the water or on the surface of produce

Antimicrobial Fruit & Vegetable Treatment 5 Antimicrobial Fruit & Vegetable Treatment Only foodservice produce wash with FDA clearance and EPA registered1 Effective on both whole and further processed produce Reduces pathogens* on the surface of further cut produce Reduces spoilage organisms Costs less than a penny per plate Cleans off waxes and residues and can enhance appearance Quick and convenient use No rinse required Controlled dispensing Leaves no aftertaste or smell Remove summary statement box if not applicable Reduces 99.9% of E. coli, Listeria and Salmonella* in wash water for raw agricultural commodities *Pathogens: E. coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enterica 1Product claims are registered with US EPA and updated label may be in review with state agencies. Please review product label for Claims and Direction for Use. (RLD)

Washed in Ecolab’s Antimicrobial Fruit & Vegetable Treatment 6 Cleaning Properties Washed in Ecolab’s Antimicrobial Fruit & Vegetable Treatment Washed in Water Remove summary statement box if not applicable

Benefits of Washing with AFVT1 7 Benefits of Washing with AFVT1 AFVT Water Chlorine Reduces 99.9% of pathogens in wash water* Reduces pathogens on surface of further processed produce** vs. water No aftertaste or smell Reduces spoilage organisms No rinse required Visible dispensing (proof of delivery) Enhances produce appearance Formulated for reliable dispensing in Foodservice Show competition and how our product compares *Pathogens: E. coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enterica for raw agricultural commodities **In a study using water as a control 1Product claims are registered with US EPA and updated label may be in review with state agencies. Please review product label for Claims and Direction for Use. (RLD)