Romania: Economic Situation And Prospects

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ukraine: Current Economic Situation and Future Prospects Oleg Ustenko Executive Director, The Bleyzer Foundation October 2012.
Advertisements

Sanctions, counter-sanctions and mid-term prospects for the Russian economy November 11, 2014 NRU HSE Development Center 1 Natalia Akindinova.
The Polish economy in 2002 Frigyes Ferdinand Heinz Research Office (London) Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi Ltd.
1 Βulgaria * Macroeconomic & Business Environment * Bilateral Economic & Commercial Relations * Prospects Theologia Voulgari Second Secretary for Economic.
Maintaining Macroeconomic Stability in Turbulent Times: The Case of Macedonia Maintaining Macroeconomic Stability in Turbulent Times: The Case of Macedonia.
Macroeconomic Policies Dr. George Norton Agricultural and Applied Economics Virginia Tech Copyright 2009 AAEC 3204.
General Directorate of Annual Programs and Conjunctural Evaluations1 15 February 2010 Turkish Economy: Macroeconomic Developments in 2009 and Medium Term.
Nikolay Georgiev Dushan Nedeljkovic. Outline Country Facts Trends of macroeconomic aggregates Economic activity Indicators Labor Market Trade FDI Monetary.
Macroeconomic Development in the 1990s © Libor Žídek, 2004.
A Tour of the World Chapter 1. © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved The Crisis Table 1-1 World Output Growth since 2000.
Strictly private & confidential. 2 ASSOCIATION OF INVESTMENT FUND MANAGEMENT COMPANIES  2015 election year – number of populist measures that can have.
Economic Crisis: The Way Out? An Eastern European Perspective Sándor Meisel – Krisztina Vida Institute for World Economics Research Centre for Economic.
Signs of crisis During the crisis following the bankruptcy of financial institutions and banks, there is a bankruptcy of many companies and enterprises,
Introduction to the UK Economy. What are the key objectives of macroeconomic policy? Price Stability (CPI Inflation of 2%) Growth of Real GDP (National.
MINISTRY OF FINANCE ENSURING STABILITY AND GROWTH PLAMEN ORESHARSKI MINISTER OF FINANCE 12 December 2007 Sofia.
1 International Economics -International Finance Wang Feng Department of International Economics and Trade School of Business Shenzhen University .
Federal Planning Bureau Economic analyses and forecasts Economic budget 2008 Evaluation of risks and uncertainties.
2.3.1 Unit content Students should be able to: Define balance of payments and the key components (the current account, and the balance of trade in goods.
CABRI and World Bank Institute Training Programme Budget Management and Public Financial Accountability Presented by: Matthew Simmonds Chief Director:
Economic Context 2016 August 2016
Indonesia's Economy and Trade Development in 2016 EU HoMS Meeting 14 March 2017.
6.00 Understand economics trends and communication.
20 Multiple Choice Questions with Answers
Microeconomics Topic 1: The Economic Problem
BULGARIA – ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES
In-Class Final Exam Review
BULGARIA – ECONOMIC PROSPECTS
BULGARIAN ECONOMY - OPPORTUNITIES AND PERSPECTIVES
UNIT IVE INFLATION.
Presentation made by the South African Reserve Bank to the Standing Committee on Finance 23 February 2010.
3.4 Managing the Economy Fiscal Policy
World Economic Situation and Prospects: 2018 View on India
Macroeconomic Context for Budget 2017
Presentation to the MPC, August 2004
Introduction to the UK Economy
Macroeconomic Review August 2017.
Macroeconomic Review November 2017.
Macroeconomic Review November 2016.
Macroeconomic Review January 2017.
Macroeconomic Review February 2017.
User needs and practices
Macroeconomic Review May 2017.
Macroeconomic Review September 2017.
Macroeconomic Review February 2018.
NS4540 Winter Term 2017 Bolivia Economic Slowdown
Macroeconomic Review March 2017.
Macroeconomic Review December 2016.
Macroeconomic Review July 2017.
Macroeconomic Review December 2017.
The New Growth Model for Serbia: Monetary and Fiscal Policy Challenges
Macroeconomic Review October 2017.
Users’ needs and practices
User needs and practices
Macroeconomic Review October 2016.
2005 MTBPS 25 October 2005 Introduction Macroeconomic overview
NS4540 Winter Term 2016 Latin America: Recovery 2016
Fundamental Analysis.
A Brief Presentation of the Economic Development in Finland
Chapter 12: Gross Domestic Product and Growth Section 3
Macroeconomic Review July 2016.
Macroeconomic Review April 2017.
NS4540 Winter Term 2017 Chile: Economic Slowdown
Macroeconomic Review June 2016.
Macroeconomic Review May 2016
Macroeconomic Review August 2016.
Macroeconomic Review June 2017.
Macroeconomic Review September 2016.
Users’ needs and practices
PORTFOLIO AND SELECT COMMITTEES ON FINANCE
Chapter 12: Gross Domestic Product and Growth Section 3
Presentation transcript:

Romania: Economic Situation And Prospects September 2016 1 1

Key Macroeconomic Indicators Source: National Institute of Statistics, National Bank of Romania, Eurostat, Ministry of Public Finance, The Bleyzer Foundation

Sources of Economic Growth – Supply Side Contributions to GDP Growth by Resources, percentage points GDP expanded by 3.8% in 2015 and by 5.2% in H1- 2016; On the supply side of GDP, since 2015, trade, auto repairs, transport and tourism have been the main growth drivers, adding 2.1% to the growth in H1- 2016 GDP In June 2015, due to increasing food consumption, the government cut the VAT for food products (other than bread and pastry) from 24% to 9% In January 2016, the standard VAT rate for all other products was reduced from 24% to 20% Other growth areas included IT & Communications which contributed 0.8% to H1-2016 growth Construction grew little, adding a low 0.2% to the H1-2016 growth, in spite of the need to upgrade the country’s infrastructure. Source: National Institute of Statistics, The Bleyzer Foundation

Sources of Economic Growth – Demand Side Contributions to GDP Growth by Uses Components, percentage points On the demand side of GDP, since 2014 final consumption has been the main GDP growth contributor. The contribution of households consumption to the H1-2016 GDP growth rate was 6.8%, while the general government consumption contribution was a lower 0.4%; Gross fixed capital formation contributed 1.6% to H1-2016 economic growth; But net exports had a negative 2.8% contribution to GDP growth, as higher consumption led to higher imports and higher trade deficits. Source: National Institute of Statistics, The Bleyzer Foundation

Consolidated Budget Deficit, Fiscal Policy Consolidated Budget Deficit, % of GDP Romania has maintained low consolidated fiscal budget deficits by reducing public investments in order to finance increases in public wages (+10.2% in 2016) and to cut Value Added Taxes, as noted earlier. The fiscal budget deficit during January-July 2016 was 0.2% of the GDP, compared with a 1.0% surplus in the same period of last year. The fiscal budget is expected to show a 2.9% of GDP deficit in 2016, as usually budget deficit jumps by 1.5%-2.0% of GDP during the last month of the year; Parliamentary elections are planned for December 2016, and politicians are likely to be generous with budget expenditures. The government is a caretaker one, without parliamentary support, so it can hardly oppose these excesses. Source: National Bank of Romania, Ministry of Public Finance, The Bleyzer Foundation

Monetary Policy and Inflation Consumer prices, % annual change eop Inflation at end-July 2016 was -0.8% yoy due to negative contributions of - 2.2% yoy and -0.9% yoy from non-food and services prices, respectively; The VAT cut implemented in January 2016 for non-food goods led to the above declines in prices The base effect from the cut of VAT on food products VAT has already expired, with food product prices increasing 1.3% yoy in July 2016; The NBR expects the end-2016 inflation to remain negative, at -0.4% yoy; Source: National Institute of Statistics, The Bleyzer Foundation

Current Account and Foreign Trade Current account, bn Euro Romania’s current account deficits and the level of public debt are comfortable, thanks to reform carried out in the recent past However, the current account deficit is widening due to increases in imports associated with expanded consumption. But the CA deficit is still at manageable levels at 1.1% of the GDP in 2015 and expected to reach 2.9% of GDP in 2016 During H1-2016, CA deficit reached EUR 2.5 billion, up from EUR 0.4 billion in H1-2015 The increase is mainly due to deficits in the trade of goods, which reached EUR 4.0 billion during H1-2016, up from EUR 2.9 billion during H1-2015; Foreign direct investments amounted to EUR 1.9 billion during H1-2016; Public and publicly guaranteed debt remains at low levels by EU standards, at 38.4% of GDP as of end-2015; Net FDI inflows Source: National Institute of Statistics, National Bank of Romania, Ministry of Public Finance, The Bleyzer Foundation

Outlook for 2016 and 2017 In 2016, GDP growth will reach 5.0%, slightly slowing down during 2017 Consumption will remain the main GDP growth driver, due to cuts in the VAT rate Increasing consumption should lead to increases in trade and current account deficits: The trade deficit was up 30% yoy during Jan-Jul 2016 reaching EUR 5.1 billion The current account deficit reached EUR 2.5 billion over January-June 2016, up from EUR 0.4 billion over the same period of last year. For 2016 the CA deficit is expected at 2.9% of the GDP The year 2016 is been strongly influenced by political life: In December 2016 Romania will have parliamentary elections The current government is a technocrat one, led by Mr. Dacian Ciolos, an ex-EU Agriculture Commissioner. Mr. Ciolos stated it will not take part in the 2016 elections All parliamentary parties are eager to distribute public money ahead of the elections, with little consideration to financing needs; Romania remains unable to use EU funds and this is likely to remain an issue in the future Infrastructure remains inadequate, with no government able to correct it: The strong performance of the National Anticorruption Directorate has became a deterrent for government initiatives. Nobody wants to become a target by pushing a project, while being fired for doing nothing is unheard of in the government.