Geospatial Coordinating Board

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GIS Executive Council and Advisory Committee Update November 2010.
Advertisements

Portfolio Management, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance, is the coordination of Federal geospatial.
Building a Strategic Management System Office for Student Affairs, Twin Cities Campus Ground Level Work Metrics Initiatives Managing Change Change Management.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Alabama GIS Executive Council November 17, Alabama GIS Executive Council Governor Bob Riley signs Executive Order No. 38 on November 27 th, 2007.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
Project Initiation Document (PID) Strategic Plan PID Committee Meeting - November 5, 2012.
Progress Update- August IDENTITY Solidify UME’s identity as the provider of excellent research-based educational programs in defined priority areas.
1 National Geospatial Advisory Committee NGAC Innovative Strategies for Geospatial Programs and Partnerships Subcommittee Update Subcommittee Members 
International Speedway Boulevard Stakeholders Task Force (STF) Meeting 1 Wednesday, May 19, 2010.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update National Geospatial Advisory Committee Meeting December 11, 2013.
1 25 STRONG WORKFORCE RECOMMENDATIONS IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW #strongworkforce DoingWhatMATTERS.cccco.edu.
Workforce Innovation & Opportunity Act Regional and Local Area Designation and Redesignation Local Workforce Investment Board Listening Session February.
1 An Overview of Process and Procedures for Health IT Collaboration GSA Office of Citizen Services and Communications Intergovernmental Solutions Division.
Our Mission... “To facilitate collaboration and partnerships through a comprehensive master plan which promotes economic growth, community development.
Orange County Consolidated Plan One-Year Action Plan and Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice August 2, 2016 BCC.
UNGGIM – PRIVATE SECTOR NETWORK. AGENDA > OVERVIEW OF PRIVATE SECTOR >PURPOSE AND VISION OF PRIVATE SECTOR NETWORK > STRUCTURE AND TERMS OF REFERENCE.
January 23,  Balance state’s higher education long range plan and agency operations in the required strategic plan;  Involve agency staff in.
Minnesota Geospatial Advisory Council
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Knowledge for Healthcare: Driver Diagrams October 2016
Visit Mendocino County: Strategic Direction 2017/ /20
Supervision of Insurance Market Conduct in Canada
CAÑADA COLLEGE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK
Update from the Faster Payments Task Force
Transforming the future of public health in Missouri
Improving the Garment Sector in Lao PDR:
Workforce Development Areas
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
HUIT is mission-driven, goal-oriented, and values-based
Working with your AoA Project Officer
Rich plays video. Introduces Cecilia
Annual Plan Earlier this week, the SNA Board reviewed the progress we have made to date on the new Strategic Plan that was introduced last year.
Ken Matthews Chair, Partnership Working Group 31 July 2013
What does the State GIS Coordinator do?
Equity, Opportunity, Results
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
TSMO Program Plan Development
Strategic Planning Update
One ODOT: Positioned for the Future
VERMONT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LEADERS
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Accreditation Update Regional Municipality of Durham March 15, 2018.
Board of Higher Education Meeting | May 1, 2018
How does the Branding fit into ECC Excels???
Return to First Principles
Support for the AASHTO Committee on Planning (COP) and its Subcommittees in Responding to the AASHTO Strategic Plan Prepared for NCHRP 8-36, TASK 138.
HUIT is mission-driven, goal-oriented, and values-based
Office of Secretary of Defense
Institutional Framework, Resources and Management
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
CRUE – The Way Forward Vicki Jackson
Continuity Guidance Circular Webinar
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Strategic Boards Toolkit
Albania 2021 Population and Housing Census - Plans
Key Stakeholders are aware of the Coalitions activities
Revolutionize USACE Civil Works
DEVELOPING A HIGH PERFORMING FEDERAL WORKFORCE THROUGH INTERAGENCY COLLABORATION Randy Bergquist Chair, Interagency Chief Learning Officer Council.
Portfolio, Programme and Project
1915(c) WAIVER REDESIGN 2019 Brain Injury Summit
AHC Strategic Plan Progress: Update to Board of Regents
Regional COORDiNATION STRUCTURE AND BEST PRACTICES RECOMMENDATIONS
California GIS Strategic Plan Phase 2:
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Presentation transcript:

Geospatial Coordinating Board May 4, 2017

Content Background Approach Coordination Framework Task Forces Data Program Task Force Governance Task Force Service Delivery Task Force Accomplishments 2017 Goals

Background Established per Act 178 in October 2014 Advise and prepare recommendations for issues and data standards Coordinate efficient policy and technology issues Memberships from entities Local, county and state government agencies Academia and private sector professionals Facilitated by Office of Administration

Approach CURRENT EXECUTION FUTURE GOVERNANCE TASK FORCE Lessons Learned Refresh Base Map GOVERNANCE TASK FORCE Current Challenges Data Sharing Opt In DATA PROGRAM TASK FORCE Situational Analysis Funding Coord. SERVICE DELIVERY TASK FORCE Strategy / Actions Strategic Plan IMPROVEMENTS

Coordination Framework Governance STANDARDS CONSUME Author Approve Publish Applications & Infrastructure

Task Forces Service Delivery Data Governance Evaluate how geospatial services are delivered today in the commonwealth Evaluate how other states and counties deliver geospatial services Identify recommendations for how geospatial services should be delivered in the commonwealth to maximize investments. Data Identify initiatives and approaches that remove barriers to sharing geospatial data Promote cost effective approaches to data sharing. Drive operational efficiencies and value-add solutions Advance the delivery of geospatial services Governance Document the geospatial governance process in the commonwealth (to include all governmental entities) Establish a list of major priorities or initiatives to address the needs of the broader geospatial community Evaluate approaches to accomplishing initiatives within existing budget constraints Identify opportunities for collaboration to meet common objectives Coordinate activities across other geospatial governing bodies.

Data Program Task Force Mission The mission of the data program task force is to identify initiatives and approaches that remove barriers to sharing geospatial data across the commonwealth and promote cost effective approaches to data sharing. The focus is on driving operational efficiencies and value-add solutions while advancing the commonwealth’s delivery of geospatial services

Data Program Task Force Challenge No official base map exists for PA Business Rationale A single base map should be created so that entities using GIS data are working from the same base data with established standards. Authoritative data ownership is needed to reduce redundant efforts and multiple copies of base data layers. Standards need to be created to ensure data consistency.  Barriers to Implementation Cost, ownership of technology and data, frequency of updates, service delivery methods Effort to Complete Coordinate the ownership of the base map technology, service delivery, and then identify the data layers that need to be included and ensure that only the authoritative source is providing updates and ownership of the specific layers. Develop data standards.

Adopted Base Map Layers

Data Program Task Force Challenge No single data sharing agreement exists between government entities with in the commonwealth Business Rationale A single data sharing agreement would foster over all sharing and simplify the task of ensuring that data is shared openly and in a manner that protects the interests of the data owner. Barriers to Implementation Buy-in from all entities about how the agreement should be structured, legal issues, RTK issues, coordination of the collection and ownership of the data agreements  Effort to Complete Review what other states have done and evaluate the fit for PA. Involve local government organizations (CCAP, Municipal League, etc..) to get feedback. Involve legal to give review and final blessing. Review a need for incentivizing the sharing of data. 

Governance Task Force Mission The mission of the governance task force is to document the geospatial governance process in the commonwealth (to include all governmental entities), establish a list of major priorities or initiatives to address the needs of the broader geospatial community, evaluate approaches to accomplishing initiatives within existing budget constraints, identify opportunities for collaboration to meet common objectives and coordinate activities across other geospatial governing bodies.

Governance Task Force Goals Evaluation of the current state of GIS in PA Must understand the status of PA’s GIS community before we can do any work Development of GIS Strategic Plan Lead the development of a commonwealth wide Geospatial strategic plan and business plan in coordination with the other task forces, existing geospatial governing bodies, other governmental entities and interested parties. Assessment of key funding opportunities and a means to disseminate the information Coordinate information technology investment strategies that may be underway so as to maximize investments. Identify and evaluate creative approaches to fund geospatial activities in the commonwealth given the current fiscal climate.

Goal: Evaluation of the current state of GIS in PA Governance Task Force Goal: Evaluation of the current state of GIS in PA Challenge No all encompassing statewide GIS Survey exists / occurs on a consistent basis to update state of the State in GIS. Business Rationale Knowing the status of GIS throughout the spectrum Commonwealth entities helps target outreach, align goals, implement collaborative projects, and provide valuable information of direction forward. Barriers to Implementation Who creates / processes survey; Survey length; Entities to send survey to; Multiple iterations of survey; Industry specific questions; How often? Effort to Complete “State Geospatial Coordinating Board Questionnaire” joint TF developed; 8/1/2016 – 8/19/2016 addressing questions regarding goals & objectives of the Geoboard. Results analyzed jointly by TF. Next survey likely dive into more detail of individual GIS operations – Yearly minimum.

Goal: Evaluation of the current state of GIS in PA (continued) Governance Task Force Goal: Evaluation of the current state of GIS in PA (continued)

Questionnaire Summary Governance Task Force Goal: Evaluation of the current state of GIS in PA Questionnaire Summary There is a strong need for a Pennsylvania base map to support many different business related activities Data sharing agreement - most sharing is done with other government agencies while the private sector pays fees to acquire the data; ½ of respondents had DSA GIS is centralized in about half of the respondents but only a third have developed an internal strategic plan Respondents are largely unaware of external funding opportunities for GIS but almost a third have unmet funding needs for GIS related activities About half of the respondents provide some form of GIS service delivery; overwhelming majority of those services are consumed both internally and externally

Goal: Development of GIS Strategic Plan Governance Task Force Goal: Development of GIS Strategic Plan Challenge The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania currently lacks an up to date, statewide, all encompassing, comprehensive GIS strategic plan. Business Rationale Without a strategic plan, the Commonwealth is not able to take advantage of opportunities related to funding, enhanced cooperation, and streamlined operations. A plan can provide the overarching guidance necessary to capture these opportunities and increase the efficiency of GIS within the State. Barriers to Implementation Who creates / revisits / maintains plan; Revisitation timeline - how often?; capture needs of many entities; interaction with other plans; Feedback & Revisions vital Effort to Complete GIS Strategic Plan is currently being drafted by the Governance Task Force.

GIS Strategic Plan Preview Governance Task Force Goal: Development of GIS Strategic Plan (continued) GIS Strategic Plan Preview Key Tenets Sustainability of GIS in the Commonwealth Sustainable Funding Sustainable Personnel Sustainable Model of Governance Cooperation, Collaboration, and Coordination Cooperation Between Entities Collaboration Among Entities Coordination Across Entities Phased Approach Constructed to include objectives that have similar criteria: priority implementation time frame resource allocation pre-requisite dependencies Constructed in a chronological manner to allow for continued operations and measurements of milestone success as we the Geospatial community progress through the strategic plan

Governance Task Force Goal: Development of GIS Strategic Plan (continued) Geoboard Vote – Final Acceptance of GIS Strategic Plan / Phase 1 Implementation Plan Geoboard Vote - Accepts Annual Report Feedback Round 2 July 15-24, 2017 August 14, 2017 March 20, 2017 Geoboard Vote – Proceed / Alter Current Plan Direction Feedback Round 1 Professional Writer Review May 8, 2017 July 1 - 9, 2017 July 31, 2017 March April May June July August July 10-15, 2017 July 10-15, 2017 March 20, 2017 Round 1 Revision Final review Governance TF Given Go-Ahead to Proceed Drafting Strategic Plan Based on Previously Explored Key Tenets & Goals July 25-30, 2017 Round 2 Revision

Governance Task Force Challenge Business Rationale Goal: Assessment of key funding opportunities and means to disseminate information Challenge Budget constraints and shortfalls inevitably stifle the growth & development of GIS across all sectors throughout the Commonwealth, how can PA create a more sustainable funding model for the future? Business Rationale Collaboration, cooperation, and coordination provide savings in resources. Using these principals to create a sustainable model of funding opportunities (and disseminating those opportunities) will allow many entities to tap into pooled resources for mutually beneficial results. Barriers to Implementation Budget constraints & shortfalls; earmarked budgetary items only allowed for certain uses; staffing to ensure this happens; platform non existent Effort to Complete This is an effort outlined in the Draft Plan as an objective. Preliminary research has been conducted at this point but is an ongoing project.

Service Delivery Task Force Mission​ ​ The mission of the service delivery task force is to evaluate how geospatial services are delivered today in the commonwealth, evaluate how other states and counties deliver geospatial services and identify recommendations for how geospatial services should be delivered in the commonwealth to maximize investments. ​

Service Delivery Task Force Focus Areas Identify existing challenges and formulate recommendations to improve the current environment. Assess existing center of excellence models to improve geospatial service delivery as cost effectively as possible Establish a service delivery framework to improve geospatial service delivery in the commonwealth

Service Delivery Task Force Challenge Establish a service delivery framework to improve geospatial service delivery in the commonwealth Business Rationale Develop a “partnership culture” - Create an environment that encourages information sharing that encourages new opportunities to engage and collaborate across sectors Avoid redundant investments Improve the user experience Barriers to Implementation Resource constraints, budget limitations, desire to control Effort to Complete Explore new channels to better service and delivery effective data services Continuously improve and measure performance Focused innovation

Accomplishments Conducted four board meetings Held task force meetings Conducted state-wide GIS survey Gained agreement on base map themes Gained agreement on Annual Report

2017 Goals Advise Governor Complete a strategic plan Support PEMA’s upcoming remote sensing procurement preparation Identify authoritative spatial data layers and their stewards supporting the base map themes Decide approach to resolving local municipal boundary discrepancies Define a single data sharing agreement that can be used throughout PA Determine a strategy for coordinated funding of statewide GIS programs Define the strategy for leveraging cloud-based services Implement a GIS governance framework Continue outreach and education at industry events