School P&C Meeting June 2017

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fiscal Year 2010 Budget Update Board of Early Education and Care June 9, 2009.
Advertisements

INDIVIDUAL SERVICE FUNDS (“ISF”). ISF – a form of Self Directed Support Potential Benefits to the Customer Flexibility – not just regulated (CQC) activity.
30.5.  State funding helps keep tuitions low at public colleges. As a result, more Texans can afford college.  For the years 2000 and 2001, the Texas.
TAFE Funding: The need for a new deal 2003 Update.
Sequestration How Does it Work. Passed the Congress in August 2011 Established the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction It’s the Law! P.L
35 TH ANNUAL CAREER TECH AND ADULT EDUCATION LEGISLATIVE SEMINAR Representative Teresa Fedor JANUARY 21,
17th January 2015 Agenda item 6 High Needs Alison Shipley Bob Seaman Schools Forum.
March Funding overview Governments provide about three quarters of VET revenue. In 2007, the Australian government provided: 26.2% of NSW operating.
Office of Child Development & Early Learning Tom Corbett, Governor | Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Education | Gary D. Alexander, Secretary of Public Welfare.
Chapter 13 Federal Spending Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TITLE I PARENT MEETING PRESENTATION.
Chapter 11 Public Finance in Texas. The Budget The state constitution requires that the legislature operate within a balanced budget. The Texas budget.
Genesis Solar Module Brochure ™
School Funding Reform Act (SFRA): Please Underfund Us Fairly Gloucester & Camden County Unfairly Funded School Districts Hosted by: Woodbury City Public.
Lakewood City Schools Goals Goal #1 To realize a full year of academic growth for each and every student during the school year. To.
“An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010.
Ramona Unified School District First Interim Report December 17, 2009.
THE GONSKI REVIEW OF SCHOOL FUNDING Update for Principals.
Investment in VET for a productive and inclusive society Peter Noonan Centre for Economics of Education and Training Presentation originally prepared for.
CEC 4 Melody Benitez, Class Size Matters Oct. 8, 2014 WHY DOE’S C4E PLAN VIOLATES THE LANGUAGE AND INTENT OF THE LAW.
Leonie Haimson, Class Size Matters Oct. 15, 2014 WHY DOE’S C4E PLAN VIOLATES THE LANGUAGE AND INTENT OF THE LAW.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Chapter 14 Vocabulary.  Budget - A policy document allocating burdens (taxes) and benefits (expenditures)  Deficit - An excess of federal expenditures.
Raising Money Types of Taxes Managing the Country’s Money.
Personal Budgets. Introduction Name Andrea Woodier Organisation Leicestershire County Council Telephone number address
NACTEI General Session. How Did We Get Here? Feb. 2010:President’s FY 11 budget consolidates Tech Prep, holds funding constant July 2010: House and Senate.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Karen Sprowal, Class Size Matters Nov. 18, 2014 HOW DOE’S C4E PLAN DOES NOTHING TO ADDRESS CLASS SIZE OR OVERCROWDING IN D13 AND CITYWIDE.
Briefing for Member Schools 15 th September 2011.
Association of Childrens Welfare Agencies Conference 2006 Improving Care Through Accreditation- The Role of the NSW Children’s Guardian.
WE ARE LAUSD BUDGET OVERVIEW OCTOBER 5, 2010.
September Board Meeting FY08 and FY09 Spending Plan.
Agency for Persons with Disabilities Update House Health Care Appropriations Subcommittee September 24, 2013 Barbara Palmer Director Rick Scott Governor.
Our collective ambition for Greater Manchester GM has a history of ambition and cooperation. Skilled, healthy and independent people are crucial to bring.
Fiscal Policy= Congress+ President Budget: – A policy document allocating burdens (taxes) and benefits (expenditures). Deficit: – An excess of federal.
Leonie Haimson, Class Size Matters Oct. 21, 2014 HOW DOE’S C4E PLAN DOES NOTHING TO ADDRESS CLASS SIZE OR OVERCROWDING IN D11 AND CITYWIDE.
Gonski Funding Model A brief summary of the proposed new funding model for Australian Schools.
Oxnard College Campus Budget Forum Presented by: Richard Duran, President John al-Amin, VP Business Services Scott Corbett, President Academic Senate April.
1 01 STUDENT RESOURCE PACKAGE Student Resource Package (SRP) Equity Reform: Social Disadvantage and Catch-Up.
Class Size Matters Updated May 2015 HOW DOE’S PROPOSED CAPITAL PLAN WILL LEAD TO WORSE OVERCROWDING & LARGER CLASSES IN D6.
Student Data Privacy FERPA. What governs Student Data Privacy at SCC? FERPA- Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (aka the Buckley Amendment)
The Budget. Review terms: Budget: – A policy document allocating burdens (taxes) and benefits (expenditures). Expenditures: – What the government spends.
What you need to know About Title I Parent Meeting Presentation.
What is a sin tax? What is its purpose and function as a government restriction on the use of individual property? A sin tax is a relatively high tax.
Homeless Children and Youth in ESEA Reauthorization
Child health advocacy update
Ch. 7 Outline Congress at work.
The Budget.
What you need to know About Title I
Texas Budget Process GOVT 2306, Module 12.
St Anthony’s School Wanneroo
Performance-Based Funding in Higher Education
Chapter 16: Financing Government Section 3
Budget Update Governing Board Meeting - November 17, 2010
The New Children and Families Bill and SEND- Issues for implementation
Chapter 11 Federal Spending
Quality Schools Package
The way forward on school funding
EOPS and CARE Allocation Formulas in and Beyond CCC Confer March 22, :30-3:30 Listen over your computer Or…. Call , Passcode.
Federal budget and tax policy for children’s advocates
Agenda Why school level financial data?
Spring 2014 Budget Update March 2014.
TYPES OF BILLS & RESOLUTIONS
Chapter 16: Financing Government Section 3
State and Local Governments Spending and Revenue
Leonie Haimson Class Size Matters Jackson Heights education forum
UWE Bristol External Examiners day 27th January 2016
California Budget & Propositions
Leonie Haimson, Class Size Matters Feb. 11, 2015
Chapter 11 Federal Spending
Presentation transcript:

School P&C Meeting June 2017 Further information regarding this presentation: Rob Walker (rwalker@nswppa.org.au) Put your own school name in front of ‘School’ School P&C Meeting June 2017

Gonski 2.0 Is not a good deal for public schools Provides 40% of the funding of the original Gonski – for which NSW currently has a signed agreement Puts a cap on Federal Govt funding of public schools – the cap is set at 20% of the School Resource Standard* *Gonski defined the School Resource Standard as specifying the recurrent resources required to enable students who attend schools with minimal levels of educational disadvantage the opportunity to achieve agreed national educational outcomes

The proposed amendment to the legislation Means that schooling for children will NOT be funded according to need Has been formed without consultation with State and Territory governments Ensures there will be variations between states in funding for schools

The Original Gonski Created an integrated national school funding system providing equity in funding across all schools, systems and states Could be funded by phasing out all over-funding of private schools, which amounts to billions of dollars

Further information regarding this presentation: Rob Walker (rwalker@nswppa.org.au) How school funding should be issued according to Gonski. Each school has a unique filter funnel. The spouts each have a tap (not shown) permitting variable amounts of funding for each spout. These reflect the Gonski loading factors – different for each school based on the children enrolled in the school. There are actually three funding beakers: Federal Gonski funds (65%) of Gonski funding, State Gonski funds (35% of Gonski funds) and State Recurrent funding for the school. Only one beaker is shown for simplicity.

The Loss to Our Nation LOSS TO OUR NATION Opportunity to reach TRINITY GRAMMAR ST ANDREW’S CATHEDRAL SCHOOL NEWINGTON COLLEGE THE KINGS SCHOOL LOSS TO OUR NATION Opportunity to reach potential Under resourced* *mainly public schools Full Gonski resourcing Elite school Resourcing level required to reach (recommended increase from current funding level was $5B in 2009) applied using Gonski weighting factors Further information regarding this presentation: Rob Walker (rwalker@nswppa.org.au) Note the axis on left “Opportunity to reach potential”. Note over funding of the private schools (blue). Note the under-funding of the public and low fee catholic schools (gold). Note the Gonski funding level – all schools funded to reach the SRS. Finally note the loss to the nation as those children in the public and low fee catholic schools struggle to reach their potential due to poor school resourcing.

The current Federal proposal Is a confidence trick $13.1 billion increase in ten years 2016-17 to 2026-27 amounts to $506 per student over ten years or $50 per student per year Is only 38% of what has been promised in the current signed agreement with the NSW government

The current Federal proposal Will limit Federal funding of public schools to 20% of the School Resource Standard (SRS) but will fund private schools to 80% of the SRS Will abolish the requirement of the Federal Govt to increase, by 4.7% annually, funding to a school till it reaches the SRS Abandons the increased role for the Federal Govt in funding of disadvantaged students, over 80% of whom attend public schools

Public schools will receive less than 50% of the small increase in funds ($6.4 billion out of $13.1 billion) despite being the largest provider and carrying the most needy students The original Gonski sees the Federal Govt providing about $10 billion in additional funding between 2013-14 and 2019-20 and public schools would receive about $8 billion, or 80% of the increase Annually the current Federal Govt spends approaching $500 billion when all expenditure is considered – we are requesting a comparatively small amount for our children

Under the proposal private schools will all reach 100% of their SRS by 2026-27, not withstanding some are well above their SRS now and many are there, or nearly there The proposal will lock in different funding roles for Federal and State Govts instead of developing an integrated model as originally proposed by Gonski The current Federal Govt spends approaching $500 billion

There is no more important issue for us at the present time We are the adults at his moment in the history of our country who can make a difference for the generations of children to come

Gonski is the great enabler for unlocking the potential of our nation With Gonski funding arrangements there will be less demand on the welfare system, health system and justice system. Our children will have equity of educational opportunity. It will unlock the potential of our nation.

Request of Parents The Bill has passed through the Government-controlled Lower House To bring it into law it needs to pass through the Senate as well We need parents to contact Senators, particularly the cross bench, requesting the amendment be defeated and the FULL Gonski be delivered to Australian school children We want bipartisan support for Commonwealth funding to be allocated according to the Gonski loading factors to the Gonski identified SRS

How much Gonski funding has been received so far? 2014 Gonski Year 1 3% 2015 Gonski Year 2 9% 2016 Gonski Year 3 18% 2017 Gonski Year 4 36% 2018 Gonski Year 5 63% AT RISK 2019 Gonski Year 6 100% AT RISK

For our school this equates to 2018 Gonski Year 5 63% AT RISK $198,698 2019 Gonski Year 6 100% AT RISK $492,715 And will be maintained at this level (adjusted for CPI each year subsequently) Each school will need to insert their own figures here (the percentages don’t change but the $ do. Refer to file <TF Gonski 1 v Gonski 2 5th & 6th year data – 170518> - provided in email from NSWPPA to principal.

List of Senators contact details available on departure Please support our kids by following through