Taxicab Geometry TWSSP Monday.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Silicon Valley Math Initiative Professional Development Series
Advertisements

P.M van Hiele Mathematics Learning Theorist Rebecca Bonk Math 610 Fall 2009.
A Story of Geometry Grade 8 to Grade 10 Coherence
Spherical Geometry TWSSP Wednesday.
Agenda. Mathematical Practices 1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively. 3. Construct viable arguments.
Overview of this Afternoon from 1PM to 3:45 PM
Chapter 8 Introductory Geometry Section 8.3 Triangles, Quadrilateral and Circles.
The van Hiele levels MA418 – Spring 2010 McAllister.
VDW Ch 20: Geometric Thinking
The van Hiele Model of Geometric Thought
SPHERICAL GEOMETRY TWSSP Thursday. Welcome Please sit in your same groups from yesterday Please take a moment to randomly distribute the role cards at.
1 Geometry and Spatial Reasoning Develop adequate spatial skills Children respond to three dimensional world of shapes Discovery as they play, build and.
Transforming Geometric Instruction Part 1 Understanding the Instructional Shifts in the Iowa Core Mathematics Standards Grades 6-8.
2.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SUMMER INSTITUTE 2015 SESSION 2 16 JUNE 2015 CONGRUENCE IN HIGH SCHOOL.
TIPM3 Grades 2 and 3 February 15 Monica Hartman. Agenda Homework and Lesson Sharing Geometric Measurement – relating area to multiplication and addition.
1. An Overview of the Geometry Standards for School Mathematics? 2.
Developing Geometric Reasoning Mary Jane Schmitt August 22–24, 2006 Washington, DC.
Geometric and Spatial Reasoning
Developing Geometric Reasoning K-2 Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Class March 14, 2011 Paige Richards and Dana Thome.
Students can identify objects by their overall shape. They need to see many examples and non-examples. Van Hiele Model of Geometric Understanding Level.
Bridging Math Practices Summer Workshop Wednesday, June 25, 2014 Day 3.
Geometry Grades K-2. Goals:  Build an understanding of the mathematical concepts within the Geometry Domain  Analyze how concepts of Geometry progress.
Shape Group 1 CCLM^2 Spring 2013 Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2012–2013 This material.
TIPM3 Second and Third Grade Geometry November 3, 2010.
Tending the Greenhouse Vertical and Horizontal Connections within the Mathematics Curriculum Kimberly M. Childs Stephen F. Austin State University.
GRADE 8 PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM  Understand and apply the Pythagorean Theorem.  Explain a proof of the Pythagorean Theorem and its converse. Here is one.
6.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SUMMER INSTITUTE 2015 SESSION 6 29 JUNE 2015 SEQUENCING BASIC RIGID MOTIONS; THE KOU-KU THEOREM.
An Introduction to Chapter 9: Geometric Figures
Geometry and Measurement ECED 4251 Dr. Jill Drake.
1.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SUMMER INSTITUTE 2015 SESSION 3 17 JUNE 2015 SIMILARITY IN MIDDLE SCHOOL.
T1PM3 4 th and 5 th grade Math Institute Focus on Geometry, Measurement and Data & The Eight Mathematical Practice September 27, 2011.
Class 4: Part 1 Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Class April 4, 2011.
4.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SUMMER INSTITUTE 2015 SESSION 4 18 JUNE 2015 SIMILARITY IN HIGH SCHOOL.
TAXICAB GEOMETRY TWSSP Tuesday. Welcome Grab a playing card and sit at the table with your card value Determine your role based on your card’s suit.
Common Core Leadership in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Understanding Shape in Kindergarten and Grade 1 Common Core.
Chapter 15 To accompany Helping Children Learn Math Cdn Ed, Reys et al. ©2010 John Wiley & Sons Canada Ltd.
NUMBER SYSTEMS TWSSP Monday. Welcome Fill out a notecard with the following: Front: Name Back: School, Grade What are two things you know about the structure.
Lesson 5-4 The Triangle Inequality. Ohio Content Standards:
Using GSP in Discovering a New Theory Dr. Mofeed Abu-Mosa This paper 1. Connects Van Hiele theory and its levels of geometric thinking with.
 Van Hiele Levels Math Alliance September 14, 2010 Kevin McLeod Chris Guthrie.
College and Career Readiness Conference Middle School Geometry Summer 2015.
Geometry The Van Hiele Levels of Geometric Thought.
NC NAEP Project Middle Grades Module 2 – Activity 4 Research Reflections.
TIPM3 March 2, 2011 Kindergarten and First Grade.
Geometry in NZC Shape - a teaching progression Sandra Cathcart LT Symposium 2009.
7.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SUMMER INSTITUTE 2015 SESSION 7 30 JUNE 2015 MODELING USING SIMILARITY; COPYING AND BISECTING.
T AXICAB G EOMETRY An exploration of Area and Perimeter Within city blocks.
Geometry- Lesson 4 Construct a Perpendicular Bisector.
Tools of Geometry Chapter 1. Please place your signed syllabus and textbook card in the basket on the table by the door. Take out your group’s work on.
CHAPTER 20 Geometric Thinking and Geometric Concepts
K-6 Geometry Progression In Practice
Welcome to ….
Developing Geometric Thinking and Spatial Sense
Creating, Describing, and Comparing Shapes
Today’s Objectives Create shared understanding of roles, responsibilities, and lived experiences related to diesel and remote communities Provide people.
Exploring Symmetry Core Mathematics Partnership
CHAPTER 15 Geometry Tina Rye Sloan To accompany Helping Children Learn Math10e, Reys et al. ©2012 John Wiley & Sons  
Levels of Geometric Thinking The van Hiele Levels
Core Mathematics Partnership Building Mathematical Knowledge and
Key Concept: Undefined Terms Example 1: Name Lines and Planes
Dr. Lee Wai Heng & Dr. Ng Kok Fu
Progression of Geometry
Exploring Transformations
The Geometer’s Sketchpad
Identify and model points, lines, and planes.
Entry Task What are the first 3 steps for constructing a line through point P that is parallel to the line. Reflection Question: What are the main concepts.
K-6 Geometry Progression In Practice
M.Ed Mathematics Student No: 15m8814
Welcome to Geometry - Room 102 Mr. Sudo Find your assigned seat.
Proving Congruence – SSS, SAS
Presentation transcript:

Taxicab Geometry TWSSP Monday

Welcome Grab a playing card and sit at the table with your card value Fill out a notecard with the following: Front: Name Back: School, Grade What do you like about teaching geometry? Learning geometry? What don’t you like about teaching geometry? Learning geometry? Introduce the person to your left by name, school, grade, and share something that person will do this summer

Week Overview Focus on two non-Euclidean geometries, taxicab and spherical What is a geometry? The properties, definitions and measurements of points, lines, angles and figures Often accompanied by a visual model consistent with the properties of the geometry – but the model is NOT the geometry

Week Overview Why non-Euclidean geometries? When we contrast with Euclidean, our understanding will deepen We will attend to the analogues of several CCSSM for Euclidean geometry Put us in our students’ shoes Van Heile level 4

Week Overview Content focused, but transparent in pedagogy Dedicated time every day to consider whole group work in our content area Purple cup time if desired

Monday Agenda Before lunch: After lunch: Community Agreements Preassessment After lunch: Establish basic definition for and model of taxicab geometry Explore properties and make conjectures Question for today: How do we define distance differently in taxicab geometry, and what impact does that have on geometric objects and properties? Success criteria: I can use a model for taxicab geometry to draw a point and a line, I can find the distance between two points in taxicab geometry, and I can find the set of points equidistant to two points

A protocol we will use Think - Go Around – Discuss Private Think Time: Quietly and privately respond to questions. Respect the need for others to process quietly. Go Around: Share your ideas, all ideas one person at a time. Discuss: Come to agreement or consensus that can be shared out with the whole group. Make sure everyone in your group understands the ideas discussed.

Community Agreements What do you need from each other in order to be able to feel safe to explore mathematical ideas, share thinking, and build on and connect with others’ ideas? What do you need to feel respected and valued as part of the mathematical community?

Van Hiele Levels Describes levels of understanding through which students progress in relation to geometry Levels 0-4 (or 1-5) Not dependent on child’s age or development level Dependent on experiences and activities in which students engage Levels are sequential – must pass through one to reach the next

Van Hiele Levels Level 0 – Visualization Level 1 – Analysis Can identify a shape; can’t articulate its properties Level 1 – Analysis Can identify the properties of a shape; can’t articulate relationships Level 2 – Informal Deduction Can articulate relationships and informally justify conclusions; can’t construct formal proofs Level 3 – Deduction Can construct mathematically sound proofs of conjectures Level 4 – Rigor Understand geometry in the abstract, and that other geometries exist

What do we know? Use the Think (5 min) – Go Around (5 min) – Discuss (10 min) protocol How would you define points and lines in Euclidean geometry? How do we measure distances in Euclidean geometry? How do we measure angles?

Taxicab Geometry Imagine a city set on a perfect east-west, north-south grid. Taxicab geometry allows motion only along the grid, and measures distances accordingly. A reasonable model for taxicab geometry is a grid or a Cartesian plane. What are the points and lines in taxicab geometry? Think – Go Around - Discuss

Taxicab lines What is a line in taxicab geometry? How does a line in taxicab geometry compare to a line in Euclidean geometry?

Proof What constitutes a mathematical proof? Think – Go around – discuss protocol

Taxicab distances Given two points A = (a1, a2) and B = (b1, b2), find the taxicab distance between those two points. Notation – to make our life easier… dT(A, B) := taxicab distance between points A and B dE(A, B) := Euclidean distance between points A and B If dT(A, B) = dT(C, D), must dE(A, B) = dE(C, D)? If dE(A, B) = dE(C, D), must dT(A, B) = dT(C, D)?

More taxicab distance thoughts Under what conditions on points A and B does dT(A, B) = dE(A, B)? For any two points, how do the taxicab and Euclidean distances between the two points compare?

Common Euclidean definitions What are the definitions of parallel and perpendicular lines in Euclidean geometry? What should those definitions be for taxicab geometry? In how many points can two Euclidean lines intersect? In how many points can two taxicab lines intersect?

Exit Ticket (sort of…) How are Euclidean and taxicab geometries similar? How are they different? Given any two points, would you expect the distance between them to be larger in Euclidean geometry or in taxicab geometry? Why?