Creating open data policies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to the State-Level Mitigation 20/20 TM Software for Management of State-Level Hazard Mitigation Planning and Programming A software program.
Advertisements

EEN [Canada] Forum Shelley Borys Director, Evaluation September 30, 2010 Developing Evaluation Capacity.
INTERNATIONAL IDEA AND GOVERNMENT OF BOTSWANA ANNUAL DEMOCRACY FORUM 2014 GABORONE, NOVEMBER 2014 Session 2: Legal Frameworks and Standards for.
Legal NISHA Copyright and Licensing Issues Michael Sparenberg e Institute for Internet Security Gelsenkirchen.
SYMPOSIUM ON OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES OPEN TEXT BOOKS – A VIGNETTE G. DHANARAJAN WAWASAN OPEN UNIVERSITY PENANG, MALAYSIA.
The new EITI Rules (2011 Edition). Background New edition of the EITI Rules agreed on 16 February 2011 Follows extensive consultation process, incorporating.
Workshop on Audit of Extractive Industries by SAIs 23 September 2015, OAG office, Oslo, Norway EITI reporting and Supreme Audit Institutions Global practice.
What Agencies Should Know About PDF/A September 20, 2005 Susan J. Sullivan, CRM
What Agencies Should Know About PDF/A-1 April 6, 2006 Mark Giguere
Guidance on EITI Requirements 12 and 13 EITI International Secretariat April 2011.
Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative: Civil Society Participation October 21, 2005, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia Bermet Sydygalieva.
STUDY CONCERNING MULTI-TERRITORY LICENSING FOR THE ONLINE DISTRIBUTION OF AUDIOVISUAL WORKS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION Presentation Europa Distribution 7th.
M ODULE 6 PART 1: Planning and Stakeholder Management GLOBAL FUND GRANT CONSOLIDATION WORKSHOP DATE.
Copyright Issues in Data Management CHRISTINE FRUIN / SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATIONS LIBRARIAN.
Licensing Health and Sensitive Data Dr Jeff Christiansen, Intersect | med.data.edu.au Publishing & Sharing Health-y Data Seminar, 26 Nov
Licences for Europe Introductory meeting, 4 February WG 2 - User- generated content and licensing for small-scale users of protected material.
Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency 3rd Health Programme The Electronic Submission System (JA 2015) Georgios MARGETIDIS.
Licences for Europe Introductory meeting, 4 February WG 4 – Text and data mining.
Report of the Ethics Committee Eighteenth Board Meeting, 7-8 November 2008.
RCUK International Funding Name Job title Research Councils UK.
Continuing Medical Education Guidance for Planners of Regularly Scheduled Series (RSS) To insert your company logo on this slide From the Insert Menu Select.
PARTNERSHIP COMMUNICATIONS STRATEGY
Beneficial ownership: Data collection and publication, timeliness
Agenda Challenges Open Data Initiative Future Plan Open Data
Key takeaways from day 1 Bash Razak, Ghana EITI
GEF Familiarization Seminar
Managing the Project Lifecycle
Beneficial Ownership Roadmap, Naypidaw, Myanmar March 2017
EITI Anglophone and Lusophone Africa Beneficial Ownership Workshop
Gerhardt Bouwer Statistics South Africa
CREATIVE COMMONS FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE
Part 2: How to ensure good project management?
Second SDG Partnerships Webinar:
PROJECT MANUAL Galina Georgieva Project Officer
THE EITI’S VALIDATION Validation corrective actions to drive reforms
An Introduction to Open Data
City of Toronto Open Data
Beneficial Ownership Disclosure: From Why to How
Tell us about your Wins! Microsoft 365 Collaboration Case Study Opportunities Promote partner success for public and internal use.
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
Training for New District Test Coordinators
Mainstreaming transparency
Business Plan Template
Beneficial ownership: Data verification
Training of Trainers Workshop
Project Plan Template (Help text appears in cursive on slides and in the notes field)
Writing the Methods Section
Erica Westenberg September 28, 2017
Systematic disclosure Transparency an integral and routine feature of countries governance and management systems [event] [date]
Dan Tofan | Expert in NIS 21st Art. 13a WG| LISBON |
e-Official Journal of the European Union
EITI QUALITY ASSURANCE Best practices preparing for Validation
Beneficial ownership: Data collection and publication
Oslo Group’s Mandate Address issues related to energy statistics
Mainstreaming mapping
SRH & HIV Linkages Agenda
This PowerPoint document can be found at:
Introduction to electronic resources management
2019 Local School District Charter Application Process
Assessment of Quality in Statistics GLOBAL ASSESSMENTS, PEER REVIEWS AND SECTOR REVIEWS IN THE ENLARGEMENT AND ENP COUNTRIES Mirela Kadic, Project Manager.
Introduction to electronic resources management
Task Force on Target Setting and Reporting TFTSR
EIFL-Licensing webinars on the
Neil Butcher, OER Africa
National data opt-out - Preparing for implementation
Electronic resources in Rongo University college
EITI International Secretariat August 2019
Validation procedure Nat. Secretariat and MSG
Draft Charter Community of Practice for Direct Access Entities
Presentation transcript:

Creating open data policies 1 December 2016 Open data policy webinar EITI International Secretariat

Contents Developing an open data policy Requirement 7.1 Access, release and re-use Five useful steps Examples Policies Open data solutions QA and next steps

2016 EITI Standard – what’s new? Requirements 2013 Standard - Requirement 5.3.b “Summary data […] should be submitted electronically to the International Secretariat […].”

2016 EITI Standard – what’s new? Requirements 2016 Standard - Requirement 7.1 Public debate The multi-stakeholder group is required to: b) Agree a clear policy on the access, release and re-use of EITI data. […] c) Make the EITI Report available in an open data format (excel or csv) online and publicise its availability. https://eiti.org/node/4922#r7-1 Standard TOR for Independent Administrators - section 5.4 Requires the delivery of “summary data […] electronically to the International Secretariat according to the standardised reporting format available from the International Secretariat”.

2016 EITI Standard – what’s new? Requirements 2016 Standard - Requirement 7.1 Public debate The multi-stakeholder group is required to: b) Agree a clear policy on the access, release and re-use of EITI data. […] c) Make the EITI Report available in an open data format (excel or csv) online and publicise its availability. https://eiti.org/node/4922#r7-1 Standard TOR for Independent Administrators - section 5.4 Requires the delivery of “summary data […] electronically to the International Secretariat according to the standardised reporting format available from the International Secretariat”. DEADLINE 1 JANUARY 2017

What is open data? Definition “[…] digital data that is made available with the technical and legal characteristics necessary for it to be freely used, reused, and redistributed by anyone, anytime, anywhere.” - http://opendatacharter.net/principles/

Access Key points for access Decide on effective way of enabling access to data based on profile, resources and technology available to potential users. Identify the potential users of open data with user stories: Who (user role) What (goal/desire) Why (benefit) gives clarity as to why a product is useful can influence how a product should function can give you ideas for other useful features that support the user's goals Step 1 – Review the accessibility of EITI data (with reference to requirement 7.2). Essentially, take stock of the current situation regarding the access, release and re-use of EITI data. These would have two aspects: (1) assessing whether the data from EITI Reports is accessible, (2) taking stock of wider efforts to promote routine automated online disclosure (a mini mainstreaming feasibility study).   Step 2 – Review national policies and international best practice on open data. This helps to ensure that the MSG’s work is aligned with other national efforts (e.g., OGP and similar efforts), and emerging best practice. This should address the question of data standards. Step 3 – Consider options for the policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data. Here, we should highlight international best practice. (Perhaps a box on the US-EITI efforts to consider the data needs of different user groups). Step 4 – Document the MSG’s policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data, and agree any actions to be included in the workplan to address these issues. Suggest we provide a list of possible actions, including: Addressing open data issues in the Independent Administrator’s Terms of Reference. Tasking the Independent Administrator to produce excel files, and with compiling the Summary Data Templates Clarifying the policy on open data in forthcoming EITI Reports. Publishing excel files on the EITI website. Efforts to increase open data literacy Commission feasibility studies and/or recommend reforms to promote routine automated online disclosure by companies and government agencies. Step 5 – Evaluation. Provide an update on theses effort in annual activity reports.

Access Key points for access Decide on effective way of enabling access to data based on profile, resources and technology available to potential users. Identify the potential users of open data with user stories: Who (user role) What (goal/desire) Why (benefit) gives clarity as to why a product is useful can influence how a product should function can give you ideas for other useful features that support the user's goals Step 1 – Review the accessibility of EITI data (with reference to requirement 7.2). Essentially, take stock of the current situation regarding the access, release and re-use of EITI data. These would have two aspects: (1) assessing whether the data from EITI Reports is accessible, (2) taking stock of wider efforts to promote routine automated online disclosure (a mini mainstreaming feasibility study).   Step 2 – Review national policies and international best practice on open data. This helps to ensure that the MSG’s work is aligned with other national efforts (e.g., OGP and similar efforts), and emerging best practice. This should address the question of data standards. Step 3 – Consider options for the policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data. Here, we should highlight international best practice. (Perhaps a box on the US-EITI efforts to consider the data needs of different user groups). Step 4 – Document the MSG’s policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data, and agree any actions to be included in the workplan to address these issues. Suggest we provide a list of possible actions, including: Addressing open data issues in the Independent Administrator’s Terms of Reference. Tasking the Independent Administrator to produce excel files, and with compiling the Summary Data Templates Clarifying the policy on open data in forthcoming EITI Reports. Publishing excel files on the EITI website. Efforts to increase open data literacy Commission feasibility studies and/or recommend reforms to promote routine automated online disclosure by companies and government agencies. Step 5 – Evaluation. Provide an update on theses effort in annual activity reports.

Access Key points for access Decide on effective way of enabling access to data based on profile, resources and technology available to potential users. Identify the potential users of open data with user stories: Who (user role) What (goal/desire) Why (benefit) gives clarity as to why a product is useful can influence how a product should function can give you ideas for other useful features that support the user's goals Step 1 – Review the accessibility of EITI data (with reference to requirement 7.2). Essentially, take stock of the current situation regarding the access, release and re-use of EITI data. These would have two aspects: (1) assessing whether the data from EITI Reports is accessible, (2) taking stock of wider efforts to promote routine automated online disclosure (a mini mainstreaming feasibility study).   Step 2 – Review national policies and international best practice on open data. This helps to ensure that the MSG’s work is aligned with other national efforts (e.g., OGP and similar efforts), and emerging best practice. This should address the question of data standards. Step 3 – Consider options for the policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data. Here, we should highlight international best practice. (Perhaps a box on the US-EITI efforts to consider the data needs of different user groups). Step 4 – Document the MSG’s policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data, and agree any actions to be included in the workplan to address these issues. Suggest we provide a list of possible actions, including: Addressing open data issues in the Independent Administrator’s Terms of Reference. Tasking the Independent Administrator to produce excel files, and with compiling the Summary Data Templates Clarifying the policy on open data in forthcoming EITI Reports. Publishing excel files on the EITI website. Efforts to increase open data literacy Commission feasibility studies and/or recommend reforms to promote routine automated online disclosure by companies and government agencies. Step 5 – Evaluation. Provide an update on theses effort in annual activity reports. As a civil servant in the ministry of mines, I am interested in revenue data from mining activities, To present options for a license agreement to my minister.

Release Three key points for Release Appropriate procedures for the release of data: regularity of release timeliness methods of release – platforms and formats (which website, link/reference to source, format) Step 1 – Review the accessibility of EITI data (with reference to requirement 7.2). Essentially, take stock of the current situation regarding the access, release and re-use of EITI data. These would have two aspects: (1) assessing whether the data from EITI Reports is accessible, (2) taking stock of wider efforts to promote routine automated online disclosure (a mini mainstreaming feasibility study).   Step 2 – Review national policies and international best practice on open data. This helps to ensure that the MSG’s work is aligned with other national efforts (e.g., OGP and similar efforts), and emerging best practice. This should address the question of data standards. Step 3 – Consider options for the policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data. Here, we should highlight international best practice. (Perhaps a box on the US-EITI efforts to consider the data needs of different user groups). Step 4 – Document the MSG’s policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data, and agree any actions to be included in the workplan to address these issues. Suggest we provide a list of possible actions, including: Addressing open data issues in the Independent Administrator’s Terms of Reference. Tasking the Independent Administrator to produce excel files, and with compiling the Summary Data Templates Clarifying the policy on open data in forthcoming EITI Reports. Publishing excel files on the EITI website. Efforts to increase open data literacy Commission feasibility studies and/or recommend reforms to promote routine automated online disclosure by companies and government agencies. Step 5 – Evaluation. Provide an update on theses effort in annual activity reports.

Release Three key points for Release Appropriate procedures for the release of data: regularity of release timeliness methods of release – platforms and formats (which website, link/reference to source, format) Step 1 – Review the accessibility of EITI data (with reference to requirement 7.2). Essentially, take stock of the current situation regarding the access, release and re-use of EITI data. These would have two aspects: (1) assessing whether the data from EITI Reports is accessible, (2) taking stock of wider efforts to promote routine automated online disclosure (a mini mainstreaming feasibility study).   Step 2 – Review national policies and international best practice on open data. This helps to ensure that the MSG’s work is aligned with other national efforts (e.g., OGP and similar efforts), and emerging best practice. This should address the question of data standards. Step 3 – Consider options for the policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data. Here, we should highlight international best practice. (Perhaps a box on the US-EITI efforts to consider the data needs of different user groups). Step 4 – Document the MSG’s policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data, and agree any actions to be included in the workplan to address these issues. Suggest we provide a list of possible actions, including: Addressing open data issues in the Independent Administrator’s Terms of Reference. Tasking the Independent Administrator to produce excel files, and with compiling the Summary Data Templates Clarifying the policy on open data in forthcoming EITI Reports. Publishing excel files on the EITI website. Efforts to increase open data literacy Commission feasibility studies and/or recommend reforms to promote routine automated online disclosure by companies and government agencies. Step 5 – Evaluation. Provide an update on theses effort in annual activity reports.

Re-use Three key point for re-use Include declarations on the free use and re-use of data without legal or administrative restrictions. The examples below allow users to: Copy and distribute Produce new works using the data Modify, adapt, and build upon the data Step 1 – Review the accessibility of EITI data (with reference to requirement 7.2). Essentially, take stock of the current situation regarding the access, release and re-use of EITI data. These would have two aspects: (1) assessing whether the data from EITI Reports is accessible, (2) taking stock of wider efforts to promote routine automated online disclosure (a mini mainstreaming feasibility study).   Step 2 – Review national policies and international best practice on open data. This helps to ensure that the MSG’s work is aligned with other national efforts (e.g., OGP and similar efforts), and emerging best practice. This should address the question of data standards. Step 3 – Consider options for the policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data. Here, we should highlight international best practice. (Perhaps a box on the US-EITI efforts to consider the data needs of different user groups). Step 4 – Document the MSG’s policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data, and agree any actions to be included in the workplan to address these issues. Suggest we provide a list of possible actions, including: Addressing open data issues in the Independent Administrator’s Terms of Reference. Tasking the Independent Administrator to produce excel files, and with compiling the Summary Data Templates Clarifying the policy on open data in forthcoming EITI Reports. Publishing excel files on the EITI website. Efforts to increase open data literacy Commission feasibility studies and/or recommend reforms to promote routine automated online disclosure by companies and government agencies. Step 5 – Evaluation. Provide an update on theses effort in annual activity reports. Table 2: Open licenses Sharing-level of Licence Creative Commons License Open Data Commons License Public Domain CC0 PDDL Attribution CC-by ODC-by Attribution & Share-Alike CC-by-sa ODbL

Re-use Three key point for re-use Include declarations on the free use and re-use of data without legal or administrative restrictions. The examples below allow users to: Copy and distribute Produce new works using the data Modify, adapt, and build upon the data Step 1 – Review the accessibility of EITI data (with reference to requirement 7.2). Essentially, take stock of the current situation regarding the access, release and re-use of EITI data. These would have two aspects: (1) assessing whether the data from EITI Reports is accessible, (2) taking stock of wider efforts to promote routine automated online disclosure (a mini mainstreaming feasibility study).   Step 2 – Review national policies and international best practice on open data. This helps to ensure that the MSG’s work is aligned with other national efforts (e.g., OGP and similar efforts), and emerging best practice. This should address the question of data standards. Step 3 – Consider options for the policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data. Here, we should highlight international best practice. (Perhaps a box on the US-EITI efforts to consider the data needs of different user groups). Step 4 – Document the MSG’s policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data, and agree any actions to be included in the workplan to address these issues. Suggest we provide a list of possible actions, including: Addressing open data issues in the Independent Administrator’s Terms of Reference. Tasking the Independent Administrator to produce excel files, and with compiling the Summary Data Templates Clarifying the policy on open data in forthcoming EITI Reports. Publishing excel files on the EITI website. Efforts to increase open data literacy Commission feasibility studies and/or recommend reforms to promote routine automated online disclosure by companies and government agencies. Step 5 – Evaluation. Provide an update on theses effort in annual activity reports. Table 2: Open licenses Sharing-level of Licence Creative Commons License Open Data Commons License Public Domain CC0 PDDL Attribution CC-by ODC-by Attribution & Share-Alike CC-by-sa ODbL

Re-use Three key point for re-use Include declarations on the free use and re-use of data without legal or administrative restrictions. The examples below allow users to: Copy and distribute Produce new works using the data Modify, adapt, and build upon the data Step 1 – Review the accessibility of EITI data (with reference to requirement 7.2). Essentially, take stock of the current situation regarding the access, release and re-use of EITI data. These would have two aspects: (1) assessing whether the data from EITI Reports is accessible, (2) taking stock of wider efforts to promote routine automated online disclosure (a mini mainstreaming feasibility study).   Step 2 – Review national policies and international best practice on open data. This helps to ensure that the MSG’s work is aligned with other national efforts (e.g., OGP and similar efforts), and emerging best practice. This should address the question of data standards. Step 3 – Consider options for the policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data. Here, we should highlight international best practice. (Perhaps a box on the US-EITI efforts to consider the data needs of different user groups). Step 4 – Document the MSG’s policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data, and agree any actions to be included in the workplan to address these issues. Suggest we provide a list of possible actions, including: Addressing open data issues in the Independent Administrator’s Terms of Reference. Tasking the Independent Administrator to produce excel files, and with compiling the Summary Data Templates Clarifying the policy on open data in forthcoming EITI Reports. Publishing excel files on the EITI website. Efforts to increase open data literacy Commission feasibility studies and/or recommend reforms to promote routine automated online disclosure by companies and government agencies. Step 5 – Evaluation. Provide an update on theses effort in annual activity reports. + attribution (naming source) Table 2: Open licenses Sharing-level of Licence Creative Commons License Open Data Commons License Public Domain CC0 PDDL Attribution CC-by ODC-by Attribution & Share-Alike CC-by-sa ODbL

Re-use Three key point for re-use Include declarations on the free use and re-use of data without legal or administrative restrictions. The examples below allow users to: Copy and distribute Produce new works using the data Modify, adapt, and build upon the data Step 1 – Review the accessibility of EITI data (with reference to requirement 7.2). Essentially, take stock of the current situation regarding the access, release and re-use of EITI data. These would have two aspects: (1) assessing whether the data from EITI Reports is accessible, (2) taking stock of wider efforts to promote routine automated online disclosure (a mini mainstreaming feasibility study).   Step 2 – Review national policies and international best practice on open data. This helps to ensure that the MSG’s work is aligned with other national efforts (e.g., OGP and similar efforts), and emerging best practice. This should address the question of data standards. Step 3 – Consider options for the policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data. Here, we should highlight international best practice. (Perhaps a box on the US-EITI efforts to consider the data needs of different user groups). Step 4 – Document the MSG’s policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data, and agree any actions to be included in the workplan to address these issues. Suggest we provide a list of possible actions, including: Addressing open data issues in the Independent Administrator’s Terms of Reference. Tasking the Independent Administrator to produce excel files, and with compiling the Summary Data Templates Clarifying the policy on open data in forthcoming EITI Reports. Publishing excel files on the EITI website. Efforts to increase open data literacy Commission feasibility studies and/or recommend reforms to promote routine automated online disclosure by companies and government agencies. Step 5 – Evaluation. Provide an update on theses effort in annual activity reports. + attribution (naming source) Table 2: Open licenses Sharing-level of Licence Creative Commons License Open Data Commons License Public Domain CC0 PDDL Attribution CC-by ODC-by Attribution & Share-Alike CC-by-sa ODbL + re-publication must use same license!

Re-use Three key point for re-use EITI’s Content Use Policy – custom license Step 1 – Review the accessibility of EITI data (with reference to requirement 7.2). Essentially, take stock of the current situation regarding the access, release and re-use of EITI data. These would have two aspects: (1) assessing whether the data from EITI Reports is accessible, (2) taking stock of wider efforts to promote routine automated online disclosure (a mini mainstreaming feasibility study).   Step 2 – Review national policies and international best practice on open data. This helps to ensure that the MSG’s work is aligned with other national efforts (e.g., OGP and similar efforts), and emerging best practice. This should address the question of data standards. Step 3 – Consider options for the policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data. Here, we should highlight international best practice. (Perhaps a box on the US-EITI efforts to consider the data needs of different user groups). Step 4 – Document the MSG’s policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data, and agree any actions to be included in the workplan to address these issues. Suggest we provide a list of possible actions, including: Addressing open data issues in the Independent Administrator’s Terms of Reference. Tasking the Independent Administrator to produce excel files, and with compiling the Summary Data Templates Clarifying the policy on open data in forthcoming EITI Reports. Publishing excel files on the EITI website. Efforts to increase open data literacy Commission feasibility studies and/or recommend reforms to promote routine automated online disclosure by companies and government agencies. Step 5 – Evaluation. Provide an update on theses effort in annual activity reports.

Five useful steps Step 1: Review the accessibility of EITI data (req 7.2) Is data from EITI Reports accessible? I.e. online in an open data format? Taking stock of wider efforts of automated online disclosure http://data.gheiti.gov.gh/#home http://e-reporting.eitimongolia.mn/ Step 1 – Review the accessibility of EITI data (with reference to requirement 7.2). Essentially, take stock of the current situation regarding the access, release and re-use of EITI data. These would have two aspects: (1) assessing whether the data from EITI Reports is accessible, (2) taking stock of wider efforts to promote routine automated online disclosure (a mini mainstreaming feasibility study).   Step 2 – Review national policies and international best practice on open data. This helps to ensure that the MSG’s work is aligned with other national efforts (e.g., OGP and similar efforts), and emerging best practice. This should address the question of data standards. Step 3 – Consider options for the policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data. Here, we should highlight international best practice. (Perhaps a box on the US-EITI efforts to consider the data needs of different user groups). Step 4 – Document the MSG’s policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data, and agree any actions to be included in the workplan to address these issues. Suggest we provide a list of possible actions, including: Addressing open data issues in the Independent Administrator’s Terms of Reference. Tasking the Independent Administrator to produce excel files, and with compiling the Summary Data Templates Clarifying the policy on open data in forthcoming EITI Reports. Publishing excel files on the EITI website. Efforts to increase open data literacy Commission feasibility studies and/or recommend reforms to promote routine automated online disclosure by companies and government agencies. Step 5 – Evaluation. Provide an update on theses effort in annual activity reports.

Five useful steps Step 2: Review national policies and int. best practices Ensure alignment with other national efforts (e.g. OGP etc.), and emerging best practice. This should address the question of data standards Step 1 – Review the accessibility of EITI data (with reference to requirement 7.2). Essentially, take stock of the current situation regarding the access, release and re-use of EITI data. These would have two aspects: (1) assessing whether the data from EITI Reports is accessible, (2) taking stock of wider efforts to promote routine automated online disclosure (a mini mainstreaming feasibility study).   Step 2 – Review national policies and international best practice on open data. This helps to ensure that the MSG’s work is aligned with other national efforts (e.g., OGP and similar efforts), and emerging best practice. This should address the question of data standards. Step 3 – Consider options for the policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data. Here, we should highlight international best practice. (Perhaps a box on the US-EITI efforts to consider the data needs of different user groups). Step 4 – Document the MSG’s policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data, and agree any actions to be included in the workplan to address these issues. Suggest we provide a list of possible actions, including: Addressing open data issues in the Independent Administrator’s Terms of Reference. Tasking the Independent Administrator to produce excel files, and with compiling the Summary Data Templates Clarifying the policy on open data in forthcoming EITI Reports. Publishing excel files on the EITI website. Efforts to increase open data literacy Commission feasibility studies and/or recommend reforms to promote routine automated online disclosure by companies and government agencies. Step 5 – Evaluation. Provide an update on theses effort in annual activity reports.

Five useful steps Step 3: Consider options for access, release and re-use of data Open data: Ghana, Norway, United States Step 1 – Review the accessibility of EITI data (with reference to requirement 7.2). Essentially, take stock of the current situation regarding the access, release and re-use of EITI data. These would have two aspects: (1) assessing whether the data from EITI Reports is accessible, (2) taking stock of wider efforts to promote routine automated online disclosure (a mini mainstreaming feasibility study).   Step 2 – Review national policies and international best practice on open data. This helps to ensure that the MSG’s work is aligned with other national efforts (e.g., OGP and similar efforts), and emerging best practice. This should address the question of data standards. Step 3 – Consider options for the policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data. Here, we should highlight international best practice. (Perhaps a box on the US-EITI efforts to consider the data needs of different user groups). Step 4 – Document the MSG’s policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data, and agree any actions to be included in the workplan to address these issues. Suggest we provide a list of possible actions, including: Addressing open data issues in the Independent Administrator’s Terms of Reference. Tasking the Independent Administrator to produce excel files, and with compiling the Summary Data Templates Clarifying the policy on open data in forthcoming EITI Reports. Publishing excel files on the EITI website. Efforts to increase open data literacy Commission feasibility studies and/or recommend reforms to promote routine automated online disclosure by companies and government agencies. Step 5 – Evaluation. Provide an update on theses effort in annual activity reports.

Five useful steps Step 3: Consider options for access, release and re-use of data Policies: International Secretariat, Philippines and D-EITI. EITI International Secretariat will share new policies as they are approved and become public. Step 1 – Review the accessibility of EITI data (with reference to requirement 7.2). Essentially, take stock of the current situation regarding the access, release and re-use of EITI data. These would have two aspects: (1) assessing whether the data from EITI Reports is accessible, (2) taking stock of wider efforts to promote routine automated online disclosure (a mini mainstreaming feasibility study).   Step 2 – Review national policies and international best practice on open data. This helps to ensure that the MSG’s work is aligned with other national efforts (e.g., OGP and similar efforts), and emerging best practice. This should address the question of data standards. Step 3 – Consider options for the policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data. Here, we should highlight international best practice. (Perhaps a box on the US-EITI efforts to consider the data needs of different user groups). Step 4 – Document the MSG’s policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data, and agree any actions to be included in the workplan to address these issues. Suggest we provide a list of possible actions, including: Addressing open data issues in the Independent Administrator’s Terms of Reference. Tasking the Independent Administrator to produce excel files, and with compiling the Summary Data Templates Clarifying the policy on open data in forthcoming EITI Reports. Publishing excel files on the EITI website. Efforts to increase open data literacy Commission feasibility studies and/or recommend reforms to promote routine automated online disclosure by companies and government agencies. Step 5 – Evaluation. Provide an update on theses effort in annual activity reports.

Five useful steps Step 4: Document policy on access, release and re-use Publishing Open data for future/previous data Include in workplan ToR for IA Capacity building Promote open data towards source of information (linked to mainstreaming) Step 5 – Evaluation – update in annual activity reports Policy ToR for IA Workplan / APR Website Etc … Step 1 – Review the accessibility of EITI data (with reference to requirement 7.2). Essentially, take stock of the current situation regarding the access, release and re-use of EITI data. These would have two aspects: (1) assessing whether the data from EITI Reports is accessible, (2) taking stock of wider efforts to promote routine automated online disclosure (a mini mainstreaming feasibility study).   Step 2 – Review national policies and international best practice on open data. This helps to ensure that the MSG’s work is aligned with other national efforts (e.g., OGP and similar efforts), and emerging best practice. This should address the question of data standards. Step 3 – Consider options for the policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data. Here, we should highlight international best practice. (Perhaps a box on the US-EITI efforts to consider the data needs of different user groups). Step 4 – Document the MSG’s policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data, and agree any actions to be included in the workplan to address these issues. Suggest we provide a list of possible actions, including: Addressing open data issues in the Independent Administrator’s Terms of Reference. Tasking the Independent Administrator to produce excel files, and with compiling the Summary Data Templates Clarifying the policy on open data in forthcoming EITI Reports. Publishing excel files on the EITI website. Efforts to increase open data literacy Commission feasibility studies and/or recommend reforms to promote routine automated online disclosure by companies and government agencies. Step 5 – Evaluation. Provide an update on theses effort in annual activity reports.

Five useful steps - overview Step 1: Review the accessibility of EITI data (req 7.2) Is data from EITI Reports accessible? Taking stock of wider efforts of automated online disclosure Step 2: Review national policies and int. best practices Ensure alignment with other national efforts (e.g. OGP etc.), and emerging best practice. This should address the question of data standards. Step 3: Consider options for access, release and re-use of data Open data: Ghana, Norway, United States; Policies: Philippines, Germany Step 4: Document policy on access, release and re-use ToR for IA, publishing, open data for future/previous data, capacity building, promote open data towards source of information (linked to mainstreaming) Step 5 – Evaluation – update in annual activity reports Step 1 – Review the accessibility of EITI data (with reference to requirement 7.2). Essentially, take stock of the current situation regarding the access, release and re-use of EITI data. These would have two aspects: (1) assessing whether the data from EITI Reports is accessible, (2) taking stock of wider efforts to promote routine automated online disclosure (a mini mainstreaming feasibility study).   Step 2 – Review national policies and international best practice on open data. This helps to ensure that the MSG’s work is aligned with other national efforts (e.g., OGP and similar efforts), and emerging best practice. This should address the question of data standards. Step 3 – Consider options for the policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data. Here, we should highlight international best practice. (Perhaps a box on the US-EITI efforts to consider the data needs of different user groups). Step 4 – Document the MSG’s policy on access, release and re-use of EITI data, and agree any actions to be included in the workplan to address these issues. Suggest we provide a list of possible actions, including: Addressing open data issues in the Independent Administrator’s Terms of Reference. Tasking the Independent Administrator to produce excel files, and with compiling the Summary Data Templates Clarifying the policy on open data in forthcoming EITI Reports. Publishing excel files on the EITI website. Efforts to increase open data literacy Commission feasibility studies and/or recommend reforms to promote routine automated online disclosure by companies and government agencies. Step 5 – Evaluation. Provide an update on theses effort in annual activity reports.

Open data definitions and policies EITI International: https://eiti.org/standard/open-data-policy Open Government Partnership’s declaration: http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/open-government-declaration G8 Open data charter: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/open-data-charter/g8-open- data-charter-and-technical-annex The Open Data Charter: http://opendatacharter.net/ Open data definition: http://opendefinition.org/ World Bank report on open data standards: https://eiti.org/node/7340

Examples of open data … In countries DRC: https://www.mapx.online/app/w3/ Ghana (NRGI): http://data.gheiti.gov.gh/#home Mongolia: http://e-reporting.eitimongolia.mn/ Norway: http://www.norskpetroleum.no/en/ US: https://useiti.doi.gov/explore/

In case of any questions: Christoffer Claussen Data Officer cclaussen@eiti.org www.eiti.org @EITIorg Thank you! Email: secretariat@eiti.org - Telephone: +47 22 20 08 00 Address: EITI International Secretariat, Ruseløkkveien 26, 0251 Oslo, Norway