Death Penalty Landmark Decisions: Folder project

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gregg v. Georgia Tiffany Browne Karisa Myers 2 nd Hour.
Advertisements

The Death Penalty and the Eighth Amendment. Admin Opportunity to participate, be on the news! 2:00, Thursday, Room 117 Wooten – First 60 students – Line.
Department of Criminal Justice California State University - Bakersfield CRJU 330 Race, Ethnicity and Criminal Justice Dr. Abu-Lughod, Reem Ali Color of.
Capital Punishment: For or Against
Landmark Supreme Court Cases Marbury v Madison Description (Key Question) –Who has the power to decide what is Constitutional? Decision –Established.
Choose the right picture
Mr. Noel Ciyanna Clark December 4, 2014 ATKINS V. VIRGINIA.
BY:ANNA GRACE,LACEY,KATIE,CATE SUPREME COURT This is a picture of the Supreme Court. The judges work here.
Orlando, Florida Constitutional History The Learning Institute for Elders (“LIFE”) at the University of Central Florida January 8,
Landmark Supreme Court Cases MIRANDA V. ARIZONA GIDEON V. WAINWRIGHT BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION.
Death Penalty Constitutional Questions. Constitutional?  Can the death penalty be mandated for certain crimes?
Judicial Branch Review.   When someone is accused of a crime, the type of case is.
Southeast States Virginia Atlantic Coast Gulf Coast Inland South.
Supreme Court Cases You Need to Know! Instructions: 1)Research each court case (HINT: PBS website on Landmark Supreme Court Cases is AWESOME!) 2)Complete.
The following Supreme Court Cases were used to interpret the 4 th Amendment 39.Weeks v. U.S., Mapp v. Ohio, Payton v. New York, Florida.
Essential Questions: What rights are guaranteed to all Americans who are accused of crimes?
CJA 344 TUTORS Education Expert/cja344tutorsdotcom FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
Atkins v. Virginia Peter Diddy Period 6 Constitutional Law.
1 Sentencing the Guilty Chapter Eighth Amendment Excessive bail shall not be required, not excessive fines imposed, not cruel and unusual punishments.
Gregg v Georgia By: Sarah Jaskie. FACTS Troy Leon Gregg convicted of two counts of armed rubbery and two counts of murder. Judge give the jury the option.
Choose the right picture Choose the right word. 5.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: (Insert Name of Case) DATES YOUR NAME.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases Proving that the Bill of Rights protects you.
CIS 170 MART Teaching Effectively/cis170mart.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT CJA 344 MART Education Expert/cja344mart.com FOR MORE CLASSES.
CJA 344 Entire Course FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT CJA 344 Week 1 Discussion Question 1 CJA 344 Week 1 Discussion Question 2 CJA 344 week.
CJA 344 MART Peer Educator/cja344mart.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
Assignment 4/26/16.  Go to My Website, Click on the English Folder  Click on “Little Rock Girl, MOD. 3” Folder  Open the videos, view each video and.
Chapter 20 The Death Penalty.
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 4
THE DEATH PENALTY IN THE USA
Protections Theme: Rights
Death Penalty.
Supreme Court Activity: You Decide
9 Sentencing.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: (Insert Name of Case)
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 4
Capital Punishment.
Chapter 9 Sentencing. Chapter 9 Sentencing This sentencing goal is the act of taking revenge on a criminal perpetrator. Rehabilitation Retribution.
By: Lindsey Haney and Jessica Cunningham
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 4
Rights of Criminal Suspects
The New South 13th/14th/15th Amendments:
CRJ 514 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
CRJ 514 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com.
CRJ 514 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
CJA 344 Education for Service-- tutorialrank.com
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) U.S. Supreme Court Case Study Project
Landmark Case Name (Date)
Assignment, Discussion & Activity with 8.3 & 8.4
Chapter 20: Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights Section 4
The Supreme Court.
SUPREME COURT CASE PROJECT
The Supreme Court Report
Presented By: Dashawn Currington & Adam Walker
Federal Court Systems: Supreme Court
Why was it important then?
Explain the significance of the landmark decision Marbury vs. Madison
The Supreme Court Report
Modern Issues in the U.S. Agenda:
Gideon v. Wainwright Does the Sixth Amendment allow a defendant the right to a lawyer in all criminal cases?
Title Page.
Ap u.s. government & politics
Case Study: Important Supreme Court Cases
Final Write-Up for Supreme Court Activity
Gregg vs Georgia.
Write a story about the picture
The Supreme Court Report
Miranda vs. Arizona.
Landmark Supreme Court Decisions Rights of the Accused
Write a letter! (50 points, final exam)
Presentation transcript:

Death Penalty Landmark Decisions: Folder project Choose a Landmark Decision to do your Research Due November 9th Wednesday 50 points One picture relative to the Decision One page summary of essential questions Glue to Folder provided

Choose a Decision · Furman v. Georgia (1972), · Gregg v. Georgia (1976), · Woodson v. North Carolina (1976),. · Coker v. Georgia (1977), . · Enmund v. Florida (1982) and Tison v. Arizona (1987) · Stanford v. Kentucky (1989) and Penry v. Lynaugh (1989), · Ford v. Wainwright (1986) · Pulley v. Harris (1984), Godfrey v. Georgia (1980), i · Lockett v. Ohio (1978) and McKoy v. North Carolina (1990), · Blystone v. Penn-sylvania (1990), · Spaziano v. Florida (1984), · McCleskey v. Kemp (1987), . · Payne v. Tennessee (1991), · Burger v. Kemp (1987), · Arizona v. Rumsey

Essential Questions Title of Decision Year decided Background and facts: what is the story behind the case Constitutional Question: what was the Supreme Court suppose to answer? Decision: what was the final vote and explanation behind the Decision Importance: How did this decision affect future cases involving the death penalty?

Criteria for assignment Use the website Oyez.org to do your research Find a picture relative to the decision, the death penalty, or the criminal justice system Neat Organized Accurate and complete information Make an informed answer and intelligent answer to the final question on how this decision has affected future death penalty decisions