Prototype Assemblying, SiPM Characterization and QC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Development of scintillation detectors with MRS APD light readout for CBM Muon system and ECAL preshower Alexander Akindinov ITEP(Moscow) on behalf of.
Advertisements

MICE Collaboration MTG IIT – Feb 2002 The Fiber Tracker Option for MICE Spectrometers The D0 Central Fiber Tracker – Experience and Implications for MICE.
Recent news about SiPM based applications R&D in DESY Nicola D’Ascenzo University of Hamburg - DESY.
Comparison of 3 types of scintillator strips and 2 types of reflector films Miho NISHIYAMA Shinshu-U Light yield of 3 scintillator strips have been measured.
Tests of a 10cm by 10cm triple GEM detector
T1008 status W.Baldini for the Ferrara and Padova SuperB-IFR Group.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
Characterization of Silicon Photomultipliers for beam loss monitors Lee Liverpool University weekly meeting.
Report on SiPM Tests SiPM as a alternative photo detector to replace PMT. Qauntify basic characteristics Measure Energy, Timing resolution Develop simulation.
Status of EIC Calorimeter R&D at BNL EIC Detector R&D Committee Meeting January 13, 2014 S.Boose, J.Haggerty, E.Kistenev, E,Mannel, S.Stoll, C.Woody PHENIX.
GLD Calorimeter Status Oct 学術創成会議 S. Uozumi Shinshu University FJPPL meeting held at the end of September. Preparation underway toward the ECAL.
Study of response uniformity of LHCb ECAL Mikhail Prokudin, ITEP.
CALICE Meeting DESY ITEP&MEPhI status report on tile production and R&D activities Michael Danilov ITEP.
Photo-detector and scintillator studies at ITEP Outline 1. Check of casting form 2. Study of MRS APD’s from CPTA 3. MC simulation of light collection in.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK) for KEKDTP photon sensor group.
VC Feb 2010Slide 1 EMR Construction Status o General Design o Electronics o Cosmics test Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Geneva.
Status report on MURAY telescope R&D
Scintillator tile-SiPM system development for CALICE Engineering AHCAL Prototype Michael Danilov, ITEP & CALICE LCWS10 Beijing March 2010 Outline New scintillator.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK)
Scintillating Tiles for the Muon Inner regions LHCb Muon Upgrade meeting, CERN May Wander Baldini for the Ferrara LHCb group.
All DØ Meeting, 12/01/00 Central Fiber Tracker Light Guide Performance Thomas Nunnemann Fermilab 90 days before RunII … (a.k.a. 12/01/00)
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
MPPC status M.Taguchi(kyoto) T2K ND /7/7.
PCAL Strips light transmission properties April 25, 2011April 26, 20111April 27,
28 June 2007G. Pauletta: ALCPG Tests of IRST SiPMs G. Pauletta Univ. & I.N.F.N. Udine Outline 1.IRST SiPMs : baseline characteristics 2.first application.
SPIROC update Felix Sefkow Most slides from Ludovic Raux HCAL main meeting April 18, 2007.
Linearity Tests The laser induced high noise pulses on the APD rendering it useless. We tried several methods to shield and filter the noise. With a stabilized.
Multipixel Geiger mode photo-sensors (MRS APD’s) Yury Kudenko ISS meeting, KEK, 25 January 2006 INR, Moscow.
DESY BT analysis - MPPC Saturation Correction - S. Uozumi Feb Sci-ECAL meeting 1.MPPC Gain Measurement (with LED data) 2.Inter-calibration of readout.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
Update on CHANTI F.Ambrosino, M.B. Brunetti*, F. Canfora*, T. Capussela**, D. Di Filippo, P. Massarotti, M. Napolitano, L. Roscilli, G. Saracino Università.
Quality control for large volume production GEM detectors Christopher Armaingaud On behalf of the collaboration GEMs for CMS.
Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.
Paul Rubinov on behalf of Gene Fisk, Kurt Krempetz 22 Aug 2012.
Super-IFR Detector R&D summary Wander Baldini Ferrara, Padova, Roma1 INFN and University on behalf of the superB-IFR group: Ferrara, Padova, Roma1 INFN.
Status of NEWCHOD E.Guschin (INR), S.Kholodenko (IHEP), Yu.Kudenko (INR), I.Mannelli (Pisa), O.Mineev (INR), V.Obraztsov (IHEP), V.Semenov(IHEP), V.Sugonyaev.
Upgrade of the MEG liquid xenon calorimeter with VUV-light sensitive large area SiPMs Kei Ieki for the MEG-II collaboration 1 II.
IFR Status Report W. Baldini, on behalf of the Ferrara SuperB-Group XIV SuperB General Meeting, Frascati Sept.27 – Oct
Status of Prototype Preparation (I) Wander Baldini On behalf of the Ferrara SuperB group SuperB Workshop, LNF Dic. 2-nd 2009.
Silicon Photomultiplier Development at GRAPES-3 K.C.Ravindran T.I.F.R, OOTY WAPP 2010 Worshop On behalf of GRAPES-3 Collaboration.
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group Kobe Introduction Performance.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK) for KEKDTP photon sensor group.
M.Taguchi and T.Nobuhara(Kyoto) HPK MPPC(Multi Pixel Photon Counter) status T2K280m meeting.
Study of the Radiation Damage of Hamamatsu Silicon Photo Multipliers Wander Baldini Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare and Universita’ degli Studi di.
Straw Working group Ferrara 4/9/2014. Outline Status and Plans Installation of Chambers 1-3 Chamber 4 Vacuum test SRB Readout, monitoring and software.
SuperB – IFR status of the detector & tooling development 1V. Carassiti - INFN FEINP PAN 07-09/09/2012.
SuperB workshop SLAC, October 6, Outline Present Design Some thoughts about tile production Updated cost estimate Light yield studies of 3 mm thick.
IFR Detector R&D status
IFR Detector R&D status
Activities and Results from PNPI GATCHINA
CEPC ScECAL Optimization for the 3th CEPC Physics Software Meeting
Wander baldini on behalf of the SHIP Muon Group
Roberto Calabrese Ferrara University and INFN
Power Supply Development for JEDI Polarimeter Modules
IFR Status Summary W. Baldini on behalf of the IFR Group
Status of Prototype Preparation and SiPM Characterization
The Beam Test at Fermilab:
Claudio Cerri, Riccardo Fantechi, Luigi Di Lella
Prototype activities update
KM2A Electron Detector Optimization
IFR detector mechanics
The E835 SCI-FI Detector In Ferrara It has been built a scintillating fibers detector for the tracking system of exp. E835 (Charmonium spectroscopy) a.
ScECAL+AHCAL+TCMT Combined Beam FNAL
Han Jifeng BESIII MUON GROUP IHEP, CAS
ITEP&MEPhI status report on tile production and R&D activities
Scintillator tile- SiPM systems R&D
R&D of MPPC for T2K experiment
General Introduction to IFR
R&D of MPPC in kyoto M.taguchi.
CLAS 12 Status of the test bench Calculation of the time resolution
Presentation transcript:

Prototype Assemblying, SiPM Characterization and QC W. Baldini on behalf of the Ferrara SuperB Group XV SuperB General Meeting, Caltech Dec.14-18 2010

The IFR Prototype The Prototype

The IFR Prototype The Iron is on Its way to Fermilab Iron Active Layers (Pizza Boxes) The Iron is on Its way to Fermilab Iron Iron: 60x60x92 cm3 , 9 slots for the active layers 8-9 active layers readout together 4 Time readout (TDC-RO) “standard “ 4 Binary Readout (BiRo) “standard” 4 special modules to study different fibers or SiPM geometry

Prototype assembling

Active Layers: the Pizza Boxes Pizza box #1: TDC-standard (fibers Bicron-1.0mm, SiPM 1.2x3.2 mm2 - 4020) Pizza box #2: TDC-standard Pizza box #3: TDC-standard Pizza box #4: TDC-standard Pizza box #5: TDC Special fibers 1.2mm Pizza box #6: TDC Special round SiPM Pizza box #7: TDC Special MPPC Pizza box #8: BiRo Standard (fibers Kuraray 1.2mm, SiPM 1.4x3.8 mm2 - 4380) Pizza box #9: BiRo Standard Pizza box #10: BiRo Standard Pizza box #11: BiRo Standard Pizza box #12: BiRo Special Round SiPM Menu’

Pizza boxes Assembling Prepare the supports and place the scintillator bars Pizza boxes Assembling fibers positioning Put silicone Sealant to fix fibers and keep optical glue inside the embedded holes

Labeling and collecting the fibers around the supports Fill the machined grooves with optical grease and cover it with stripes of reflecting aluminum (BiRo only) Fill with optical glue the embedded holes Put double-side adhesive to fix the second layer (BiRo only)

Aluminum tape Aluminum on the not-readout end of the fibers Positioning of the second layer of scintillators (BiRo) Sputtering (on 1 pizza box)

Fiber-SiPM coupling Fibers SiPM Output Connector

Local test with cosmics All the active layers have been assembles ad locally tested with cosmics The test was very fast (not much time left before the shipping to Fermilab) We performed a rate vs Threshold scan, from 4.5 p.e. up to 10.5 p.e. for each channel of the pizza box, looking for a “plateau” around the expected cosmic rate: ≈ 2Hz This test was basically done to check the functioning of the SiPM and could not give any efficiency or time resolution estimate This parameters are being measured thanks to the testbeam data

Local test with cosmics Rate (Hz) Rate (Hz) Vbias Pizza Box Channel Rate (Hz) Vbias Roughly the expected rate Pizza Box Channel Thr (p.e.)

SiPM Characterization

SiPM Characterization three types of SiPM tested: 1.2x3.2 mm2 (type 4020), to be coupled to 1.0mm fibers (3 fibers), total 126 needed, 171 characterized 1.4x3.8 mm2 (type 4380), for 1.2mm fibers, 128 needed, 172 characterized array of 3 round sensors: f=1.4mm, for both 1.0mm and 1.2 mm fibers, 53 needed, 94 characterized

SiPM Characterization summary Received and tested 437 SiPM: 171 1.2x3.2 mm2 (4020) : Good: 160 Bad: 11 (no signal) Yield: 93.6% 172 1.4x3.8 mm2 (4380) Good: 166 Bad: 6 Yield: 96.5% 94 round F=1.4 mm (5550) Good: 84 Bad: 10 Yield: 89.4%

SiPM Selection

SiPM Selection Custom software (Labview) has been developed Acquires noise distributions (tipically 15000 events ) Fit distributions with 2 gaussians (1 p.e., 2 p.e) and calculate G Plot/fit G vs Vbias and 0.5 p.e. threshold vs Vbias

For each SiPM we measure 4 paramenters: mG, qG G vs Vbias linear fit parameters mth, qth Thr(0.5p.e) vs Vbias linear fit parameters From the above parameters we calculate the working Vbias voltage for a chosen Gain: G = mG* Vbias + qG  Vbias = (G-qG)/mG and the corresponding thresholds: 0.5p.e. = mth*Vbias + qth Th (n*p.e.) = Th(0.5p.e.) + n * G with the above paramenters we can set each SiPM at the desired working point (Gain, Thr) Since we equalize the Gain, the dark count could be very different from each other

1 p.e. 2 p.e. G Noise Spectra We measure Gain and Dark Count Rate vs Vbias and select the most homogeneous devices for each type 0.5 p.e. G vs Vbias

SiPM Selection Dark Count (Hz) Vbias=33V, th=2.5 p.e. Spares Selected G>15 mV/p.e. Spares DC< 200 KHz Selected Gain (V/p.e.)

Parameters comparison Vbias = 33.0V , Thr = 2.5 p.e. Ratio DC/G among the three types: 4020: <DC/G> = 4.1 x 106 Hz*p.e./mV 4380: <DC/G> = 5.9 x 106 Hz*p.e./mV 5550: <DC/G> = 6.6 x 106 Hz*p.e./mV Ratio DC/Area: 4020: 2.21 x 104 Hz/mm2 (area = 3.84 mm2 ) 4380: 1.48 x 104 Hz/mm2 (area = 5.32 mm2 ) 5550: 2.73 x 104 Hz/mm2 (area = 4.62 mm2)

Conclusions The assembly of the 12 active layers was completed on Nov 3-rd The local cosmics tests were completed on Nov 8-th (the shipping was foreseen on Nov 9-th…) Not enough time to perform extensive tests before the testbeam... First “impressions” from testbeam were encouraging (online monitor showed a good behaviour) Efficiency and time resolution studies are ongoing with testbeam data