Easy Pavement Thickness Design Using

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Testing on Airport Subgrade Soils
Advertisements

LOW VOLUME ROAD DESIGN EMPIRICAL APPROACH.
Deterioration of Concrete Roads
Pavement Structure and Base
Pavement Design Session Matakuliah: S0753 – Teknik Jalan Raya Tahun: 2009.
Recalibration of the Asphalt Layer Coefficient Dr. David H. Timm, P.E. Mrs. Kendra Peters-Davis.
Chemical Stabilization of Subgrades Section Engineers ’ Meeting Lake Cumberland State Resort Park March 5-7, 2013.
Engr. Ejaz Ahmad Khan Deputy Director Pakhtunkhwa Highways Authority
Pavement Design CE 453 Lecture 28.
Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitation Pavement Structures By Matt Mason.
Know the factors considered in the AASHTO design method
Transportation Engineering II
Paviasystems A Simplified Pavement Design Tool APAM Local Road Workshop March 2015.
PAVEMENT DESIGN. Introduction Pavement design is the major component in the road construction. Nearly one-third or one-half of the total cost of construction,
SESSION 3 Subgrade This module presents the concepts and methods of characterizing the subgrade for the purpose of concrete pavement design. It also highlights.
Pavement Design CEE 320 Anne Goodchild.
Lec 28, Ch.20, pp : Flexible pavement design, ESAL (Objectives)
Flexible Pavement Thickness Design / AASHTO Method
Module 2-5 Field Sampling and Testing.  Identify reasons for conducting field sampling and lab testing  Describe typical field sampling and testing.
Chapter 9. Highway Design for Rideability
Nondestructive Testing and Data Analysis Module 2-3.
Wes Marshall, P.E. University of Connecticut March 2007
Concrete Pavements The Right Tool for The Right Job.
Research Findings from the NCAT Test Track APAI Winter Conference Indianapolis, December 14, 2010.
Maintenance & Rehabilitation Strategies Lecture 5.
1 Hot-Mix Asphalt and Flexible Pavement Design: the MEPDG Kevin D. Hall, Ph.D., P.E. Professor and Head, Dept. of Civil Engineering University of Arkansas.
National Performance of High Recycled Mixtures. 2 Outline Trends in RAP and RAS usage and practices Motivations for higher recycled contents Barriers.
Using Reflective Crack Interlayer-
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-II
Choosing the Right Asphalt Mix Clark S. Morrison, PE State Pavement Design Engineer February 23-24, 2015.
GEOTEXTILES IN TRANSPORTATION APPLICATIONS
Asphalt Technology Course
At Auburn University National Center for Asphalt Technology Accelerated Pavement Testing Facilities “APT”
PROJECT SELECTION RIGHT TOOLS, RIGHT TIME, RIGHT PROJECT Presented by Joe Ririe, PE PAVEMENT ENGINEERING INC. September 9, 2015.
Tensar TriAx TX8 Geogrid
California Bearing Ratio
Chapter 9. Highway Design for Rideability
Chapter 5: Pavement Structure and Base
CE 3500 Transportation Engineering Introduction to Pavement Materials
Supervised by Dr. Sami Hijjawi Prepared by Hamza Saifan
Presenters: Sumon Roy1 and Badrul Ahsan1
Pavement Design Al-Balqa’ Applied University
Transportation Engineering-II
Update on the current APT Project in Texas
Barry Paye, PE Chief Materials & Pavement Engineer Wisconsin DOT
Structural Design of Highway
Structural Design of Highway
Chapter(16) AASHTO flexible pavement design method
Structural Design of Highway
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-II
Pavement Design Guidance
CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO (CBR) METHOD
Pavement Design  A pavement consists of a number of layers of different materials 4 Pavement Design Methods –AASHTO Method –The Asphalt Institute Method.
Pavement Thickness Design
PAVEMENTS CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Transportation Engineering
Introduction to Pavement Design
SUBGRADE HOW TO DEAL WITH SOFT SPOTS
Calculating Dimensions for a Typical Pavement Section using 1993 AASHTO Flexible Pavement Design Guide.
Performance Assessment of 100% Recycled Hot Mix Asphalt
Flexible Pavement Design (JKR Method)
Flexible pavement design
AASHTOWare Pavement-ME Design Software: Materials Library
Structural Design of Highway
Flexible Pavement Design (ARAHAN TEKNIK JALAN 5/85 PINDAAN 2013)
What’s New In Pavement Design
Structural Design of Highway
Pavement materials: Soil
Pavement Structural Analysis
Pavement Structural Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Easy Pavement Thickness Design Using 2017 Alabama Annual Asphalt Pavement Conference Danny Gierhart, P.E. Senior Regional Engineer Asphalt Institute www.PaveXpressDesign.com

www.PaveXpressDesign.com

What are some methods people use to decide how thick a pavement should be in order to carry the expected traffic loading without failures? www.PaveXpressDesign.com

How can you document that the pavement is thick enough considering the design parameters? www.PaveXpressDesign.com

What Is PaveXpress? A free, online tool to help you create simplified pavement designs using key engineering inputs, based on the AASHTO 1993 and 1998 supplement pavement design process. Accessible via the web and mobile devices Free — no cost to use Based on AASHTO pavement design equations User-friendly Share, save, and print project designs Interactive help and resource links www.PaveXpressDesign.com

www.PaveXpressDesign.com

Project Types New Asphalt, 1993 AASHTO Design Guide New Concrete, 1998 Supplement AC Overlay on Asphalt, 1993 Guide AC Overlay on Concrete or Composite (No Design Performed) Finally, the designer specifies the type of project. PaveXpress allows new pavement design for asphalt and concrete pavements, new asphalt overlay design on existing asphalt pavements, but not new asphalt overlay design on a concrete or composite pavement. Overlay of existing concrete pavements and composite pavements are covered in Chapter 5 of the 1993 AASHTO Pavement Design Guide; however, the approach is unreliable and few agencies follow the procedure. Therefore, it was decided not to include in PaveXpress. Instead, the application points the user to the SHRP2 R23 project site where long-life composite pavement designs can be performed. For the next few slides, we will cover the new asphalt pavement design process. Later, we will hit the other design scenarios. www.PaveXpressDesign.com

1993 AASHTO Design Guide Equation — Basic Overview The equation was derived from empirical information obtained at the AASHO Road Test. The solution represents the average amount of traffic that can be sustained by a roadway before deteriorating to some terminal level of serviceability, according to the supplied inputs. www.PaveXpressDesign.com

What Information Do I Need to Use It? 1 What kind of roadway you are designing www.PaveXpressDesign.com

Roadway Classifications Interstate: All routes that comprise the Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of Interstate and Defense Highways Arterials/Highways: Directional travel lanes, usually separated by some type of physical barrier, access points limited to on- and off-ramp locations or a very limited number of at-grade intersections. Local: Local roads are not intended for use in long distance travel. They are often designed to discourage through traffic. Residential: The lowest traffic loadings - basically comprised of automobiles and periodic truck service traffic, such as garbage trucks. www.PaveXpressDesign.com

Roadway Classification In PaveXpress, the selection affects default values for design period, reliability, and initial & terminal serviceability index. These default values can be overridden by the user. The Roadway Classification helps set the default values for numerous fields in the application. www.PaveXpressDesign.com

2 Design parameters Design Period - the length of time the design is intended to last before the pavement reaches the end of its serviceable life and requires rehabilitation. Reliability Level (R) is the probability that the designed pavement section will perform satisfactorily over the traffic and environmental conditions for the design period. What are each of the design input parameters? Let’s touch on each one. www.PaveXpressDesign.com

Functional Classification Recommended Level of Reliability AASHTO Suggested Reliability Levels For Various Functional Classifications Reliability Level (R): 50% to 95%, depending on Roadway Classification Suggested levels of reliability for various Functional Classifications (1993 AASHTO Guide, Table 2.2, page II-9): Functional Classification Recommended Level of Reliability Urban Rural Interstate and Other Freeways 85–99.9 80–99.9 Principal Arterials 80–99 75–95 Collectors 80–95 Local 50–80 www.PaveXpressDesign.com

Initial Serviceability Index (pi) is the Present Serviceability Index (PSI) of the pavement immediately after construction. Terminal Serviceability Index (pt) is the PSI when the pavement is considered to have exhausted its serviceable life. Change in Serviceability (ΔPSI) is the difference in PSI between the time of the pavement’s construction and the end of its serviceable life. PaveXpress calculates this number based on the designer’s inputs for pi and pt (ΔPSI = pi − pt). From the AASHTO Design Guide: The serviceability of a pavement is expressed in terms of the present serviceability index (PSI). The serviceability-performance concept includes the idea that ride quality is a matter of subjective opinion of the User. Serviceability can be expressed by the mean of all ratings given by highway Users. There are physical characteristics of a pavement which can be measured objectively, which can be related to subjective evaluations. The procedure of analyzing these characteristics produces a serviceability index. The PSI is obtained through measurements of roughness and distress, e.g., cracking, patching, and rut depth. Roughness is the dominant factor in estimating the PSI of a pavement. www.PaveXpressDesign.com

Present Serviceability Index Concept PSI Traffic 4 3 2 1 5 PaveXpress default range for terminal serviceability (pt) PaveXpress default initial serviceability (pi) www.PaveXpressDesign.com

Roadway Classification Effect On PaveXpress Default Values Interstate Arterials/ Highway Local Residential/ Collector Design Period 40 years 30 years 20 years Reliability Level 95 85 75 50 Combined Standard Error (S0) 0.5 Initial Serviceability Index (pi) 4.5 Terminal Serviceability Index (pt) 3.0 2.0 Change in Serviceability (ΔPSI) 1.5 2.5 www.PaveXpressDesign.com

3 Traffic and loading How much traffic? What kind of traffic? (trucks, buses, cars, etc.) Anticipated traffic growth rate Analysis method Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESALs) If the user has basic traffic information, they can use the AADT approach. As seen on this slide, basic information is input to calculate how much cumulative traffic will use the road in the first year opened to traffic. www.PaveXpressDesign.com

Where Can I Find Traffic Data? Many DOTs post their traffic count data online Contact the Traffic Division of the DOT Contact the Traffic Division of the city, if available If no official traffic count is available, conduct a short-term count Interview local people and businesses The bottom line is, try to document in some way why you selected the number for input into the design software. The common question we get is — Where Can I Find Traffic Data? Here are a few options. If you are designing a pavement for a parking lot, then the owner should know how many trucks will be serving the store or warehouse and how heavily they are loaded. www.PaveXpressDesign.com

Example of Online Traffic Data Many agencies post traffic count info online https://aldotgis.dot.state.al.us/atd/default.aspx www.PaveXpressDesign.com

Layer Coefficient a measure of the relative ability of the material to function as a structural component of the pavement. Used with layer thickness to determine the structural number (SN). Drainage Coefficient the relative loss of strength in a layer due to its drainage characteristics and the total time it is exposed to near-saturation moisture conditions. Minimum Thickness the minimum allowable layer thickness (either per specification, or based on practical construction limitations of the material). This thickness should consider the materials that will be used for construction. If the mix uses ½” aggregate, then a minimum thickness of 2” would be appropriate. www.PaveXpressDesign.com

Layer Coefficient Considerations Average values of layer coefficients for materials used in the AASHO Road Test were as follows: Asphalt Surface Course 0.44 Crushed Stone Base Course 0.14 Sandy Gravel Subbase 0.11 Keep in mind that these values were empirically derived from a road test with one climate, one soil type, and one asphalt mix type. The asphalt layer coefficient used for the Road Test was actually a weighted average of values ranging from 0.33 to 0.83. More recent studies at the NCAT Test Track found that for Alabama, an asphalt layer coefficient of 0.54 better reflected actual performance. Also, keep in mind the layer coefficient does not consider polymer modification of binders, finer gradations and higher asphalt contents compared to the Road Test. To save money and not compromise performance, agencies should look into recalibrating their coefficients using the NCAT approach. www.PaveXpressDesign.com

Drainage Coefficient Considerations 1993 Design Guide Table 2.4 — Recommended mi Values for Modifying Structural Layer Coefficients of Untreated Base and Subbase Materials in Flexible Pavements Quality of Drainage Percentage of Time Pavement Structure is Exposed to Moisture Levels Approaching Saturation < 1% 1–5% 5–25% > 25% Excellent 1.40–1.35 1.35–1.30 1.30–1.20 1.20 Good 1.35–1.25 1.25–1.15 1.15–1.00 1.00 Fair 1.15–1.05 1.00–0.80 0.80 Poor 1.05–0.80 0.80–0.60 0.60 Very Poor 1.05–0.95 0.95–0.75 0.75–0.40 0.40 Keep in mind many agencies use a value of 1. Unless you have better information, stick with that value. A value greater than 1 will thin the pavement structure and a value less than 1 will thicken the pavement. www.PaveXpressDesign.com

Subgrade Considerations The most common methods of classifying the subgrade for pavement design are: California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Resistance Value (R) Resilient Modulus (MR) After the sub-base is input, the strength of the subgrade is required. The user can input the CBR, R-value or resilient modulus. For CBR and R-value, a correlation to resilient modulus is used. www.PaveXpressDesign.com

Using the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer to Estimate CBR The Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) Test can be performed in the field in situ (ASTM D6951) and used to estimate CBR values. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station developed the following relationship between Dynamic Penetration Index (DPI) and CBR: log10(CBR) = 2.46 − 1.12 log10 (DPI) DCP Testing at the NCAT Test Track *Other correlations have been developed also. www.PaveXpressDesign.com

California Bearing Ratio (CBR) The CBR Test can be performed either in the lab (AASHTO T 193, ASTM D 1883) or in the field in situ (ASTM D4429). The CBR is a simple test that compares the bearing capacity of a material with a standard well-graded crushed stone, which has a reference CBR value of 100%. Fine-grained soils typically have values less than 20. www.PaveXpressDesign.com

Resistance Value (R) The Resistance Test is performed in the lab (AASHTO T 190, ASTM D 2844). It tests both treated and untreated laboratory compacted soils or aggregates with a stabilometer and expansion pressure devices. It tests the ability of the material to resist lateral spreading due to an applied vertical load. A range of values are established from 0 to 100, where 0 is the resistance of water and 100 is the resistance of steel. www.PaveXpressDesign.com

Resilient Modulus (MR) The Resilient Modulus Test is performed in the lab (AASHTO T 307, ASTM D 2844). It is a measure of the soil stiffness and tri-axially tests both treated and untreated laboratory compacted soils or aggregates under conditions that simulate the physical conditions and stress states of materials beneath flexible pavements subjected to moving wheel loads. As a mechanistic test measuring fundamental material properties, it is often thought preferable to the empirical CBR and R-value tests. www.PaveXpressDesign.com

How do I know if I’m in the ballpark? The Asphalt Institute publication IS-91 gives the following test values for various subgrade qualities: Relative Quality R-Value California Bearing Ratio Resilient Modulus (psi) Good to Excellent 43 17 25,000 Medium 20 8 12,000 Poor 6 3 4,500 Note that different design guides will show different ranges for the various subgrade qualities — use engineering judgment when evaluating subgrade design inputs. www.PaveXpressDesign.com

Use engineering judgment to select the optimum pavement structure. Recommendation: Perform multiple iterations of the design with different plausible input values to get a sense of the range of pavement structures needed to carry the anticipated loads in various scenarios. Use engineering judgment to select the optimum pavement structure. www.PaveXpressDesign.com

This very simple tool gives the user a total asphalt mixture cost for the project. Inputs are: asphalt price per ton, unit weight of the asphalt mixture, project length, width, and thickness Estimate Cost www.PaveXpressDesign.com

Estimate Cost www.PaveXpressDesign.com

Estimate Cost www.PaveXpressDesign.com

A Simplified Pavement Design Tool www.PaveXpressDesign.com You can access the website by visiting www.pavexpressdesign.com In addition, the Asphalt Pavement Alliance has conducted several webinars on PaveXpress that go into more detail around specific designs. Should you want to view it, just visit http://bit.ly/PaveXpressWebinar We always welcome feedback or questions. You can send comments and suggestions directly to Pavia, the application developer, using the PaveXpress application. Thanks, www.PaveXpressDesign.com