Status of ECLOUD Simulations for the Shielded Button Measurements

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

BUILD-UP SIMULATIONS FOR DAFNE WIGGLER W/ ELECTRODES Theo Demma.

Advertisements

Comparison of ECLOUD and POSINST Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts with Emphasis on the Relative Drift and Dipole Contributions Jim Crittenden Cornell.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden & John Sikora Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based.

ECLOUD Calculations of Field Gradients During Bunch Passage Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education Electron Cloud.

LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.

Early Results on a Search for Cyclotron Resonances in ECLOUD -- Collaboration with Eric Wilkinson -- These slides includes corrections arising from the.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Resolution of ECLOUD Tune Shift Calculation Instability Jim Crittenden.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York ECLOUD Simulations for the Tune Shift Measurements of December.

ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - Study of SEY Model Effects - Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based.

ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - Study of SEY Model Effects - Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based.

ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 and January 2009 Measurements - Preparation for PAC2009 FR5RF Paper and Poster - “Effects.

LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Modeling Cyclotron Resonances in ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Comparison of ECLOUD Calculations in Dipole and Quadrupole Fields.

ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - This presentation limited to resolving drift/dipole weighting question -

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Recent Studies with ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for.

Space Charge Electric-Field Calculations for Coherent Tune Shift Estimations using the Electron-cloud Modelling Algorithm ECLOUD Jim Crittenden Cornell.

ECLOUD Calculations of Coherent Tune Shifts for the April 2007 Measurements - Thanks to Marco for clarifying the drift/dipole weighting - - Thanks to Gerry.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York ECLOUD Simulations for the Tune Shift Measurements of December.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Comparison of ECLOUD Calculations in Dipole and Quadrupole Fields.

ECLOUD Simulations for CESR Witness Bunch Tune Shift Measurements Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York First Results on the Introduction of the Rediffused SEY Component.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.

49th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop October 8 –12, 2010 LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.

The Secondary Electron Yield Model in ECLOUD and Comparison to CLOUDLAND Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.

Electron Cloud Simulations Using ORBIT Code - Cold Proton Bunch model April 11, 2007 ECLOUD07 Yoichi Sato, Nishina Center, RIKEN 1 Y. Sato ECLOUD07.

Shielded-Pickup Measurements in June and Update on Modeling Results / J.A. Crittenden 23 August / 4 Shielded-Pickup Measurements in June and Update.

FCC-hh: First simulations of electron cloud build-up L. Mether, G. Iadarola, G. Rumolo FCC Design meeting.

2nd International Particle Accelerator Conference September 4–9, 2011, San Sebastián, Spain LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle.

RFA Simulations Joe Calvey LEPP, Cornell University 6/25/09.

3 February 2010 ILC Damping Ring electron cloud WG effort Mauro Pivi SLAC on behalf of ILC DR working group on e- cloud ILC DR Webex Meeting Jan 3, 2010.

Electron Cloud Studies at DAFNE Theo Demma INFN-LNF Frascati.

Benchmarking Headtail with e-cloud observations with LHC 25ns beam H. Bartosik, W. Höfle, G. Iadarola, Y. Papaphilippou, G. Rumolo.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden & John Sikora Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.

LEPP, the Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics, has joined with CHESS to become the Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-based Sciences.

45 th ICFA Beam Dynamic Workshop June 8–12, 2009, Cornell University, Ithaca New York Jared Ginsberg Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences.

Update to ECLOUD Calculations for the

Electron Cloud Measurement Summary for the April 2014 Run

Using Time-Resolved Retarding Field Analyzer Measurements to Determine the SEY Mitigation Effectiveness of Grooves -- Bonus: first look at last night's.

Measurement of Electron Cloud in KEKB LER with RFA

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MODELING

Electron Cloud Meeting

Physics Scope and Work Plan for the Shielded-Pickup Measurements -- Synchrotron Radiation Photon Distributions Photoelectron Production Parameters.

First Look at the New SYNRAD3D Results

Detailed Characterization of Vacuum Chamber Surface Properties Using Measurements of the Time Dependence of Electron Cloud Development Jim Crittenden.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MODELING

Use of the Shielded-Pickup Measurements for Optimization of the Photoelectron Production Energy Distribution in ECLOUD -- This topic was included in the.

Physics Scope and Work Plan for the Shielded-Pickup Measurements -- Synchrotron Radiation Photon Distributions Photoelectron Production Parameters.

First Look at Modeling Photoelectron Energy Distribution for a 2

Shielded Button Measurement/ECLOUD Simulation Comparison for 5

Electron Cloud Meeting

Ryan Badman Jim Crittenden July 20, 2011 Electron Cloud Meeting

First Attempt to Simulate the Shielded Button Measurements with ECLOUD

J.A.Crittenden, Y.Li, X.Liu, M.A.Palmer, J.P.Sikora (Cornell)

Quadrupole Shielded-Pickup Data Comparison of Signals from 10- and 20-Bunch e+ Trains -- Trapping ! Updated after meeting to include suggested.

All material for this talk may be obtained at

Jim Crittenden Electron Cloud/Impedance Meeting 27 May 2015

Electron Cloud in ilcDR: Update

SuperB General Meeting June , Perugia (Italy)

Status of Ecloud Build-Up Simulations for the ILC DR’s

Higgs Factory Backgrounds

ILC Damping Ring electron cloud WG effort

CesrTA Wiggler RFA Measurements

45 e+ bunches, 4-ns spacing, 0.9 mA/bunch

Presentation transcript:

Status of ECLOUD Simulations for the Shielded Button Measurements I. Improvement in the simulation of e+ beam measurements II. Properties of the macroparticles producing the button signal III. Startling movies IV. More information on the discrepancy for the e- beam measurements V. Simulations for the witness bunch measurements All material for this talk, including full sets of the analysis plots, may be obtained at www.lepp.cornell.edu/~critten/cesrta/ecloud/14apr10 -- 16 April: Added slide 13 showing effect of increasing the primary photoelectron energy from 5 eV to 40 eV -- Jim Crittenden Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education Electron Cloud Meeting 14 April 2010

Slide 6 of Last Week's Presentation Measurement (Central Button) -- Positrons -- Measurement (Central Button) ECLOUD Simulation The ratio of the second peak in the button 2 signal to the first was only about a factor of four.

Introduction of the Horizontal Beam Offset -- Positrons -- Measurement (Central Button) ECLOUD Simulation The ratio of the two peaks is much better reproduced when the 12 mm offset of the beam axis is included.

Dependence on the Reflectivity -- Positrons -- Reflectivity 100% Reflectivity 0% The ratio of the two peaks is sensitive to the azimuthal distribution of primaries. The first bunch gives no button signal if no primaries are produced in the region of the shielded button. A value for the reflectivity of 20% gives a good match to the measured ratio.

Properties of the Signal-producing Cloud Particles -- Positrons -- Average Number and Charge Average Energy and Age Post-processing of 11k cloud macroparticles entering the detector. Averages over 0.11 ns are shown here. Primaries are generated with the same charge value of about 65k e. The button signal is a convolution of macroparticle number and charge. The bunch charge of 1.28e11 e (8 mA) is sufficient to generate kinetic energies of 6 keV during passage of the second bunch.

Cloud Snapshot Just Prior to the Passage of the Second Bunch -- Positrons -- Unexpected result for the cloud snapshot at the arrival time of the second bunch. A vertical stripe moving horizontally reaches the central button just as the second bunch arrives, as shown in the following movie. The movie has 10 snapshots during the bunch passage and 40 snapshots between bunch passages.

Slide 7 of Last Week's Presentation Measurement (Central Button) -- Electrons -- Measurement (Central Button) ECLOUD Simulation Today I will be brief on the simulation for the electron beam, because we don't yet understand it. However, I will show some important differences from the positron beam, and can quantitatively exclude one speculative source of the discrepancy in the time structure (mp transit time in the detector).

Dependence on the Reflectivity -- Electrons -- Reflectivity 100% Reflectivity 0% The reflected-photon contribution accounts for ALL of the signal in the case of an electron beam.

SEY estimated for processed TiN. ECLOUD input parameters -- Modified to give equal reflected contributions for e+ and e- -- 1.28e11 (8 mA) 2 n.a. 4.2 (14 ns) e+: 18.8 e-: 18.8 e+: 0.222 e-: 0.205 e+: 0.0185 e-: 0.0191 0.1 ( g / m / e ) e+: 1.00 e-: 0.3 n.a. e+: 20% e-: 67% 1.0 (0.9 t.s. & 0.1 rediff) 400 SEY estimated for processed TiN. Numerical parameters large: 1000 steps, 101 kicks, 250k m.p. per bunch, 4000 steps between bunches.

Present Status of the Simulation for an Electron Beam, Including the 12-mm Horizontal Beam Offset Measurement (Central Button) ECLOUD Simulation The simulated signal is prompt, and very brief, unlike the measurement. In particular, where is the signal between bunches coming from the cloud self-repulsion?

Does the cloud kinetic energy distribution contribute to an arrival time spread at the button? Button signal time structure without transit time contribution Including transit time contribution Transit time distribution for 50 V bias and 10 mm button distance (overestimated) Higher-energy cloud particles Transit time due to the 50 V bias Postprocessing for 17.4k cloud particles. The 50 V button bias dominates the contribution to the transit time. Despite overestimating the distance to the button, the transit time spread cannot account for the signal time structure.

-- Cloud Lifetime Experiment -- See John Sikora's presentation at last week's machine studies meeting Measurement (Central Button) ECLOUD Simulation The success of the simulation for a positron beam opens up a broad range of inquiry. Will we be able to derive an estimate for d (E=0) from such cloud lifetime measurements?

for the electron beam and less similar for the positron beam. What is the effect of raising the energies of primary photoelectrons? NB: The energy of an electron which travels 5 cm in 14 ns is 36 eV. Epeak = 5 eV sE = 5 eV (ECLOUD default) Epeak = 40 eV sE = 20 eV Positron beam Electron beam The energy distribution for primary p.e. is Gaussian with the negative tail omitted. For higher-energy photoelectrons, the ratio of the two peaks is more consistent with the measurements for the electron beam and less similar for the positron beam. The discrepancy between bunch passages for the electron beam remains to be resolved.