Capitalizing on GW polarization bias

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Model checking in mixture models via mixed predictive p-values Alex Lewin and Sylvia Richardson, Centre for Biostatistics, Imperial College, London Mixed.
Advertisements

RECOVERING HARDWARE INJECTIONS IN LIGO S5 DATA Ashley Disbrow Carnegie Mellon University Roy Williams, Michele Vallisneri, Jonah Kanner LIGO SURF 2013.
S3/S4 BBH report Thomas Cokelaer LSC Meeting, Boston, 3-4 June 2006.
A walk through some statistic details of LSC results.
LIGO-G Z 1 S2/E10 pulsar injection analysis Réjean Dupuis University of Glasgow 13 November 2003 LSC Meeting, LHO.
AURIGA-LIGO Activity F. Salemi Italy, INFN and University of Ferrara for the LIGO-AURIGA JWG 2nd ILIAS-GW Meeting, October 24th and 25th, Palma de Mallorca,
GWDAW 16/12/2004 Inspiral analysis of the Virgo commissioning run 4 Leone B. Bosi VIRGO coalescing binaries group on behalf of the VIRGO collaboration.
METHODS FOR HAPLOTYPE RECONSTRUCTION
Pulsar Detection and Parameter Estimation with MCMC - Six Parameters Nelson Christensen Physics and Astronomy Carleton College GWDAW December 2003.
Learning to estimate human pose with data driven belief propagation Gang Hua, Ming-Hsuan Yang, Ying Wu CVPR 05.
Brennan Ireland Rochester Institute of Technology Astrophysical Sciences and Technology December 5, 2013 LIGO: Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave.
Systematic effects in gravitational-wave data analysis
The “probability event horizon” and probing the astrophysical GW background School of Physics University of Western Australia Research is funded by the.
LIGO-G W Gregory Mendell, LIGO Hanford Observatory on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Stackslide search for continuous gravitational.
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
DelayRatio: A Gravitational Wave Event Physical Likelihood Estimator Based on Detection Delays and SNR Ratios Amber L. Stuver LIGO Livingston ObservatoryCalifornia.
Mock Data Production, Characteristics, and Confusion Background WG4 f2f – Nice 09/01/10 Tania Regimbau.
LIGO-G Z The AURIGA-LIGO Joint Burst Search L. Cadonati, G. Prodi, L. Baggio, S. Heng, W. Johnson, A. Mion, S. Poggi, A. Ortolan, F. Salemi, P.
1SBPI 16/06/2009 Heterodyne detection with LISA for gravitational waves parameters estimation Nicolas Douillet.
LIGO-G Z Coherent Analysis of Signals from Misaligned Interferometers M. Rakhmanov, S. Klimenko Department of Physics, University of Florida,
10/06/2003LSC WIDE COLLOQUIUM1 LSC Pulsar Group and P Shawhan, S Marka, and S Koranda presented by B Allen, R Dupuis, N Christensen, and X Siemens S2 Hardware.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
S.Klimenko, August 2005, LSC, G Z Constraint likelihood analysis with a network of GW detectors S.Klimenko University of Florida, in collaboration.
Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW 11 Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW Dec 2006 Leone.
Dec 16, 2005GWDAW-10, Brownsville Population Study of Gamma Ray Bursts S. D. Mohanty The University of Texas at Brownsville.
S.Klimenko, December 16, 2007, GWDAW12, Boston, LIGO-G Z Coherent burst searches for gravitational waves from compact binary objects S.Klimenko,
Gamma ray burst triggered searches in the S2, S3, S4 runs of LIGO Soumya D. Mohanty On behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Searches for Compact Binary Coalescences in LIGO and Virgo data Gabriela González For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration APS.
1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.
Joint LIGO-Virgo data analysis Inspiral and Burst Summary of the first project results Overview of the future activities M.-A. Bizouard (LAL-Orsay) on.
15-18 Dec 2004Spinning Black Hole Binaries1 Search for Spinning Black Hole Binaries in LIGO/GEO data: The First Steps Speaker: Gareth Jones LSC Inspiral.
04/21/2005 CS673 1 Being Bayesian About Network Structure A Bayesian Approach to Structure Discovery in Bayesian Networks Nir Friedman and Daphne Koller.
15-18 December 2004 GWDAW-9 Annecy 1 All-Sky broad band search for continuous waves using LIGO S2 data Yousuke Itoh 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Peter Shawhan The University of Maryland & The LIGO Scientific Collaboration Penn State CGWP Seminar March 27, 2007 LIGO-G Z Reaching for Gravitational.
Stochastic Background Data Analysis Giancarlo Cella I.N.F.N. Pisa first ENTApP - GWA joint meeting Paris, January 23rd and 24th, 2006 Institute d'Astrophysique.
GWDAW91Thursday, December 16 First Comparison Between LIGO &Virgo Inspiral Search Pipelines F. Beauville on behalf of the LIGO-Virgo Joint Working Group.
GW – the first GW detection ! Is it a start of GW astronomy ? If “yes” then which ? «Счастлив, кто посетил сей мир в его минуты роковые !...» Ф.Тютчев.
2 June 2003Soumya D. Mohanty et al, LIGO-G D1 LASER INTERFEROMETER GRAVITATIONAL WAVE OBSERVATORY - LIGO – CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.
SEARCH FOR INSPIRALING BINARIES S. V. Dhurandhar IUCAA Pune, India.
All-sky LIGO Search for Periodic Gravitational Waves in the Fourth Science Run (S4) Keith Riles University of Michigan For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LSC Meeting, June 3, 2006 LIGO-G Z 1 Status of inspiral search reviews Alan Weinstein (LIGO Laboratory / Caltech) For the LSC Internal review.
24 th Pacific Coast Gravity Meeting, Santa Barbara LIGO DCC Number: G Z 1 Search for gravitational waves from inspiraling high-mass (non-spinning)
LIGO-G Z Results from LIGO Observations Stephen Fairhurst University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
GRB triggered Inspiral Searches in the fifth Science Run of LIGO Alexander Dietz Cardiff University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
Search for gravitational waves from binary inspirals in S3 and S4 LIGO data. Thomas Cokelaer on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
G v1Heterogeneous Detector Networks1 Heterogeneous Detector Networks Sky Localization with 3G Detectors May 26, 2016 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory.
A 2 veto for Continuous Wave Searches
All-Sky broad band search for continuous waves using LIGO S2 data
Searching for pulsars using the Hough transform
Searching for gravitational-wave transients with Advanced detectors
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
Analysis of LIGO S2 data for GWs from isolated pulsars
Coherent wide parameter space searches for gravitational waves from neutron stars using LIGO S2 data Xavier Siemens, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Igor Yakushin, LIGO Livingston Observatory
Searching for Gravitational-Wave Bursts (GWBs) associated with Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) during the LIGO S5 run Isabel Leonor University of Oregon (for the.
GW150914: The first direct detection of gravitational waves
An improved method for estimating the efficiency of GW detectors
On Behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and VIRGO
A.M. Sintes for the pulgroup
GW Data Analysis (from an experimentalist’s point of view)
M.-A. Bizouard, F. Cavalier
Background estimation in searches for binary inspiral
LISA Data Analysis & Sources
Search for gravitational waves from binary black hole mergers:
Searching for GRB-GWB coincidence during LIGO science runs
Center for Gravitational Wave Physics Penn State University
J. Ellis, F. Jenet, & M. McLaughlin
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
Presentation transcript:

Capitalizing on GW polarization bias for a pair of interferometric detectors To increase parameter estimation speed and Investigate the potential implications for stellar evolution models. Cristina Valeria Torres University of Texas at Brownsville Amber L. Stuver LIGO Livingston Observatory LIGO-G1201267-v1

Astrophysics Obtaining astrophysical information (search) Externally triggered GW search GW band only identified GW event Signal information Infer system parameters Localize sky position LIGO-G1201267-v1

Sky localization Detection method Matched filter Excess power Triangulation indirectly SNR dependent Network configuration dependent Google LIGO-G1201267-v1

Parameter Estimation Requires time of detection parameter priors Results convergence to 'real' parameters most likely sky position (non triangulation) Raymond, 2012 (Thesis) LIGO-G1201267-v1

Effective Network Antenna Response Source Sensitivity L1H1:H1V1 Effective Network Antenna Response Signal polarization Network polarization sensitivity Single detector sensitivity Detector Geometry Simple, single site Complex, network configuration Stuver LIGO-G1201267-v1

Errors in Sky Pointing and Distance Sky Pointing: “timing” Template choice / phase Is network blind at some (RA,DEC) for given polarizations Est. Distance: “SNR” Data quality PSD estimates “Ignored” errors Source polarization “Simple” search assumptions Torres Wikipedia LIGO-G1201267-v1

Source sampling 'deafness' Past observing epochs Polarization average ideal orientations not triangulation limiting Future observing epochs Polarization 'deafness' may be an issue (5x) address via hierarchical filtering Klimenko, 2010 LIGO-G1201267-v1

Improving PE Convergence PE can triangulate signal Convergence timescale subspace dimensionality: masses, spin, mass ratio, etc domain breadth initial 'guess' or information LIGO-G1201267-v1

Case Study:GRB100328A Externally trigger GW search Stats: RA 10h23m45s DEC 47d02m 953781779 LIGO detector pair Traditional PE run via Monte Carlo Markov Chains Ψ GW Stats: Pair: LLO-LHO Posterior (mu,sigma): 89,57 GRB 100328A parameters: RA = 10h23m45s Dec = 47o 02' source epsilon (error) = 4.8o (Source: arXiv:1201.3099v1 & http://vizier.cfa.harvard.edu/viz-bin/nph-Cat/html?J%2FApJS%2F199%2F18/table2.dat) time = 03:22:44.6049 UTC on 28 March 2010 = 953781779.6049 (GPS) (mu,sigma): 1.56,0.901 π 1.56 LIGO-G1201267-v1

Case Study:GRB100328A Using polarization bias Predicts 'deafness' in polarization Intelligent MCMC prior improve convergence timescales RA,Dec instrument pairing Geometrically determined LIGO-G1201267-v1

Case Study:GRB100328A Using polarization bias Predicts 'deafness' in polarization Intelligent MCMC prior improve convergence timescales RA,Dec instrument pairing Geometrically determined Not allowed! GW Stats: Pair: LLO-LHO Posterior (“mu”,”sigma”): 105,60 LIGO-G1201267-v1

Case Study:GRB100328A Using polarization bias Predicts 'deafness' in polarization Intelligent MCMC prior improve convergence timescales RA,Dec instrument pairing Geometrically determined GW Stats: Pair: LLO-LHO Posterior (“mu”,”sigma”): 105,60 1.82 π Deterministic New Prior! LIGO-G1201267-v1

Polarization Prior Bank Leveraging Potential Detection 2 LIGO detectors Cuts 80 possibly more degrees of psi space N detector network cuts >=80deg Psi prior convolution of n!/2(n-2)! simple pair priors F(Ra,Dec) 3 2 4 F(Ra,Dec) 3 2 4 F(Ra,Dec) 3 2 4 Polarization Prior Bank F(Ra,Dec) 3 2 4 F(Ra,Dec) 3 2 4 F(Ra,Dec) 3 2 4 F(Ra,Dec) 3 2 4 F(Ra,Dec) 3 2 4 F(Ra,Dec) 3 2 4 LIGO-G1201267-v1

Polarization bias = Sampling Bias Potential polarization 'bias' mask across sky NS-NS polarization distribution knowledge limited (@ 40/yr) 'Bias' maps calculable per object in Virgo super- cluster Voce esta aqui! LIGO-G1201267-v1

Conclusions Polarization sensitivity/bias affects Rapid source reconstruction MCMC convergence time Sampling of NSNS orientations Capitalizing on polarization bias 2 stage search (NSNS) could be more sensitive MCMC Prior bank, may effectively remove 1 PE DOF Things to do Determine polarization sensitivity impact for 2, 3, and 4 GW detectors across entire sky For Virgo super-cluster (LIGO obs sphere), investigate potential methods to de-convolve polarization sensitivity mask form observational data LIGO-G1201267-v1