Department of Environmental Quality

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
S.L Part 1, Section 3.(b) G.S. 150B-21.3A: PERIODIC REVIEW AND EXPIRATION OF EXISTING RULES.
Advertisements

CHERYL E. BRADLEY RULES AND PLANNING SECTION AIR QUALITY DIVISION JANUARY 15, 2014 Impact of Executive Order on Rulemaking Process.
Thomas K. Fidler Deputy Secretary for Waste, Air and Radiation Management Department of Environmental Protection Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Proposed.
BRIEFING TO SELECT COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL SERVICES ON THE MENTAL HEALTH CARE AMENDMENT BILL 11 June 2013.
Jeff Manning Division of Water Resources. What? Readopting all the rules? S.L (H74) requires review and, where necessary, readoption of all.
Federal Statute, Federal Regulations, State Policies, and State Procedures What’s the Difference? Mississippi Department of Education Office.
Joelle Burleson Planning Section, Rules Development Branch Division of Air Quality Periodic Review and Expiration of Existing Rules per Regulatory Reform.
Joelle Burleson Planning Section, Rules Development Branch Division of Air Quality Status of Periodic Review and Expiration of Existing Rules per Regulatory.
1 Special Information Session on USEPA’s Carbon Rules & Clean Air Act Section 111 North Carolina Division of Air Quality Special Information Session on.
Department of Environmental Quality May 11, 2016.
Department of Environmental Quality Review of 15A NCAC 13A.0101 Hazardous Waste Rules May 12, 2016.
Final Rulemaking: 25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 139 Measurement and Reporting of Condensable Particulate Matter Emissions Environmental Quality Board Meeting.
Department of Environmental Quality
Jessica Montie Solid Waste Section Division of Waste Management
Department of Environmental Quality
Regulatory Review of 15A NCAC 02L Groundwater Classification and Standards Jeff Manning - Division of Water Resources Environmental Management Commission.
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
Grid Code Review Panel 16th August 2017
Division of Waste Management
July 13, 2016 Department of Environmental Quality Proposed Amendments to UST Rules 15A NCAC 02N and 02O Ruth Strauss.
September 8, 2016 Department of Environmental Quality Proposed Amendments to UST Rules 15A NCAC 02N and 02O Ruth Strauss.
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Department of Environmental Quality
Environmental Management Commission July 13, 2017 Jeff Manning, DWR
Department of Environmental Quality
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
Groundwater and Waste Management Committee November 9, 2016
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Department of Environmental Quality
Environmental Management Commission January 10, 2013
Department of Environmental Quality
Regulatory Review of 15A NCAC 02L Groundwater Classification and Standards Jeff Manning - Division of Water Resources Environmental Management Commission.
Rulemaking and Readoption of 15A NCAC 02T .1500
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Department of Environmental Quality
Jessica Montie, Division of Waste Management
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
Evan Kane Division of Water Resources
Temporary Rulemaking for 15A NCAC 02L Section .0400
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality Scott Bullock
EMC – Air Quality Committee March 9, 2016
September 8, 2016 Request Approval of the Determinations to be Submitted to Rules Review Commission for Subchapter 15A NCAC 02E (Periodic Review of Existing.
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Department of Environmental Quality
May 12, 2016 Department of Environmental Quality Amendments to 15A NCAC 13A .0107, Hazardous Waste Rules for Federal E-Manifest Rules.
Department of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Quality
Periodic Review Reports for 15A NCAC 02N, 02O, and 02P
Environmental Management Commission, March 9, 2017
Department of Environmental Quality
Jessica Montie, Division of Waste Management
3 step process Step 1: Agency determination
Regulatory Reform Act (SL ) Periodic review and expiration of existing rules NC Environmental Management Commission March 13, 2014 Jeff Manning.
Vacancies and Filing Procedures
Department of Environmental Quality
NC Environmental Management Commission
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Wastewater Permitting Updates
EU legislation on noise emission in the environment by equipment for use outdoors: latest developments September 2018 European.
Ellen Lorscheider, Division of Waste Management
Periodic Review and Expiration of Existing Rules (G.S. 150B-21.3A)
Presentation transcript:

Department of Environmental Quality July 13, 2016 Department of Environmental Quality

Periodic Review of Existing Rules S.L. 2013-413/H74 Codified G.S. 150B-21.3A, mandates all agencies to conduct a review of the agency’s existing rules at least once every 10 years. The EMC was required to readopt or repeal all existing rules, including the rules in Section .0100 of Subchapter 2A of Title 15A of the NC Administrative Code. Department of Environmental Quality

First step in the process is categorization and public comment: Necessary with substantive public interest Necessary without substantive public interest Unnecessary Held comment period: January 29 – April 8, 2016 Received no comments Proceed to EMC in September Department of Environmental Quality

Department of Environmental Quality G.S. 150B-21.3A Report for 15A NCAC 02A, ORGANIZATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION Agency - Environmental Management Commission Comment Period - January 29, 2016- April 8, 2016 Date Submitted to APO - Filled in by RRC staff Rule Citation Rule Name Date and Last Agency Action on the Rule Agency Determination [150B-21.3A(c)(1)a] Implements or Conforms to Federal Regulation [150B-21.3A(e)] Federal Regulation Citation Public Comment Received [150B-21.3A(c)(1)] Agency Determination Following Public Comment [150B-21.3A(c)(1)] 15A NCAC 02A .0101 NAME Eff. February 1, 1976 Unnecessary No 15A NCAC 02A .0102 DEFINITIONS Amended Eff. December 15, 1978 Necessary without substantive public interest 15A NCAC 02A .0103 GENERAL DUTIES AND POWERS Amended Eff. July 1, 1988 15A NCAC 02A .0105 DELEGATIONS OF AUTHORITY Amended Eff. March 1, 1993 15A NCAC 02A .0107 CREATION OF N.P.D.E.S. COMMITTEE Amended Eff. October 1, 1988 Yes If yes, include the citation to the federal law 40 CFR 123.25 ( c ) Department of Environmental Quality

The 2A .0100 rules are entitled, “Organization of Environmental Management Commission”. 2A .0101 – Name [Unnecessary] Staff decided this was unnecessary because it provided nothing of substance except an address, which is provided elsewhere. 2A .0102 – Definitions [Necessary without substantive public interest] Definitions are important, but these are non-controversial, “Commission,” “Secretary,” “Division,” “Director,” and “State.” 2A .0103 – General Duties and Powers [Unnecessary] These powers and duties are set by statute. The rule simply restated where in the statutes the powers and duties were delegated. Department of Environmental Quality

The 2A .0100 rules are entitled, “Organization of Environmental Management Commission”. 2A .0104 – Structure Repealed in 1988. 2A .0105 – Delegations of Authority [Necessary without substantive public interest] The delegations are all to the Secretary who functions as staff to the EMC, and subdelegates as necessary or convenience. 2A .0106, and .0108, rules authorizing subdelegation, were repealed in 1988. 2A .0107 – Creation of the NPDES Committee [Necessary without substantive public interest] The composition (and necessity) of the NPDES Committee is dictated by EPA rule, and is required for NPDES program approval.

Second step in the process is Rules Review Commission (RRC) review: RRC reviews the comments received for rules placed in the necessary without substantive public interest and unnecessary categories. RRC makes final decision. RRC submits report to Joint Legislative Administrative Procedures Oversight Committee (APO). RRC review – December 15, 2016 Department of Environmental Quality

Third step is APO consultation: If APO does not meet within 60 days for a consultation then final determinations will become effective on the 61st day from submission. If the APO does meet then the determinations will become effective on the day they consulted. If APO disagrees with a determination in the report, the APO may recommend that the General Assembly direct the agency to conduct a review of specific rule in the following year. If APO does not meet within 60 days for a consultation then the determinations will become effective on the 61st day from submission. Typically, the APO does not meet when the General Assembly is in session. But if they do meet, the determinations will become effective on the day they reviewed it. If the APO disagrees with a determination in the report, they may recommend that the General Assembly direct the agency to conduct a review of specific rule in the following year. Department of Environmental Quality

Periodic Review and Expiration of Existing Rules Final Determinations and Next Steps: Necessary with Substantive Public Interest = Rules get readopted Necessary without Substantive Public Interest = Rules remain in the Code Unnecessary Rules = expire So what does this all mean? Rules that were classified as necessary with substantive public interest have to be readopted. Readoption is just a fancy word for rulemaking. So those rules will have to go through the permanent rulemaking process with either proposed changes or without proposed changes. Rules that were classified as necessary without substantive public interest will just remain in the Administrative Code as is and we don’t have to do anything with them. Unnecessary rules will come out of the Code as if they had been repealed. As you may recall your 7B rules went through this process last year. And up next will be all of the rest of your rules which are scheduled for the January 2018 RRC meeting. Also, the 7O rules, the Coastal Reserve rules are due next year and that while they are Departmental rules, it is my understanding that they will come before you for recommendations at your July meeting. Department of Environmental Quality

Jennifer Everett DEQ Rulemaking Coordinator 919-707-8614 Questions? Jennifer Everett DEQ Rulemaking Coordinator 919-707-8614 If APO does not meet within 60 days for a consultation then the determinations will become effective on the 61st day from submission. Typically, the APO does not meet when the General Assembly is in session. But if they do meet, the determinations will become effective on the day they reviewed it. If the APO disagrees with a determination in the report, they may recommend that the General Assembly direct the agency to conduct a review of specific rule in the following year. Department of Environmental Quality