Transition for Students with Disabilities from K-12 to Post-Secondary Education Transition du secondaire au postsecondaire pour les élèves ayant un handicap.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Response to Intervention
Advertisements

Session Objectives Begin to understand the goals, purpose and rationale for Program Reviews Learn about the components of implementing Program Reviews.
Managing the Statutory Requirements for Assessment April 2011.
Part 2: The Co-Teaching Partnership Programming Codes: o IEP.
May 22, Today is a chance to... - look at the provincial report card template - understand the new process -inform a decision about implementation.
Program Planning in NS Schools – a Team Approach AVRSB, 2012.
SPECIAL EDUCATION IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM By: Ashlei Wrinkles.
Welcome!. Guiding Questions “Alberta Education has set the direction – each district must now set the course…..” (Special Education Conference, 2010)
Response to Instruction and Intervention Process Presentation.
Participation in Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills.
Purpose of Instruction
Building Capacity for Effective Co- Teaching EdPower Teacher Institute Summer 2013.
I.E.P. on IEPs: Information Especially for Parents on Individualized Education Programs.
Deana Holinka, MA, CRC, Administrative Coordinator,
Orientation to the Planning 10 IRP  How does Planning 10 fit into the 2004 Graduation Program?  How was Planning 10 developed?  What’s the difference.
The teacher of each classroom is responsible for evaluating the individual student's progress toward the AKS as described in the guidelines below. Kindergarten.
The Individualized Education Program (IEP) Legal and Practical Issues Families as Partners: School-Family Collaboration in the Education of Students with.
GUIDELINE DIRECTIONS ABOUT ACCOMMODATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS OF PROGRAMS TO MEET A STUDENT’S NEEDS.
Understanding Special Education services SPECIAL EDUCATION REFERRAL PROCESS.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
1 Our priorities for the next three years Close Critical Service Gaps Increase availability of culturally appropriate services and serve more children.
PUT TITLE HERE Collaborating for Better IEPs Slide Deck No.4 Ministry of Education, 2009.
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
Understanding the IEP Process
Parent’s Guide to the IEP
Carroll County Public Schools Gifted & Talented. On February 28 th, 2012, the Maryland State Board of Education approved regulations that set the minimum.
Accommodations Strategies, human supports or equipment that allows a student to understand the curriculum or demonstrate their learning Accommodations.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program May 7, 2013.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
NTIP Nov 10, 2009 Judi Kochanka Kim Slomka Special Education: Secondary Panel.
Hand In Hand: The IGP and IEP Working Together 9/15/20151.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
Inclusive Schooling “An inclusive school is a school where every child is respected as part of the school community and where each child is encouraged.
Summary of the presentation of inclusive education Christer Ohlin
1. 2 Roots of Ontario Legislation and Policy Bill 82 (1980), An Amendment to the Education Act: –Universal access: right of all children, condition notwithstanding,
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program CCSA March 25, 2013.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
IDEA and NCLB Standards-Based Accountability Sue Rigney, U.S. Department of Education OSEP 2006 Project Directors’ Conference.
 What is special education?  How does a student qualify for services?
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today’s Schools, 6e ISBN: © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress.
Climbing the Ladder Special Education OVERVIEW Niles North High School, District 219.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP) Toronto District School Board January 20, 2015.
Special Education Module #1 : Legislative Overview.
Significant Developmental Delay Annual State Superintendent’s Conference on Special Education and Pupil Services October 20-21, 2015.
Diana Dinzey Educational Placement. General Education Paraprofessional Residential Treatment Center Alternative H.S Self Contained Resource Room I nclusion.
 Is unique to Nebraska with its self- assessment process.  Is intended to be a component of your district’s School Improvement Process.  Is an ongoing.
Ensuring Progress in the General Education Curriculum ED 222 Spring 2010.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Individual Education Plans.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANNING MARCH 3, 2016.
Single Plan For Student Achievement January 27, 2016 Los Angeles Unified School District Local District Northwest “Building Academic Excellence Through.
IEP Participation Special Education Paraprofessional Workbook Module 3.
A GUIDE FOR CANTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT’S PARENTS AND STAKEHOLDERS The Mississippi Literacy-Based Promotion Act
Personalized Learning Plans Understanding the PLP Process.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
Closing the Educational Gap for Students with Disabilities Kristina Makousky.
Welcome! Taylor County Schools Student Assistance Team School Level Training September 2017.
American Institutes for Research
#UDL2016 Engaging Educators in System-wide Implementation of Universal Design for Learning 2nd Annual UDL Symposium Building UDL Community and Practice.
Definition and Considerations
Non Diploma Secondary Services
IEP Workshop Kathryn Everest YRDSB SEAC Representative – AO – YRC
Evaluating Provision for Students with Additional and Special Educational Needs in Post-Primary Schools Briefing for the Education Partners 4th September.
Definition and Considerations
Developing the Individual Education Program (IEP)
Grading Students with Disabilities
Evaluating Provision for Students with Additional and Special Educational Needs in Post-Primary Schools Briefing for the Education Partners 4th September.
Presentation transcript:

Transition for Students with Disabilities from K-12 to Post-Secondary Education Transition du secondaire au postsecondaire pour les élèves ayant un handicap Education and Early Childhood Development / Éducation et Développement de la petite enfance April 30th 2012 / 30 avril 2012

INCLUSION Kim Korotkov Julie McIntyre

INCLUSION 1.Leadership / Leadeurship 2.Roles and Responsabilities / Rôles et responsabilités 3.Instruction and Learning / Enseignement et apprentissage 4.Professional Learning / Perfectionnement professionnel 5.Structures for Collaboration / Structures de collaboration 6.Equity / Équité

INCLUSION 7.Funding and Accountability / Financement et responsabilité 8.Personalized Learning Plans / Plans dintervention individualisés 9.Positive Learning Environment / Milieu propice à lapprentissage 10.High Schools / Écoles secondaires 11.Alternative Education / Éducation alternative 12.Resolving Conflict / Résolution de conflits

Communication Kim Korotkov Learning Specialist Student Services Julie McIntyre Agente pédagogique Direction des services aux élèves

Special Education Plans Changes implemented in September 2010 Sandy Nickerson Learning Specialist, Student Services (Anglophone Sector)

Types of Special Education Plans (SEP-A) Accommodation plan Universal accommodations strategies, technologies or adjustments that enable a student to reach prescribed outcomes and can be used by the teacher / student as needed. Universal accommodations dont necessitate an SEP or prior approval for provincial assessments. (examples :extra time, quiet place, special seating, etc.)

Types of Special Education Plans (SEPS) Justifiable accommodations documented strategies, technologies or adjustments without which the student would not be able to access the curriculum. These accommodations are documented within an SEP and require prior approval to be accessed during provincial assessments.

Types of Special Education Plans (SEP) Examples of Justifiable accommodations: A scribe would be a justified accommodation if the child would not be able to succeed without the accommodation. Extended time would be a justified accommodation if it were more than double the time.

Types of Special Education Plans Modification plan: Some of the grade level curriculum outcomes of a subject area have been changed (or deleted) to address the specific needs of the student. The general intent of the curriculum is maintained but the depth of treatment of the outcomes has been altered or deleted.

Types of Special Education Plan (Modified plan continued) Decisions for modification involve the classroom teacher(s), the resource teacher, the parent/guardian(s), the school-based Student Services Team and the student when possible. Modifications can occur in one or more courses or subjects and are based on the regular curriculum.

Types of Special Education Plan Individualization Requires planning that deviates significantly from the regular curriculum. The student will not be expected to achieve many, if any, of the outcomes of the grade level curriculum. Can involve planning in areas other than educational outcomes (for example, toileting, feeding, dressing, etc).

Address any questions or concerns to; Learning Specialist, Student Services Department of Education & Early Childhood Development Thank You! Contact Information

Plans dintervention (secteur francophone) Plan dintervention – programme détudes prescrits Plan dintervention – programme dadaptation scolaire Communication Jeanne Duquette Agente pédagogique en adaptation scolaire Direction des services aux élèves

Transition des élèves ayant un handicap sensoriel Gisèle Desjardins Enseignante spécialiste en intervention auprès des élèves ayant un handicap sensoriel Communication Jasmine Gallant Agente pédagogique pour les élèves ayant un handicap sensoriel Direction des services aux élèves

TRANSCRIPTS Tammy Strong Learning Specialist, Student Services (Anglophone Sector)

In order to facilitate appropriate placement at PSI, the Department of Education & Early Childhood Development recognises that it is critical that high school transcripts contain accurate: – course codes – course nomenclature – and where appropriate, an indicator for students with a modified Special Education Plan (SEP-M)

Course Code & Course Name For students in courses that are MODIFIED through Special Education Plans (SEPs), the following changes are made to the course code and name: * The standard code for the course is altered by adding the number 9 as the eight digit in the code. (Example – Modern History 113 is but for a student taking a modified version of this course the code would be ) * The standard course name is altered by the addition of an S at the end of the designation. (Example – Canadian History 122 would become Canadian History 122S for a student)

When a student transcript includes 1 or more courses that have an S at the end of the name and a 9 at the end of the code, the Yes checkbox should be selected to indicate that some courses have been modified to meet the needs of the student. In the comment field below the modified flag a school may choose to provide additional information but this is not required.

Accommodations Please note that accommodations are NOT reflected in the course name or code.

Transitioning Students with Diverse Needs – Pilot Project Beginning in the academic year, EECD will partner with Harvey High School (a demonstration school) and other community-based stakeholders to pilot some evidence informed strategies to assist students with diverse needs as they transition from high school to post-secondary education and/or the world of work.

Contact Information Tammy Strong Learning Specialist, Student Services Department of Education & Early Childhood Development (506)