Development of Partnerships:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
April 4, 2012 Indiana Joint National Public Health Week Conference.
Advertisements

Migrant Education Comprehensive Needs Assessment
Thurston County Public Health & Social Services Department Public Health and Social Services Department Assessment Team Meeting.
Engaging Patients and Other Stakeholders in Clinical Research
Le-Edged Sword Risks, Rewards and the Double-Edged Sword: Views of Pharmacogenetic Testing and Research in the Alaska Native/American Indian Community.
Human Exposure Monitoring for PBDE Derivatives Timothy J. Ledbetter, D.Min., BCC Kathy Ertell, MS, CIH November 2009 Human Subjects Working Group 1.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting November 9, 2004 Research Use of Stored Data and Tissues.
FOUNDATIONS OF NURSING RESEARCH Sixth Edition CHAPTER Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Nursing Research,
... for our health Peggy O’Halloran, MPH University of Wisconsin Department of Family Medicine Setting up the Wisconsin Primary Care Clinician Survey Group.
The Nuffield Council on Bioethics Report : The collection, linking and use of data in biomedical research and health care: ethical issues. Martin Richards.
Lisa Denney, MPH HRPP Assistant Director Melanie Mace, MA HRPP Education and Training Coordinator Bill Woods, PhD CAPS Policy and Ethics Core November.
A Participatory Approach to Conducting Case Studies: Walking the Talk in a Study of Tribal Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Programs Carlyn Orians,
Funding was provided through a Community Engagement Supplement to the Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute at Oregon Health & Science University.
ACCELERATING CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
September SAFETY GROUPS PROGRAM SAFETY GROUPS PROGRAM 2008 Element Requirements.
Community Issues And Needs Associated With Microbicides Clinical Trials Presenter: John M. Mutsambi, Community Liaison Officer with University of Zimbabwe.
1 OAR Guidance on -- “Consulting with Indian Tribal Governments” May 21, 2012.
 The IRB application  The Review Process  Summary of Protocol  Appendixes  Informed Consent  Recruiting materials  Research Instruments  Other.
Group Technical Assistance Webinar August 5, CFPHE RESEARCH METHODS FOR COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH.
Community Based Participatory Research: Considerations for IRBs Puneet Chawla Sahota, Ph.D. Post-doctoral Fellow, National Congress of American Indians.
Gonorrhea Control in Region X Seattle, July 20, 2009 Jessica Leston, MPH ANTHC STD Program Clinical and Research Services.
David B. Resnik, JD, PhD, Bioethicist, NIEHS/NIH This research was supported by the intramural program of the NIEHS/NIH. It does not represent the views.
 Successful surveillance includes appropriate partnerships, sampling, IRB authorizations and an effective system for documentation.  Once a surveillance.
Center for Genomics & Healthcare Equality Consent for & Use of Biospecimens Proposed Changes to the Common Rule Wylie.
Cancer 101: A Cancer Education and Training Program for American Indians & Alaska Natives Cancer 101: A Cancer Education and Training Program for American.
HPTN Ethics Guidance for Research: Community Obligations Africa Regional Working Group Meeting, May 19-23, 2003 Lusaka, Zambia.
Contextualizing the Evaluand: Contextual Influences and Constraints on Communicating Findings Kristi Pettibone, PhD The MayaTech Corporation, With CDC’s.
 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.
CSWE Overview This resource highlights key aspects of the mission of the Commission on Research and its goals for the next 5 years. It will then.
SFSP Pre-Qualification Packet Returning Sponsors This institution is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Creative approaches to developing and disseminating culturally appropriate genetics education information to African American communities Valerie Robinson.
DRAFT January 2015 Prepared by: A ndrew C hang & C ompany, LLC CRDP Phase 2 Survey Results DISCLAIMER: This data is representative of the survey respondents.
Alaskan Rural Water and Sanitation Working Group Update Cheryl Rosa, DVM, PhD Deputy Director, United States Arctic Research Commission 3 RD Annual Water.
Patient and Public Involvement: Supporting a future of better research Isabelle Abbey-Vital, Research Involvement Officer.
Los Angeles Regional Food Bank All Agencies Conference 2017
12/26/2017 From Clinical Trial Research to Reality: Recruitment, Retention, and Community-Engaged Research Sherrie Flynt Wallington, PhD Assistant Professor.
Focus Groups A Tool to Enhance CCRs
FIRST NATION LIFELONG LEARNING TABLE
Community Facilitator Introduction to FORGE AHEAD
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Addressing Breast Health Inequalities Among Women with Disabilities
MUHC Innovation Model.
Leigh E. Tenkku, PhD, MPH Department of Family and Community Medicine
CESSATION SERVICES IN AMERICAN INDIAN COMMUNITIES: RECOMMENDATIONS
HCS 451 CART Inspiring Minds/hcs451cart.com
Boston Community Academic Mental Health Partnership
HCS 451 CART Perfect Education/hcs451cart.com
Digital Learning Framework Evaluation Overview
Bringing It All Together: The PCI Framework
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
AAHRPP Accreditation Welcome to the University of Georgia’s presentation for accreditation of the human research protection program (HRPP). This presentation.
Nina Wallerstein, DrPH University of New Mexico Malia Villegas, EdD
Exploring the indigenization of data collection  Daniel Domaguin, LCSW Mentor: Bruce Friedman, PhD, CSWM, LCSW NSWM Annual Management Conference 6/15/2018.
Creating a P.L Plan.
Community Technology Assessments
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
Rail Program Management Services
Informed Consent (SBER)
In Argentina Ana Palmero Legal and Research Ethics Advisor
Ethics in Evaluation Research & IRB
Overview of Process for GSEP Students
Revised Common Rule: Informed Consent Changes
The Center for Nursing Research Ochsner Health System December 2015
Community Scientist Academy
IRB Harmonization 2016 Review
Grant Writing 101.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System
Khayelitsha District Hospital Investigation
Spatial Tools for Arctic Mapping & Planning
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
Presentation transcript:

Development of Partnerships: A Project To Ascertain Alaska Native People’s Views on Specimen Banking Vanessa Hiratsuka, MPH, Jennifer Brown, BA, Theresa Hoeft, PhD, and Denise Dillard, PhD Southcentral Foundation, Research Department, Anchorage, AK PURPOSE METHODS RESULTS SUMMARY To explore the views of biobanking research among Alaska Native community members and leaders across the state of Alaska using a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach. Management of the AASB is provided by the Alaska Area Specimen Bank Working Group (AASBWG). Partnering Organizations Comprising AASBWG Southcentral Foundation Arctic Investigations Program of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium Alaska Area of the Indian Health Service Partnership Process Partnering organizations posed the question of how Alaska Native people view the collection and use of biological samples. Members of the partnering organizations met four times to develop and finalize the research plan. Following pilot testing, 25 THOs were approached through presentations in each location and asked to partner and guide the study within their region. Village based community consultants were hired to assist in focus group recruitment. Fourteen THOs agreed to partner with the research team resulting in 178 individuals participating in 29 focus groups held in 14 locations across Alaska. Atlas.ti software was used to compile the range of views across all participants then between leaders and community members. Partnership Timeline Focus groups revealed two broad categories of participant responses: research process and context. Overall Findings Participants expect researchers to be transparent throughout the research process and to return meaningful results to them. Participants are very interested in how samples are stored and used. Participants confused biological sample collection for research purposes with clinical tests or collection for blood donation or testing for legal purposes. Historical experiences, future implications of research findings, and portrayal of Alaska Native people were mentioned in the discussion groups. Participants considered the relative harms and benefits of research in producing meaningful advances in health for Alaska Native people. Results Dissemination Findings were summarized into newsletter form and presented to partners for comment. Community partnering organizations were contacted to determine their preferred method for results return. Newsletters were sent to all partnering organizations with presentation of findings also occurring in eight locations. Focus group results and policy recommendations on AASB policies and procedures were shared with the members of the AASBWG. Policy Recommendations Consider development of a AASB fact sheet for distribution during the informed consent process. The fact sheet could describe information about the AASB, the process of banking specimens, and participant rights in studies using banked specimens. Consider requiring tiered informed consent on sample use and destruction. Results were shared with research development partners as well as with members of the communities where the data was gathered. Findings may influence the policies of the AASB and provide insight to other biobanks with specimens from Alaska Native people. INTRODUCTION DISCUSSION Biological samples have been used in research studies in Alaska for more than 60 years. Unused portions of research samples and clinical samples from 1948 to present are currently stored in a specimen bank called the Alaska Area Specimen Bank (AASB). Following the Indian Self Determination Act, Alaska Native Tribal Health Organizations (THO) have assumed management of their healthcare system and in 2004, they assumed shared ownership of the AASB. The AASB has advanced the understanding of Alaska Native people's health, however, important ethical and cultural considerations arise with the use of stored Alaska Native (AN) specimens for research. To date, there are no in-depth accounts of AN perspectives, despite a rich history of biobanking research. The research team which consisted of employees of a tribal health organization. Research can be used as a tool to improve health disparities in minority populations however, if researchers do not include with research in their research setting, they may continue to be viewed as untrustworthy and exploitive. These findings may help spur researchers to work more closely with communities to understand concerns and desires for health benefit when developing research projects. For more information Vanessa Hiratsuka, MPH Southcentral Foundation- Research Department Email: vhiratsuka@scf.cc Phone: (907) 729-8627 Website: www.scf.cc/research This project was funded by the Native American Research Centers for Health from the Indian Health Service with support from the National Human Genome Research Institute. 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 AASBWG Formed Research plan developed Proposal submitted to NHGRI Start of funding Protocol undergoes IRB and tribal approval Pilot test Recruit THO partners Focus groups conducted Policy recommendations provided to AASBWG Results dissemination to partnering communities