SRF Operating Experience at JLab

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C. Rossi – L4 Project Meeting 3 March 2011 Status and Plans of 3 MeV Test Stand.
Advertisements

Chris Tennant Jefferson Laboratory March 15, 2013 “Workshop to Explore Physics Opportunities with Intense, Polarized Electron Beams up to 300 MeV”
SRF Cryomodule Assembly Facility Plans Tug Arkan AAC, May 10-12, 2005.
LINACs Michael Bevins May 17, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Injection, Linac, Extraction, & Correctors Preliminary Design and Safety Review.
ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Department of Energy Commissioning and Operation of the Horizontal Test Apparatus at SNS Presented at: CEC/ICMC.
SPX - Cavity WBS U , U , U Genfa Wu SRF Scientist Accelerator Systems Division/RF Group DOE Lehman CD-2 Review of APS-Upgrade.
Superconducting Accelerating Cryo-Module Tests at DESY International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 (ECFA-CLIC-ILC Joint Meeting) Denis Kostin, MHF-SL,
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
Accelerators for ADS March 2014 CERN Approach for a reliable cryogenic system T. Junquera (ACS) *Work supported by the EU, FP7 MAX contract number.
Hurricane Isabel’s impact on JLab Yan Wang August 6, 2012.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Sergey Belomestnykh SRF and RF systems.
Rongli Geng March 4, th LCC ILC Cavity Group Meeting
Machine Protection at the 1MW CEBAF Electron Accelerator and Free Electron Laser Facility Kelly Mahoney Presented at the Workshop for.
Experience with LEP (and LHC) cryo-modules Workshop on cryogenic and vacuum sectorisations of the SPL O.Brunner – November ’09.
Road map of the workshop Machine availability: – “work-horse” in the injection chain – 100% availability not viable,.What is achievable? And at which cost?
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 SPL Cryogenic and vacuum sectorisations 9-10 November, 2009 Joe Preble Workshop on cryogenic and.
Spreaders & Recombiners Beam Transport Michael Bevins May 30, GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Spreader/Recombiner Dipoles and Layout, & Installation.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
TILC Electron Source Update A. Brachmann, J. Sheppard, F. Zhou -SLAC – M. Poelker - Jlab - TILC, Tsukuba, April 2009.
JLab Update Rongli Geng April 30, th LCC ILC Cavity Group Meeting.
JLAB Pressure Systems Considerations Ed Daly. Outline Introduction Federal Law - 10CFR851 Compliance JLAB Pressure Systems Program –Complies with 10CFR851,
CW Cryomodules for Project X Yuriy Orlov, Tom Nicol, and Tom Peterson Cryomodules for Project X, 14 June 2013Page 1.
HISTORY OF SNS DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY CHOICES PROJECT X WORKSHOP NOVEMBER 12-13, 2007 R. KUSTOM.
Integration and Cold Testing of the CW ERL Cryomodule at Daresbury Shrikant Pattalwar ASTeC, STFC, Daresbury Laboratory (UK) On behalf of ERL Cryomodule.
Cryomodule Safety Approvals Jay Theilacker LCLS-II Production Cryomodule Final Design Review May 12-14, 2015.
Evolution of Field Emission Characteristics Selected C100 Cryomodules Michael Drury.
Plasma Cleaning of SRF Cavities Program Status J. Mammosser, S. Ahmed, L. Phillips Jlab S. Popovic, J. Upadhyay, L. Vuskovic, M. Nikolic ODU.
ESS Cryomodule Status Meeting – Introduction | | Christine Darve Introduction to Cryomodules for the ESS 2013 January, 9 th Christine Darve.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Jefferson.
C100 summary of performance degradation - VTA to Cryomodule Ari Deibert Palczewski SRF Scientist July 5, 2016.
Field Emitter Workshop Summary Rong-Li Geng 2016 CEBAF StayTreat June 28-30, 2016.
Science and Technology Briefing Sept
Introduction Six-Month Follow-Up on Action Items of Feb 2016 CEBAF Field Emitter Workshop Rongli Geng September 12, 2016.
CERN – Zanon discussions
Field Emission Minimization for LCLS-II
Requirements for Efficient CW SRF Cryomodules
FRIB Cryogenic Support
CEBAF Accelerator Status
HIE-ISOLDE Report Jose Alberto Rodriguez on behalf of Yacine Kadi and the HIE-ISOLDE project team.
Online Helium Inventory Monitoring of JLab Cryogenic Systems
TTC Topical Workshop - CW SRF, Cornell 12th – 14th June 2013
Overview of LERF Status, Plans and Goals
SNS Operational History
R&D Activity for Field Emission and Vertical EP
Operational Experience - Field Emission
Jiyuan Zhai ( IHEP ) TTC Meeting, JLAB, 6 Nov 2012
SNS Fundamental Power Coupler History
Regular cryomodule maintenance plans (radiation damage, seals, etc)
Accelerator status after the 12 GeV upgrade
Operation experience of cryogenic system and cryomodules for the superconducting linear accelerator at IUAC, New Delhi. T S Datta ( On behalf of Cryogenics.
Cost Optimization Models for SRF Linacs
C75 Risk Assessment Geoff Krafft
Mathew C. Wright January 26, 2009
IHEP Cryomodule Status
Thoughts on Energy Reach
Update on Dark current generation in ILC Main Linac
C75 Commissioning Michael Drury SRF Operations Support
Strategy for operation and recovery of performance at SNS -Background -History of performance -What is our operational strategy -Performance recovery.
Performance Recovery at CEBAF
SNS PPU Cryomodule Instrumentation
Cryomodules Challenges for PERLE
Outline: Recent CEBAF performance JLAB-TN-022 Energy Reach Plan
CTF Users’ Perspective
Cryomodule Test Schedule
ERL Director’s Review Main Linac
Field Emission and Mitigation in the CEBAF Linacs R Legg, R Geng Jlab SRF Ops Dept. TTC,
Magnetic Field Sensors and Measurements in Cryomodules
Comparison between 4K and 2K operation performance of CEBAF injector cryomodules Grigory Eremeev Monday, August 19, 2019.
Summary of the maximum SCRF voltage in XFEL
SNS PPU Cryomodule Design Overview
Presentation transcript:

SRF Operating Experience at JLab Andrew Hutton

Topics to Consider Operating gradient compared to peak gradient Protecting the cryomodule against catastrophic failure Protecting the cryomodule performance against long-term degradation Optimum operating conditions (temperature, vibration, magnetic fields, etc.) Probability of replacing cryomodules

CEBAF Overall Operating Experience >7 cryomodule-centuries operating experience at cryogenic temperature 4 cryomodule-centuries under power >56 cavity-centuries (>30 cavity-centuries under power) Initial performance of all cavities was improved by Helium processing Total failures 3 cryomodules (damaged during warm-up) 2 cryomodules with severely degraded performance All five were early production cryomodules 6 cavities (mostly stuck tuners) Cavity degradation 65 MV/year/CEBAF (due to new electron emission sites)

Probability of replacing cryomodules 11 cryomodules have already been removed from CEBAF for refurbishment Probability of replacement is 11 in 7 cryomodule-centuries 1 – 1.5 replacement per cryomodule-century CEBAF refurbishment plan called for 2 cryomodules per year with 42¼ operating cryomodules 5 replacements per cryomodule-century Required to catch up

Cavity Degradation Courtesy of Jay Benesch From January 1995 through February 2003, there were 64 instances of spontaneous onset or change in cavity field emission This corresponds to 8 per year in CEBAF 2.4 events per cavity-century Since 2003 (post Isabel), rate has climbed to 13 per year 4 events per cavity-century Drop in usable gradient averaging 1.4 ± 0.8 MV/m 0.7 MV per pass, 3.5 MV top energy (5 pass) Leads to loss of ~ 45 MV/year top energy We add 50% safety margin for predictions – 65 MV/yr

Example of “Event” Courtesy of Jay Benesch Cavity 2L145 Red circles are before 04:40 on 9/21/2004; Blue squares are after At 8.1 MV/m, interval changed from ~80,000 seconds to ~500 seconds

Summary 5 cryomodule-centuries of operating experience at CEBAF 1 – 1.5 cryomodule failure per cryomodule-century Failures exposed design flaws Did not appear for ~7 years (3 cryomodule-centuries) New designs will avoid these problems But will have different problems Gradient degradation of ~1% per year from new field emission sites Strongly recommend regular refurbishment program 1-2 refurbishments per cryomodule-century

Halo CEBAF has excellent control of Halo Hall B profile is Gaussian for ~5 orders of magnitude But an FEL has even more stringent requirements

DarkLight Experiment on FEL Beam Established low beam loss in transmission of CW high power sub-100 micron beam at 100 MeV, 60 pC, 75 MHz Independently controlled betatron match of primary beam and halo. Measured beam interception as low as 3.2 PPM in <2 mm x 40 mm long aperture while running 450 kW of beam power Target Chamber Tube block Stepper motor DarkLight Collaboration

Tour New SRF Facilities: Refurbished Test Lab Vertical Test Area (VTA), Cryomodule Test Facility (CMTF) Test Lab Addition (TLA) Cavity fabrication, cavity processing, R&D facilities, cryomodule assembly CEBAF Tunnel with new C100 modules installed New CHL2 FEL

Backup Slides

CEBAF Catastrophic Failures (1) In September 18, 2003 Hurricane Isabel caused 4-day power outage Two cryomodules damaged by uncontrolled warm-up Loss of insulating vacuum caused thermal gradients which flexed internal Indium beamline vacuum joints, causing Helium leaks into the cavities Affected early production cryomodules Our (partial) solution is to provide emergency generator power for vacuum pumps and controls Insufficient emergency power to keep Central Helium Liquefier operational (start-up takes even more power)

CEBAF Catastrophic Failures (2) In January 2005, a module failed during removal of adjacent cryomodule for refurbishment Cryomodule was taken to ambient temperature because beamline vacuum valve leaked allowing back-filling with air Indium beamline vacuum joints leaked after cool down Cryomodule ambient temperature cycle procedure was modified to reduce possibility of thermal transients Cryomodules were probably already weakened by flexing during Hurricane Isabel Cryomodules with slow Helium leaks into the beamline suffer performance degradation over ~ 1 month Can be recovered by thermal cycle to ~25K