Performance Indicators

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reasons for Monitoring and Evaluation at the Project Level
Advertisements

Performance management guidance
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
Good Evaluation Planning – and why this matters Presentation by Elliot Stern to Evaluation Network Meeting January 16 th 2015.
Objectives and Indicators for MCH Programs MCH in Developing Countries January 25, 2011.
A Human Rights-Based Approach to Monitoring Session 6 (cont.)
Purpose of the Standards
Indicator Baseline Target Milestones PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS.
How to Develop a Project Evaluation Plan Pat Gonzalez Office of Special Education Programs
Performance Measurement and Analysis for Health Organizations
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
The National Development Plan, Iraq 6 July 2010 “Developing Objectives & Indicators for Strategic Planning” Khaled Ehsan and Helen Olafsdottir UNDP Iraq.
8 TH -11 TH NOVEMBER, 2010 UN Complex, Nairobi, Kenya MEETING OUTCOMES David Smith, Manager PEI Africa.
UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.
M&E Basics Miguel Aragon Lopez, MD, MPH. UNAIDS M&E Senior Adviser 12 th May 2009.
Monitoring & Evaluation Presentation for Technical Assistance Unit, National Treasury 19 August 2004 Fia van Rensburg.
MAINSTREAMING MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Can education be effectively managed without an M & E system in place?
UK Aid Direct Introduction to Logframes (only required at proposal stage)
Project Management Learning Program 7-18 May 2012, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Writing Project Report Multi-Purpose Reporting.
Screen 1 of 22 Food Security Policies – Formulation and Implementation Policy Monitoring and Evaluation LEARNING OBJECTIVES Define the purpose of a monitoring.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Impact Measurement why what how Atlanta. Today Imperatives Questions Why Now? Significant Challenges Breakthroughs in the field CARE’s Long-Term.
Application of Human Rights Principles in Results Based Management Muhammad Usman Akram, Evaluation Advisor Adapted from RBM training held for UNDP BRC.
OED Perspective on ICR Quality Soniya Carvalho, OED Quality At Entry Course on SFs/CDD April 13, 2005 * Contributions from OED’s ICR Review Panel members.
IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Monitoring and Evaluating Results.
Module 9 Monitoring and Evaluation Tuesday, Oct 14, 2013 Ngo Thi Loan and John Carter.
Development of Gender Sensitive M&E: Tools and Strategies.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
Cindy Tumbarello, RN, MSN, DHA September 22, 2011.
SUB-MODULE 4. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2)
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Community Score Card as a social accountability Approach Methodology and Applications March 2015.
Achieving Sustainable Development with Low Carbon Action Asia Pacific Carbon Forum Rakshya Thapa Regional Technical Specialist, UNDP Global Environment.
What is Advocacy? ]thepressuregroup[.
Maintenance BC - NZTA assessment in TIO
Country Level Programs
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Scrutiny of RIAs Problem Definition and Objectives
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
M&E Basics Miguel Aragon Lopez, MD, MPH
Session 1 – Study Objectives
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
ROLE AND MANDATE In terms of the National Development Agency (NDA) Act (Act No 108 of 1998 as amended), NDA was mandated to contribute towards the eradication.
Creating Priority Objectives
Technical Cooperation Section SEDI- Executive Office
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
Tracking development results at the EIB
05 April 2016 Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on review of the draft APP - Department of Arts and Culture.
World Vision Partnership Approach to Building Evidence
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
16 May 2018 Briefing to the Portfolio Committee of the Department of Sport and Recreation portfolio on the review of the draft APP.
Monitoring & Evaluation
UNDP-UNEP POVERTY & ENVIRONMENT INITIATIVE (PEI): MID-TERM REVIEW
Results of the Organizational Performance
Accountability Issues in Proposal Writing
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
WHAT is evaluation and WHY is it important?
Good practice in preparing an application
United Nations Voluntary Fund on Disability (UNVFD)
Developing a shelter strategy
Furthering the Field GROWING THE MOVEMENT
Performance and Quality Improvement
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
Assessing the Relevance of Global and Regional Partnership Programs (GRPPs) Chris Gerrard Global Programs Coordinator, IEG November 13,
Monitoring and Evaluation in Communication Management
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
Data for PRS Monitoring: Institutional and Technical Challenges
M & E Plans and Frameworks
Presentation transcript:

Performance Indicators Cambodia’s National Mine Action Strategy Clearing for Results III (2016-19)

What is a Performance Indicator? ‘Indicators are signposts of change along the path to development. They describe the way to track intended results and are critical for monitoring and evaluation.’ UNDP PME Handbook 2009

Why have Performance Indicators?

Performance Indicator Purpose Performance Quality Reporting Planning

Performance Indicator Purpose Measure progress and achievements, as understood by the different stakeholders Measure extent to which planned results have been achieved Clarify consistency between activities, outputs, outcomes and impacts

Performance Indicator Purpose Measure progress and achievements, as understood by the different stakeholders Measure extent to which planned results have been achieved Clarify consistency between activities, outputs, outcomes and impacts Quality Inform decision making for ongoing programme or project management Continual improvement for a strategy, programme, project or activity redesign Prompt corrective action; Timely risk management Assess project and staff performance

Performance Indicator Purpose Measure progress and achievements, as understood by the different stakeholders Measure extent to which planned results have been achieved Clarify consistency between activities, outputs, outcomes and impacts Quality Inform decision making for ongoing programme or project management Continual improvement for a strategy, programme, project or activity redesign Prompt corrective action; Timely risk management Assess project and staff performance Reporting Ensure legitimacy and accountability to all stakeholders by demonstrating progress: eg Reporting to Stakeholders: RCG, CMAA Executive, donors, beneficiaries

Performance Indicator Purpose Measure progress and achievements, as understood by the different stakeholders Measure extent to which planned results have been achieved Clarify consistency between activities, outputs, outcomes and impacts Quality Inform decision making for ongoing programme or project management Continual improvement for a strategy, programme, project or activity redesign Prompt corrective action; Timely risk management Assess project and staff performance Reporting Ensure legitimacy and accountability to all stakeholders by demonstrating progress: eg Reporting to Stakeholders: RCG, CMAA Executive, donors, beneficiaries Planning Better project designs and implementation in future Approach and achievements Enhanced institutional, individual learning ensuring better planning and design

Stakeholders Who is interested in Performance Indicators? CMAA – management and staff, technical groups Demining partners ….. Broader Government ….. Beneficiaries, Communities and Regional bodies Donors ….

Timing Through all phases of a strategy, programme, project, activity. planning and design stage. implementation monitoring, review, evaluation post activity

P e r f o r m a n c e I n d i c a t o r s Process Goal Objective Impact Outputs Outcomes Inputs Pis Impact on all aspects of a strategy. How will we know if goal/objectives r being met; impact is being achieved P e r f o r m a n c e I n d i c a t o r s

Indicative Strategic Goals Goal 1: To release all known mined and cluster munitions contaminated areas by 2025 Goal 2: To minimise mine/ERW causalities and improve victims’ livelihoods Goal 3: To contribute to economic growth and poverty reduction Goal 4: To ensure sustainable national capacities to address residual mine/ERW contamination Goal 5: To promote stability and regional and international disarma

Indicative Strategy Goals Goal 1: To release all known mined and cluster munitions contaminated areas by 2025 + Complete baseline survey throughout the country by 2017. + Release known mined areas from the most impacted communities by 2020. + Release remaining known mined areas by 2025. + Use evidence-based survey to define and release known cluster munition contaminated areas by 2025. Goal 2: To minimise mine/ERW causalities and improve victims’ livelihoods + Provide effective & appropriately prioritized mine/ERW risk education + Support mine/ERW survivors &their families to receive adequate medical care, physical rehabilitation & livelihood assistance + Address public safety issues by removing residual threats requested by the communities and authorities. Goal 3: To contribute to economic growth and poverty reduction + Support local development priorities in communities affected by mines/ERW. + Support national & sub-national development priorities.

SMART Indicators Specific Measurable Attainable Relevant Time Bound

SMART Indicators Specific: enough to measure progress Articulated in clearly understood text without ambiguity Measurable: a clear & reliable measure of results (not always) Attainable: Must be realistic Relevant: ie to outputs and outcomes, impact Time Bound: At reasonable cost and effort (Useful, not overly complicated, must serve a purpose)

SMART Indicators Specific: enough to measure progress Articulated in clearly understood text without ambiguity Measurable: a clear & reliable measure of results (not always) Attainable: Must be realistic Relevant: ie to outputs and outcomes, impact Time Bound: At reasonable cost and effort (Useful, not overly complicated, must serve a purpose)

SMART Indicators Specific: enough to measure progress Articulated in clearly understood text without ambiguity Measurable: a clear & reliable measure of results (not always) Attainable: Must be realistic Relevant: ie to outputs and outcomes, impact Time Bound: At reasonable cost and effort (Useful, not overly complicated, must serve a purpose)

SMART Indicators Specific: enough to measure progress Articulated in clearly understood text without ambiguity Measurable: a clear & reliable measure of results (not always) Attainable: Must be realistic Relevant: ie to outputs and outcomes, impact Time Bound: At reasonable cost and effort (Useful, not overly complicated, must serve a purpose)

SMART Indicators Specific: enough to measure progress Articulated in clearly understood text without ambiguity Measurable: a clear & reliable measure of results (not always) Attainable: Must be realistic Relevant: ie to outputs and outcomes, impact Time Bound: At reasonable cost and effort (Useful, not overly complicated, must serve a purpose)

Types of indicators We can use: Intuitive indicators Impact Indicators Output Indicators Outcome Indicators

Types of indicators We can use: Intuitive indicators: Progress we are unable to measure, but we can see benefits. Impact Indicators: Output Indicators Outcome Indicators

Types of indicators We can use: Intuitive indicators: Progress we are unable to measure, but we can see benefits. Impact Indicators: The changes in peoples lives or development opportunities. Indicators of change in development conditions or opportunities. Eg people are not so poor because they are producing more food Output Indicators Outcome Indicators

Types of indicators We can use: Intuitive indicators: Progress we are unable to measure, but we can see benefits. Impact Indicators: The changes in peoples lives or development opportunities. Indicators of change in development conditions or opportunities. Eg people are not so poor because they are producing more food Output Indicators Assesses Quantified progress against specific outputs. Sq Km, no. of accidents Outcome Indicators

Types of indicators We can use: Intuitive indicators: Progress we are unable to measure, but we can see benefits. Impact Indicators: The changes in peoples lives or development opportunities. Indicators of change in development conditions or opportunities. Eg people are not so poor because they are producing more food Output Indicators Assesses Quantified progress against specific outputs. Sq Km, no. of accidents Outcome Indicators Assesses Quantified progress against specific outcomes. More productive land (sq Km), fewer accidents

Types of data used in the Indicators Quantitative and Qualitative indicators Number, percentage, rate (eg x per 1,000), Ratio (eg No. of hill tribes/women/youth/casualties per No. of X Percentage), proportion annual growth, extent to which overall conclusion, based on records, reports, surveys Qualitative: judgement, opinions, perceptions, attitudes, sense of well being Compliance with, eg mine awareness education mRE, quality of, extent of, level of Proxy: Less direct. Eg a sample client survey. Greater satisfaction may show improved services

Types of Data used in the Indicators Quantitative and Qualitative indicators Number, percentage, rate (eg x per 1,000), Ratio (eg No. of hill tribes/women/youth/casualties per No. of X Percentage), proportion annual growth, extent to which overall conclusion, based on records, reports, surveys Qualitative: judgement, opinions, perceptions, attitudes, sense of well being Compliance with, eg mine awareness education mRE, quality of, extent of, level of Proxy: Less direct. Eg a sample client survey. Greater satisfaction may show improved services

Types of Data used in the Indicators Quantitative and Qualitative indicators Number, percentage, rate (eg x per 1,000), Ratio (eg No. of hill tribes/women/youth/casualties per No. of X Percentage), proportion annual growth, extent to which overall conclusion, based on records, reports, surveys Qualitative: judgement, opinions, perceptions, attitudes, sense of well being Compliance with (mine awareness mRE, quality of, extent of, level of Proxy: Less direct. Eg a sample client survey. Greater satisfaction may show improved services

Performance Indicator Goals Objectives Activities Impact Impact Performance Indicator Proxy Intuitive Qualitative Outcome Quantitative Output

Outcome indicators at strategic level Sample Outcomes Sample Indicators (What can we see , measure, deduce, observe to know if change is being achieved) Released land in most seriously impacted communities available for agriculture. Proxy/survey: Representative sample areas recorded as under cultivation Quantifiable: x sq Km measured: dbase reporting indicates x sq km area cleared/released Qualitative: Sharp reduction of injuries attributed to effectiveness of MRE messages

Thank You Questions?