Research ethics Rachel H. Ellaway

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

A Process of Quality Improvement: Informed Participation and Institutional Process SACHRP March 27, 2008 Nancy Neveloff Dubler Director Center for Ethics.
University Research Ethics Committee Workshop on procedure and data protection issues 30th May 2008.
Tri-Council Policy Statement 2010 Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.
The Institutional Review Board. What is an IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Fundamentals of IRB Review. Regulatory Role of the IRB Authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research.
HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS. TRI-COUNCIL POLICY The University has adopted the Tri-Council Policy Statement on the Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.
Ethical Guidelines for Research with Human Participants
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
Ethics in Research The Ethical Standards of the American Psychological Association (2002 Ethics code, to be effective June 1,
Human Subjects Research Dr. John S. Irvine Chairperson, NMSU Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects Research
Ethics in Research Stangor Chapter 3.
Fair participant selection Dr Enoka Corea. Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria Where the study will be conducted How the participants will be recruited.
ETHICAL RESEARCH © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Research Methods for the Social Sciences: Ethics Ryan J. Martin, Ph.D. Thomas N. Cummings Research Fellow March 9, 2010.
Ethical Issues in Research
Human Subject Research by Students at William Paterson University May 2011.
METHODS IN BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH NINTH EDITION PAUL C. COZBY Copyright © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
Research Ethics PPAL February, 2012.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Is Your Research Ethical? The application of Research Ethics Guidelines to Regional Health Authority Research Dr Alan Katz Need to Know: June 9, 2003.
“What’s Ethics Got To Do With It” Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Gary Kent Head Governance Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
University of North Carolina at Greensboro Protecting Research Participants.
Chapter 18 Ethical Precautions in Music Therapy Research.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) What is our Purpose and Role for Ethical Research.
Human Subjects Protections Research Ethics. Basic Assumptions about How Research Should be Conducted Subjects should be protected from harm. Subjects.
Tri-Council Guidelines.  Between 1932 and 1972, 412 men with untreated syphilis compared with 204 disease-free men to study the natural course of the.
Introducing Communication Research 2e © 2014 SAGE Publications Chapter Three Ethics: What Are My Responsibilities as a Researcher?
Introducing Communication Research 2e © 2014 SAGE Publications Chapter Three Ethics: What Are My Responsibilities as a Researcher?
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) School of Professional Studies April 18, 2013
$100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 Terms Clinical Trial Facts.
APPROVAL CRITERIA AN IRB INFOSHORT MAY CFR CRITERIA FOR IRB APPROVAL OF RESEARCH In order for an IRB to approve a research study, all.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
Cultural Competence Considerations [and other alliterations] in International Research IRB 2 Continuing Education March 10, 2015.
Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Understanding the Ethics of Research.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
Research Ethics PPAL February, 2011 Part 2.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin A McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Research Ethics Dr Nichola Seare Aston Health Research & Innovation Cluster.
CULTURALLY AND LINGUISTICALLY APPROPRIATE SERVICES (CLAS)
Ethical Issues in Public Health and Health Services
Susan Sonne, PharmD, BCPP Chair, MUSC IRB II
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
Class 9 Jeff Driskell, MSW, PhD
IRB BASICS Ethics and Human Subject Protections Summer 2016
Patricia M. Alt, Ph.D. Dept. of Health Science Towson University
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
Getting to know your… R E B ESEARCH THICS OARD.
Baruch College HRPP Office
Tri-Council Policy Statement 2010
Chapter 1: A Code of Ethics for Psychology: How Did We Get Here?
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
© 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Human Subjects and Ethics Review
IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections
Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)
Ethics Review Morals: Rules that define what is right and wrong Ethics: process of examining moral standards and looking at how we should interpret and.
Human Participants Research
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

Research ethics Rachel H. Ellaway Scholarship in Health Education Research and Innovation (SHERI) course Rachel H. Ellaway Community Health Sciences Office of Health and Medical Education Scholarship

Responsible inquiry Lots of aspects of research have oversight Animals Biohazardous substances Human subjects In medical education human ethics review is by far the most common What is it and how does it work?

Principles of research involving human subjects Respect for Persons Respect autonomy - free, informed and ongoing consent Protect those with developing/impaired/diminished autonomy Concern for Welfare Impact on individual’s physical, mental and spiritual health, and physical, economic and social circumstances Justice Fairness - treating all people with equal respect & concern Equity – distribute benefits + burdens of resch participation

Tri-Council Policy Statement (TCPS) Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans TCPS2 2014 the current version www.pre.ethics.gc.ca Policy + tutorial – complete this to get your TCPS2 certificate

TCPS2 topics Consent process Fairness and equity in research participation Privacy and confidentiality Conflicts of interest Multi-jurisdictional research Research involving indigenous peoples Qualitative research

Consent process When and how to do it When not to do it Informed what the research involves what risks are associated with participation Free to decline or withdraw at any time without penalty When not to do it Sometimes consent is not practical Subjects need to be unaware they are being observed Scale of study or access to subjects means consent is not practical

Fairness and equity Appropriate inclusion and inappropriate exclusion Do not exclude on the basis of culture, language, religion, race, disability, sexual orientation, ethnicity, linguistic proficiency, gender or age, unless there is a valid reason for the exclusion

Privacy and confidentiality Privacy – the right to be free from intrusion or interference and the right to control information about oneself … by consenting to, or withholding consent for, the collection, use and/or disclosure of information Confidentiality – protection of information from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, modification, loss or theft Security – protecting information by adopting and enforcing appropriate security measures Identifiable Information – the more identifiable the greater risk. Only collect what is needed and anonymize and aggregate as much as possible Secondary Use of Identifiable Information for Research Purposes - needs to be vetted and only if no harm, impractical to gain consent, and compliance with known preferences

REBs and IRBs Research Ethics Board Aka institutional review board (IRB), independent ethics committee (IEC), or ethical review board (ERB) Responsible for maintaining research ethics standards, primarily through reviewing research proposals and monitoring research initiatives University of Calgary has 2 REBs: Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board (CHREB) Kinesiology, Medicine, Nursing Conjoint Faculties Research Ethics Board (CFREB) – for everyone else

Does my study need REB review? ‘Yes’ for research, ‘maybe’ for program evaluation and audit ARECCI offers training, tools, and support to assist project leads and organizations in assessing and mitigating ethical risks http://www.aihealthsolutions.ca/initiatives-partnerships/arecci-a-project-ethics-community-consensus-initiative/tools-and-resources/

Submitting for REB review IRISS: Institutional Research Information Services Solution - www.ucalgary.ca/iriss You need to be registered Includes templates and guides Create a new application and fill in the forms: Study Staff, Funding, Location Study Summary Risks and Benefits Assessments Participant Information, Recruitment, and Informed Consent Research Methods and Procedures Data Privacy and Confidentiality Documentation

Responding to ethics review Administrative review – complete application Ethics review – outcomes: Approval Amend (most common) iterate until approval Make all suggested changes and provide explanations unless impractical or undermine study principles or design Reject (rare) Approved through IRISS

Responsibilities Follow the approved study design Ensure all those working on the project are aware of the ethics and of research ethics in general – TCPS2 tutorial Complete within allotted time Submit changes to study design for approval Report any significant problems or issues Final report on execution of the study Model robust ethical principles throughout

Summary Responsible inquiry Principles of research involving human subjects Tri-Council Policy Statement (TCPS) Consent process Fairness and equity in research participation Privacy and confidentiality Research Ethics Board – CHREB and CFREB Ethics review - IRISS Responsibilities