JD Salinas Middle School

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inquiry Team Eydie Wilson, Ph.D. Math Coach November 3, 2009.
Advertisements

Dudley-Charlton Regional School District 2009 MCAS Information October 2009.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
1 Joe Serna, Jr. Charter School Annual Report Lodi Unified School District Board of Education November 16, 2010 Michael Gillespie, Principal.
Executive Summary  Did not meet API/AYP goals in language arts for the school or significant subgroups.  Did not meet API/AYP goals in math for the school.
October 9 th, 2013 Curriculum Presentation: State Assessments Grades 3-8.
2012 SSTAGE RTI STAR Award Teasley Middle School Cherokee County Amy Graham, Donna Bertram, Judy Withey Assistant Principal, RTI Coach, Academic Coach.
Universal Screening: Answers to District Leaders Questions Are you uncertain about the practical matters of Response to Intervention?
Manson School District Elementary: How did we do last year? SMART Goals Reading – 78% of students met the targeted SMART goal Math – 89% of.
1 Standards, Curriculum, and Research Mathematically Connected Communities (MC 2 ) Adapted from a PowerPoint by Barbara A. Austin, Ph.D.
Pam Stewart, Commissioner SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN [ DRAFT ] Memorial Elementary School 851 E HICKORY ST Arcadia, FL
Faulk Middle School Campus Planning Presentation Presented by: Sulia Garza Evangelina Guillen Jessica LastraSantos Recio Linda N. Rodriguez.
Will your students be college ready? Carolyn Mendiola 1.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
Principal’s Forecast Tangipahoa Parish School System Leadership Focus Strategy June 2015 Gary T. Porter.
San José Unified School District Principal’s Coffee: Booksin Elementary SBAC Results September 11,
1 Student Assessment Report One Goal: Support Student Success West Hempstead UFSD Board of Education Presentation August 20, 2013.
Campus Based Istation Implementation Principal Presentation Presenters: Rosa E. Hernandez Burbank Middle School Clayton Crook, Cullen Middle School.
THE KEY TO CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP The key to predictable results in improving student achievement requires connecting curriculum, assessment and instruction.
1 Standards, Curriculum, and Research Mathematically Connected Communities (MC 2 ) Adapted from a PowerPoint by Barbara A. Austin, Ph.D.
A. E. Joe Elementary School School Improvement Plan (SIP)
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Leadership Team July 24, Learning Targets 1. Familiarize and use The Framework of Teaching in the areas of engagement and questioning to observe.
Lake Street Elementary School A Connected and Caring Learning Community Lake Street CONNECTS for the SUCCESS of ALL Learners!
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
Comprehensive K-12 Mathematics Improvement Plan Update May 9, 2013.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
“ Let us not be content to wait and see what will happen, but give us the determination to make the right things happen”- Horace Mann 2014 MCAS Overview.
Swampscott Elementary Schools MCAS Results Grade 3 ELA Performance Level Above Proficient Proficient Needs Improvement
1. Elementary School Parents Pre-K Teachers Students Community Birth Explicit and Systematic Alignment of Curriculum and Instruction Leadership High School.
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
Northwest ISD Vision Statement: The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready:  Ready for college  Ready for the.
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
Policy Recommendation Best Practices in Reading Achievement to Address Reading Failure Roxanne Boyd Walden University.
Edgewood ISD   School District Effectiveness  Statutory Requirements  Valid Indicators of Performance  Maximum Inclusion  Individual.
Policy IG Curriculum Development, Adoption, and Review …[D]esign a curriculum to carry out the instructional goals of the district. The curriculum will.
Pease Elementary Improvement Plan
What is AYP? AYP stands for Adequate Yearly Progress
Millbrae Elementary School District
McBean Elementary School BOY Data
North Ridge Elementary
CIP: Key Action # 1: Develop and implement systems to achieve academic growth goals for all students.    Objectives/Indicators of Success: Common Assessments.
David Q. Moreno, CTE Director
Bilingual/ESL Education Department
By: Alice Tackett and Jill Maynard
Huntsville City Schools
Monitoring of the Secondary Literacy Plan
Third Annual Summit on Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment
K-6 Benchmark Assessment Inservices
PLCs and the high performing, High Poverty school
Advancing ELL Progress
Utilizing Data to Facilitate Academic Growth in Middle School
Instructional Coaches District BE/ESL Department
Roswell North Elementary School
Retention: Review and Next Steps
Mountain Park Elementary School
Education Services October 3, 2017.
Goal Progress Measure 1.1 Update September 26, 2017 Academics Division
Brooks Elementary School SUCCESS AND NOTHING LESS!
Primary Literacy Accomplishments:
Mountain Park Elementary School
New Prospect Elementary School
Instructional Coaches District BE/ESL Department
Presented to the Springfield School Board of Directors June 17, 2019
Mayra Perez, Ed. D. October 10, 2016
Roswell North Elementary School
Mountain Park Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

JD Salinas Middle School Texas Accountability Intervention System Plan October 14, 2013

CLT Members Math- JL Perez ELA- Vanessa Rodriguez History- Beatrice Gonzalez Principal- L. Mendiola

JD SALINAS STAAR DATA

Feeder Elementary Schools

Comparison Chart Feeder Schools JD Salinas Ma RE Wr SS Sc ELL 69 65 70 48 Reg 75 67 76 Sp E 66 All 62 Span 538/82 63 MA RE WR SS SC ELL 53 27 22 31 28 Reg 88 79 75 83 Sp E 73 56 38 46 All 76 62 58 63 ELL 320

Problem Statements Based on the 2013 Index Student Achievement Table, ELL population is 50% lower than our non-ELL population in reading. 289 students out of 806, are at the urgent intervention category in STAR Reading.

Needs Assessment Teachers not knowing students specific needs and how and when to address those needs Teachers not knowing how to use our resources that target student needs Implement with Fidelity Work out a schedule to utilize resources that target the specific needs Monitoring effectiveness of resources used

Annual Goals for 2013-2014 ELL students will meet the 50% safeguard performance goals in the area of reading All teachers will be able to access and utilize all resources effectively Teachers will implement resources with consistency and fidelity Placement of students in appropriate programs to meet their needs Generating reports on utilized programs on a consistent, timely basis

Need 1: Teachers not knowing students specific needs and how and when to address those needs Interventions: Q2 Q3 Q4 Identify areas of need based on TELPAS composite score Increase learning time. (after school tutoring) Continuation of Q2 and Q3 interventions Identify weaknesses based on STAR reading Continuation Q2 interventions Utilize AR reading lessons to target needs Provide guided practice assignments Monitored Interventions: Progress monitoring using STAR reading Six Weeks curriculum based assessment District benchmarks reports Progress monitoring using STAR reading Six Weeks Exams Middle of the year (MOY) reports STAAR results for ELL population End of the year (EOY) results TELPAS reports

Need 2: Teachers not knowing how to use our resources that target student needs Interventions: Q2 Q3 Q4 More staff development on AR reading to learn how to access lesson plans and assignments Sharing of best practices by department/ grade level Departmentalized SIOP trainings SIOP trainings Technology training technology training Training on additional resources Monitored Interventions: Administrative walkthroughs Certificates for professional development Sign in’s

Need 3: Implement with Fidelity Interventions: Q2, Q3, Q4 Reading Renaissance Read 180, Systems 44 Winnings, Language Power, Writing Coach Successful Reader Monitored Interventions: Review of program reports Review of Curriculum bases assessment Administrative Walk-throughs Lesson plan review Q4 Monitored Interventions: STAAR results for ELL population TELPAS results End of the Year (EOY) reports

Need 4: Work out a schedule to utilize resources that target the specific needs Interventions: Q2 Q3 Q4 EMT Rescheduling based on performance 1st Period Reading Elective Class Continuation of Q2 Continuation of Q2 & Q3 Early Bird using I-Station Tutorials Scheduling based on student needs Monitored Interventions: DMAC Reports Curriculum Based Assessment data I-Station reports AR reports STAAR Results TELPAS Scores

Need 5: Monitoring effectiveness of resources used Q2, Q3, Q4 Interventions: AR lessons targeting area of weaknesses Progress monitoring bi-weekly EMT guidelines AR lessons for 1st period Reading elective Monitored Interventions: Campus monitoring bi-weekly District monitoring bi-weekly

Curriculum Based Assessments (8%) Quarterly Goals Curriculum Based Assessments (8%) STAR Reading (12%) Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 24% 33% 42% 50% Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2.9 GE 3.26 GE 3.65 GE 4.1 GE