Administration, Finances, and Resources

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Advertisements

Campus Improvement Plans
A specialized accrediting agency for English language programs and institutions Accreditation Presentation ABLA conference 2012.
Does Your School Really Know What You Do?: Classification and Compensation of Campus NMC Staff David Herrington, Princeton University Andrew Bonamici,
HELPFUL TIPS FOR UNIT PLANNING Office of Institutional Effectiveness.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
21 st Century Maricopa Review of Process Human Resources Projects Steering Team Meeting May 12, 2010.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Association for Biblical Higher Education February 13, 2013 Lori Jo Stanfield Evaluator Team Training for Business Officers.
NCATE Standard 6 Governance and Resources: Debunking the Myths AACTE/NCATE Workshop Arlington, VA April 2008 Linda Bradley James Madison University
Roles and Responsibilities Of the library trustee NJLTA New Jersey Library Association.
Outcome Based Evaluation for Digital Library Projects and Services
Designated County Partner Grassroots Grant Application.
SBCC CONSULTATIVE PLANNING PROCESS. The Consultative Planning Process A holistic planning process has not been undertaken at Santa Barbara City College.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Adult Education and Literacy Budget Development and Cost Allocation.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
ASA Board Membership Board Members: (vote) Four Paraguayan Citizens Four U.S. Citizens One Third-country National Ex-Officio Members: (voice but no vote)
Some examples of quality standards and their use for self assessment and planning CINDA Workshop for TEIs Ramallah, May 2007.
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
Standard Five - Library and Information Resources Committee Members Chris Brown, College of Education, Co-Chair Scott Smith, University Libraries, Co-Chair.
By Monica Y. Peters, Ph.D. Coordinator of Institutional Effectiveness/QEP Office of Quality Enhancement.
Bethune Middle School Technology Plan Presented by: William Carter E7801-Instructional Technology Planning and Management Dr. Regina Merriwether.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
Reviewer Training Welcome & Introductions Co-Chairs.
Taking Stock 2004 University of Hawaii - Windward Community College Presented by Chancellor Angela Meixell March 10, 2004.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Administer financial aid programs: –Aid availability. –Review qualifications. –Equitable distribution. –Requirements for future years. Application processing:
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #4: RESOURCES & SUPPORT SYSTEMS
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Institutional Effectiveness: Administrative and Educational Support Assessment Units A Practical Handbook Incorporating TracDat Terminology.
Discussion on Compensation. Goal To assist in securing and retaining a staff of necessary quality to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization.
FY 16 BUDGET PRESENTATION PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT. PRIORITIES FOR FY 16 Continue to assist departments to recruit and retain high performance employees who.
ACUI TRAINING Core Competency Module. Purpose Overview of the 11 core competencies Introduction to the resources offered by ACUI regarding the core competencies.
Academic Program Viability Report February 2010 Florida Association of Institutional Research 2010 Annual Conference.
Program Review Presentation March 17th, 2016
Building Your Personnel Action Dossier
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
Understanding and Applying the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey
Functional Area Assessment
Standard I Systematic Planning.
Standard III Faculty.
Standard II Curriculum.
As a financial aid administrator, my primary function is to help students achieve their educational potential by helping award and disburse monetary resources.
Standard IV Students.
New Agent Professional Development
HLC
Standard III – Resources
Professional Development Conference 2018
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
SCC Tenure Process November 9, 2016.
UA Workplace Experience Survey - Chime in!
Sam Houston State University
Presenters: Maureen Chalmers (NWCC) and Steve Krevisky (MXCC)
Blue Mountain Community College Non-Academic Program Review
Review of Strategic Plan Accomplishments
Middle States Commission on Higher Education
Overview of accjc stanard IV
2018 Great Colleges Survey for Champlain College
Distance Learning Benchmarking
South Seattle Community College
Sam Catherine Johnston, Senior TA Specialist National AEM Center
Sam Houston State University
Supporting Excellence In Academic Departments
Cynthia Curry, Director National AEM Center
PROGRAM REVIEW PROCESS
Considering Board Priorities at the Board Table
Presentation transcript:

Administration, Finances, and Resources Standard V Administration, Finances, and Resources

V.1 Adequate program autonomy and institutional support Not only this… But also this, for example… “The program resides in XXX College and is administered by the director.” “The University provides XX% of the program’s budget.” Include an organization chart that shows both the programs and others and where they reside. Show some budget rationale: based on tuition income or enrollment, for instance. Provide several years’ data to illustrate the program’s financial trajectory. V.1 Adequate program autonomy and institutional support

Not only this… But also this, for example… “The program has members on university-wide committees.” “The program offers a total of $50,000 in financial aid each year.” Provide a list of faculty, staff, and students and the committees on which they serve. Select a program or two of similar size within the university and show the number and amounts of assistance given, with comparison to the $50,000. V.2 Program represented at institutional level and has equitable resources

Not only this… But also this, for example… “Program head compensation is set by our bargaining unit.” “The program head has xxx years’ experience as a manager.” Include CV of program head. Indicate other similar programs in the same bargaining unit and show salaries and years of service (if public information). Show the program head’s annual evaluations that might show strengths and weaknesses in leadership and management. Provide analysis/highlights on program head’s CV. V.3 Program head is comparable to heads of other units; program head has necessary skills and knowledge

Not only this… But also this , for example… “Students are socialized through professional associations and events sponsored by the program.” Provide programs from the events, statistics as to attendance, names of faculty sponsors. Orientation, professional organization, and awards program agendas, reviews, or media coverage. V.4 Program head nurtures environment to enhance accomplishment of program goals and socialization of students into the field.

Not only this… But also this, for example… Lists of staff positions, job descriptions, and statements of their contributions. Specific examples of staff interaction with students mapped to mission, goals, objectives. Minutes of staff meetings and other evidence that staff, both professional and hourly, are informed by and contribute to development of program goals and objectives. V.5 Staff contribute to fulfillment of program mission, goals, and objectives.

Not only this… But also this, for example… Statements of support and budget figures. Information on the availability of funds for travel, research, professional development, and leaves or sabbaticals. Lists of recipients of support and their accomplishments. V.6 Institutional support adequate to carry out program’s teaching, research and service

V.7 Equitable faculty and staff compensation Not only this… But also this, for example… Statements of equitable compensation within the institution and/or among peer institutions. Comparative data on program salaries and benefits with peer institutions and with similar programs within the university. If not equitable, discussion of efforts to improve. V.7 Equitable faculty and staff compensation

V.8 Institutional funds equitable with other units Not only this… But also this, for example… Statements that program is “on par” with others within the institution. Budgets, budget analyses, and data, along with institutional policies regarding allocation of resources to units. Information on administrative personnel including demographics, salaries, and skills as compared to similar units. V.8 Institutional funds equitable with other units

V.9 Physical and technological resources for program Not only this… But also this, for example… Inventory of equipment and software for teaching and learning Schedule for replacement of digital equipment V.9 Physical and technological resources for program

Not only this… But also this, for example… “The program occupies XXX square feet in YYY library and has three classrooms, ten offices, and a lab.” Add maps, floor plans, photographs, along with descriptions of on-campus and off-campus facilities. V.10 Physical facilities provide functional learning, research, service, & program administration

Not only this… But also this, for example… “Our facilities and services are ADA compliant.” Add descriptions of the compliance or accommodations for all facilities where face-to-face classes or activities (orientation, social, etc.) are held. Provide evidence that all on-line programs are accessible to students with hearing, visual, or other disabilities. V.11 Access to information resources and services, and information technologies

V.12 Support resources meet program needs Not only this… But also this, for example… Provide budgets, assessments, usage data, collection and services for libraries, labs, commons, etc. Provide particulars on support for technology, staff assigned, equipment budgets, etc. Describe institutional facilities used by program regardless of location or mode of instructional delivery. “Library and technology services support students both on campus and online.” V.12 Support resources meet program needs

Not only this… But also this, for example… Description of surveys or other methods for constituent input on administrative policies Examples of policy or fiscal decisions resulting from systematic policy and budget review Examples of changes to facilities or other physical resources to improve program V.13 Administrative, fiscal, and support policies systematically reviewed with constituent involvement

Not only this… But also this, for example… Description of the process for evaluation of resources. Minutes, forms and data collection instruments, and other evidence of evaluation. Performance evaluation data. Usage data for library and lab resources by program constituents. V.14 Data substantiate evaluation of administration, finances, & resources

Not only this… But also this, for example… “Data is used to improve the program.” Examples of how data is used in specific decision making situations – substantiate with minutes, communication of decision, and results of the decision. V.15 Administrative evaluation results used to improve program and plan

Suggestions for Standard 5 documentation Use graphics to represent process Give concrete examples Use tables to organize information Use timelines to illustrate process Suggestions for Standard 5 documentation