Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan Revised Terms of Reference

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Management Plan: An Overview
Advertisements

Alberta’s Strategy for Sustainability presented to Prairie Water Policy Symposium Beverly Yee, Assistant Deputy Minister Alberta Environment September.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
A Review ISO 9001:2015 Draft What’s Important to Know Now
Briefing to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board on Status of the FCSA July 12, 2013 Central Valley Integrated Flood Management Study.
CEOS-CGMS Working Group on Climate John Bates, NOAA SIT-30 Agenda Item #11 Climate Monitoring, Research, and Services 30 th CEOS SIT Meeting CNES Headquarters,
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators.
Delivering Results Since 1975 Vancouver Calgary Edmonton Toronto Lakeland Catholic School District Education Planning Project Objectives, Work Plan & Schedule.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Options for CBP Agreement and EC Membership For Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March, 2013.
GOVERNOR’S EARLY CHILDHOOD ADVISORY COUNCIL (ECAC) September 9, 2014.
Delivering Results Since 1975 Vancouver Calgary Edmonton Toronto Lakeland Catholic School District Education Planning Project Objectives, Work Plan, Input.
Watershed Council June 25, DWR Funding and Bay Area IRWMP Project Selection Background Regional Acceptance Process (RAP) Regional Projects North.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Report of the Technical Subcommittee Mario Bergeron, Technical Subcommittee Chair/NGEC Vice Chair.
Kettle River Watershed Management Plan Stakeholder Advisory Group Meeting #3 – July 19, 2012.
Watershed Monitoring *Background Watershed Stewardship Plan-2004 Gap Projects IRWMP-Dec Policies SFEI study-2007 Joint TC/WC meeting-June 2010 *Proposed.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Related to the framework of the State and Federal Accountability Measures Customer Statisfaction with the ACSI.
NSRP Lake Management History and Current Progress Dave Mussell Red Deer River Wateshed Alliance Spring Forum, Alix AB.
Chesapeake Bay Program
Framework Policy on Continuing Care in First Nations Communities of Quebec Conference on clients with decreasing independence May 10, 2017.
Update for the Citizens Advisory Committee February 22, 2017
Chesapeake bay program: Funding & Bay TMDL Midpoint Assessment
Master Plan Updates February 2015 Salem, Oregon
Board Roles & Responsibilities
Well Trained International
EIA approval process, Management plan and Monitoring
Orientation Overview April 14, 2017
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System
Contracting Officer Podcast Slides
Audit Guideline on Delivering the 2030 Agenda through Environmental Audit WGEA’s Work Plan Goal 1 - Developing guidance materials available.
Guilford Standards for Promotion and Tenure
Mexico 8th Meeting of the Steering Committee of INTOSAI Committee on
SEEA CF research agenda
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Linden County Water District
IAASB-IESBA Coordination
Action Request (Advice) Registry
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
Project Objectives, Workplan and Timescales
Support for the AASHTO Committee on Planning (COP) and its Subcommittees in Responding to the AASHTO Strategic Plan Prepared for NCHRP 8-36, TASK 138.
Building Changes’ Strategic Business Planning Process
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System ~Meetings Detail~ DRAFT August 29, /6/2018 DRAFT.
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
Charter System Principals’ Budget Sharing Guidance
Mexico 8th Meeting of the Steering Committee of INTOSAI Committee on
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
2013 UPDATE Brooke Carere Environmental & Utilities Services Technician Squamish-Lillooet Regional District September 18th, 2013.
CCWG Accountability Recommendations
The GEF Public Involvement Policy
(Project) SIGN OFF PROCESS MONTH DAY, YEAR
Report of the Technical Subcommittee
Concept paper on the assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans
Central Valley Water Board Meeting of 29 March 2012
San Francisco Bay Water Board
Tribal Data WG Fire and Smoke WG Oil and Gas WG
CWG Membership July 30-31, 2012 – Climate Working Group Meeting.
Audit Evidence Bob Dohrer, Audit Evidence Working Group Chair
Presentation transcript:

Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan Revised Terms of Reference BRBC Forum – September 13, 2006 Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 1

Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 2 Background The Draft TOR were first presented to BRBC members at the June 12 BRBC Forum and forwarded via e-mail to all BRBC members for input. All comments were reviewed, discussed at the SC & TC level, and incorporated to the best ability possible. BRBC Forum – September 13, 2006 Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 2

Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 3 Background Based on the comments, the SC revised the Draft TOR on August 14 and forwarded a revised version of the TOR to the BRBC BOD for approval. Copies were also mailed to key agencies, municipalities, and First Nations in the Bow Basin with the intention that these groups would be asked for their support of the plan direction (via an authorized representative). **TOR is step one, only, in the full process of preparing the watershed management plan. It allows objectives to be set to be fleshed out in the plan itself. BRBC Forum – September 13, 2006 Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 3

Recap - Plan Objectives Recommend site-specific water quality objectives (WQOs) for key parameters for the: Bow River mainstem Nose Creek and West Nose Creek mainstem WQOs for the Nose Creek and West Nose Creek mainstems will be considered by the Nose Creek Watershed Partnership in their current and/or future planning initiatives. Elbow River upstream of Glenmore Reservoir WQOs for the Elbow River mainstems will be considered as part of the Elbow River Water Management Plan. Even though Nose Creek is further into their plan the science coming out of the joint technical committee will be useful to their implementation. BRBC Forum – September 13, 2006 Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 4

Recap - What are Water Quality Objectives? Water quality objective (WQO): Numerical concentration limit or narrative statement which has been established to support and protect a designated water use at a specific site. (CCME 1996) WQO is a provincial definition. The point here being that water quality guidelines developed for all of Alberta may not be specific enough for all reaches and tributaries. BRBC Forum – September 13, 2006 Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 5

Recap - Plan Objectives The plan will also recommend: an action plan including both regulatory and non-regulatory tools such as policy changes, best management practices, identification of future research priorities, etc. and, an implementation plan Including performance monitoring requirements, accountabilities for each identified strategy, timelines and priorities for implementation). Since all these early wmp’s are really test cases, it is our opportunity to learn from each one drafted. Therefore we are including both the action and implementation plans right in the document. BRBC Forum – September 13, 2006 Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 6

Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 7 How Will WQOs Be Used? The WQOs will be : used as performance indicators for future state of watershed reporting, and; considered by decision–makers for decisions that will have the potential to impact water quality. More uses may appear as we get into the plan itself. BRBC Forum – September 13, 2006 Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 7

Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 8 Expectations It is the expectation that representatives from various agencies and members of the BRBC are: Actively engaged, and Communicate within their own agencies throughout the planning process to help ensure implementation of the plan within their jurisdictions / agencies. We are even considering copying the ERWMP and formalizing a representative’s report-back system every 3rd meeting. BRBC Forum – September 13, 2006 Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 8

What SC Proposed in March 2006? March 2006 - Establish a “Water Quality Technical Committee (Done ) March to May 2006 – Coordinate the development of the initial draft Terms of Reference (TOR) for Phase One (Done ) June 2006 – Initial draft TOR presented at BRBC Forum. (Done ) June to Sept. 2006 – Coordinate initial review of draft TOR via BRBC membership (Done ) BRBC Forum – September 13, 2006 Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 9

SC-Proposed Next Steps August 2006 – Copies of SC-Final TOR sent to municipalities and key agencies for support / sign-off. Sept. 2006 – BRBC BOD approve Final Draft Terms of Reference and Joint BRBC BOD and BBWMP SC Meeting December 2006 – BRBC BOD announce release of Final Terms of Reference June 2007 – Complete First Draft BBWMP Including holding sessions and ensuring support of all groups tasked with implementation. The Sept. “alignment” meeting may now become part of the board retreat in Oct. BRBC Forum – September 13, 2006 Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 10

Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 11 Summary Work on the plan is continuing, largely on schedule. The plan is being conducted in a phased manner with a focus on “water quality” for Phase One. Enhanced public involvement and collaboration methods are currently being developed. Future phases will be determined, in 2007, as the project progresses. If results from Nancy and James – report them. BRBC Forum – September 13, 2006 Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 11

Comments on Final Draft TOR Comments on the Final Draft TOR (or any aspect of the planning process) are still being accepted. Please forward all comments to Mark Bennett at Mark.Bennett@brbc.ab.ca. “Still” I.e. always because this is an open process – and – a planning document is a living document. BRBC Forum – September 13, 2006 Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 12

Questions or Information If there are any questions, please contact: Gloria Wilkinson, Chair, BBWMP at gmwilky@shaw.ca or Chris Vermeeren, Vice-Chair, BBWMP at cvermeer@eidnet.org BRBC Forum – September 13, 2006 Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 13

Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 14 Thank You! BRBC Forum – September 13, 2006 Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 14

Hidden Slides If Required BRBC Forum – September 13, 2006 Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 15

Survey Results - Broad Priorities BRBC Forum – September 13, 2006 Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 16

Survey Results - Broad Priorities Water quality ranked as the highest priority by a 20% margin. This was followed by land use management and source water protection, and water quantity. All of which are strongly linked with water quality. BRBC Forum – September 13, 2006 Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 17

Survey Results – Water Quality WQO = Water Quality Objectives BRBC Forum – September 13, 2006 Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 18

Performance Management Planning Process   Public Involvement & Education Identify Desired Outcomes (Goals) Current Conditions & Future Trends Environmental Indicators Knowledge, Actions, Timelines and Accountability Implement, Monitor & Evaluate Thresholds are values that should never be exceeded. Targets are longer term values that are set as long-term goals. Thresholds & Targets Recommendations BRBC Forum – September 13, 2006 Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 19  

Water Quality Process Outcomes Water Quality Objectives Thresholds and Targets Recommendations Water Quality Recommendations Riparian Areas Recommendations Land Use Recommendations Implementation The point here is that although the focus is water quality, the outputs (recommendations) may be much broader and may include recommendations on water quality, riparian areas, water quantity, land use planning, groundwater, wetlands, etc. It is anticipated that the selected indicators for each phase will be used in successive State of the Bow Basin reports. Monitoring Evaluation & Adaptive Management BRBC Forum – September 13, 2006 Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 20

Water Quality Links to Other Topics Wetlands Riparian Areas Water Quantity Water Quality Any significant changes to water quantity will have clear implications on water quality and vice-versa. The same concepts applies for wetlands, riparian areas, land use management, source water protection, groundwater… And we also need to be open to go to wherever the greatest gains may be found (main stems?, tributaries?, upland ecosystems?, etc.). This relates to the concept of “critical areas” previously discussed. Groundwater Land Use Management Source Water Protection BRBC Forum – September 13, 2006 Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan 21