Legislative Requirement 2013

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simpson County Schools Accountability Results, Fall of 2013 Franklin-Simpson High School 97 th Percentile* DISTINGUISHED *percentile rank based on 2012.
Advertisements

Kentucky’s School Report Card and Spreadsheets
Dec. 14, 2010 APS BOE Workshop Graduation Requirements High School Presented By: Division of Instruction PACESetters!
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
School Performance Measure Calculations SY Office of Achievement and Accountability.
Understanding Wisconsin’s New School Report Card.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
Measuring Charter Quality Eric Paisner, NAPCS Anna Nicotera, NAPCS Lyria Boast, Public Impact.
Springville CSD Where every child will become a successful reader ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 2008.
WBCSD District Strategic Goals Update August 10, 2015.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
ACT Aspire Data: What Does It Tell Us? October 27, 2015 Developed by the WISExplore Content Work Team WISExplore Content Work Team Members: Mary Ann Hudziak,
Iowa School Report Card (Attendance Center Rankings) December 3, 2015.
Brad McMillen and Sonya Stephens Data and Accountability September 19, 2013.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
PED School Grade Reports (with thanks to Valley High School) ACE August 3, 2012 Dr. Russ Romans District Accountability Manager.
Review Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
Novice Reduction & Non-Duplicated Gap Group
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
South Carolina Succeeds
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE NETCONG SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER 15, 2015 Dr. Gina Cinotti, CSA.
Overview Plan Input Outcome and Objective Measures Summary of Changes Board Feedback Finalization Next Steps.
Data Riverside Community Schools. Schoolwide Trends Riverside Community Schools.
Accountability Overview Presented by Jennifer Stafford Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:pp: 12/11/2015.
Gallatin County High School Accountability & Assessment Data.
FLORIDA STATE EOC EXAMS. **Districts will select testing dates. REQUIRED TESTING Students enrolled in the Florida Public Schools are required to participate.
Assessment and Accountability Update Longbranch Elementary School September 27,
Legislative Requirement 2013 House File 215. Category Cut Scores Based on a Normal Distribution across Measures.
Assessment & Accountability Session 3: Content and School Scores.
A-F Report Card Law, Reporting Phases, and Indicator Descriptors.
2017 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
State of Wisconsin School Report Cards Fall 2014 Results
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Future ready PA Index Update 5/23/17.
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
NHCS READY Report October 2016.
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Welcome to the BT Super Conference
Appleton Area School District
TESTING, RESEARCH & ACCOUNTABILITY
School Performance Measure Calculations SY
Annual WBWF Student Achievement Report 2017
NWEA Measures of Academic Progress (MAP)
Washington’s ESSA Consolidated Plan Implementation 101
Kentucky’s New Accountability Model
New Statewide Accountability System
New Accountability System: District and Site Report Cards
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Kansas Elementary and Secondary Education Act Advisory Council (ESEA)
ESSA Update “Graduation Rate & Career and College Readiness”
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Campus Comparison Groups and Distinction Designations
The Family Institute for Health and Human Services
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System
ESSA for AFESC Schools 2018 Under the reauthorization of ESEA, the federal government required each state to design an accountability system that met.
School Performance Measure Calculations SY
Ridgefield Public Schools New Jersey School Performance Report
Birmingham City Schools Report Card Indicators
College/Career Ready for All
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Presented by Joseph P. Stern
Closing the Expectations Gap
Spencer County Public Schools
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
CA Dashboard 2018 Overview Presentation to the Governing Board
Mississippi Succeeds Unprecedented Achievement, Unlimited Potential
Presentation transcript:

Legislative Requirement 2013 House File 215

Category Cut Scores Based on a Normal Distribution across Measures

Percent of Schools in Each Category Exceptional 3% of schools High-Performing 12% of schools Commendable 35% of schools Acceptable 35% of Schools Needs Improvement 12% of schools Priority 3% of schools A high level view of student performance across multiple measures to determine an overall performance rating Two years of data More stable indicator

Educational Measures and Their Weights High School (9-12) Middle School (6-8) Elementary School (PK-5) Proficiency 22.2% 25.0% 28.6% Closing Achievement Gap College & Career Ready Growth 11.1% 12.5% 14.3% Annual Expected Growth College and Career Readiness N/A Graduation Rate Attendance 5.6% 6.3% 7.1% Staff Retention Total 100.0%

Cut Points for Each Category High Schools Middle Schools Elementary Schools Exceptional 75.0 and above 71.0 and above 79.0 and above High Performing 70.0 to 74.9 68.0 to 70.9 73.0 to 78.9 Commendable 65.4 to 69.9 64.0 to 67.9 67.0 to 72.9 Acceptable 60.0 to 65.3 57.0 to 63.9 61.0 to 66.9 Needs Improvement 56.0 to 59.9 53.0 to 56.9 55.0 to 60.0 Priority 55.9 and below 52.9 and below 54.9 and below

Educational Measures Proficiency College and Career Readiness Growth Percent of students scoring proficient on the Iowa Assessment Across reading and math Across two school years College and Career Readiness Growth Based on a national standard score needed to reach college/career readiness by 12 grade (306) 5th grade student NSS of 220 Needs a 306 in 12 grade 306-220 = 86 across 7 years = 12.3 NSS units that year Recalculated every year If a student is already CCR they count FAY students for two years

Educational Measures Grade Reading Math 3rd to 4th 15 4th to 5th 14 Annual Expected Growth using NSS units FAY students for two years Grade Reading Math 3rd to 4th 15 4th to 5th 14 5th to 6th 13 6th to 7th 12 8th to 8th 11 8th to 9th 10 9th to 10th 8 10th to 11th 7

Educational Measures continued Closing the Achievement Gap Score Grade 3-8 and 10-11 used to compute an achievement gap score Iowa Assessments Notice in this example the gap decreased by 5% A T-scale score is calculated from the percentage Group Percent Proficient 2013-2014 math and reading combined 2014-2015 ELL, IEP and/or students receiving FRL 60.0% 65.0% All other students 75.0% GAP 15.0% 10.0%

Educational Measures continued.. College and Career Readiness The percent of students that are at or above a college readiness benchmark on the Iowa Assessments in reading and math 2 years of data CCR means the acquisition of knowledge and skills a student needs to enroll and succeed in credit bearing first year courses at a postsecondary institution without the need for remediation Grade 5-11 = 75 NPR ACT Cut Scores in Reading = 22 and Math = 22 that represent CCR

Graduation Rate The percent of students who complete high school in 5 Year Years A two year composite score is used

Attendance The average daily attendance rate of students The aggregate days of student attendance (days present) in the school or school district divided by the aggregate days of enrollment Across two years

Staff Retention The percent of licensed staff who are retained All licensed staff members except nurses and coaches Only full time staff members are retained in the base year Retirements, move outs of state, or staff dismissals are all treated the same Fall Basic Educational Data Survey (BEDS) Staff Collection Additional School Report Measures to come Parental Involvement Community Activities and Involvement

Connection between State Report Card and Differentiated Accountability None This is a stand alone School Report Card to fulfill HF 215