PEDIATRIC VS ADULT ORGAN TRANSPLANT WALDO CONCEPCION, MD FACS. Professor of Surgery Chief of Clinical Transplantation Stanford University KIEV SYMPOSIUM JULY 3-4, 2017
PEDIATRIC LIVER TRANSPLANTATION
Overview Background information Common etiologies of pediatric liver disease Listing process for liver transplant OLT surgery Post op complications
Milestones in Pediatric Liver Transplant 1963-First attempt at liver transplant in a human by Starzl 1967-First successful liver transplant by Starzl 1979-FDA approves Cyclosporine 1983-NIH Consensus Conference declares liver transplantation a valid therapy for ESLD 1984-First reduced-size liver transplant 1987-UW Solution 1988-First split-liver transplant 1989-Tacrolimus introduced into clinical trials 1990-First successful living-related liver transplant
5 Year Actuarial Survival: Ped. Liver Transplants % % Years After Transplant
INDICATIONS FOR PEDIATRIC LIVER TRANSPLANTATION
Biliary Atresia Congenital condition, common bile duct blocked or absent 1 in 10,000 live births, females > males Etiology is unknown (infectious, immune, abnormal bile, error in dev) Jaundice at birth Clay colored stools, cirrhosis often present Need prompt recognition, persistent elevation of direct bili Abdominal US, absent gallbladder HIDA scan Liver biopsy and intra-operative cholangiogram Kasai procedure prior to 8 weeks (or 12) of life Without Kasai, survival is not greater than 2 years old
KASAI - PORTO-ENTEROSTOMY
Alagille Syndrome Autosomal dominant Liver, cardiac, skeletal, eye, renal involvement with characteristic facies Variable expression JAG1 mutation or NOTCH2 1 in 100,000 Bile duct paucity, cholestatic liver disease, peripheral pulmonic stenosis, moyamoya disease, renal Poor growth, small stature Increased bile acids-->pruritus, xanthomas Fat soluble vitamin deficiencies Skeletal abnormalities
Alagille Syndrome
ALAGILLE SYNDROME
Fulminant Hepatic Failure Hepatic necrosis with acute loss of hepatic function Includes encephalopathy and coagulopathy Occurs within 8 weeks of onset of liver disease Absence of pre-existing liver disease
Fulminant Hepatic Failure In the US: 2000 cases each year across all age groups Pediatrics: estimated to be 50 cases per year Males=females Without OLT, 80-90% mortality Some centers state survival rates of 50-75%
Etiology Viral hepatitis and drug-induced hepatotoxicity are the two most common causes of FHF in children Toxins, metabolic diseases, autoimmune hepatitis, ischemic Often, no specific etiology is found
FULMINANT HEPATITIS
Infections 50% of cases of FHF Hepatitis A-E EBV CMV Varicella-zoster virus Herpesvirus Parvovirus Adenovirus Echovirus
Liver Tumors LPCH major referal center for liver tumors Hepatoblastomas (HB): most common liver cancer in children Hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC): underlying liver disease, metabolic disease, hepatitis
HEPATOBLASTOMA
Liver Tumors: Indication for liver transplantation Multifocal tumor. Response to chemotherapy. Unresectable after chemotherapy. No evidence of active extra-hepatic metastasis. No gross vascular invasion. Adequate cardiac status.
Liver Transplantation in Children with HB & HCC at Stanford* Tumor Type Mean age Yr + SD Lesion > 5 cm Multifocal Yrs post Transplant % recurr. HCC (N=10) 10 + 4 5 6 7.6 +6.9 11% HB (N=15) 3 + 3 10 2.7 + 3.5 20% *Beaunoyer et al: Pediatr Transpl 11:655, 2007
Metabolic Disorders Urea cycle defects Wilson’s disease Hemachromatosis (neonatal iron storage disease) Alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency Crigler-Najjar Metabolic Acidemias (Methylmalonic acidemia, others)
Urea Cycle
Listing for Liver Transplantation The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease (PELD) are numerical scales that are currently used for liver allocation. The MELD and PELD scores are based on a patient's risk of dying while waiting for a liver transplant, and are based on objective and verifiable medical data. UNOS website: www.unos.org/resources
Organ Distribution February 2002 implementation of MELD/PELD Objective data only The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and Pediatric End-Stage Liver Disease (PELD) are numerical scales that are currently used for liver allocation. The MELD and PELD scores are based on a patient's risk of dying while waiting for a liver transplant, and are based on objective and verifiable data.
Listing for Liver Transplantation The MELD score calculation uses: * Serum Creatinine (mg/dl) * Bilirubin (mg/dl) * INR The PELD score calculation uses: * Albumin (g/dl) * Bilirubin (mg/dl) * INR * Growth failure (based on gender, height and weight) * Age at listing
Organ Distribution PELD does not include symptoms of liver disease GI bleeds Ascites In complete measure of need for liver transplant in children Disadvantage for Adolescents
MANIFESTATION OF LIVER FAILURE CLINICAL LABORATORY Muscle wasting Encephalopathy (sleepy, poor appetite) Ascites Coagulopathy (bruising, GI bleeding) Low serum albumin Elevated ammonia Prolonged PT & PTT Rising bilirubin with low transaminases
Listed for OLT PELD SCORE BLOOD TYPE STATUS 1A--FHF, primary non-function STATUS 1B--after listed by PELD of 30 for 30 days (met, tumors) REGIONAL LISTING NATIONAL LISTING
OLT Surgery
SPECIAL ISSUES IN PEDIATRIC LIVER TRANSPLANTATION DONOR AVAILABILITY USE OF ABO INCOMPATIBLE DONORS SIZE OF LIVER GRAFT VASCULAR CHALLENGES: - small size hepatic artery - portal vein atresia - lower IVC - situs inversus SINGLE OR DUAL BILE DUCTS
CJ with Internal Stent
Living Donation Adult to Child
Post Operative Care Immunosuppression: antibody induction (thymo, zenapax), steroids, prograf Anti-coagulation: heparin, dextran, aspirin, persantine Anti-infection agents: PCP ppl, CMV and EBV ppl (Valcyte)
Kim, WR et al AJT 2017;17 pag 174-251
PEDIATRIC LIVER TRANSPLANTS
PEDIATRIC LIVER TRANSPLANTS
PEDIATRIC LIVER TRANSPLANTS
PEDIATRIC LIVER TRANSPLANTS
Surgical Complications after Pediatric Liver Transplantation Portal vein thrombosis or stenosis Hepatic vein-vena cava thrombosis or stenosis Hepatic artery thrombosis Biliary strictures Cosmetic issues from scarring
ADULT LIVER TRANSPLANTATION
Indication for Primary OLT Adult
Liver Transplantation in the U.S. Current Status 1-year patient survival: 85–90% in most centers 3-year survival 75-80%; 8-year survival 60-70% ~7,000 LT/year last 3 years in 110 centers >17,000 patients on LT waiting list ~1,800 deaths/year on waiting list last 3 years Mismatch between qualified candidates and available organs limits application of LT www.unos.org
Patient Selection Criteria for LT Accepted indications for LT Advanced chronic liver disease Acute liver failure Unresectable hepatic malignancy Inherited metabolic liver disease No alternative form of therapy No absolute contraindication to LT Willingness to comply with follow-up care Ability to provide for costs of LT .
Contraindications to LT: Absolute Active alcohol or substance abuse Advanced cardiopulmonary disease Systemic sepsis, unresponsive to Rx Multiorgan failure; multiple pressors Extrahepatic malignancy Severe pulmonary hypertension Severe psychiatric disease likely to affect compliance
Deceased Donor Liver Allocation February 2002 Changes CTP Score Ascites Encephalopathy Bilirubin Protime INR Albumin MELD Score Creatinine Bilirubin Protime INR www.unos.org MELD Score = 0.957 x Loge(creatinine mg/dL) + 0.378 x Loge(bilirubin mg/dL) + 1.120 x Loge(INR) + 0.643.
HEPATITIS C During the last decade, HCV infection accounted for about 30% of the indications for liver transplant in Europe and North America. Direct antiviral agents (DAA) are highly effective at curing HCV, even in patients with cirrhosis. The incidence of decompensated cirrhosis and HCC will continue to decrease, but a large cohort of patients with cirrhosis will be at risk for developing HCC event after HCV has been cured. Patients without viral clearance (SVR) have a 200% higher risk of developing HCC. Post-transplant recurrence can be effectively treated with DAA’s.
Hepatitis B LT considered a contraindications prior to current treatment options secondary to high rates of reinfection, graft loss and patient death Pretransplant control of replication (lamivudine, adefovir, tenofovir) now possible Postoperative HBIg plus nucleoside analogues are standard prophylaxis Recurrence of HBV currently rare, and most cases manageable Hepatitis E is emerging as an indication for liver transplantation in Europe. Yu AS, Keeffe EB. Clin Liver Dis 2003;7:551-72
Liver Transplantation for HCC Selection - Stage 2 limit Survival rates at four years: 85% overall (of whom 92% recurrence-free) (Mazzaferro 1996) Overall 5 year survival: 70-75% with recurrence rates <15% (Llovet 1999, Yao 2001) Liver transplantation offers the best outcome for those who make it to transplant
NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE With the increasing prevalence of obesity, diabetes and metabolic syndrome, NAFLD may affect as many as 40% of the adult population of United States ( about 100 million). Slowly progressive disease and a significant proportion of patients progress to decompensated cirrhosis and HCC
Recurrent Disease after Liver Transplantation
Diseases That May Recur after LT Hepatitis B Hepatitis C Primary biliary cirrhosis Primary sclerosing cholangitis Autoimmune hepatitis Malignant tumors Hemochromatosis Alcoholic liver disease Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis Budd-Chiari syndrome
Recurrence of Disease after LT Some recurrent disease inconsequential, while other recurrence a cause of death or re-LT Increasing problem as patients live longer after LT Potential requirement for re-LT an added burden to already limited resources for LT Results of re-LT inferior to initial LT (survival 62% vs. 87% at 1 year, and 54% vs. 77% at 3 year)1 1UNOS Update: UNOS Scientific Registry. 1996; p. 11-32.
ADULT LIVER TRANSPLANTS
ADULT LIVER TRANPLANTS
ADULT LIVER TRANSPLANTS
ADULT LIVER TRANSPLANTS
ADULT LIVER TRANSPLANTS
ADULT LIVER TRANSPLANTS
ADULT LIVER TRANSPLANTS
SUMMARY
PEDIATRIC VS ADULT LIVER TRANSPLANT Pediatric transplants are lower volume vs adult. Pediatric mortality while awaiting is very low vs adult. Pediatric etiologies for liver disease more congenital vs adult virals. Pediatric patients more access to donors vs adults. Technical challenges are more frequent in children vs adults. Children suffer more rejections vs adults (25 vs 12%). Children have better long-term graft and patient survival vs adults. Children have less recurrence of primary disease vs adults.
THANK YOU!