Evaluation of PH-ELIM trainings

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Producing Quality Evidence in a Well Organised Portfolio Doc Ref: 20/04/09-portfolio-quality-evidence.
Advertisements

2 It is assessment that occurs regularly It informs both students and teachers about their progress and where they need to grow It should be used to.
Using the IDEA Student Ratings System: An Introduction University of Saint Thomas Fall
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
Kazakhstan Centres of Excellence Teacher Education Programme Assessment of teachers at Level Two.
Barry Williams1 Analyzing Learners & Context Dick & Carey, Chp. 5.
Curriculum development A brief guide to the construction of relevant curricula.
Certificate IV in Project Management Course Structure Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S.
Certificate IV in Project Management Certificate IV in Project Management Course Structure Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
Implementing Inquiry Based Science Teaching Through Teacher Networks The SINUS model for educational development in Germany Matthias Stadler, Kiel (Germany)
Dr. Sande Caton. Assessments Why do we assess our students? Individually, write at least three ideas you have about assessments With one or two colleagues.
CEIT 225 Instructional Design Prof. Dr. Kürşat Çağıltay
“To begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination. It means to know where you’re going so that you better understand.
Courses of instruction are usually divided into learning units as reflected in textbooks, manuals, modules, and other instructional materials that are.
Celia Regimbal chapter Principles of Assessment 12.
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Provide instruction.
A community of learners improving our world
How to Develop CPBL Courses Part 5
NEEDS ANALYSIS.
COMP390/3/4/5 Final Year Project Introduction & Specification
3rd Coordination meeting- DAY II 27-29th June, Germany
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Delivery of Training & Monitoring & Evaluation
Performing Arts in the Twentieth century
Personal Goals and Aspirations as a Council Member
It’s called “wifi”! Source: Somewhere on the Internet!
4th Coordination meeting 4th September, Debrecen
In-Service Teacher Training
The Learning Cycle 1 Prepare for learning 2 6 Review – Step back
Chapter 3: Curriculum © VAN SCHAIK PUBLISHERS Chapter 3: Curriculum.
Transforming Grading Robert Marzano
Facilitation guide for Building Team EQ skills.
Accountability Court Certification and Peer Review
Respect for People March 22, 2018.
Mentor training Wednesday 13th February 2013.
Student Assessment and Evaluation
The Minute Paper Short, in-class writing activity (NMT 2-3 minutes)
Assessment of student achievement of outcomes from the 7-10 Science syllabus Use this as a screen saver.
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
COMP390/3/4/5 Final Year Project Introduction & Specification
Whole-Part-Whole Learning Process
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Tasks & Grades for MET2.
Exploring Assessment Options NC Teaching Standard 4
Tasks & Grades for MET3.
Tasks & Grades for MET5.
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
The Heart of Student Success
Tasks & Grades for MET4.
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
IENE – INTERCULTURAL EDUCATION OF NURSES AND MEDICAL STAFF IN EUROPE
WP4- Piloting and Evaluation Meeting 22/23. November, 2018: Athens
What you assess makes a statement about what you value
Analyzing Learners & Context
Course Portfolio Project: important initial questions to answer
The Minute Paper Short, in-class writing activity (NMT 2-3 minutes)
Business Administration Programs School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2016 Assessment Report
Level 2 Certificate in Fitness Instructing: Gym
Understanding By Design.
WP4- Piloting and Evaluation
Student Assessment and Evaluation
Designing Assessment Methods
Level 2 Certificate in Fitness Instructing: Aqua
Evaluation Measures, Ongoing Improvements and Enhancement
Portfolio HMRL 1010 Your Name Here.
UCAS Application Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of PH-ELIM trainings IV. Coordination meeting September 4, 2017, Debrecen Project web site: www.ph-elim.net

Goals of this presentation to define self-regulation in order to test self-reflection for the training activities that will take place in PH-ELIM, starting in September 2017 with the training in Debrecen. if the first test during the training in Debrecen is successful, it is planned to use this approach for all trainings. Project web site: www.ph-elim.net

Concept of self-regulation Self-regulation is based on the key assumption that people desire to control the events that affect their lives (Schunk, 2012). Self-regulation encompasses three phases: forethought, performance control, and self-reflection (Schunk, 2012).

Forethought At the beginning of the first day of the training, participants are asked to describe their previous experiences with the training topic, their motivation to participate, and their personal learning goals. Students could be asked to write down these points on a piece of paper. The paper stays with them – they need this information for the final reflection. 5 – 10 Minutes should be sufficient for this.

Performance control At the end of each training day, the participants are asked to shortly reflect on their personal progress in reaching their personal learning objectives. They are asked to compare what they learned to the objectives they have documented on the very first day. This can be done in a short oral discussion round between all participants.

Self-Reflection Within two weeks after the training, participants are asked to deliver a written self-reflection (of 2 – 3 pages) describing their personal learning objectives, learning process and learning outcomes they made in the course as well as the transfer of the new knowledge to their professional life. The instructions for this self-reflection of described in the next section. This written self-reflection is the precondition for obtaining the course certificate and is thus part of the overall assessment (however, we will not grade this self-reflection).

Participants - after the training The following instruction should be given for the participants of the trainings after the training: You have participated in the training course on public health law. To conclude this training and to gain a course certificate, it is mandatory that you deliver a written self-reflection. Self-reflections after the deadline (e.g. by e-mail) will be collected and sent to elske.ammenwerth@umit.at

Questions on self-reflection Which knowledge did you already have on the training topic before the training? Which was your motivation to participate in the training and what were your personal learning objectives? How was your learning process during the training? Where did you have difficulties, and why? Could you connect the training to knowledge you already had before the training? How did you make progress towards your personal learning objectives during the training? Did you reach your learning objectives at the end? If not, why not? How do you want to apply what you have learned to your professional context? Can you make use of the new knowledge that you have obtained? Do you plan to pursue further trainings in this area?

Participants - after the training Short skype (or phone) interviews with all participants will be conducted to give feedback on their reflection (this is important to motivate them for future self-reflections), and then to discuss how they perceived the self-reflection.

Interview guide questions Content of their reflection (short feedback on their reflection, just to be polite, they handed it in and will expect a feedback) How did you perceive the need to define your personal learning goals at the beginning of the training? How did you perceive the need to do daily performance assessments in the group? How did you perceive the need to do a final, written reflection (clear instruction? Difficult? Helpful? Ways to improve it?)

Future possibilities Afterwards, we (UMIT/Debrecen) should decide whether it worked well and whether it should be used for further training After the training courses, a publication entitled “Acceptance of integrating self-reflection activities into international training courses on public health – concept and evaluation”