Outline ・ Introduction ・ XRD experiment by the SOPHIAS detector

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. Detector 2. Crystal diffraction conditions
Advertisements

Study of the MPPC Performance - contents - Introduction Fundamental properties microscopic laser scan –check variation within a sensor Summary and plans.
Standalone VeloPix Simulation Jianchun Wang 4/30/10.
Fiber-Optic Communications
FPIX0 Electronic Test Marina Artuso Paul Gelling Jianchun Wang  The system works fine with charge injection calibration  Gain curve, threshold, and noise.
Design and test of a high-speed beam monitor for hardon therapy H. Pernegger on behalf of Erich Griesmayer Fachhochschule Wr. Neustadt/Fotec Austria (H.
1D or 2D array of photosensors can record optical images projected onto it by lens system. Individual photosensor in an imaging array is called pixel.
LNLS Experimental facilities 15 beam lines in operation : X-Ray diffraction (XRD) Crystallography (MX) Small Angle X-Ray Scattering (SAXS) X-Ray Absorption.
Detecting Electrons: CCD vs Film Practical CryoEM Course July 26, 2005 Christopher Booth.
NA62 Gigatracker Working Group Meeting 2 February 2010 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors: Small band gap (E g = 1.12 V)  good resolution in the deposited energy  3.6 eV of deposited.
Chapter 12 Atomic X-Ray Spectroscopy
Energy-Dispersive X-ray Microanalysis in the TEM Anthony J. Garratt-Reed Neil Rowlands.
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Introduction Measurement of basic characteristics –Gain, Noise Rate, Cross-talk Measurement of uniformity.
10/26/20151 Observational Astrophysics I Astronomical detectors Kitchin pp
Fully depleted MAPS: Pegasus and MIMOSA 33 Maciej Kachel, Wojciech Duliński PICSEL group, IPHC Strasbourg 1 For low energy X-ray applications.
2000/11/101 X-ray polarimetry experiment with balloon borne gas proportional counters K.Hayashida, H. Tsunemi, T. Koike, T. Horikawa (Osaka University),
Performance limits of a 55  m pixel CdTe detector G.Pellegrini, M. Lozano, R. Martinez, M. Ullan Centro Nacional de Microelectronica, Barcelona, 08193,
1 TRD-prototype test at KEK-FTBL 11/29/07~12/6 Univ. of Tsukuba Hiroki Yokoyama The TRD prototype is borrowed from GSI group (thanks Anton).
TOP counter overview and issues K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2008/7/3-4 2 nd open meeting for proto-collaboration - Overview - Design - Performance - Prototype.
Fine Pixel CCD for ILC Vertex Detector ‘08 7/31 Y. Takubo (Tohoku U.) for ILC-FPCCD vertex group ILC vertex detector Fine Pixel CCD (FPCCD) Test-sample.
1 5-9 October th ICATPP, Como, Italy S. Maltezos NITROGEN MOLECULAR SPECTRA OF AIR FLUORESCENCE EMULATOR USING A LN 2 COOLED CCD S. Maltezos, E.
Development of TOP counter for Super B factory K. Inami (Nagoya university) 2007/10/ th International Workshop on Ring Imaging Cherenkov Counters.
The development of the readout ASIC for the pair-monitor with SOI technology ~irradiation test~ Yutaro Sato Tohoku Univ. 29 th Mar  Introduction.
Gain stability and the LYSO beam radiation monitor measurements
Lecture 3-Building a Detector (cont’d) George K. Parks Space Sciences Laboratory UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
On a eRHIC silicon detector: studies/ideas BNL EIC Task Force Meeting May 16 th 2013 Benedetto Di Ruzza.
Peterson xBSM Optics, Beam Size Calibration1 xBSM Beam Size Calibration Dan Peterson CesrTA general meeting introduction to the optics.
F Don Lincoln, Fermilab f Fermilab/Boeing Test Results for HiSTE-VI Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
A Prototype Diamond Detector for the Compton Polarimeter in Jefferson lab, Hall C Medium Energy Physics Group Amrendra.
Progress with GaAs Pixel Detectors K.M.Smith University of Glasgow Acknowledgements: RD8 & RD19 (CERN Detector R.&D. collaboration) XIMAGE (Aixtron, I.M.C.,
Performance of new MPPC Nov. 21 Korea-Japan joint meeting Takashi Maeda Hideki Yamazaki Yuji Sudo (University of Tsukuba) --- Contents ---
1 Performance of a CCD tracker at room temperature T. Tsukamoto (Saga Univ.) T. Kuniya, H. Watanabe (Saga Univ.); A. Miyamoto, Y. Sugimoto (KEK); S. Takahashi,
Status of NEWCHOD E.Guschin (INR), S.Kholodenko (IHEP), Yu.Kudenko (INR), I.Mannelli (Pisa), O.Mineev (INR), V.Obraztsov (IHEP), V.Semenov(IHEP), V.Sugonyaev.
CdTe prototype detector testing Anja Schubert The University of Melbourne 9 May 2011 Updates.
V.Aulchenko 1,2, L.Shekhtman 1,2, B.Tolochko 3,2, V.Zhulanov 1,2 Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, , Novosibirsk, Russia Novosibirsk State University,
Study of the MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Satoru Uozumi (Shinshu University) for the GLD Calorimeter Group Kobe Introduction Performance.
Semiconductor Detectors and Applications on X-ray imaging Natalie Diekmann Particle Physics 1 NIKHEF.
6:th IWORID, Glasgow, Scotland, July 2004 Energy Dependence in Dental Imaging with Medipix 2 Börje Norlin & Christer Fröjdh Mid Sweden University.
Energy-Filtered Transmission Electron Microscope (EFTEM)
Progress with GaAs Pixel Detectors
1. Detector 2. Crystal diffraction conditions
IHEP Mini Beijing 2016/07/14-15 Status of High Speed DAQ System for SOI Pixel Detector For X-ray Imaging e.g. 3D CT Application SOKENDAI (総合研究大学院大学)
Quantum Array Detectors
Elettra Sincrotrone Trieste
A. Bergamaschi, A. Cervellino, R. Dinapoli, F. Gozzo, B. Henrich, I
Dr: Mohamed Afifi By Lecturer Radiological Science
Testing and Calibration at IHEP for eXTP (current plans and needed facilities) YuSa Wang
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
R. Hashimoto, N. Igarashi, R. Kumai, H. Takagi, S. Kishimoto
LHAASO-WCDA: Design & Performance
Exploring the limits of hybrid pixel detectors with MÖNCH
On behalf of the GECAM group
Litao Zhao Liaoning University&IHEP
Proton Beam Diagnostics
BESIII EMC electronics
Energy Response of the X-ray Imaging Spectrometer (XIS) on Suzaku
High Rate Photon Irradiation Test with an 8-Plane TRT Sector Prototype
Neutron Beam Test for Measuring Quenching Factor of CsI(Tl) Crystal
FPCCD Vertex Detector for ILC
LCLS bunch length monitor utilizing coherent radiation
Semiconductor Detectors
Remote sensing in meteorology
Hot and cold spots are common problems associated with planning:
Radhabai Kale Mahila Mahavidhyalaya, Ppt. name:- x-Ray techniques
Photographic Image Formation I
The MPPC Study for the GLD Calorimeter Readout
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors:
Computed Tomography (C.T)
Gain measurements of Chromium GEM foils
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of the SOI Pixel Detectors by Synchrotron Radiation X-ray at KEK/PF KEK IMSS R. Hashimoto, S. Kishimoto, R. Kumai, N. Igarashi KEK IPNS Y. Arai, T. Miyoshi RIKEN T. Hatsui, T. Kudo IHEP Yunpeng Lu、 Yang Zhou、 Qun Ouyang SOKENDAI R. Nishimura

Outline ・ Introduction ・ XRD experiment by the SOPHIAS detector ・ Evaluation of the counting type pixel ・ Summary

Introduction Development of the SOI area detector using for X-ray structural analysis. ・ X-ray diffraction (XRD) experiment for functional materials. ・ Small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) experiment for functional thin films. etc…

Introduction X-ray diffraction (XRD) Å order Structural analysis at the atomic level Small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) nm order molecular level Area detector using SOI +P -P Crystal, Thin film Precise analysis of position for hydrogen atoms Time response of the domain structure by pulsed external electric field X rays Complementary use of hard and soft X-ray Glazing-Incidence SAXS experiment

Introduction Requests for detectors from experiments ・high frame rate ・high sensitivity ・high spatial resolution Realizing by counting type pixel

Introduction Requests for detectors from experiments ・high frame late ・high sensitivity ・high spatial resolution Realizing by counting type pixel Checking the importance of the fine pixelated detector by use of the SOPHIAS detector in X-ray structural analysis. In this talk, our current works (following 2 topics) will be shown. ・ XRD experiment by the SOPHIAS detector ・ Evaluation of the counting type pixel

Outline ・ Introduction ・ XRD experiment by the SOPHIAS detector ・ Evaluation of the counting type pixel ・ Summary

XRD experiment by the SOPHIAS detector SOPHIAS (RIKEN, Hatsui group) ・ Charge integrating type detector Pixel Size 30 um×30um Pixel Number 1.9 M Chip size 65.598 mm ×30.58 mm Frame Rate 60 frame/sec Noise 150 e-rms Depletion Depth 500 μm @VHV=200V Peak Signal 7 Me-/pixel Photon Energy limitation < 7 keV (for FEL) Gain High : 7.2uV/e Low :0.15uV /e H:L=50:1 SOPHIAS MPCCD COTS CCD Takaki. Hatsui, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2014, Synchrotron Radiation News Allowing high dynamic range

XRD experiment by the SOPHIAS detector Setup @KEK/PF BL-8A Camera length ~150 mm Sample location X-ray Sample is in front of the SOPHIAS SOPHIAS on the IP diffractometer

XRD experiment by the SOPHIAS detector Sample : SmBaMn2O6 Material property ・ Changes in the ferroelectric in the transition phase in XRD measurement, normal phase → 1 peak transition phase → Split into very close 2 peaks Phys. Rev. B 90 241113(R) (2014)

XRD experiment by the SOPHIAS detector EX-ray = 18 keV 1-D transformation by circular integration

XRD experiment by the SOPHIAS detector IP (100 μm square pixel) SOPHIAS Camera length ~190 mm Camera length ~150 mm SOPHIAS had disadvantage in camera length but made good result!

Outline ・ Introduction ・ XRD experiment by the SOPHIAS detector ・ Evaluation of the counting type pixel ・ Summary

Evaluation of the counting type pixel Collaborative research between IHEP and KEK. Development of the pulse-counting-type fine pixelated X-ray detector based on Double-SOI technology. TEGs CPIXTEG3b (IHEP) : 50 μm square pixel, 64×64 array Under evaluation. CPIXPTEG1 (KEK) : 64 μm square pixel, 32×32 array Now suspended. Each pixels has just one contact to Middle-SOI layer. → does not work enough. ⇒ In this winter, CPIXPTEG2 will be rollout. It has many contacts.

Evaluation of the counting type pixel Setup @KEK/PF BL-14A 10 μmφ beam mode TEG chip CPIXTEG3b /CPIXPTEG1 X-ray pin-hole X-ray filter Ionization chamber

Evaluation of the counting type pixel Setup @KEK/PF BL-14A Flat field beam mode Scattering target (Glassy carbon) X-ray

Evaluation of the counting type pixel Recovery from the total ionization dose (TID) effect by use of Middle-SOI. Typical pulse shape of the Shaper amp. of CPIXPTEG1. TID effect require some voltage to Middle-SOI Middle-SOI 0 V Middle-SOI -1 V (Before X-ray exposure) Shaper pulse was recovered.

Evaluation of the counting type pixel CPIXTEG3b CSR calibration The discriminator can be adjusted by 4-bit CSR on each pixels. S-curve before/after CSR calibration using a pulse generator Before calibration After calibration Counts Input pulse height Vin@negative (mV)

Evaluation of the counting type pixel Mean distribution of S-curves Before After Numbers of pixel σ value became better to about 5 times. Before : 4.57 mV → After : 0.95 mV @ input pulse height

Evaluation of the counting type pixel Before After Check by the flat field X-ray beam In the test of threshold level scan with flat field X-ray, threshold dispersion became half by CSR calibration. Before : 26 nA → After : 14 nA @threshold level

Evaluation of the counting type pixel 1-dimensional pixel array scan by 10 μmφ beam EX-ray = 16 keV, VHV = -120 V, exposure time = 2 sec 1 2 3 4 ・ : Maximum counts in pixel array ・ : Total counts of all pixels ・・・・ : Counts of each pixels

Evaluation of the counting type pixel Fitting by f(x) = p0 * Freq( ( x-p1 )/p3 ) * ( 1-Freq( ( x-( p1+p2 ) )/p3 ) ) p2 : size of a pixel (μm) ~ 45 μm → 5 μm smaller due to shortage of the charge collection efficiency in peripheral area of the pixel. p3 : degree of the charge sharing effect @σ (μm) ~ 6 μm

Evaluation of the counting type pixel 2-dimensional pixel array scan by 10 μmφ beam Very low sensitivity in corners of a pixel. Charge was shared in 4 pixels. Edge of the pixel array Row 63 Row 62 Row 61 Black line : boundary of the pixel

Evaluation of the counting type pixel 2-dimensional pixel array scan by 10 μmφ beam Very low sensitivity in corners of a pixel. Charge was shared in 4 pixels. CNPIX1 (Arai-san’s talk) hexagonal shape and prevents to charge sharing effect. This is expected to solve the problems of the square pixel. Edge of the pixel array Row 63 Row 62 Row 61 Black line : boundary of the pixel

Summary XRD experiment by the SOPHIAS detector SOPHIAS succeeded to separate very close 2 peaks with 150 μm camera length. On the other hand, IP failed to separate although it had advantage in camera length. → Fine size pixel is an important tool, especially in the experiment where camera length is limited in short distance. Evaluation of the counting type pixel X-ray tests of the CPIXTEG3b/CPIXPTEG1 were done in KEK/PF. It was noticed that the peripheral part of the pixel had low sensitivity to X-ray. → CNPIX1 prevents this problem. The X-ray test for it will be planed end of FY2016 (more happy case, end of this year).