Figure 4. Same as Fig. 3 but for x = 5.5.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dynamics of the young Solar system Kleomenis Tsiganis Dept. of Physics - A.U.Th. Collaborators: Alessandro Morbidelli (OCA) Hal Levison (SwRI) Rodney Gomes.
Advertisements

MINOR MEMBERS OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM: Asteroids. Images of three asteroids, taken during spacecraft flybys, shown to scale (Mathilde is 59 km wide and 47.
The `Nice’ Model Öpik approximation Planet migration in a planetesimal disk The Nice model Consequences of the Nice Model: Epoch of Late Heavy Bombardment,
Physics and Astronomy University of Utah Extreme Solar Systems II Fall 2011 The Evolution of Protoplanetary Disks and the Diversity of Giant Planets Diversity.
10Nov2006 Ge/Ay133 More on Jupiter, Neptune, the Kuiper belt, and the early solar system.
Origin of the Solar System Astronomy 311 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 8.
Terrestrial Planet Formation and the Delivery of Water: Theory and Simulations Dara Zeehandelaar TERPS Conference, ASTR688 December 9, 2004 Dara Zeehandelaar.
COMETS, KUIPER BELT AND SOLAR SYSTEM DYNAMICS Silvia Protopapa & Elias Roussos Lectures on “Origins of Solar Systems” February 13-15, 2006 Part I: Solar.
Measuring Up! Science Lesson 25 Stars
A coherent and comprehensive model of the evolution of the outer solar system Alessandro Morbidelli (OCA, Nice) Collaborators: R. Gomes, H. Levison, K.
Mass Distribution and Planet Formation in the Solar Nebula Steve Desch School of Earth and Space Exploration Arizona State University Lunar and Planetary.
THE LATE HEAVY BOMBARDMENT AND THE FORMATION OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM
Outer Solar System. Planets Outer solar system is dominated entirely by the four Jovian planets, but is populated by billions of small icy objects Giant.
Survey of the Solar System
Lecture 3 – Planetary Migration, the Moon, and the Late Heavy Bombardment Abiol 574.
Solar System. MILKY WAY 200 billion stars Diameter LY Height at center LY Solar System is LY from center.
THE SOLAR SYSTEM Made by: Carlos Munaiz Cossío Roberto Aldea Velayos
Chaotic Case Studies: Sensitive dependence on initial conditions in star/planet formation Fred C. Adams Physics Department University of Michigan With:
How do “Habitable” Planets Form? Sean Raymond University of Washington Collaborators: Tom Quinn (Washington) Jonathan Lunine (Arizona)
Space Asteroids Raynaldo 6B.
WARM UP Can you list the planets in order?. Our Solar System.
1 ACM #8103 PROBABILITIES OF COLLISIONS OF MIGRATING SMALL BODIES AND DUST PARTICLES WITH PLANETS S.I. Ipatov (1) Catholic University of America, USA
David Nesvorny David Vokrouhlicky (SwRI) Alessandro Morbidelli (CNRS) David Nesvorny David Vokrouhlicky (SwRI) Alessandro Morbidelli (CNRS) Capture of.
Group competition Tonight: discussion translation printing.
Sean Raymond University of Washington
The Solar System The Planets. Celestial Bodies Is an old term that means the sun, moon and stars Is an old term that means the sun, moon and stars Thousands.
David Nesvorny (Southwest Research Institute) David Nesvorny (Southwest Research Institute) Capture of Irregular Satellites during Planetary Encounters.
The PSI Planet-building Code: Multi-zone, Multi-use S. J. Weidenschilling PSI Retreat August 20, 2007.
1 IAU GA, RIO, Symp. 263, #498 Collision Probabilities of Migrating Small Bodies and Dust Particles with Planets Sergei I. Ipatov (1) Catholic University.
Solar System.
DYNAMICAL EVOLUTION OF THE SEINAJOKI ASTEROID FAMILY Vladimir Đošović Bojan Novaković The sixth Symposium "Mathematics and Applications" 17. October2015.
Cratering in the Solar System William Bottke Southwest Research Institute Boulder, Colorado.
THE SOLAR SYSTEM. BODIES IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM Our planet, Earth, is part of a system of planets that orbit a star, the sun. The solar system is comprised.
Terrestrial Planet Formation in Binary Star Systems ROSES Workshop 2005 February Jack J. Lissauer, NASA Ames Elisa V. Quintana, NASA Ames & Univ. Michigan.
Dynamical constraints on the nature of the Late Heavy Bombardment and models of its origin A.Morbidelli Observatoire de la Cote d’Azur, Nice, France.
Orbit of Mercury Yeah protractors!. Planetary Orbits - All planets orbit the Sun in an ellipse - Semi-major axis (a) is half of the long axis.
Formation of the Solar System Section 28.1 Modeling the Solar System This geocentric, or Earth-centered, model could not readily explain some aspects of.
Our Solar System. Solar System The region of space that falls within the gravitational influence of the Sun Consists of: –yellow star, Planets, Dwarf.
Formation of the Solar System Transparency for Activity From Messenger Activity.
Capture of Irregular Satellites during Planetary Encounters
Figure 1. Orbital evolution of the planetesimals and Jupiter-mass planet in simulation S1. The solid points show the planetesimals. The radii of the planetesimals.
Figure 1. HATLAS J (z = , marked with vertical line)
Space.
From: Ion chemistry in the coma of comet 67P near perihelion
Figure 3. The hybrid simulations results
Figure 2. A comparison between the modern PMS spectral type-to-effective temperature conversion scales of Pecaut & Mamajek (2013, solid red line, labelled.
Figure 1. Left – a small region of a typical polarized spectrum acquired with the ESPaDOnS instrument during the MiMeS project. This figure illustrates.
From: Discovery of carbon-rich Miras in the Galactic bulge
From: The VISTA Deep Extragalactic Observations (VIDEO) survey★
Survey of the Solar System
From: Numerical aspects of giant impact simulations
Overview of the Solar System
From: The evolution of star formation activity in galaxy groups
Figure 2. The residuals to a phenomenological continuum model, revealing strong features at the iron L, iron K, and Compton hump bands. The data are from.
Figure 3. Inclination instability in the outer Solar system
5 lectures, beginning Autumn 2007
Fig. 2. Semi-major axis vs. eccentricity (left) and semi-major axis vs
Our Solar System PAGE 16.
Figure 1. A decay chain normalized by the total number of nuclei in the chain. The dashed line depicts e−1/t, where e is Euler number. From:
Solar system Sergei popov.
The Planets and the Solar System
Bell Ringer What is the order of the planets?
Figure 1. Position vectors of the components – Sun, Earth, Moon and particle (P) – of the studied four-body problem in the barycentric ecliptic coordinate.
Star-planet coalescence
Planetary Orbits Recall eccentricity e defined by:
Figure 1. Changes to the orbital parameters of close binary star systems due to dynamical interactions in star-forming ... Figure 1. Changes to the orbital.
1.1.1a and 1.1.1b ORIGIN OF THE EARTH’S MOTION BASED ON THE ORIGIN OF THE GALAXY AND SOLAR SYSTEM.
The Structure of the Solar System
Figure 1. Two examples (left-hand and right-hand panels) of the orbital evolution of a planet tidally interacting with ... Figure 1. Two examples (left-hand.
Solar system Sergei popov.
Presentation transcript:

Figure 4. Same as Fig. 3 but for x = 5.5. From: Terrestrial planet formation constrained by Mars and the structure of the asteroid belt Mon Not R Astron Soc. 2015;453(4):3619-3634. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1835 Mon Not R Astron Soc | © 2015 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society

Figure 3. Snapshots of the dynamical evolution of one simulation where x = 2.5. Jupiter and Saturn are initially as in the Nice model II. The size of each body corresponds to its relative physical size and is scaled as M<sup>1/3</sup>, where M is the body mass. However, it is not to scale on the x-axis. The colour coding gives the range of mass which each body belongs to. From: Terrestrial planet formation constrained by Mars and the structure of the asteroid belt Mon Not R Astron Soc. 2015;453(4):3619-3634. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1835 Mon Not R Astron Soc | © 2015 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society

Figure 2. Initial conditions of our simulations Figure 2. Initial conditions of our simulations. Each panel shows the distribution of planetary embryos and planetesimals generated within a given disc profile defined by the surface density slope x. Planetary embryos are marked as open circles and planetesimals are objects with masses smaller than 0.000 75 Earth masses. From: Terrestrial planet formation constrained by Mars and the structure of the asteroid belt Mon Not R Astron Soc. 2015;453(4):3619-3634. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1835 Mon Not R Astron Soc | © 2015 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society

Figure 1. Orbital distribution of the real population of asteroids with absolute magnitude H < 9.7, which corresponds to diameter of about 50 km. The upper plot show semimajor axis versus eccentricity. The lower plot shows semimajor axis versus inclination. From: Terrestrial planet formation constrained by Mars and the structure of the asteroid belt Mon Not R Astron Soc. 2015;453(4):3619-3634. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1835 Mon Not R Astron Soc | © 2015 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society

Figure 5. Final distribution of the surviving bodies in our simulations after 700 Myr of integration. Each panel shows the final distribution in a diagram semimajor axis versus mass for all simulations considering the same value of x. The value of x is indicated on the upper-right corner of each panel. Open circles correspond to bodies with masses larger than 0.3 M<sub>⊕</sub>. Smaller bodies are labelled with crosses. The solid triangles represent the inner planets of the Solar system. From: Terrestrial planet formation constrained by Mars and the structure of the asteroid belt Mon Not R Astron Soc. 2015;453(4):3619-3634. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1835 Mon Not R Astron Soc | © 2015 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society

Figure 6. Orbital distributions of the surviving bodies in our simulations after 700 Myr of integration. Open circles correspond to bodies with masses larger than 0.3 M<sub>⊕</sub>. Smaller bodies are labelled with crosses. The left-hand column shows the orbital eccentricity versus semimajor axis while the right-hand column shows orbital inclination versus semimajor axis. The value of x is indicated on the upper-right corner of each panel. The filled triangles represent the inner planets of the Solar system. Orbital inclinations are shown relative to a fiducial plane of reference. From: Terrestrial planet formation constrained by Mars and the structure of the asteroid belt Mon Not R Astron Soc. 2015;453(4):3619-3634. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1835 Mon Not R Astron Soc | © 2015 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society

Figure 7. Timing of last giant collision on Earth-analogues for all our simulations. The surface density profile is indicated on the upper-right corner of each plot. The grey area shows the expected range (30–150 Myr) for the last giant impact on Earth derived from cosmochemical studies. From: Terrestrial planet formation constrained by Mars and the structure of the asteroid belt Mon Not R Astron Soc. 2015;453(4):3619-3634. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1835 Mon Not R Astron Soc | © 2015 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society

Figure 8. Final state of one simulation considering self-interacting planetesimals distributed between 2 and 3.5 au after 200 Myr of integration. Each planetesimal has an initial small mass equal to 1.3 × 10<sup>−4</sup> M<sub>⊕</sub>. The upper plot shows eccentricity versus semimajor axis. The lower plot shows orbital inclination versus semimajor axis. The vertical lines show the locations of mean motion resonances with Jupiter. From: Terrestrial planet formation constrained by Mars and the structure of the asteroid belt Mon Not R Astron Soc. 2015;453(4):3619-3634. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1835 Mon Not R Astron Soc | © 2015 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society

Figure 9. Evolution of rms eccentricity and inclination of a population of 1000 Ceres-mass planetesimals for 4 Gyr obtained from statistical calculations. From: Terrestrial planet formation constrained by Mars and the structure of the asteroid belt Mon Not R Astron Soc. 2015;453(4):3619-3634. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1835 Mon Not R Astron Soc | © 2015 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society

Figure 10. Same as that for Fig Figure 10. Same as that for Fig. 6 but after the jumping-Jupiter-like evolution of Jupiter and Saturn. From: Terrestrial planet formation constrained by Mars and the structure of the asteroid belt Mon Not R Astron Soc. 2015;453(4):3619-3634. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1835 Mon Not R Astron Soc | © 2015 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society

Figure 11. Snapshots at 10 Myr of a simulation considering 2000 test particles distributed between 0.5 and 4 au. Jupiter and Saturn are initially as in their current orbits but with slightly higher orbital eccentricities. Secular resonance locations are also shown. From: Terrestrial planet formation constrained by Mars and the structure of the asteroid belt Mon Not R Astron Soc. 2015;453(4):3619-3634. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1835 Mon Not R Astron Soc | © 2015 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society