Premium Allocation Approach

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IFRS 4 Phase 2 Insurance Contract Model IAA Fund Meeting Kuala Lumpur, October 10, 2011 Darryl Wagner, FSA, MAAA.
Advertisements

Session 8 IFRS and Solvency Requirements Regional Training Seminar IAIS-ASSAL-FIDES 25 November 2009, Lima Peru Takao Miyamoto, IAIS Secretariat.
Focus on Accounting Cayman Islands Society of Professional Accountants
*connectedthinking  Discussion Paper Preliminary Views on Insurance Contracts Sabine Wuiame.
EFRAG’s views on ED Insurance Contracts Final comment letter 14 December 2010.
6/9/2015Copyright 2015 A. C. Sondhi & Associates, LLC1 ASU , ASC 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers and Proposed ASU, Deferral of Effective.
Insurance Contracts Jeong-Hyeok, Park Research Fellow September 29, 2010 Agenda-D-2.
The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter, not necessarily those of the IASB or IFRS Foundation. International Financial Reporting.
EFRAG’s views on ED Leases Final comment letter 15 December 2010.
©2007 National Association of Insurance Commissioners International Accounting Issues Rob Esson, NAIC & Chair of the IAIS Insurance Contracts Subcommittee.
International Financial Reporting Standards The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter, not necessarily those of the IASB or IFRS.
2009 Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné Seminar for the Appointed Actuary Colloque pour l’actuaire désigné 2009.
International Accounting Standards for Insurance Contracts Implications for Property/Casualty Insurance in the United States Casualty Loss Reserve Seminar.
International Accounting Standards Board ® May 2006 The IASB’s project on Insurance Contracts Peter Clark Senior Project Manager International Accounting.
PD - 16 Developments on International Accounting Standards From a P & C and Life Perspective Canadian Institute of Actuaries Annual Meeting David Oakden.
Click to edit Master title style Casualty Loss Reserving Seminar – San Diego, CA September 10 – 11, INSURANCE AND ACTUARIAL.
International Accounting Standards Board © 2011 IFRS Foundation. 30 Cannon Street | London EC4M 6XH | UK. The views expressed in this presentation.
New Revenue Recognition Standard – Overview
1 Financial Instruments: Classification and Measurement Update.
Accounting (Basics) - Lecture 6 Provisions and contingencies.
Current IASB Position Contracts with Participating FeaturesContracts: Measurement of the Insurance Contract Liability.
Insurance Contracts Summary of project and proposed Update Larry Smith, FASB member Jennifer Weiner, FASB senior practice fellow.
IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers Presented by CPA Peter Njuguna.
Accounting (Basics) - Lecture 5 Impairment of assets
EFRAG’s preliminary position on the IASB Supplementary Document Financial Instruments: Impairment Draft comment letter 28 February 2011.
Product Classification and DPFs Session 6
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Participating Contracts
Sailing a Course through Risk Margins Will it be perilous?
Insurance IFRS Seminar December 1, 2016 Darryl Wagner Session 10
Insurance IFRS Seminar Hong Kong, December 1, 2016 Eric Lu
Current IFRS 4 Reporting
Insurance IFRS Seminar Hong Kong, August 3, 2015 Eric Lu Session 18
Contractual Service Margins
Actuarial Valuation Methods
EFRAG’s views on ED Leases
IFRS 4 Phase 2 Insurance Contract Model
Loss Reserve Discounting – International Accounting Ralph Blanchard, FCAS CAS representative to the IAA Insurance Accounting Committee.
Separating components from insurance contracts
FASB Targeted Improvements
Insurance IFRS Seminar December 2, 2016 Chris Hancorn Session 32
Insurance IFRS Seminar December 2, 2016 Darryl Wagner Session 23
Ready Set Go! The New Revenue Recognition Rules
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs)
IASB Questions & Feedback
Insurance IFRS Seminar December 2, 2016 Chris Hancorn Session 28
Insurance IFRS Seminar December 2, 2016 Bill Horbatt Session 33
Risk adjustment (margin)
Casualty Actuarial Society Practical discounting and risk adjustment issues relating to property/casualty claim liabilities Research conducted.
Accounting proposals for insurance contracts
IASB/FASB meetings – January 2013 Francesco Nagari
Insurance IFRS Seminar December 2, 2016 Bill Horbatt Session 33
Section 21 Provisions & Contingencies
Indian Actuarial Profession Serving the Cause of Public Interest
Accounting for general insurance contracts
This standard in general specifies :-
Introduction to IFRS 17 for Non-Life Actuaries
Insurance IFRS Seminar December 1, 2016 Darryl Wagner Session 11
Presentation Workshop
Contract boundaries Insurance IFRS Seminar December 1, 2016
Acquisition costs Insurance IFRS Seminar December 1, 2016
Premium Allocation Approach WS
IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts – the final standard is here!
Insurance IFRS Seminar December 1, 2016 Darryl Wagner Session 17
Insurance IFRS Seminar December 1, 2016 Darryl Wagner Session 17
Contractual Service Margins WS
THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF NIGERIA (ICAN)
IFRS 15 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Una scenografia teatrale della commedia dell’arte
IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments
Presentation transcript:

Premium Allocation Approach Darryl Wagner, FSA, MAAA Insurance IFRS Seminar December 1, 2016 Bill Horbatt Session 21

Agenda Premium Allocation Approach Subsequent measurement

Premium Allocation Approach An entity may simplify the measurement of the liability for the remaining coverage (known in the 2010 ED as the “pre-claims liability”) using the premium-allocation approach if Doing so would produce a measurement that is a reasonable approximation to that which would be produced when applying the building block approach; The coverage period at initial recognition is approximately one year or less. Pre-claims liability is the insurer’s stand ready obligation to pay claims for future insured events arising under existing contracts. When an entity uses the simplified approach, it shall recognize an onerous contract liability (the difference between the liability and the fulfillment cash flow), if, at initial recognition or subsequently, the portfolio of the contracts containing the contract is onerous. A portfolio of insurance contracts is onerous if, after the entity is bound by the terms of the contract, the sum of the fulfillment cash flows and any pre-coverage cash flows is greater than zero. The pre-claims liability at initial recognition is the premium received at initial recognition, less the directly attributable acquisition costs and plus any onerous liability. Consistent with the general measurement model, a current market discount rate would be used in discounting the pre-claims liability (note practical expedient).

Modified approach subsequent measurement Pre-claims liability for subsequent reporting period is the previous carrying amount: Plus the premium received in the period; Minus the amount recognized as insurance contract revenue for coverage provided in the period Plus any onerous liability recognized during the period Plus (or minus) the effect of any changes in estimates that relate to any onerous liability recognized in previous periods Plus any adjustment to reflect the time value of money.

Premium Allocation Approach Proposals in Original ED/DP Proposals in the 2013 ED FASB and IASB introduced the “modified approach” as an alternative model for certain short duration contracts Initial pre-claims liability is premiums received less directly attributable acquisition costs Pre-claims liability is reduced/amortized over the coverage period Onerous contract test required each period Liabilities for claims incurred would be measured at the present value of fulfillment cash flows using building blocks 1 and 2 IASB: PAA is permitted as a simplification to BBA FASB: PAA is required based on comprehensive eligibility criteria Quantitative onerous contract test and reflection of onerous liability in the pre- claims liability Discount cash flows if there is a significant financing element; however, there is a practical expedient to not require discounting for contracts that have a duration of 12 months or less at inception

Comparison of PAA Eligibility Criteria IASB FASB Objective Eligible for PAA if measurements are reasonable approximation to BBA. Insured should apply the BBA instead of PAA, if certain specific criteria are met. Practical Expedient Contract meets the objective if the coverage period is one year or less. Contract is within scope of the PAA if coverage period is one year or less. Permit/ Require PAA permitted but not required PAA required for contracts not BBA eligible. Eligibility Requirements The principles based objective does not provide for eligibility requirements. IASB agreed to application guidance consistent with the FASB’s eligibility requirements – however this would not be included in the main body of the final standard. Apply the PAA if, at contract inception, either condition is met: During the period before a claim is incurred, it is unlikely there will be a significant change in the CFs required to fulfill the contract; or, The coverage period of the insurance contract is one year or less

Comparison of PAA Eligibility Criteria IASB FASB Application Guidance Contracts would not produce BBA comparable measurements if, at contract inception, either condition is met: [Same as FASB Eligibility Criteria] It is likely that, during the period before a claim is incurred, there will be a significant change in the CFs required to fulfill the contract; or, Significant judgment is required to allocate the premium to the insurer’s obligation in each reporting period. Uncertainty examples include: premium that would reflect the exposure and risk for each reporting period; or length of the coverage period. Example contracts would not be included as application guidance. The following are indicators that the eligibility criteria for BBA are met: Existence of guarantees or options may indicate there is likely to be a significant change in CFs, unless substantially offset by variations in premiums. Changes in circumstances will not always significantly change the CFs. Other circumstances are not likely at contract inception. Significant change in premium pricing for future contracts with similar or identical risks could indicate a significant change in the CFs. The longer the coverage period of a contract, the more likely it is that there will be a significant change in the CFs. Refer to the FASB ED for specific examples.

IASB Measurement Model PAA BBA AC PAA BBA CSM AC CSM BB3 RA Liability for remaining coverage RA ≈ BB2 UPR PAA BBA BB1 RA RA BB2 RA RA = RA UPR BB2 BB2 BB2 = BB2 Liability for incurred claims BB1 BB1 BB1 = BB1 BB1 BB1 Day 0 Coverage Period End of Coverage AC Acquisition Costs BB Building Block BBA Building Block Approach LEGEND PAA Premium Allocation Approach RA Risk Adjustment CSM* Contractual Service Margin UPR Unearned Premium Reserve, or PAA Pre-Claims Liability * CSM can be unlocked for favorable and unfavorable changes, resulting in a CSM that can increase and decrease.

FASB Measurement Model PAA BBA The single margin relates to both incurred claims and remaining coverage CFs. AC PAA BBA BBA AC SM BB3 SM AC PAA BBA Liability for remaining coverage UPR BB2 Liability for remaining coverage BB2 UPR SM BB1 UPR BB1 BB2 BB2 BB2 = BB2 Liability for incurred claims BB1 Liability for incurred claims BB1 BB1 = BB1 BB1 BB1 Day 0 Coverage Period End of Coverage AC Acquisition Costs BB Building Block BBA Building Block Approach LEGEND PAA Premium Allocation Approach RA Risk Adjustment SM* Single Margin UPR Unearned Premium Reserve, or PAA Pre-claims Liability * There is no explicit unlocking adjustment SM subsequent to initial recognition. Note that the SM equals building block 3 in the FASB model.

Thank You