Teterboro Airport Part 150 Noise/Land Use Compatibility Study Teterboro Users Group Meeting July 19, 2017 Teterboro Airport

Agenda Introductions Part 150 Overview Noise Exposure Map (NEM) Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) Discussion Study Schedule

Generalized Part 150 Study Process / Schedule

Final TEB Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs)

Final NEM Dwelling Unit and Population Counts Year Metric Dwelling Units within DNL Contour Interval Population within DNL Contour Interval 65-70 70-75 Total 2016 Single Family 88 213 Multi-Family 51 123 Mobile Home 44 8 52 106 19 125 183 191 442 461 2021 83 5 201 12 49 2 119 124 Mobile Home1 48 9 57 116 22 138 180 16 196 436 39 475 Note: Population = 2.42 people times number of residential units

Noise Compatibility Program Development Process Step 1: Identify Incompatible Land Uses Existing conditions Noise Exposure Map Forecast conditions Noise Exposure Map Step 2: Consider Noise Abatement Strategies Reduce exposure over incompatible uses Limit growth in exposure over incompatible uses Step 3: Consider Land Use Strategies Mitigate residual incompatible uses Prevent introduction of new incompatible uses Step 4: Consider Programmatic Strategies Implement and promote measures Monitor and report on effectiveness Update NEMs and revise NCP as appropriate Analysis and Selection Process Applied in Steps 2 - 4 Evaluate effectiveness of each measure in addressing objectives Evaluate feasibility (operational, safety, economic, etc.) Select preferred “package” of measures Identify implementation schedule, responsibilities, budget, funding sources, etc. If not recommended, document reasons

Major NCP Strategy Options within Each Category Noise Abatement Strategiess Noise abatement flight tracks Preferential runway use Arrival/departure procedures Airport layout modifications Noise barriers (presented today) Runup enclosures Use restrictions (will be addressed at TAC 13) Other actions proposed by stakeholders Land Use Strategiesfff Mitigation Land acquisition Sound insulation Avigation easements Prevention Land use controls Zoning Building codes Comprehensive plans Real estate disclosures Other actions proposed by stakeholders Programmatic Strategies Implementation tools (rules, regulations, ordinances, etc.) Promotion, education, signage, etc. Monitoring Reporting NEM updating NCP revision Other actions proposed by stakeholders

“Partial” DNL Contributors by Operational Category Most Effective Noise Abatement Alternatives Departure Operations Day Departure Operations Night Departure Operations Jet Operations To determine where we could have the biggest impact in procedural changes, the 2021 Future Condition NEM contours were analyzed by operational categories for DNL contribution. For the full analysis, see the TEB TAC #9 presentation here: http://panynjpart150.com/TEB_TAC.asp To obtain a significant change in the DNL 65 contour, a noise abatement procedure: Must affect jet departures Will be most effective in night jet departures as it will provide the greatest benefit relative to the number of operations affected Results: Jet operations dominate total DNL Departures contribute more to total DNL than arrivals Daytime operations contribute slightly more than nighttime

NCP Operational Noise Abatement Proposals Category Measure Noise Benefit Preferential runway use Shift Runway 6 night arrivals to Runway 1 – Existing Program Small benefit (reduction of 8 homes with a 25% shift) Shift Runway 24 night departures to Runway 19 – Existing Program Small benefit for a small increase (10%), no benefit at a higher increase (25%) Shift Runway 1 night departures to Runway 6 No Benefit as increased dwelling units north of Runway 24 Combination of Increased arrivals to Runway 1 and departures from Runway 19 Little benefit as increases in units in the mobile home park offset reductions of units along Route 17 Noise abatement flight paths, arrival procedures, and departure procedures Runway 19 Quiet Visual approach FAA discontinued procedure for use after publication due to the complexity of flying it Runway 24 noise abatement departure to 230 heading at night Reduction of 15 dwelling units in total, 6 of which are within the 70 DNL contour Noise abatement departure procedures - NBAA high-density NADP Reduction of 19 dwelling units if used for 88% of of jet departures not held down at or below 3,000 ft. Airport layout Runway 1 jet departures starting at Taxiway K intersection Reduction of 28 dwelling units in the mobile home park Relocation of maintenance run-ups to center of airfield along Taxiway Q Reduction of 5 dwelling units in the mobile home park

Preferential Runway Use Shift 25% of Rwy 6 Night Arrivals to Runway 1 Shift 25% of Rwy 24 Night Departures to Rwy 19 These figures are not official Noise Exposure Maps. They are hypothetical cases for deliberative purposes only.

Preferential Runway Use (cont’d) Shift 25% of Rwy 1 Night Departures to Rwy 6 Shift 25% of Rwy 6 Night Arrivals to Rwy 1 and 25% of Rwy 24 Night Departures to Rwy 19 These figures are not official Noise Exposure Maps. They are hypothetical cases for deliberative purposes only.

Preferential Runway Use (cont’d) We looked at increasing use of the Preferential Runway Use at night TRACON does not expect the airspace situation to change to allow for more Runway 19 departures at night Overall the existing program has a benefit and should remain in place

Noise Abatement Flight Track: 90% of Night Jet Departures on Runway 24 Assigned 230° Heading Existing track shown is the jet backbone track with the highest usage The new 230o departure heading track turns after the end of the runway Slight reduction in residential land within the 70 DNL contour Moderate reduction in residential land within the 65 DNL contour These figures are not official Noise Exposure Maps. They are hypothetical cases for deliberative purposes only.

NBAA High-Density NADP

Departure Procedure: Use of NBAA High-Density NADP to Jet Departures Not Held at or Below 3,000’ Limiting application to departures not held at 3,000’ results in approximately 52% of all jet departures using high-density NADP North Jersey Vineyard Church to the north of Runway 1/19 is removed from 65 DNL Pulls the 70 DNL contour onto airport property Reduces residential land within 65 DNL under Runway 24 departures These figures are not official Noise Exposure Maps. They are hypothetical cases for deliberative purposes only.

Airport Layout: Shift the start-of-takeoff-roll point to the Taxiway K intersection for all of Runway 1 jet departures at night Would lose approximately 550’ of takeoff distance, but takeoff distance is still longer than Runway 6 Voluntary procedure would permit aircraft to use full runway length if needed Taxiway K intersection Normal, full-length start-of-takeoff-roll location Noticeable reduction of contour extent over mobile home park – reduction of 28 dwelling units These figures are not official Noise Exposure Maps. They are hypothetical cases for deliberative purposes only.

Proposed runup location along Taxiway Q north of Taxiway G Airport Layout: Location of All Maintenance Runups in the Center of the Airfield along Taxiway Q Proposed runup location along Taxiway Q north of Taxiway G Provides reduction of the 70 DNL contour south of Route 46 Using 60o and 240o headings – with the same split as the existing locations There is a slight benefit to the mobile home park (reduction of five homes) These figures are not official Noise Exposure Maps. They are hypothetical cases for deliberative purposes only.

Dwelling Unit and Population Analyses Green highlight is net reduction Red highlight is net increase Category Scenario 65 – 70 DNL 70+ DNL Total Dwelling Unit Change from Baseline Population Change from Baseline Units Pop’n 65-70 70+ Baseline 2021 Baseline Operations 180 436 16 39 196 475 - Runway Use Shift 25% of Rwy 6 Night Arr.s to Rwy 1 179 433 9 22 188 455 -1 -7 -8 -3 -17 -20 Shift 25% Rwy 24 Night Dep.s to Rwy 19 189 457 10 24 199 481 -6 3 21 -15 6 Shift 25% of Rwy 1 Night Dep.s to Rwy 6 181 438 12 29 193 467 1 -4 2 -10 Shift 25% of Rwy 6 Night Arr.s to Rwy 1 and 25% of Rwy 1 Night Dep.s to Rwy 19 183 443 7 Flight Tracks 90% Night Rwy 24 Jet Dep.s Turn to 230° 171 414 -9 -22 -37 Layout 100% of RW 1 Night Departures Start at Twy K 161 390 17 168 407 -19 -28 -46 -68 All maintenance runups use central location 191 462 -5 -13 NBAA High-Density NADP Use by 88% of Jet Departures Not Held Down at or Below 3,000 ft. 177 429 -12 -29 Note: Noise abatement procedures must be studied and approved by the FAA for safety and efficiency before any proposed procedure can be implemented.

Sensitive Receptors within 65 DNL Blue checkmark indicates site is wholly or largely within DNL 65 Category Scenario Learning Tree Academy Daycare Bergen County Technical School (Sound insulated, so compatible) Catalyst Agape Church (formerly North Jersey Vineyard Church) Jersey College School of Nursing (Sound insulation status unknown) Baseline 2021 Baseline Operations Runway Use Shift 25% of RW 6 Night Arrivals to Runway 1 Shift 25% RW 24 Night Departures to Runway 19 Shift 25% of RW 1 Night Departures to Runway 6 Shift 25% of RW 6 Night Arrivals to Runway 1 and 25% of Runway 1 Night Departures to Runway 19 Flight Tracks 90% Night Rwy 24 Jet Dep.s Turn to 230° Layout 100% of RW 1 Night Departures Start at Twy K NBAA High-Density NADP Use by 88% of Jet Departures Not Held Down at or Below 3,000 ft. Removed from contours Note: Noise abatement procedures must be studied and approved by the FAA for safety and efficiency before any proposed procedure can be implemented.

Next Steps Finalize operational recommendations Develop land use/mitigation recommendations Develop programmatic recommendations Draft NCP will be submitted to FAA in August of 2018