Administrative Code Amendment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ninth Amendment to the Orange County / City of Maitland Joint Planning Area Agreement April 17, 2007 Ninth Amendment to the Orange County / City of Maitland.
Advertisements

Applicants Rob & Judi McCarthy, SLO County Permit #DRC
FORA Board Meeting Friday, June 13, 2014 City of Seaside 2013 Zoning Code Update – FORA Consistency Determination.
August 20, 2014 Infill Incentive District Revisions 2014.
1 May 9, 2014 Nancy S. McNayr, AICP McNayr Paque, LLC Oklahoma Municipal League Oklahoma Municipal League Planning Commissioner Workshop Practical Advice.
CBJ Planning Commission Presentation November 9, 2010 Subdivision Ordinance Revision Update.
Land Development Regulations : Section 2 – Waivers (and related sections) Regulation Update Board of County Commissioners Hearing November 25, 2014.
Josh Metz, Associate Planner Consistency Determination: City of Seaside – 2013 Zoning Code Text Amendments.
November 22, 2011 Historical Commission Mission : To promote, preserve and protect Alachua County’s historic resources.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT City Council June 3, 2014.
Alachua County Board of County Commissioners May 12, 2015.
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 15 Article III Air Quality Control Public Hearing Presented by the Orange County Environmental Protection Division June.
Planning Processes/Permits “From Pre-application meeting to Board of Aldermen Approval.” “From Pre-application meeting to Board of Aldermen Approval.”
Roles and Responsibilities in Municipal Land Use.
Horizon West Village Planned Development Code Update Adoption Public Hearing Board of County Commissioners January 14, 2014 Chapter 38, Article XIII, Division.
ZOM Major Amendment to Arbor Greens PD. Overview Arbor Greens PD site +/- 152 ac Amendment request summary –Extension of buildout date from 2014.
Consistency Determination: City of Seaside Local Coastal Program FORA Board Meeting March 15, 2013 Agenda No: 8a.
Public Hearing Modifications to the Gated Community Ordinance Board of County Commissioners Presented by the Orange County Public Works Department February.
Board of County Commissioners School Concurrency June 10, 2008 Adoption Public Hearing.
First Public Hearing February 10,  Board of County Commissioners direction of April 2008 to assess efficiency of development review process and.
Land Development Regulations : Section 2 – Waivers (and related sections) Regulation Update Board of County Commissioners Hearing December 9, 2014 Continued.
Second and Final Public Hearing February 24,
Updates to Title 8. Anticipated Timeline… July - December 2013 Ideas Compiled Research and Drafting January 2014 Planning Commission Worksession Review.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Planning & Land Development Regulation Board May 21, 2014.
February 20, 2007 Macon County Planning Board. Structure Height Ordinance Allows construction to 4 stories or 48 feet, whichever is greater Measured from.
Eastside Activity Center Zoning Overlay District and Amended Land Development Regulations.
Horizon West Village Planned Development Code Update Adoption Public Hearing Board of County Commissioners February 11, 2014 Chapter 38, Article XIII,
Planning & Community Development Department Zoning Code Amendment Public Hearing Proposed elimination of the 50% review step from the design review process.
Department of Sustainable Development and Construction Proposed Amendments to Cell Tower Regulations - Notification Requirements and Form District Standards.
Residential Plats Orange County Board of County Commissioners August 19, 2014.
AMENDMENTS TO THE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REVIEW GUIDE July 2006 IFTA Annual Business Meeting.
February 12, 2013 Alachua County Board of County Commissioners.
Repeal and Replace the Boundary Adjustment Act with the Urban Reserve Act.
Grant County Zoning Ordinance Review Public Comment Forum Todd Kays:Executive Director – 1 st District Association of Local Governments.
Request to Advertise January 27,  Board of County Commissioners direction of April 2008 to assess efficiency of development review process and.
Chapter 15, Amended Article II Appeals To EPC Presented by EPD May 1, 2007 Presented by EPD May 1, 2007 BCC Public Hearing BCC Public Hearing.
Siemon & Larsen Outline of New Zoning Code. Siemon & Larsen Goals Eliminating redundant and conflicting provisions An overall update Address concerns.
1 Presented to the City Council by the Planning and Development Department March 31, 2009 HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE UPDATES.
Development Permit System. Development Permit System 2 Disclaimer  The information presented is provided as background information to facilitate understanding.
CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE & PLANNING DIVISION: Hampton City Council July 13, 2011 Briefing Amendments to Chapter 35 of the Hampton City Code.
Regulatory Improvement Workplan: Policy Package 3 Planning Commission Recommendation to City Council July 28, 2004.
Chapter 15, Amended Article X Wetland Conservation Areas Presented by the Orange County Environmental Protection Division February 5, 2008 Presented by.
AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: 9.01CA3-05 January 17, 2006 City-initiated Code Amendment.
Overview: Code Modification Process Summary. PROPONENT Step 1 - Proponent has a code change in mind MODIFICATION (Mod) Step 2 - Proponent enters the mod.
N Current Adopted Post-LCP Certification and Appeal Jurisdiction Map Exhibit 1.
1 Villa Laguna MXD3 Site Plan Review. 2 Request: The applicant is requesting site plan review of a proposed mixed-use project pursuant to the recently.
Sewer Code Update (Title 13)
PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO ARTICLE 10 (VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC) OF THE PASADENA MUNICIPAL CODE City Council January 23, 2017.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
Planning Commission Public Hearing September 9, 2016
Sewer Code Update (Title 13)
Council Orientation October 24, 2017
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
ZONING CODE UPDATE ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES
Code Amendments to SMC 19A Planning Commission Meeting
Consideration of Action Re: Commercial Cannabis Businesses
Department Activities
Regulation Amendment AM April 3, 2018.
Department of Environmental Quality
Code Amendments to SMC 19A Planning Commission Meeting
Mock planning commission hearing LC 101
What is OAL? The Office of Administrative Law (OAL) ensures that agency regulations are clear, necessary, legally valid, and available to the public. OAL.
City of Coral Gables Zoning Code Re-Write.
WSUP (Lightning W Tank #2)
Planning and Zoning Essentials
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
Request Permission to Proceed to the EMC for Approval of Delegation of the Neuse Buffer Program to Johnston County and Delegation of Further Approval Authority.
Appeal Code Changes Delynn Coldiron, City Clerk; Brad Yatabe, Legal
Mock planning commission hearing LC 101
Board of County Commissioners
Presentation transcript:

Administrative Code Amendment Planning Commission January 5, 2017

Purpose of code amendment Streamline and simplify the processing of frequent & minor petitions by public Save time and money for the applicants and County tax payers through increased efficiency within the Planning Department Increase administrative processing of land use permits Cleaning up, clarify, and adjust appropriate code Sections Adopt standards/safeguards to ensure appropriate application of delegated authorities granted by the BOCC The BOCC has ultimate authority and with that authority has the ability to delegated it. It’s this delegation of authority which is allowing the PC and Staff to process applications on the Boards behalf. However, when Staff, PC, or JPC make a decision on their behalf, there are “Call-up” provisions of the code which allow the Board to hear the project.

Determinations & Call-ups A determination is a formal administrative action. A “call-up” has been designed for affected parties to have a land use application re-heard within the County process directly to, and by the Board of County Commissioners.

Updates All blue line edits are new since meeting on 12.22.2016 Clarification of blueline edits Retain existing BOA hearing timeframes (60 Days) Retain existing JPC call-up timeframes (20 days) Retain existing City Council call up language

Ch. 62, Definitions Director Determination, New & important Administrative Land Use, Proposed to be determined by Planning CL I, Proposed to be heard by PC CL II, Proposed to be heard by JPC or BOCC Special Uses, Proposed to be processed as CL I Cleaning up of existing definitions A few new definitions (e.g., Site Plan, Sketch Plan) which add needed clarity Redefining processing of Class I & Class II land use permits (Special Use is proposed to proceed through CL I since parameters are already established) Talk briefly about call-up procedures pursuant to Sec. 82-91

Ch. 82, Land Use and Development Permits - Administrative land use permit Clarifies Directors ability to classify projects, and make determinations Restructures Administrative process to allow for certain project modifications, Boundary adjustments, Lot consolidations, Final plats, Special events Includes requirements for specific evaluations as outlined in 82-2(b) Project mod – 82-15, not change in mitigation or impact BA & LC – 82-11 Final Plat – 82-95 Special Event – 82-13

Ch. 82, Land Use and Development Permits - Determination letters Planning Director or Public Works Director responsible for making formal determinations Identifies circumstances when a determination letter must be used Identifies elements of determination letter Allows for formal process to hear an appeal by the Board of Adjustment

Final plats to be approved via administrative land use permit Ch. 82, Land Use and Development Permits - Subdivisions, Boundary Adjustment & Lot Consolidations Final plats to be approved via administrative land use permit Boundary adjustments and lot consolidations to be approved via administrative land use permit Clarifies process, requirements, and standards for action identified above Changes made since 12.22.2016

Ch. 82, Land Use and Development Permits - Temporary uses Subject to Class I process Clarified specific submittal requirements

Ch. 82, Land Use and Development Permits - Adjustments; modifications Identifies specific criteria when an existing permit can be adjusted by Planning Department without requiring a hearing for a new land use permit Creates two different categories Adjustment (determination letter) Modification/re-permit (administrative re-permit) so long as use is less impactful If request exceed modification criteria, it shall require a new land use permit Subject to call-up provisions

Ch. 82, Land Use and Development Permits - Call-up procedure Important section to ensure accountability to BOCC of their delegated authority Clearly identifies who is eligible to “call-up” an approval to the BOCC Clearly identifies the process and requirements for a “call-up” procedure Clearly identifies the timeframe within which a “call-up” can occur This is important

Ch. 82, Land Use and Development Permits – Compatibility Assessment Identifies compatibility measures which must be evaluated when a permit adjustment or modification is sought (sec. 82-15) Expanded definitions to more clearly identify compatibility metrics Clarifies neighborhood compatibility meeting requirements This is important

Ch. 82, Land Use and Development Permits – Zoning Clarifies that “use permitted by right” shall not require a land use permit Allows special use permits to be processed as a CL I instead of as a CL II This is important

Summary of code amendment intended outcomes Amendments include adequate standards/safeguards to ensure appropriate application of delegated authorities by the BOCC Streamlined and simplified processing of frequent & minor petitions Saves time and money for the applicant and the County (tax payer) through faster permit processing Increased administrative processing of land use permits Cleaned up, clarified, and adjusted appropriate code Sections The BOCC has ultimate authority and with that authority has the ability to delegated it. It’s this delegation of authority which is allowing the PC and Staff to process applications on the Boards behalf. However, when Staff, PC, or JPC make a decision on their behalf, there are “Call-up” provisions of the code which allow the Board to hear the project.