NEW Louisiana Science Standards

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Core State Standards and Essential Standards
Advertisements

The Adventure Continues: Exploring the Next Generation Science Standards.
A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts and Core Ideas Board on Science Education July, 2012.
Science Framework, And Next Generation Science Standards.
Oregon State Board of Education October 2012
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
1 Welcome back!. Vision for Science Teaching and Learning 2 View free PDF from The National Academies Press at *Will also be posted.
Seeing the Destination So We Can Direct Others to It
Next Generation Science Standards Update Cheryl Kleckner Education Specialist.
Supporting the CCSS in the Science Classroom through the Science and Engineering Practices of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) John Spiegel.
Common Core Mathematics, Common Core English/Language Arts, and Next Generation Science Standards. What’s the common thread?
Common Core State Standards in Action at HCS Presentation for Partners in Education (PIE) November, 2013 by Betsy Knox and Nancy Pollack HCS Literacy and.
Why am I here? Science and Math Practices PASS Summer Session I June 10, 2013.
Grade K Menu Day Professional Development Heinrich Sartin Elementary Science Specialist, ESC North 1 Educational Service Center.
Engaging in Next Generation Science Standards. Amber Farthing Professional Learning and Program Assistance Coordinator, LASER Ellen Ebert Science Director,
New Standards and Environmental Education What is happening with Common Core and with Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)? How do these new standards.
Michigan’s Public Review of the Next Generation Science Standards for Today’s Students and Tomorrow’s Workforce.
LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP 1 Start recording—title slide—1 of 3 Introducing the Next Generation Science Standards Originally presented by:
1. THE STANDARDS WE TEACH Curriculum. ACTIONTIMELINE Phase 1: Review panel meetings (develop broad recommendations for changes; direction setting) Completed.
The Changing Face of Education: How Common Core Impacts Our Curriculum Beth Smith President, ASCCC Oct. 31, 2013.
The Next Generation Science Standards From Awareness to Transition
Introduction and Overview Rapid City Area Schools May 2011.
Middle/High School Model Exploration Kirk Brown and Lissa Gilmore
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
The State of Things FOSS Users Group November 5, 2012 Craig Gabler – Regional Science Coordinator.
Chris DeWald Science Instructional Coordinator Montana Office of Public Instruction.
Developing the Next Generation Science Standards.
Common Core State Standards Where we are as a district and as a state 1.
Update for TN State Board of Education July 24, 2013 Next Generation Science Standards for Today’s Students and Tomorrow’s Workforce.
Pennsylvania Common Core Standards & Student Assessments Changes.
What does a Framework for k-12 Science Education have to do with PER?
Anchor Standards – A Way for Art Sandy Roe Nanette Nichols WDMESC.
What Every Principal Should Know about STEM Education November 16, 2012 Maine Principals Association Conference Portland, ME.
Sustainability Education and the Next Generation Science Standards.
Planning for Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) 1.
NGSS-Health Science August Connection to the Common Core.
Next Generation Science Standards “Taking the Steps to Implement NGSS” March 29, 2013 TEEAM Conference.
S.P.S. - HMS May 19, New 2011 ELA & Literacy and Math Curriculum Frameworks  comprised primarily of the Common Core State Standards  written explicitly.
ITEAMS is designed to provide teachers with the tools to develop inquiry-based lessons, and the opportunity to develop a deep understanding of implementation.
The NRC Framework for K-12 Science Education and the Next Generation Science Standards Tom Keller, Senior Program Officer Board on Science Education National.
Unpacking NGSS Laura Kresl Julie Roney. Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) September 4, 2013 C Subject: State Schools Chief.
NEXT GENERATION SCIENCE STANDARDS (NGSS) Millard E. Lightburn (Ph.D.) Science Supervisor Ms. Mary Tweedy and Ms. Keisha Kidd Curriculum Support Specialists.
Click to edit Master title style Overview of the NGSS Framework.
The Basics About NGSS
Planning for Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) 1 Lesley Merritt, Science Specialist STEM Center for Math & Science Education-University of Arkansas.
Integration of practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. NGSS Architecture.
The case for scientific literacy? so pretty i never knew mars had a sun.
NGSS and Harding Township School Presented to the BOE on February 8, 2016 Dr. Michael Gervis Middle School Science Supervisor.
Performance Task and the common core. Analysis sheet Phases of problem sheet Performance task sheet.
Nevada State Science Standards Revision: Why NGSS?
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Welcome to the STEM Task Force Funding provided by:
Shifts in Science Education Testing, Standards, Curriculum, and Instruction Virginia Rhame, Science Specialist, NWAESC Lesley Merritt, Science Specialist,
Framework for K-12 Science Education Step 1 in Developing The Next Generation Science Standards.
Carolyn A Hayes, Ed.D. NSTA President ( ) 1 Next Generation Science Standards.
NGSS JUSD Science Committee Overview for Teachers.
Module 1: Overview of the Framework for K–12 Science Education
Board on Science Education Draft released 15 July 2011
NGSS 101 Introducing the Next Generation Science Standards for
The New Illinois Learning Standards
NATIONAL PROCESS FOR DEVELOPMENT
Key to Decoding NGSS NGSS = Next Generation Science Standards
Next Generation Science Standards
The New Illinois Learning Standards
LCUSD’s NGSS Implementation Plan
Never Science Alone with Project-Based Instruction
A Look at the New Science Standards
Next Generation Science Standards
NextGen STEM Teacher Preparation in WA State
Connecting NGSS to independent research September 21, 2019
Presentation transcript:

NEW Louisiana Science Standards Louisiana Science Teachers Association Nathan Cotten, LSTA President http://www.lsta.info/

Background Current benchmarks were adopted in May 1997. GLE’s were written in 2004. The comprehensive curriculum for science was last updated in 2008 under Paul Pastorek. A Framework for K-12 Science Education published in 2012. NGSS (Next Generation Science Standards) were released in 2013. BESE approved the adoption of new Louisiana Student Standards for Science, March 8, 2017. http://www.lsta.info/

The Need For New Standards Why did we need new science standards? Recent studies have shown that students begin forming complex ideas and explanations at an early age. Research has shown that content and the process of learning must be taught in tandem. Research has proven that depth is more important to student learning than breadth. https://www.slideshare.net/djharland/ngss-070913-wip5- actual-copy http://www.lsta.info/

Standards Are Based on the Framework Children are born investigators Understanding builds over time Science and engineering require both knowledge and practice Connect content to students’ interests and experiences Content is connected across ALL disciplines Express ideas grounded in scientific evidence Prepare students to be scientific literate citizens (college and career ready) A Framework for K-12 Science Education http://www.lsta.info/

Where can I find the new science standards? http://www.louisianabelieves.com/resources/library/ academic-standards Be sure to select LSS science standards for your grade/subject. http://www.lsta.info/

Domains Louisiana Science Standards are broken down into 5 domains. Physical Science (PS) Life Science (LS) Earth and Space Science (ESS) Environmental Science (EVS) Engineering, Technology and Applications of Science (ETS)   Mention that ETS only a few standards with this domain. http://www.lsta.info/ http://www.lsta.info/

3-Dimensional Learning Science and Engineering Practices (SEP) Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCI) Crosscutting Concepts (CCC) http://www.nextgenscience.org/three- dimensions http://www.lsta.info/

Performance Expectation: Definition Performance Expectations represent what the students should know and be able to do to be proficient in science. Performance Expectations are built using all three dimensions: Science and Engineering Practices Disciplinary Core Ideas Crosscutting Concepts All components are a part of each standard providing clarity and guidance for instructors. http://www.lsta.info/ http://www.lsta.info/

Pass out standard, HS-LS1-3 http://www.lsta.info/

Science and Engineering Practices The 8 science and engineering practices are: Ask questions (science) and define problems (engineering) Develop and use models Plan and conduct investigations Analyze and interpret data Use mathematical and computational thinking Construct explanations (science) and design solutions (engineering) Engage in scientific argument from evidence Obtain, evaluate, and communicate information http://www.lsta.info/

Practices in Different Disciplines Math M1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. M2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively. M3. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. M4. Model with mathematics. M5. Use appropriate tools strategically. M6. Attend to precision. M7. Look for and make use of structure. M8. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning. Science S1. Asking questions (for science) and defining problems (for engineering). S2. Developing and using models. S3. Planning and carrying out investigations. S4. Analyzing and interpreting data. S5. Using mathematics, information and computer technology, and computational thinking. S6. Constructing explanations (for science) and designing solutions (for engineering). S7. Engaging in argument from evidence. S8. Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information. English Language Arts E1. They demonstrate independence. E2. They build strong content knowledge. E3. They respond to the varying demands of audience, task, purpose, and discipline. E4. They comprehend as well as critique. E5. They value evidence. E6. They use technology and digital media strategically and capably. E7. They come to understand other perspectives and cultures. Here’s a listing of the practices for math, ELA and Science -- key intellectual practices. Each somewhat different by discipline – as you might expect … but there are some striking commonalities. Ask the group to look and process the practices for the three disciplines, all some think time and then as the group to discuss with shoulder partners and full table. Ask a couple tables for what they notice. http://www.lsta.info/

Disciplinary Core Ideas: Definition Represent a set of ideas that have broad importance across multiple disciplines; provide a key tool for understanding or investigating more complex ideas and solving problems; relate to the interests and life experiences of students; be teachable and learnable over multiple grades at increasing levels of sophistication. Each DCI describes what students are supposed to know by the end of the grade level and requires prior knowledge/experience. Disciplinary Core Ideas are grouped into five domains: Physical Science (PS) Life Science (LS) Earth and Space Science (ESS) Environmental Science (EVS) Engineering, Technology, and Applications of Science (ETS) http://www.lsta.info/

Crosscutting Concepts The 7 crosscutting concepts are: Patterns Cause and Effect: Mechanisms and explanations Scale, Proportion, and Quantity Systems and System Models Energy and Matter: Flows, cycles, and conservation Structure and Function Stability and Change http://www.lsta.info/

Summary of LSS Parts Coding and Descriptor (example: 2-PS1-3 Matter and Its Interactions) Performance Expectation: States what students should be able to do to demonstrate that they have met the standard. Performance expectations are built on the foundation of the science and engineering practices, disciplinary core ideas, and crosscutting concepts. Clarification Statement: Provides examples or additional clarification of the performance expectation. Science and Engineering Practices: Detail the behaviors that students should engage in that mimic those of scientists and engineers. Disciplinary Core Ideas: Describe the most essential ideas (content) in the major science disciplines. Crosscutting Concepts: Ideas that have applications across all areas of science. http://www.lsta.info/

Depth vs. Breadth Identify fewer standards http://www.lsta.info/

Louisiana Student Standards for Science The new standards call for changes in the science classroom. Key shifts called for by the Louisiana Student Standards for Science: Apply content knowledge Content knowledge is critical and evident in the standards in the Disciplinary Core Ideas, the key ideas in science that have broad importance within or across multiple science or engineering disciplines. However, simply having content knowledge is not enough. Students must investigate and apply content knowledge to scientific phenomenon. Investigate, evaluate, and reason scientifically Scientists do more than learn about science; they “do” science. Science instruction must integrate the practices, or behaviors, of scientists and engineers as they investigate real-world phenomenon and design solutions to problems. Connect ideas across disciplines For students to develop a coherent and scientifically-based view of the world, they must make connections across the domains of science (life science, physical science, earth and space science, environmental science, and engineering, technology, and applications of science). The crosscutting concepts have applications across all domains. Three Dimensional Learning: the integration of the Science and Engineering Practices, Disciplinary Core Ideas, and Crosscutting Concepts in science instruction Contact LouisianaStandards@la.gov with questions.

Louisiana Student Standards for Science The Department will provide multiple phases of support as districts and teachers work to implement the Louisiana Student Standards for Science. PHASE TIMELINE FOCUS Phase 1 Spring – Summer 2017 Framework and make-up of the standards Shifts in science instruction Progressions of learning Phase 2 Fall 2017 Educators begin implementation of the new standards, practice implementing aligned tasks, pilot 3-dimensional lessons LDOE releases scope and sequence documents, revised instructional tasks, sample EAGLE items Phase 3 Spring –Summer 2018 Quality curriculum piloted Suite of assessment items/item sets released on EAGLE Field test in grades 3-8 *The trainings you are doing at the Summit, as well as those held over the summer will all focus on Phase 1. Be clear about this to participants. Contact LouisianaStandards@la.gov with questions.

Louisiana Student Standards for Science Area Support and Timeline Assessment Email assessment@la.gov with questions Previous RFP secured vendor for assessment development Field test for grades 3-8 – Spring 2018 Operational test – Spring 2019 Platform the same as ELA, Math, Social Studies, and EAGLE EAGLE Assessment Tool Teacher Leader Advisors, who will help create sample assessment items, hired and trained Summer 2017 EAGLE items created throughout the 2017-2018 school year

Questions Contact Information Nathan Cotten, nathancotten@tpsd.org Each group should add info http://www.lsta.info/ http://www.lsta.info/