MURSD March 11, 2016 Jeff Weinstein.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards Launch Event November 16, 2013.
Advertisements

Transitioning to Revised Draft MA Science & Technology/ Engineering Standards C&I Summit October 27-28, 2014.
Development of New Science Standards:
1 Welcome back!. Vision for Science Teaching and Learning 2 View free PDF from The National Academies Press at *Will also be posted.
THE NEXT GENERATION OF SCIENCE STANDARDS: PRELIMINARY REFLECTIONS ON ASSESSMENTS A Presentation for BUILDING CAPACITY FOR STATE SCIENCE EDUCATION (BCSSE)
Integrating the Life Sciences from Molecule to Organism The American Physiological Society Transform a Cookbook Lab Moving Toward More Student-Centered.
Seeing the Destination So We Can Direct Others to It
Crosscutting Concepts and Disciplinary Core Ideas February24, 2012 Heidi Schweingruber Deputy Director, Board on Science Education, NRC/NAS.
Next Generation Science Standards Update Cheryl Kleckner Education Specialist.
Supporting the CCSS in the Science Classroom through the Science and Engineering Practices of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) John Spiegel.
3 Dimensions of the Next Generation Science Standards Spokane County Water Resource Center Wendy Whitmer- Regional Science Coordinator 1.
Common Core Mathematics, Common Core English/Language Arts, and Next Generation Science Standards. What’s the common thread?
The Four Strands of Scientific Proficiency Students who understand science:  Know, use, and interpret scientific explanations of the natural world  Generate.
The Development of Pre-K Science, Technology, and Engineering Standards Karen WorthJeff Winokur
NGSS Today Awareness NGSS SWAC Discussion Fall 2013 Gail Hall and Regina Toolin.
Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2014.
Next Generation Science Standards Paula Messina San Jose State University Science Education Program & Geology Department Achieve, Inc; Washington D.C.
LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP 1 Start recording—title slide—1 of 3 Introducing the Next Generation Science Standards Originally presented by:
Curriculum Report Card Implementation Presentations
Life Science Standards 3 rd Grade4 th Grade5 th Grade 3. Adaptations in physical structure or behavior may improve an organism’s chance for survival. As.
Chris DeWald Science Instructional Coordinator Montana Office of Public Instruction.
Next Generation Science Standards Quick Overview Analysis: Performance Expectations related to Climate Change Modified from a presentation by Paula Messina.
Developing the Next Generation Science Standards.
What does a Framework for k-12 Science Education have to do with PER?
NGSS Connections and Implications for Teaching and Learning Cheryl Kleckner Education Specialist Oregon Department of Education.
NGSS-Health Science August Connection to the Common Core.
National Research Council Of the National Academies
Next Generation Science Standards –
ITEAMS is designed to provide teachers with the tools to develop inquiry-based lessons, and the opportunity to develop a deep understanding of implementation.
NEXT GENERATION SCIENCE STANDARDS (NGSS) Millard E. Lightburn (Ph.D.) Science Supervisor Ms. Mary Tweedy and Ms. Keisha Kidd Curriculum Support Specialists.
Click to edit Master title style Overview of the NGSS Framework.
The Basics About NGSS
The case for scientific literacy? so pretty i never knew mars had a sun.
Science Education Collaborative.
A Vision for K-12 Science Education as Described in the Framework for K-12 Science Education and Next Generation Science Standards How is NGSS different.
Welcome!  Please sign in and pick up your handouts  Find a seat that fits your needs  6 people per table to support the work we will do today.
Develop and Use Models I can identify limitations of models. I can use a model to test cause and effect relationships or interactions concerning the functioning.
 Introduction to UT Science with Engineering Education Standards (SEEd) An Overview of Development, Research, and Outcomes Ricky Scott K-12 Science Specialist.
Nevada State Science Standards Revision: Why NGSS?
District and school leaders January 22 or March 4, 2016.
Shifts in Science Education Testing, Standards, Curriculum, and Instruction Virginia Rhame, Science Specialist, NWAESC Lesley Merritt, Science Specialist,
 Continue to develop a common understanding of what STEM education is/could/should be here at Killip.
Carolyn A Hayes, Ed.D. NSTA President ( ) 1 Next Generation Science Standards.
Page 1 New SD Science Standards – What Is Important? Marcia Torgrude –
Module 1: Overview of the Framework for K–12 Science Education
Five Tools & Processes for NGSS
Board on Science Education Draft released 15 July 2011
NGSS 101 Introducing the Next Generation Science Standards for
Example slides for Middle & High School to explain to NGSS to parents
Plants and Animals First Grade
Key to Decoding NGSS NGSS = Next Generation Science Standards
Navigating Change: Science Education Leadership Today
Transitioning to the 2016 Science and Technology/Engineering (STE) Curriculum Framework Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Amplify Science.
David M. Lyons Ed.D October 14, 2016
Five Tools & Processes for NGSS
IB Assessments CRITERION!!!.
Next Generation Science Standards
We believe in books. Somehow we want to make childhood better, and we believe that a book given at the right moment can work magic in a child's life. -Ann.
Teaching Climate Science to Elementary School Students using the NGSS
LCUSD’s NGSS Implementation Plan
Pre-K Science, Technology, and Engineering Standards
8th Grade Matter and Energy in Organisms and Ecosystems
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PRACTICES
NEXT GENERATION SCIENCE STANDARDS and PROJECT LEAD THE WAY
What do we gain by teaching Motion, Force, and Energy?
Next Generation Science Standards
NextGen STEM Teacher Preparation in WA State
NGSS Next Generation Science Standards.
Connecting NGSS to independent research September 21, 2019
Presentation transcript:

MURSD March 11, 2016 Jeff Weinstein

Transitioning to the 2016 MA Science, Technology, and Engineering Standards

Massachusetts Science Ambassadors are a cadre of effective science educator leaders that are committed to raise awareness and provide information about the MA revised Science Technology Engineering (STE) Standards across the state.

Science Ambassadors Goals Increase awareness across the state of: Why revised standards are needed What is new about the revised standards and why Vision of science education upon which the standards are built Provide resources to illustrate standards and raise awareness

You are now, magically, the size of ant! Show seed from maple tree (any tree is fine)

One one side of your card… Write down three observations about what your life is like. Show log

One the other side of your card… Draw an illustration of what you see. Include yourself in your drawing. Show log

Turn and Talk What are some of your challenges? Share your observations and your illustrations.

In what ways does our “ant scenario” apply to this statement? By the end of 12th grade, all students must have an appreciation for the wonder of science, possess sufficient knowledge of science and engineering to engage in public discussion on related issues, and be careful consumers of scientific and technological information and products in their everyday lives.

Science and Technology/Engineering Education for All Students: The Vision By the end of 12th grade, all students must have an appreciation for the wonder of science, possess sufficient knowledge of science and engineering to engage in public discussion on related issues, and be careful consumers of scientific and technological information and products in their everyday lives.

Why is Science, Technology, and Engineering important? Understanding science and engineering issues and decisions in our life E.g., Our changing world: climate change; water pollution; renewable energy designs; weather challenges; inventing new technology to help mankind Readiness for the future! Note: Science always includes technology/engineering (Science = STE)

How has the world changed in the 14 years since the current standards were adopted? This is designed to show how things have changed since 2001-timer is set to show new image every second

Has the world around us changed? That’s why our teaching has to change!

Science and Technology/Engineering Education for All Students: The Vision: Concepts and Skills “The science and technology/engineering standards are intended to drive engaging, relevant, rigorous, and coherent instruction that emphasizes student mastery of both disciplinary core ideas (concepts) and application of science and engineering practices (skills) to support student readiness for citizenship, college, and careers.”

Old Frameworks Multi-grade strands that were inconsistent between districts or even schools Primarily content based-we filled the bucket with facts “Inquiry” was worked in as an afterthought and taught separately Passive Verbs Little Engineering Did not develop scientific reasoning-students are unable to make sense of the world around them

Origins of Revised MA Science, Technology, Engineering Standards (STE) Positives Integration of practices and core ideas Grade-by-grade K-5 Focus on scientific literacy Needed adjustment Vague standards Missing Pre-K Weak representation of technology/engineering Lack of attention to college and career readiness This is the discussion of NGSS origins, but the slide emphasizes MA Framework. Mention NGSS origins here (that is where the positives and changes come from)

New MA Frameworks Balance Core Ideas with Practices. STE Practices make sure that students can reason scientifically and technologically about the world. Practices are about developing a skill set that can be applied in many situations. There are strong similarities in language between the STE practices and the MATH and ELA practices. We are not filling the bucket, we are lighting the fire!

The Vision: Implications for Curriculum and Instruction Shift in revised standards Shift in curriculum & instruction Relevance: Organized around core explanatory ideas that explain the world around us The goal of teaching focuses on students analyzing and explaining phenomena and experience Rigor: Central role for science and engineering practices with concepts Inquiry- and design-based learning involves regular engagement with practices to build, use, and apply knowledge Coherence: ideas and practices build across time and between disciplines Teaching involves building a coherent storyline over time and among disciplines Adapted from: Brian Reiser, Northwestern University, 2013

Relevance in Science Instruction Develops students’ ability to apply their knowledge and skills to analyze and explain the world around them Addresses students’ prior knowledge and misconceptions

Rigor in Science Instruction Utilizes investigation, experimentation, design, and analytical problem solving Allows opportunities to collaborate and communicate their ideas Conveys high academic expectations for all students

Coherence in Science Instruction Integrates STE learning with mathematics and disciplinary literacy Uses regular assessment to inform student learning, guide instruction, and evaluate student progress Engages all students, Pre-K through grade 12 Involves district wide planning and ongoing support for implementation

Comparison: Old vs. New Instruction Science Education Will Involve Less Science Education Will Involve More Rote memorization of facts and terminology Facts and terminology are learned as needed while developing explanations and designing solutions supported by evidence based arguments and reasoning Teachers providing information to the whole class Students conducting investigations, solving problems, and engaging in discussions with teacher’s guidance Preplanned outcomes for “cookbook” labs or hands-on activities Multiple investigations driven by student’s questions with a range of possible outcomes that collectively lead to a deep understanding of core scientific ideas Worksheets Student writing journals, reports, posters, media presentations that explain and argue

Science & Engineering Practices 1. Asking questions and defining problems 2. Developing and using models 3. Planning and carrying out investigations 4. Analyzing and interpreting data 5. Using mathematics and computational thinking 6. Constructing explanations and designing solutions 7. Engaging in argument from evidence 8. Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information This begins a deeper dive into the practice standards.

There are still outliers in the Science that match with math such as M1 and S1.

Let’s take a closer look at the practices. Develop and Use Models I can identify limitations of models. I can use a model to test cause and effect relationships or interactions concerning the functioning of a natural or designed system. I can develop and/or use models to describe and/or predict phenomena. Laura

Plan and Carry Out Investigations I can plan and conduct an investigation collaboratively to produce data to serve as the basis for evidence, using fair tests in which variables are controlled and the number of trials considered. I can evaluate appropriate methods and/or tools for collecting data. I can make predictions about what would happen if a variable changes.

Analyze and Interpret Data I can represent data in tables and/or various graphical displays (bar graphs, pictographs and/or pie charts) to reveal patterns that indicate relationships. I can compare and contrast data collected by different groups in order to discuss similarities and differences in their findings. I can analyze and interpret data to make sense of phenomena, using logical reasoning, mathematics, and/or computation Laura

Use Mathematics and Computational Thinking I can describe, measure, estimate, and/or graph quantities (e.g., area, volume, weight, time) to address scientific and engineering questions and problems. I can organize simple data sets to reveal patterns that suggest relationships. Jeff

Construct Explanations and Design Solutions I can construct an explanation of observed relationships (e.g., the distribution of plants in the back yard). I can use evidence (e.g., measurements, observations, patterns) to construct or support an explanation or design a solution to a problem. I can identify the evidence that supports particular points in an explanation. Laura

Engage in an Argument from Evidence I can compare and refine arguments based on an evaluation of the evidence presented. I can distinguish among facts, reasoned judgment based on research findings, and speculation in an explanation. I can construct and/or support an argument with evidence, data, and/or a model. Jeff

Obtain, Evaluate, and Communicate Information I can read and comprehend grade-appropriate complex texts and/or other reliable media to summarize and obtain scientific and technical ideas and describe how they are supported by evidence. I can compare and/or combine across complex texts and/or other reliable media to support the engagement in other scientific and/or engineering practices. I can communicate scientific and/or technical information orally and/or in written formats, including various forms of media as well as tables, diagrams, and charts. Laura

Ask questions and define problems I can ask questions about what would happen if a variable is changed. I can identify scientific (testable) and non-scientific (non-testable)questions. I can ask questions that can be investigated and predict reasonable outcomes based on patterns such as cause and effect relationships. Jeff

What an STE standard looks like Grade 2: Life Science LS2. Ecosystems: Interactions, Energy, and Dynamics 2-LS2-3(MA): Develop and use models to compare how plants and animals depend on their surroundings and other living things to meet their needs in the places they live. Clarification Statement: Animals need food, water, air, shelter, and favorable temperature; plants need sufficient light, water, minerals, favorable temperature, and animals or other mechanisms to disperse seeds Laura Articulates expected performance/demonstration Does not limit curriculum and instruction to the included practice

What an STE standard looks like Grade 4: Earth and Space Science ESS2. Earth’s Systems 4-ESS2-1. Make observations and collect data to provide evidence that rocks, soils, and sediments are broken into smaller pieces through mechanical weathering and moved around through erosion by water, ice, wind, and vegetation. Clarification Statements: • Mechanical weathering processes can include frost wedging, abrasion, and tree root wedging. • Erosion can include movement by blowing wind, flowing water, and moving ice. State Assessment Boundary: • Chemical processes are not expected in state assessment. Laura

What an STE standard looks like Grade 5: Physical Science PS1. Matter and Its Interactions 5-PS1-1. Use a particle model of matter to explain common phenomena involving gases, and phase changes between gas and liquid and between liquid and solid. Clarification Statement: Examples of common phenomena the model should be able to describe include adding air to expand a balloon, compressing air in a syringe, and evaporating water from a salt water solution. State Assessment Boundary: Atomic-scale mechanisms of evaporation and condensation or defining unseen particles are not expected in state assessment. Laura

Core Ideas Key understandings that allow students to interpret and explain the world around them Natural phenomena (e.g. how a plant grows, what gravity is, climate change) Designed systems (e.g. energy systems, transportation systems) Progress in sophistication K-12 Laura

“Science” is… Earth and Space Science Life Science (Biology) Physical Science (Chemistry and Physics) Technology/Engineering Districts may provide more specific focus: Robotics Marine Ecology Biotechnology Computer Science Laura

Integrating Engineering Elementary (PreK-5) Mainly via application of science via engineering design practice (*) A few ETS/Engineering Design standards where deemed necessary (gr. 1-4) Laura

Integrating Engineering Design Grade 3: Physical Science PS2. Motion and Stability: Forces and Interactions 3-PS2-4. Define a simple design problem that can be solved by applying the use of the interactions between magnets.* Clarification Statement: • Examples of problems could include constructing a latch to keep a door shut and creating a device to keep two moving objects from touching each other. Laura * Application of Science via Engineering Design Practice

Where does a tree come from? Current 2001/2006 STE Gr. 3-5, LS #11: Describe how energy derived from the sun is used by plants to produce sugars (photosynthesis) and is transferred within a food chain from producers (plants) to consumers to decomposers. Gr. 6-8, LS #16: Recognize that producers (plants that contain chlorophyll) use the energy from sunlight to make sugars from carbon dioxide and water through a process called photosynthesis. This food can be used immediately, stored for later use, or used by other organisms. HS, LS 2.4: Identify the reactants, products, and basic purposes of photosynthesis and cellular respiration. Explain the interrelated nature of photosynthesis and cellular respiration in the cells of photosynthetic organisms. Jeff

Where does a tree come from? 2015 STE 5-LS1-1. Support an argument with evidence that plants get the materials they need for growth and reproduction chiefly through a process in which they use air, water, and energy from the sun to produce sugars and plant materials. MS-LS2-3. Develop a model to describe the cycling of matter among living and nonliving parts of an ecosystem including through the process of photosynthesis and cellular respiration. HS-LS1-5. Use a model to illustrate how photosynthesis uses light energy to transform carbon dioxide and water into oxygen and chemical energy stored in the bonds of glucose and other carbohydrates.

Compare standards How is the wording and conceptual focus different? What is expected of student performance? Consider similarities to changes in rigor of ELA and math standards. Focus on active vs passive verbs-ownership of “how the world works”

Key innovations for MA Explain phenomena & apply concepts Practices & core ideas Coherent progressions of learning PreK-8 grade-by-grade standards www.nymetroparents.com/fairfield/article/Hamden-Hall-Country-Day-School-in-CT-Hosts-Engineering-Workshop-for-Elementary-Teachers#.VFo0pGewWTE

MA strand maps Arrows highlight conceptual connections (needed for learning); not curricular connections

Transition Planning Transition plan based on what works for your district, teachers and students Likely differences for PK-5, 6-8, 9-12 Analyze transition strategies and lessons learned from Math and ELA Resources available for school improvement, professional development, and student support can be used for science Think about the system; how individual grades or teachers contribute to transitioning the system

MCAS Transition Details TBD- Spring 2016 General guidance: Gr 5 & 8 transition begins 2017, continues over several years HS transition begins later (TBD; other implications) Moving to computer-based testing Considering performance components

STE Standards Resources 2016 STE Standards FAQ Crosswalk of the 2001/2006 STE Standards and Revised STE Standards Matrix of the Science and Engineering Practices Matrix of Disciplinary Core Idea Progressions The Case for an Integrated, Grade-by-Grade Approach PreK-8 Value of Crosscutting Concepts & Nature of Science in Curriculum All Resources found on ESE website: http://www.doe.mass.edu/stem/review.html

How has the world changed in the 14 years since the current standards were adopted? This is designed to show how things have changed since 2001-timer is set to show new image every second

Thank you! Questions, Comments, or Requests: mathsciencetech@doe.mass.edu scienceambassadors@doe.mass.edu

Please take a moment to help us document and improve the Science Ambassador program. http://goo.gl/forms/ZTpjy7XAYI Thank you!