Patients the Surgeon Should Refer for TAVR

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ghanem et al., J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:1427–32..
Advertisements

” سبحانك لا علم لنا إلا ما علمتنا إنك أنت العليم الحكيم “
STS 2015 John V. Conte, MD Professor of Surgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators Transcatheter Aortic.
ACC 2015 Michael J Reardon, MD, FACC On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators A Randomized Comparison of Self-expanding Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic.
Lessons from TAVR Randomized Trials and Registries E Murat Tuzcu, MD Professor of Medicine Cleveland Clinic Financial disclosures: None PARTNER Executive.
Cost-Effectiveness of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Prosthesis Compared with Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in High Risk.
Long-Term Outcomes Using a Self- Expanding Bioprosthesis in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Deemed Extreme Risk for Surgery: Two-Year Results From.
Use of Psoas Muscle Size as a Frailty Assessment Tool for Open and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Raghavendra Paknikar BS Jeffrey Friedman BS David.
TAVR Pearls Addressing the Shortcomings of the Current TAVR Generation
A shifting paradigm of care: Advances in transcatheter heart valve procedures Sandra Lauck MSN, RN, CCN(C) Clinical Nurse Specialist, Arrhythmia Management.
PARTNER Objective To compare surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in high-risk patients with severe.
The Risk and Extent of Neurological Events Are Equivalent for High-Risk Patients Treated With Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Thomas.
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Prosthesis David H. Adams et al (U.S. CoreValve Clinical Investigators) Journal Club November.
Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany Sabine Bleiziffer German Heart Center, Munich, Germany Johan Bosmans University Hospital.
Trancatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)
Aortic Stenosis -The Unmet Need Simon Ray University Hospitals of South Manchester ACI 2009.
A Perspective on Family Medicine and End-of-Life and Palliative Care Peter Selwyn, M.D., M.P.H. Professor and Chairman Department of Family & Social Medicine.
Update on Frailty Assessment in Older Patients with Aortic Stenosis Dr Amy Jones ST5/Clinical Research Fellow Geriatric Medicine.
Greater New York Geriatric Cardiology Consortium: Valve Disease in Older Adults Allan Schwartz, MD Columbia University Medical Center New York Presbyterian.
© free-ppt-templates.com 2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of Valvular Heart Disease Guideline of 2014 DR. OMAR SHAHID TR CARDIOLOGY SZH.
Longest Follow-up After Implantation of a Self-Expanding Repositionable Transcatheter Aortic Valve: Final Follow-up of the Evolut R CE Study Stephen Brecker,
G. Michael Deeb, MD On Behalf of the CoreValve US Investigators
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Outcomes in the CoreValve US High-Risk Pivotal Trial in Patients with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality Less than or Equal to.
Jeffrey J. Popma, MD Director, Interventional Cardiology
Extending the Boundaries of TAVR: Future Directions
Overview of the 2012 Food and Drug Administration Circulatory System Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee meeting on the Edwards SAPIEN.
Expanding Indications for TAVR – What Should Be Next?
Mitral Regurgitation: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology and When to Repair
Anita W. Asgar MD, FRCPC, FACC Montreal Heart Institute
Raj R. Makkar, MD On behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
TAVR Addressing Real-Life Issues CRT 2013 Washington DC
Are we ready to perform TAVI in Intermediate Risk Patients?
Updates From NOTION: The First All-Comer TAVR Trial
J. Matthew Brennan, MD, MPH Duke University School of Medicine
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate Risk Patients with Aortic Stenosis Description: The goal of the trial was to assess.
Claret Cerebral Protection Device: Implications of the Sentinel Study
TAVR in Patients with Chronic Lung Disease
The Spanish Data Bank PEGASO M. Martínez-Sellés
TAVI Passed the Exam and is Ready for Clinical Use in Inoperable Patients Disclosures Research Funding and Speaking Honoraria: Edwards Lifesciences.
Early Outcomes with the Evolut R Repositionable Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve in the United States Mathew Williams, MD, For the Evolut R US.
University of Pennsylvania
Giuseppe Tarantini MD, PhD
TAVI „Catch me if you can!“
Updates From SURTAVI in Intermediate Risk Patients
Longevity of transcatheter and surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves in patients with severe aortic stenosis and lower surgical risk Lars Sondergaard,
David J. Cohen, M.D., M.Sc. On behalf of The PARTNER Investigators
Insights from the NCDR® STS/ACC TVT Registry.
Niv Ad, MD Chief, Cardiac Surgery Professor of Surgery, VCU
CoreValve Continued Access Study Shows Continued Improvement in 1-Year Outcomes With Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Steven J. Yakubov,
Michael Mack, M.D. Dallas, TX February 21, 2010
One Year Outcomes in Real World Patients Treated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation The ADVANCE Study Axel Linke University of Leipzig Heart.
Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Valve System : OUS Data
Risk Stratification of Severe, Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis Patients
The Ever-Expanding Patient Pool for TAVR:
Late Follow-Up from the PARTNER Aortic Valve-in-Valve Registry
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Canadian Cardiovascular Society Position Statement  John Webb, MD, FRCPC, Josep Rodés-Cabau, MD, FRCPC, Stephen.
Getting the 411 on TAVR Trials
Samir R. Kapadia, MD On behalf of The PARTNER Trial Investigators
Reply The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
PARTNER 2A Trial design: Intermediate-risk patients with aortic stenosis (STS PROM score 4-8%) were randomized to undergo either TAVR or SAVR, stratified.
Coronary Revascularization and TAVR
Management of Patients With Aortic Valve Stenosis
Transatlantic editorial on transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Johannes Steiner et al. JACC 2017;70:
Aspects to be considered by the Heart Team for the decision between TAVR and SAVR in patients at increased surgical risk. Aspects to be considered by the.
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
Five-Year Outcomes after Randomization to Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Final Results of The PARTNER 1 Trial Michael J. Mack, MD.
Applying Classification of Recommendation and Level of Evidence
Commentary: When a choice is not an echo
Presentation transcript:

Patients the Surgeon Should Refer for TAVR Michael J. Reardon, M.D. Professor of Cardiothoracic Surgery Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center

Conflict of Interest Consultant to Medtronic CoreValve Trial Steering committee member SurTAVI Trial National PI

All patients with symptomatic severe AS? Who gets aortic valve replacement now? All patients with symptomatic severe AS?

Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis Percent of Cardiology Patients Treated Under-treatment especially prevalent among patients managed by Primary Care physicians No AVR AVR Iung BBouma B J et al. Heart 1999;82:143-148 et al European Heart Journal 2003;24:1231-1243 (*includes both Aortic Stenosis and Mitral Regurgitation patients) Pellikka, Sarano et al Circulation 2005 Charlson E et al. J Heart Valve Dis2006;15:312-321

All patients with symptomatic severe AS PROM 0% 100% All patients with symptomatic severe AS Risk Anatomy Clinical Senerio Age Co-morbidities

Subject Assessment: Eyeball Test Patient A vs. Patient B Same STS Score Photos courtesy of Michael J. Mack, MD

Currently being referred for surgery Currently not being referred for surgery

CoreValve Extreme Risk 4% 8.3% Extreme Risk but benefits from TAVR Extreme Risk and will not benefit from TAVR 10% 25% Partner IIA SurTAVI Partner B CoreValve Extreme Risk Partner A CoreValve High Risk

Partner B Partner A One year TAVI Medical Rx All stroke/TIA 10.6% 4.5% Major stroke 7.8% 3.9% Partner A One Year TAVI AVR All stroke/TIA 8.3% 4.3%

“In judging futility, physicians must distinguish between an effect, which is limited to some part of the patient's body, and a benefit, which appreciably improves the person as a whole. Treatment that fails to provide the latter, whether or not it achieves the former, is "futile".” Schneiderman, LJ et al. Ann Intern Med 1990

4% 8.3% Benefit No Benefit

4% 8.3% Benefit No Benefit

4% 8.3% Benefit No Benefit

years to life, not life to years.” Cohort C Cohort B Porcelain Aorta Hostile Chest RIMA/LIMA Anatomy Severe COPD Liver Cirrhosis Dementia Severe Frailty “We've added years to life, not life to years.” George Carlin 2001

Beyond Frailty  Need for an Better Index Disability: ADL IADLs Difficulty or dependency in daily living Frailty Impairment in multiple systems that leads to a decline in homeostatic reserve and resiliency Charlson Co-Morbidities Two or more medical conditions

ESRD- dialysis CIRCULATION 2002;105:1336-1341

Partner B Partner A One year TAVI Medical Rx All stroke/TIA 10.6% 4.5% Major stroke 7.8% 3.9% Partner A One Year TAVI AVR All stroke/TIA 8.3% 4.3%

Fine line between utility and futility … How can society afford TAVR in the very elderly? How can we prevent inappropriate use and abuse? Lower boundary Upper boundary Fine line between utility and futility …

Age and comorbidity RISK 5 4 3 2 1 Age 70 75 80 85 90 Equal Logistic EuroSCORE distribution in different age groups, suggesting younger age groups have more co-morbidity RISK

4% 8.3% Benefit No Benefit

Commercial Product 4% 8.3% Benefit No Benefit

Study Patients 4% 8.3% Benefit No Benefit

Stroke Para Valvular Leak Valve Durability

Who should the surgeon refer for TAVR? The extreme risk patient that the surgeon believes will benefit High Risk and Intermediate Risk patients in the context of a clinical trial

Thank You