Genotype-directed dosing for Efavirenz

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Challenges to Pediatric Antiretroviral Treatment Elaine Abrams, David Hoos MTCT-Plus.
Advertisements

Group III: Demand Forecasting
A daily dose of 400 mg efavirenz (EFV) is non-inferior to the standard 600 mg dose: week 48 data from the ENCORE1 study, a randomised, double-blind, placebo.
P1060 commentary Philippa Musoke MBChB Makerere University –Johns Hopkins University Research Collaboration, Kampala Uganda.
Persisting long term benefit of genotypic guided treatment in HIV infected patients failing HAART and Importance of Protease Inhibitor plasma levels. Viradapt.
P1070: Dose Finding and Pharmacogenetic study of Efavirenz in HIV- Infected and HIV/TB Co-Infected Infants & Children < 36 months of age Interim Results:
Future ART options for HIV-infected children exposed to maternal HAART Lee Kleynhans Experts Roundtable June 2008.
Pharmacokinetics of Saquinavir hard gel (Invirase) when combined with Atazanavir 8.11 D Prelutsky 1, P Salvato 2, R Falcon 3 1. Washington University School.
Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Pediatric HIV Infection DR. S.K CHATURVEDI DR. KANUPRIYA CHATURVEDI.
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
HIV i-Base: SMART Study & CROI Feedback UK-CAB - Feb 2006 UK-CAB 24 February 2006 CROI Feedback: SMART Study Simon Collins.
Switch NNRTI to NNRTI  Switch EFV to ETR –CNS toxicity study –Patient’s preference study.
Vicki Powers Bristol Royal Infirmary CYP2B6 G516T genotyping in patients with HIV: A pharmacogenetics study of the antiretroviral, efavirenz.
Predicting NNRTI Resistance – do polymorphisms matter? Nicola E Mackie 1, Lucy Garvey 1, Anna Maria Geretti 2, Linda Harrison 3, Peter Tilston 4, Andrew.
A single nucleotide polymorphism in CYP2B6 leads to >3-fold increases in efavirenz concentrations in intensive pharmacokinetic curves and hair samples.
Pharmacogenetics & Pharmacogenomics Personalized Medicine.
FDA Case Studies Pediatric Oncology Subcommittee March 4, 2003.
The Effectiveness of generic Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy for the treatment of HIV infected Ugandan children Presenter: Linda Barlow-Mosha MD,
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
12th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections February 22-25, 2005 Boston, Massachusetts, USA Poster No. 830 Hematological Benefit of Switching.
PO 2726; IAS; Vicriviroc (formerly SCH ): Antiviral Activity of a Potent New CCR5 Receptor Antagonist D. Schuermann, C. Pechardscheck, R. Rouzier,
Abstract #O_06: Impact of drug transporter genetic polymorphisms on tenofovir exposure and creatinine clearance in HIV-infected Adults in Thailand Plasma.
A randomized open study comparing the impact of reducing stavudine dose vs. switching to tenofovir on mitochondrial function, metabolic parameters, and.
Clinical development programme for Second-Line treatment Anton Pozniak World AIDS Conference, July 2014.
 Treatment regimens –Co-formulated ombitasvir (OBV)/paritaprevir (PTV)/rironavir (r) : 25/150/100 mg QD = 2 tablets –Dasabuvir (DSV) : 250 mg BID –RBV.
Therapeutic drug Monitoring
Treatment Failure HAIVN Harvard Medical School AIDS Initiative in Vietnam.
1/11/01 Pediatric trials for ARV experienced children Coleen K. Cunningham Epidemiology of treatment experience in pediatrics How does the smaller number.
Copyright © 2008 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analyses for Raltegravir.
HAART Initiation Within 2 Weeks of Seroconversion Associated With Virologic and Immunologic Benefits Slideset on: Hecht FM, Wang L, Collier A, et al. A.
Drug efficacy is questioned.. Variation in drug responses.
Risk Factors for Linezolid-Associated Thrombocytopenia in Adult Patients Cristina Gervasoni Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Milano.
ACTG 5142: First-line Antiretroviral Therapy With Efavirenz Plus NRTIs Has Greater Antiretroviral Activity Than Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus NRTIs Slideset.
Switch to low dose ATV/r  LASA Study.  Design  Endpoints –Primary: proportion of patients with HIV RNA < 200 c/mL at W48 (ITT-E) ; non-inferiority.
Switch NNRTI to NNRTI  Switch EFV to ETR –CNS toxicity study –Patient’s preference study.
Phase 3 Treatment Experienced
Rilpivirine-TDF-FTC versus Efavirenz-TDF-FTC STaR Trial
IMPAACT 2001 STUDY Mhembere T.P. (B. Pharm (Hons), MPH)
Emory University School of Medicine Department of Medicine
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Dolutegravir plus Rilpivirine as Maintenance Dual Therapy SWORD-1 and SWORD- 2: Design
Chapter 9 PHARMACOKINETICS VARIABILITY
Daniel Meressa, M.D. Global Health Committee St. Peter’s Hospital
Phase 3b Treatment-Naive
Tolerability of Isoniazid Preventive Therapy (IPT) in an HIV infected cohort
ARV-trial.com Switch to LPV/r + RAL KITE Study 1.
Providing ARVs to children in resource limited settings
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
The Effect of Family Social Intervention on Treatment Response in Children with HIV Infection Francine Cheng DO, Janak Patel MD, Debbie Konopik SWA, and.
Better Retention Rates Observed in Patients on Lopinavir than Atazanavir in Uganda
Stampa a cura della S.S. Relazioni Esterne
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Dorina Onoya1, Tembeka Sineke1, Alana Brennan1,2, Matt Fox1,2
Simeprevir in HIV Coinfection, GT-1 C212 Trial
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve HIV Coinfection
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Conceptual Subdivisions of Pharmacology
A5338 P. G . MARIMBE-NYATSAMBO ANNUAL RESEARCH DAY 8 APRIL 2016.
Conceptual Subdivisions of Pharmacology
Switch to E/C/F/TAF + DRV
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Melissa Herrin, Jan Tate ScD, MPH & Amy Justice, MD, PhD
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Introduction to Pharmacogenetics
Rapid Detection of HIV-1 subtype C Integrase resistance mutations by the Use of High-Resolution Melting Analysis Tendai Washaya BSc, Msc. Pre-PhD Student.
Assessing similarity of curves: An application in assessing similarity between pediatric and adult exposure-response curves July 31, 2019 Yodit Seifu,
INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION
Presentation transcript:

Genotype-directed dosing for Efavirenz T. G MBENGERANWA Harare Family Care CRS

Presentation Outline Global HIV Burden in Children Treatment Options in Children IMPAACT P1070 Study

Global Picture of HIV in children

Treatment of HIV in children Treatment for children works!!! Options for children lag behind significantly (drugs and formulations) It can be complicated requiring pills and liquids Difficult to swallow Unpleasant Some medicines have temperature restrictions Electrical outages Storage facilities

ART options for children in Zimbabwe

P1070 STUDY Dose Finding and Pharmacogenetic study of Efavirenz (EFV) in HIV- Infected and HIV/TB Co- Infected Infants & Children < 36 months of age

Background (1) Recommended as 1st line treatment for adults and children >3yr/>10kg body weight EFV metabolism Metabolized through the CYP 2B6 enzyme system Significant pharmacokinetic (PK) variability of EFV is related to a single polymorphism in the cytochrome (CYP) P450 2B6 gene Prevalence of the CYP 2B6 516TT genotype ranges 9-23% 516 TT are poor metabolizers slower clearance 516 GG and 516 GT are extensive metabolizers rapid clearance

Background (2) Dose not established in children <3yr or <10kg body weight EFV is an NNRTI with a relatively narrow therapeutic window and serum concentrations showing high inter- and intra-patient variability Liquid formulations have shown erratic absorption and high variability P1070: Capsules opened into porridge, formula or expressed breastmilk

Primary Objectives Determine dose of EFV administered as opened capsules to HIV-infected OR HIV/TB co-infected infants (taking anti-TB therapy [ATT]) between 3-<36 months of age 24 week safety and tolerance of EFV Explore the influence of genetic polymorphisms on EFV levels Evaluate CNS toxicity and association with EFV PK levels It may be preferable to study an opened or intact capsule formulation of EFV in low and middle income countries for several reasons: ease of dosing (eliminating the need to measure liquid or use syringes), distribution and storage purposes, and it may be more palatable in some cases. (26)

Study Design Stratification/Sample Size Goal 100 EVALUABLE SUBJECTs

EFV Dosing Approach Starting EFV dose was modelled using data from previous EFV trials (P382 and P1021) Version 1.0 of the study used weight band dosing (approx. 40mg/kg/day) targeting AUC target of 35- 180 mcg*hr/L Real-time CYP 2B6 516 was assessed

Baseline Characteristics by CYP 2B6 516 genotype 516 GG/GT (N=38) 516 TT (N=9) Total (N=47) Age (mo) median 19 20 Gender M 24 (63%) 4 (44%) 28 (60%) F 14 (37%) 5 (56%) 19 (40%) Race Asian 9(24%) 2 (22%) 11 (23%) Black 28 (74%) 7 (78%) 35 (74%) Unknown 1 (3%) 0 (0%) 1 (2%) CYP 2B6 516 genotype GG 21 (55%) 21(45%) GT 17(45%) 17 (36%) TT 0(0%) 9 (100%) 9 (19%)

Baseline Characteristics by CYP 2B6 516 genotype 516 GG/GT (N=38) 516 TT (N=9) Total (N=47) Log10 baseline RNA Median 5.79 5.83 5.8 Q1,Q3 13.27 18.26 Baseline CD4 % 20.6 17.9 19 15, 27.1 12,21 14,26

Week 2 Intensive (24 hour) PK Prior to observed dose and 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours post dose DBS samples (CYP 2B6 516) shipped real time Results of intensive PK were used to determine the need for individual dose adjustment

Week 2 PK results

24 Hour Plasma PK at Week 2 Initially median EFV AUC was higher in TT genotype vs GG/GT (median 490 vs 107 p=0.0001)

Percentage of AUC’s in Target Range Modelling using P1070 data predicted that FDA-approved doses would produce sub-therapeutic AUCs in almost one third of participants with 516GG/GT and excessive AUCs in >50% with 516TT genotypes

Safety and Virology EFV was well tolerated No disproportionate CNS toxicity in children with excessive EFV levels 15/47 experienced toxicities deemed as “possibly treatment related” (11 GG/GT, 4 TT) Week 24 virologic suppression (< 400 copies/ml): 73%

Summary of Cohort I Results AUC GG/GT AUC TT Safety Virologic suppression

Conclusion EFV remains an important treatment option in RLS Significant inter participant PK variations due to the CYP2B6 genotype challenge the use of uniform EFV dosages for <3 years of age Genotype- directed EFV dosing can mitigate this challenge These tests can be processed in Africa however they are still costly Use of EFV in <3yrs increases the treatment options for children living with HIV

Acknowledgements