3GPP Network Slicing Georg Mayer, 3GPP CT Chairman, Huawei

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GSC-19 Meeting, July 2015, Geneva 3GPP and The Road to 5G Erik Guttman, 3GPP SA Chairman, Consultant to Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Document No:GSC-19_302.
Advertisements

Critical Communications Workshop, 26-27/August 1 © 3GPP 2012 © 3GPP GPP Status Balazs Bertenyi Chairman of 3GPP TSG SA.
1© Nokia Siemens Networks Confidential Realities of LTE Deployment Bill Payne Head of Innovation Team CTO Office.
Doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2014 William Carney, SONYSlide 1 Comments on Draft HEW PAR Date: Authors:
IEEE in 5G ‘5G’ means 5th Generation Mobile Networks not 5 GHz!
1 LTE standards Status for this work in 3GPP and what next for the Future Francois COURAU 3GPP TSG RAN Chairman.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1402r0 November 2015 Joseph Levy, InterDigitalSlide 1 Thoughts on in a 3GPP 5G Network Date: Authors:
Submission May 2016 H. H. LEESlide 1 IEEE Framework and Its Applicability to IMT-2020 Date: Authors:
5G. Overall Vision for 5G 5G will provide users with fiber-like access data rate and "zero" latency user experience be capable of connecting 100 billion.
3GPP TSG RAN WG2 meeting #92 Nanjing, China 23-27, May 2016 R
1 Presentation Title 3GPP WORK ON 5G Presenter Erik Guttman Session
Doc.: IEEE /1060r1 Submission September 2013 S. Rayment, Ericsson & S. McCann, BlackBerrySlide 1 3GPP Liaison Report Date: Authors:
Vertical Industry Applications & Challenges
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 July 2017
5G MOBILE TECHNOLOGY TECHNICAL SEMINAR
“An Eye View On the Future Generation Of Phones”
.
Progress of Network Architecture Work in FG IMT-2020
A glimpse into the future, looking beyond 2025
2 ATIS 5G OVERVIEW ATIS launched its 5G Ad Hoc in 2015 to advance regulatory imperatives, deliver an evolutionary path, address co-existence of technologies,
Plotting the course to 5G – Leading Carrier 5G
Proposed basis for PAR discussion
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 November 2017
Vision and Technologies for 5G
Views for The LTE-Advanced Requirements
Evaluation Model for LTE-Advanced
Motivation for WI on "LTE-based V2X Services"
Long Term Evolution (LTE)
RP Motivation for New WI (RP ): NB-LTE for Low Complexity Radio Access Network for Cellular Internet of Things Alcatel-Lucent, Alcatel-Lucent.
4 th SG13 Regional Workshop for Africa on “Future Networks for a better Africa: IMT-2020, Trust, Cloud Computing and Big Data” (Accra, Ghana, March.
3GPP Status.
.
Multi-RAT, Multi-Link, Multi-operator V2X Communications Apostolos Kousaridas Huawei Technologies, Munich Research Center, Germany 5G V2X Communications.
Mobile Synchronization Trends 4G to 4.5G to 5G
Overview of CV2X Requirements
5G Architecture Standardization Landscape in 3GPP
Casablanca Platform Enhancements to Support 5G Use Case (Network Deployment, Slicing, Network Optimization and Automation Framework) 5G Use Case Team.
Erik Guttman, Chairman of 3GPP TSG SA Samsung Electronics
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
Submission Title: Usage Models for Personal Space Communications
WF on LTE-NR Coexistence
Casablanca Platform Enhancements to Support 5G Use Case (Network Deployment, Slicing, Network Optimization and Automation Framework) 5G Use Case Team.
Thoughts on RTA Development
Carlos J. Bernardos, Alain Mourad, Akbar Rahman
Casablanca Platform Enhancements to Support 5G Use Case (Network Deployment, Slicing, Network Optimization and Automation Framework) 5G Use Case Team.
Thoughts on RTA Development
Thoughts on RTA Development
Thoughts on RTA Development
Thoughts on RTA Development
An Introduction to Software Architecture
Thoughts on RTA development
Candidate for ONAP Dublin Implementation 5G RAN E2E Slice Design, Deploy and Manage 5G Use Case Team.
The roadmap towards the implementation of 5G in Europe
Network Slicing (and related) Features in 3GPP
ONAP Network Slice Model
3GPP Long Term Evolution (LTE) and System Architecture Evolution (SAE)
3GPP Update/Status (Release 15 – June 2018)
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2019
Discussion on IMT-2020 mMTC and URLLC
Proposal to Cooperate to Submit 5G Standards
Current Status of submission about EUHT
Utilizing the Network Edge
5G as a Social Infrastructure Chaesub LEE, Director, ITU
5G Mobile Network Architecture and Network Integration
Overview of 3GPP and 5G standards
Florian Völk. , Robert T. Schwarz. , Mario Lorenz+, Andreas Knopp
LETI INNOVATION DAYS June 25th of 2019
Overview of 5G technology landscape
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date: September, 2019
Presentation transcript:

3GPP Network Slicing Georg Mayer, 3GPP CT Chairman, Huawei © All rights reserved

5G Timeline & Phasing Release timing 10/31/16 Release timing Two phases for the normative 5G work Phase 1 (Rel-15) to be completed by June 2018 addresses the more urgent subset for commercial deployments Phase 2 (Rel-16) to be completed by March 2020 IMT 2020 submission, addresses all identified use cases & requirements March-17 June-18 December-19/ March-20 5G Study 5G Phase 1 5G Phase 2

PCG done in progress studies / starting TSG RAN TSG SA TSG CT CT1 CT3 Radio Access Networks TSG SA Services & Architecture TSG CT CoreNetwork & Terminal CT1 end-2-end ue-2-core CT3 interworking with external networks CT4 network internal protocols CT6 smart card applications RAN1 radio layer 1 RAN2 radio layer 2 & 3 RAN3 RAN-CN interface RAN4 radio performance RAN5 terminal testing RAN6 legacy radio SA1 high-level requirements SA2 architecture SA3 security SA4 Codec SA5 orchestration & management SA6 (mission critical) applications PCG Project Coordination Group studies / starting done in progress

3GPP Requirements For IETF netslicing Does 3GPP currently have dedicated requirements for any kind of IETF protocol or activity related to nw-slicing? At the moment: No Why? Normative work so far only on high-level requirements and architecture Protocol, security, orchestration related studies ongoing, but no definite results yet – don’t speculate! What’s foreseeable? UE-to-Core / Core-internal (CT1/CT4) – can be done by existing mechanisms (NAS/SBA), i.e. most likely no requirements to IETF RAN – most likely nothing Orchestration – too early to say Collaboration with BBF (Broadband Forum)

5G Network Slicing Network Slice A logical end-to-end network Dynamically created Different slices for different services types Committed services – slice types Dedicated customers May comprise 5G CoreNetwork (CP & UP) 5G Radio Access Network Interworking Functions to non-3GPP Access Networks UE connects Max 8 slices in parallel Common AMF for one UE in all slices

Network Slicing – Slice Identification TS 23.501, section 5.15.2 10/31/16 S-NSSAI – single network slice selection assistance information SST – slice type, describes expected network behavior SD – slice differentiator, optional, further differentiation S-NSSAI can have standard or network-specific values Standard SST values: eMBB, URLCC, MIoT (see next slides) NSSAI is a collection of max 8 S-NSSAI UE sends NSSAI – based on which related slice(s) are selected

3GPP Network Slicing - Simplified AMF STT: eMBB bps 12 NB-IoT STT: MIoT AMF STT: URLCC AMF W H A R E D

Standard Slice Type (STT) Values TS 23.501, section 5.15.2.2-1 10/31/16 Slice/Service type SST value Characteristics. eMBB (enhanced Mobile Broadband) 1 Slice suitable for the handling of 5G enhanced Mobile broadband, useful, but not limited to the general consumer space mobile broadband applications including streaming of High Quality Video, Fast large file transfers etc. It is expected this SST to aim at supporting High data rates and high traffic densities URLLC (ultra- reliable low latency communications) 2 Supporting ultra-reliable low latency communications for applications including, industrial automation, (remote) control systems. MIoT (massive IoT) 3 Allowing the support of a large number and high density of IoT devices efficiently and cost effectively.

e.g. MIoT Performance Requirements TS 22.261, table 7.1-1 10/31/16 Scenario Experienced data rate (DL) Experienced data rate (UL) Area traffic capacity (DL) (UL) Overall user density Activity factor UE speed Coverage 1 Urban macro 50 Mbps 25 Mbps 100 Gbps/km2 (note 4) 50 Gbps/km2 10 000/km2 20% Pedestrians and users in vehicles (up to 120 km/h Full network (note 1) 2 Rural macro 1 Gbps/km2 500 Mbps/km2 100/km2 3 Indoor hotspot 1 Gbps 500 Mbps 15 Tbps/km2 2 Tbps/km2 250 000/km2 note 2 Pedestrians Office and residential (note 2) (note 3) 4 Broadband access in a crowd [3,75] Tbps/km2 [7,5] Tbps/km2 [500 000]/km2 30% Confined area 5 Dense urban 300 Mbps 750 Gbps/km2 125 Gbps/km2 25 000/km2 10% Pedestrians and users in vehicles (up to 60 km/h) Downtown (note 1) 6 Broadcast-like services Maximum 200 Mbps (per TV channel) N/A or modest (e.g., 500 kbps per user) N/A [15] TV channels of [20 Mbps] on one carrier Stationary users, pedestrians and users in vehicles (up to 500 km/h) 7 High-speed train 15 Gbps/train 7,5 Gbps/train 1 000/train Users in trains (up to 500 km/h) Along railways (note 1) 8 High-speed vehicle [100] Gbps/km2 [50] Gbps/km2 4 000/km2 50% Users in vehicles (up to 250 km/h) Along roads 9 Airplanes connectivity 15 Mbps 7,5 Mbps 1,2 Gbps/plane 600 Mbps/plane 400/plane Users in airplanes (up to 1 000 km/h) NOTE 1: For users in vehicles, the UE can be connected to the network directly, or via an on-board moving base station. NOTE 2: A certain traffic mix is assumed; only some users use services that require the highest data rates [2]. NOTE 3: For interactive audio and video services, for example, virtual meetings, the required two-way end-to-end latency (UL and DL) is 2‑4 ms while the corresponding experienced data rate needs to be up to 8K 3D video [300 Mbps] in uplink and downlink. NOTE 4: These values are derived based on overall user density. Detailed information can be found in [10]. NOTE 5: All the values in this table are targeted values and not strict requirements.

Thank You! Georg Mayer 3GPP CT Chairman georg.mayer.huawei@gmx.com +43 699 1900 5758 http://3gpp.org