From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Cancer cachexia by J.N. Gordon, S.R. Green, and P.M. Goggin QJM Volume 98(11): October 17, 2005 © The Author Published by Oxford University.

Advertisements

From: An open day in the metric space

Fig. 1 Flow chart of the COBRA-light trial and its extension study

From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*

Fig. 1 Graphical representation

Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.

Source: Authors. From: Strategic behaviour of research groups within the entrepreneurial university policy rhetoric: the Estonian biotechnology sector.

Figure 1. Structural Equation Model: Effects of Valence Framing on Perceived Truth of Statements and Source Trustworthiness. Standardized path-coefficients.

Test characteristics of MRI-detected inflammation for the development of arthritis in CSA patients (A) and RA in UA patients (B) during 1-year follow-up.

Error bars represent the mean (s.e.).

pSS: primary SS; Scl: scleroderma.

Figure 1 A decision tree diagram for problems and its German correspondences From: Corresponding lexical domains: A new resource for onomasiological.

Figure 3. Examples of tweets classified as ridicule.

Figure 6 Case 6: (A) MRA showed occlusion of the left internal carotid artery. (B) MRI 4 days before cell injection and (C) 7 days after cell injection.

Figure 1. Standardized coefficients for the SEM group model for heterosexual males. Latent constructs are shown in ellipses, and observed variables are.

Figure 1. Logos appearing in the choice experiment

Figure 1. Selection of papers.

Fig. 1 Flow chart of study selection

Figure 1. Conceptual model of well-being related to involvement in theatre. From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From.

Figure 1. Orthodontic set-up and location of LLLT or placebo-laser

From: What Drives Local Food Prices

Fig. 1 Flow of ascertainment of cases with incident childhood IgA vasculitis reported by four sources From: Incidence of IgA vasculitis in children estimated.

Figure 2. Illustration of minimum cross-sectional area (a) and measurements for oropharynx and soft palate in sagittal plane (b, c). From: Airway volume.

Fig. 1. Geographic locations of Shenzhen and Dongguan

Scheme 5. Direct lactonization via C–H activation.

Fig 1 Respiratory support escalation strategies for study patients

Fig 1 Perfusion index values at different time intervals in patients with successful and failed blocks. A reference line at PI 3.3 is provided. Horizontal.

From: Where do we go from here

Example 14. Schubert, Quartet in G Major, D

Fig. 1 Flow diagram of patient selection and study design.

Figure 1. Academic productivity and high academic income: top earners vs. the rest of academics. The average number of ‘peer-reviewed article equivalents’

Figure 1. Orthodontic set-up and location of LLLT or placebo-laser

Figure 1. Examples of e-cigarette discussions in social media

From: Estimating the Location of World Wheat Price Discovery

Figure 3. Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal (HPA)-axis functioning moderates crime exposure: regions of significance on X (crime). The lines represent two.

Figure 1. Time of initiation of therapeutic hypothermia according to who initiated it. Note the logarithmic scaling of the vertical axis. From: Initiation.

Figure 1. Publication channels used by scholars at the faculty of Arts, 2006–2013. From: Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems.

Figure 1: Time points at which sperm samples were analysed for aneuploidy frequencies in controls and cancer patients From: Sperm aneuploidy frequencies.

Figure 1. Dosage and administration route of drugs used in the BMD study. Each cycle was proposed every 28 days (‘base’ schedule) or 35 days (‘weekly’

Figure 1. Percentage of trainees is represented on the y-axis for each competency/knowledge item represented in the x-axis. Only Poor/Fair (P/F) ratings.

Figure 6. Effect of seed MC on the global DNA methylation of Acer platanoides (A) and Acer pseudoplatanus (B) seedlings. Values labeled with different.

Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the process of selection of studies for inclusion in the systematic review. From: How effective are weight-loss.

Figure 1. Impact ratings for prospective memory lapses for younger (~age 30), middle-age (~age 50), and older (~age 65) adults. From: Daily Memory Lapses.

Fig 1 Distribution of GlideScope® videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy patients from the Paediatric Difficult Intubation Registry. GVL,

Figure 6. RRs for clinical cure rates stratified by different diseases

Figure 1. Percentage of participants in each group (holocaust survivors, prewar immigrants, and postwar immigrants) by the main coded strategies. From:

FIG. 4. Working lifetime combined risk from fatal heart disease and lung cancer based on Hong Kong exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke and both US and.

Figure 1. The cell-lineage specification of the early mouse embryo

Figure 1. HR (95% CI) of death from dementia associated with weight or BMI in middle age and in old age. From: Adiposity in middle and old age and risk.

Figure 4. Influence of Clerk Ideology on Justice Voting.

Figure 1 Flow diagram detailing the systematic review process.

Figure 1 Mechanism of mortality benefit associated with radial access

Figure 1. Serum ceftazidime concentrations following intravenous administration. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.

Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating the correlation between the yearly absolute risk difference for both MACE and major ... Figure 1 A dot plot illustrating.

Fig. 1 CT demonstrating aortic wall thickening with renal artery involvement (short arrow). There is also subtle ... Fig. 1 CT demonstrating aortic wall.

Black: diagnosis ... Black: diagnosis from any department; grey: diagnosis at a rheumatology department. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.

x-axis, post-partum days. Closed ...

Fig. 1 Flow chart of included patients for analyses

Fig. 1 Flow chart for selection of study subjects

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Figure 1. Flow diagram for selection of articles for systematic review. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content.

Figure 1 MIC test strips showing reversion of daptomycin resistance of isolate 5 passaged in vitro. This figure ... Figure 1 MIC test strips showing reversion.

Figure 1. Trunk and leg fat over study period. LS, log transformed.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Figure 1 Grant agencies and charitable foundations supporting Plan S.

Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major trading partners (% of South Korea's total trade in goods) Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major.

Figure 1 ABCDE of primary prevention.2

Figure 1. Forest plot of lung cancer mortality in LDCT trials.

Presentation transcript:

From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation Figure 1. Diagram of the neurotransmitter release mechanism. From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation Br J Philos Sci. Published online July 20, 2017. doi:10.1093/bjps/axx011 Br J Philos Sci | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for the Philosophy of Science. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation Figure 2. A explains B if and only if every instance of A causes or constitutes an instance of B. From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation Br J Philos Sci. Published online July 20, 2017. doi:10.1093/bjps/axx011 Br J Philos Sci | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for the Philosophy of Science. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation Figure 3. Stochastic mechanisms. Not every instance of A causes or constitutes an instance of B. From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation Br J Philos Sci. Published online July 20, 2017. doi:10.1093/bjps/axx011 Br J Philos Sci | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for the Philosophy of Science. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation Figure 4. High-failure mechanisms. Most instances of A do not cause or constitute instances of B. From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation Br J Philos Sci. Published online July 20, 2017. doi:10.1093/bjps/axx011 Br J Philos Sci | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for the Philosophy of Science. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation Figure 5. Diagram of the cancer mechanism (my illustration, based on Navarro et al.[2011]). From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation Br J Philos Sci. Published online July 20, 2017. doi:10.1093/bjps/axx011 Br J Philos Sci | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for the Philosophy of Science. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation Figure 6. Reverse regularity. A explains B if every instance of B is caused or constituted by an instance of A. (The doted arrows indicate that the bs are caused or constituted by the as). From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation Br J Philos Sci. Published online July 20, 2017. doi:10.1093/bjps/axx011 Br J Philos Sci | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for the Philosophy of Science. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation Figure 7. Some instances of B might not be caused or constituted by an instance of A. The dotted lines indicate the ‘being caused or constituted by’ relation. From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation Br J Philos Sci. Published online July 20, 2017. doi:10.1093/bjps/axx011 Br J Philos Sci | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for the Philosophy of Science. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation Figure 8. Comparative regularity. A explains B if more as bring about bs than as bring about any other type (indicated by different letters c, d, e, f, g). From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation Br J Philos Sci. Published online July 20, 2017. doi:10.1093/bjps/axx011 Br J Philos Sci | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for the Philosophy of Science. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation Figure 9. Comparative reverse regularity. A explains B if more bs are brought about by as than bs brought about by any other type (indicated by different letters j, k, l, m, n). From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation Br J Philos Sci. Published online July 20, 2017. doi:10.1093/bjps/axx011 Br J Philos Sci | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for the Philosophy of Science. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com